Social:Tata Nano Singur controversy

From HandWiki
Short description: Controversy over a proposed Tata Motors auto factory in West Bengal, India

The Tata Nano Singur controversy was a controversy generated by land acquisition of a proposed Tata Motors automobile factory at Singur in Hooghly district, West Bengal, India. The factory would have been used to build the compact car Tata Nano.

Tata Motors started constructing a factory to manufacture a car, Tata Nano which was estimated to cost $2,500 . The small cars were scheduled to roll out of the factory by 2008.

The state government of West Bengal created the controversy by citing the 1894 land acquisition act rule to conduct an eminent domain takeover of 997 acres (4.03 km2) of farmland on which Tata Motors was supposed to build its factory.[1] The rule is meant for public improvement projects, and the West Bengal government wanted Tata to build in its state. The project was opposed by activists and opposition parties in Bengal.

Leadership positions within the Singur Krishi Jami Raksha Committee ( SKJRC - The Committee to Save the Farmland of Singur) were held by the locally dominant Mahishya community, who are the chasjami malik (landholder) or owner-cultivators of the region.[2][3]

Small car manufacturing facility

Singur was chosen by the company among six sites offered by the state government. The project faced massive opposition from displaced farmers. The unwilling farmers were given political support by West Bengal's then opposition leader Mamata Banerjee. Banerjee's "Save Farmland" movement was supported by environmental activists like Medha Patkar, Anuradha Talwar and Arundhati Roy. Banerjee's movement against displacement of farmers was also supported by several Kolkata based intellectuals like Aparna Sen, Kaushik Sen, Shaonli Mitra and Subhaprasanna. Leftist activists also shared the platform with Banerjee's Trinamool Congress. The Tatas finally decided to move out of Singur on 3 October 2008. Ratan Tata blamed agitation by Banerjee and her supporters for the pullout decision. On 7 October 2008, the Tatas announced that they would be setting up the Tata Nano plant in Sanand, Gujarat.

Background

The rapid rise in the population of West Bengal has not been accompanied by significant economic growth. Key indicators such as unemployment rates, poverty rates, infant mortality rates, job growth rates, per capita income, mobile phone penetration rates lag the more industrialized states of India. Local politicians gained power by promising agricultural land to landless farmers, but given West Bengal's population density, the land-holdings are small and the yields are insufficient to sustain poor families. While the shift from agriculture to industrial jobs requires re-training, given India's economic growth, it provides an opportunity for earning higher income.

Several other states had offered land to Tata Motors for the project.

The people staying in the proposed land were forced to evacuate by the government. The compensation given was considered inadequate and the new housing facilities offered were delayed. This led to the protest of the peasants backed by opposition political parties.

The company had made substantial promises. According to their claims, Singur would become a mini-auto city and approximately 70 vendors would set up shop along with the factory. The total investment planned is to the tune of Rs 1,000 crore.[4] The project had, however, generated controversy right from the start, particularly on the question of state acquisition of fertile agricultural land for private enterprise.

The land acquisition controversy

On 23 September 2008, Tatas decided to leave Singur in West Bengal, the decision is reported to have been made by the Tata management and the West Bengal government had been informed. On 3 October it became official that TATA will leave Singur (WB) when Ratan Tata announced it in a press conference in Kolkata.

While the ruling party has gone all out[5] for acquisition of 997 acres (4.03 km2)[1] of multi-crop land required for the car factory, questions have been raised about the party forcible acquisition which was made under the colonial Land Acquisition Act of 1894.[1] Others say the provisions of this act were allegedly not been met.[6]

The law has provisions for state taking over privately held land for public purposes but not for developing private businesses. The illegality of the acquisition has been substantially conceded by the Kolkata High Court.

The Tata Motors site is the most fertile one in the whole of the Singur, and the Singur block, in turn, is among the most highly fertile in West Bengal. Consequently, almost the entire local population depends on agriculture with approximately 15000 making their livelihood directly from it. With the number of direct jobs to be created no more than about 1,000, many of which are expected to go to outsiders, the local populace felt threatened for their livelihood.[7] Environmental degradation is also feared.

