Social:Reputational damage (diplomacy)
From HandWiki
German war crimes in Belgium were cited in anti-German propaganda during World War I, causing reputational harm.[1]
In diplomacy, reputational damage is harm to a country's diplomatic relations based on adverse events. Lack of human rights[2] and perceived lack of concern for allied or partner countries[3] may cause reputational damage. Scorecard diplomacy depends on countries wanting to minimize their reputational damage from poor compliance with international norms.[4]
References
- ↑ Debruyne, Emmanuel. "Intimate Relations between Occupiers and Occupied (Belgium and France)". https://encyclopedia.1914-1918-online.net/article/intimate_relations_between_occupiers_and_occupied_belgium_and_france. "the collective image and reputation of Germans abroad, as well as in the occupied territories, became that of barbarians and sexual brutes. The "rape of Belgium" was not only a symbolic image used to denounce the Germans' non-compliance with international law, but also echoed the rape of the Belgians themselves."
- ↑ Walker, Tony. "Will the diplomatic aggravation and reputational damage to Turnbull and Australia have been worth it?" (in en). The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/will-the-diplomatic-aggravation-and-reputational-damage-to-turnbull-and-australia-have-been-worth-it-71617.
- ↑ Park, Bill (May 2015). "Turkey's isolated stance: an ally no more, or just the usual turbulence?". International Affairs 91 (3): 581–600. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12280.
- ↑ Kelley, Judith G. (May 2017). "Scorecard Diplomacy and Reputation" (in en). Scorecard Diplomacy (Cambridge University Press): 31–63. doi:10.1017/9781108186100.003. ISBN 9781108186100. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/scorecard-diplomacy/scorecard-diplomacy-and-reputation/B41824A58457AADE2B2DF8DC5AB43076/core-reader.
 |  |