Chief protesters include the opposition parties spearheaded by the Trinamool Congress under Mamata Banerjee and Socialist Unity Centre of India. The movement has received widespread support from civil rights and human rights groups, legal bodies, social activists like Medha Patkar and Anuradha Talwar, Booker prize-winning author Arundhati Roy and Magsaysay and Jnanpith Award-winning author Mahasweta Devi.[8] Other intellectuals, writers like the poet Ruchit Shah, artists like Subhaprasanna, theatre and film personalities like Shaoli Mitra, Aparna Sen etc. have pitched in. The state police force has been used to restrict their access to the area.[9] The Nobel Laureate Amartya Sen supported the idea of factory but he however opposed forcible acquisition of land.[10]

Preliminary surveys by officials of the state and Tata Motors faced protests, and manhandling on one occasion, from the villagers organized under the Save Singur Farmland Committee with Trinamool Congress forming its chief component.[11] It is reported that Naxalite elements hold sway over the direction the agitation takes and the Trinamool Congress chief Mamata Banerjee takes no decisions without consulting them.[12]

The state government imposed the prohibitory Section 144 of the Indian Penal Code for initially a month and then extended it indefinitely. The imposition has been declared illegal by the Kolkata High Court[13]

While landless peasants and sharecroppers fear losing out entirely, sections of the locals, particularly those owing allegiance to the CPI(M) have welcomed the factory. These count chiefly among the owners of bigger portions of the land even as discrimination in the compensation has been alleged.[14]

A section of those promised jobs at the factory have boycotted classes while training in protest against the alleged going back on the promise.[15]

In the 2011 state assembly elections, while the sitting Trinamool Congress MLA, Rabindranath Bhattacharya retained the Singur seat, Becharam Manna, the convener of Krishi Jami Raksha Samiti, won the adjoining Haripal seat.[16][17]

Fencing off the land

The land earmarked for the project was taken control of by the state administration amidst protests and fencing off commenced on 1 December 2006. Mamata Banerjee, who was prevented from entering Singur by the state police, called a statewide bandh in protest while legislators belonging to her party turned violent in the legislative assembly causing damage to furniture. [1] Later, she went on a 26-day hunger strike [2]. During this period she presented affidavits of farmers apparently unwilling to part with their land.[18] On 4 December, Banerjee began the historic 26-day hunger strike in Kolkata protesting the forcible acquisition of farmland by the government. The then-President A. P. J. Abdul Kalam, who was concerned about her health, spoke to the then-Prime Minister Manmohan Singh to resolve the issue. Kalam also appealed to Ms Banerjee to withdraw her fast as "life is precious". A letter from Manmohan Singh was faxed to Gopalkrishna Gandhi, the then-Governor of West Bengal, and then it was immediately delivered to Mamata. After receiving the letter Mamata finally broke her fast at midnight on 29 December.[19][20][21][22]

The fenced off area has been regularly guarded, besides large contingents of policemen, by cadres of the CPI(M) party. They were accused of the multiple rape followed by burning to death of teenage villager Tapasi Malik who was active in the protests, on 18 December 2006.[23] Negligence and political interference in the probe into her death have been alleged.[24] Later, CPI(M) activist Debu Malik and based on his statement, CPI(M) zonal committee secretary Suhrid Dutta were arrested by the Central Bureau of Investigation in connection with the crime.[25][26]

Intermittent attacks by villagers have since continued on the fence. However, continuing agitations against the project appeared to have proved ineffective and a farmer who lost land committed suicide[27]

On the other hand, the pro-factory villagers siding with the CPI(M) have made accusations against the Naxalite faction of the 'Save Singur Farmland Committee' of threats and violence against them.[28]

Construction of plant

Tatas ceremonially initiated the construction of the plant on 21 January 2007.[29] The Tata Group announced on 3 October 2008 that they are pulling out of Singur due to the political unrest and agitation.

Procedural lacunae

Other aspects of the process of setting up the factory that had come under severe criticism are the government's secrecy on the details of the deal and the chief minister's furnishing of false information, including in the legislative assembly Vidhan Sabha. In particular, the concessions being given to Tata Motors have not been publicly revealed. The falsehoods of the chief minister chiefly pertain to claims made by him of having acquired 912 acres (3.69 km2) [30] through voluntary consent of the owners without the use of force.

The Kolkata High Court declared the acquisition prima facie illegal.[31] The air seemed to have cleared somewhat when the High Court ordered the state government to submit correct figures following which an affidavit but was not satisfied with the result.[32] In an affidavit filed later in June 2007, the government admitted to 30 per cent of the land was acquired from farmers without consent.[33] The affidavit remains unclear on whether the lack of consent is based on insufficiency of the compensation or refusal to sell altogether.[34]

Tata pulls out

On 3 October 2008, after a brief meeting with the then Chief Minister, Ratan Tata declared his decision to move the Nano Project out of West Bengal. Tata mentioned his frustration with the opposition movement at Singur project led by Trinamool Congress chief Ms. Mamata Banerjee. Ms Banerjee responded by referring to actions by Tatas and the state government.[35][36]

The then CM of Gujarat and today's PM of India, Shri Narendra Modi then sent an SMS to Mr. Ratan Tata, which simply said "Suswagatham", to persuade him to relocate the Tata Nano factory to Gujarat.[37]

It took 14 months to build a new factory in Sanand, Gujarat compared with 28 months for the Singur factory.[37]

Land return

In 2016, the Supreme Court quashed the West Bengal government's acquisition of 997 acres of agricultural land for Tata Motors and ordered its return to 9,117 landowners.[38][39]

Tata Motors triumphs

On 30 October 2023, Tata Motors secured an arbitral award of Rs 766 crore (approximately $103 million) plus 11% interest in the Singur plant case. The three-member Arbitral Tribunal unanimously ruled in favor of Tata Motors, compensating them for losses related to the abandoned Nano car manufacturing facility in Singur.

See also

References

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 The Economist 30 August 2008 edition. U.S. Edition. "Nano wars". Page 63.
  2. ↑ Guha, Ayan (2022-09-26) (in en). The Curious Trajectory of Caste in West Bengal Politics: Chronicling Continuity and Change. BRILL. pp. 12–13. ISBN 978-90-04-51456-0. https://books.google.com/books?id=m6-SEAAAQBAJ. 
  3. ↑ Chandra, Uday; Heierstad, Geir; Nielsen, Kenneth Bo (2015-09-25) (in en). The Politics of Caste in West Bengal. Routledge. pp. 125–144. ISBN 978-1-317-41477-3. https://books.google.com/books?id=7qXbCgAAQBAJ. 
  4. ↑ The Hindu Business Line, 13 December 2006. Thehindubusinessline.com (13 December 2006). Retrieved on 2011-10-09.
  5. ↑ CPM supports CM and Sen on Singur. Telegraphindia.com (14 October 2006). Retrieved on 2011-10-09.
  6. ↑ "30% of Singur farmers reject compensation". http://www.business-standard.com/common/storypage_c.php?leftnm=10&autono=287336. 
  7. ↑ Cover Story . Tehelka.com (3 March 2007). Retrieved on 2011-10-09.
  8. ↑ THE PUBLIC HEARING AND FURTHER INVESTIGATION ON THE STRUGGLE BY THE PEOPLE OF SINGUR. THE FINAL REPORT . Doccentre.net. 27 October 2006. Retrieved on 9 October 2011.
  9. ↑ Do you need a visa to enter Bengal?. Timesofindia.indiatimes.com (8 December 2006). Retrieved on 2011-10-09.
  10. ↑ "The Tribune, Chandigarh, India - Nation". http://www.tribuneindia.com/2007/20070215/nation.htm#2. 
  11. ↑ The Indian Express 15 January 2007. Cities.expressindia.com. Retrieved on 9 October 2011.
  12. ↑ Banerjee doesn't take decisions without Naxal elements' OK . Expressindia.com (1 September 2008). Retrieved on 2011-10-09.
  13. ↑ Sec 144 in Singur illegal: HC. Timesofindia.indiatimes.com (15 February 2007). Retrieved on 2011-10-09.
  14. ↑ Fields of foment – 'We should get a picture of Ratan Tata and do his puja every day'. Telegraphindia.com (10 December 2006). Retrieved on 2011-10-09.
  15. ↑ Job cry from Tata trainees. Telegraphindia.com (23 June 2007). Retrieved on 2011-10-09.
  16. ↑ "Haripal". Assembly Elections May 2011 Results. Election Commission of India. http://eciresults.nic.in/ConstituencywiseS25196.htm. [yes|permanent dead link|dead link}}]
  17. ↑ "Singur". Assembly Elections May 2011 Results. Election Commission of India. http://eciresults.nic.in/ConstituencywiseS25188.htm. 
  18. ↑ The Statesman 23 December 2006
  19. ↑ "Mamata ends 25-day hunger strike". 29 December 2006. https://www.hindustantimes.com/india/mamata-ends-25-day-hunger-strike/story-s7gIzBR4FvivAKFuYozrLM.html. 
  20. ↑ "Mamata Banerjee dials protesting farmers, assures TMC's support". 4 December 2020. https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/nation/farmers-agitation-mamata-reminds-people-of-her-26-day-hunger-strike-179907. 
  21. ↑ "West Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee reminds people of her 26-day hunger strike". 4 December 2020. https://www.sentinelassam.com/national-news/west-bengal-cm-mamata-banerjee-reminds-people-of-her-26-day-hunger-strike-514753. 
  22. ↑ "Mamata Banerjee remembers Singur hunger strike in context of ongoing farmers protest". 4 December 2020. https://www.thestatesman.com/bengal/mamata-banerjee-remembers-singur-hunger-strike-context-ongoing-farmers-protest-1502938968.html. 
  23. ↑ The Statesman 19 December 2007
  24. ↑ The Statesman 22 January 2007
  25. ↑ CPM local boss arrested for Singur girl's murder. Indianexpress.com (29 June 2007). Retrieved on 2011-10-09.
  26. ↑ "CPI(M) man confesses to raping Singur girl". DNA India. 29 June 2007. https://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-cpim-man-confesses-to-raping-singur-girl-1106845. 
  27. ↑ Land lost, Singur farmer said no to compensation, commits suicide. Indianexpress.com (26 May 2007). Retrieved on 2011-10-09.
  28. ↑ DNA – India – 'Save Singur' turns sour – Daily News & Analysis. Dnaindia.com (24 January 2007). Retrieved on 2011-10-09.
  29. ↑ The Telegraph 22 January 2007. Telegraphindia.com (22 January 2007). Retrieved on 2011-10-09.
  30. ↑ The Indian Express November 24, 2006. cities.expressindia.com. Retrieved on 9 October 2011. [|permanent dead link|dead link}}]
  31. ↑ Calcutta High Court says Singur land acquisition appears illegal -all eyes now on communists in West Bengal . Indiadaily.com. Retrieved on 9 October 2011.
  32. ↑ "MSN INDIA - Singur: HC asks Bengal Govt to file fresh affidavit". http://content.msn.co.in/News/National/NationalPTI_020507_1718.htm. 
  33. ↑ IBN 10 June 2007: 30 pc Singur farmers not compensated
  34. ↑ State files Singur affidavit. timesofindia.indiatimes.com. Retrieved on 9 October 2011.
  35. ↑ "Tata pulls out of Singur, blames Trinamool stir – The Financial Express". www.financialexpress.com. 4 October 2008. http://www.financialexpress.com/news/Tata-pulls-out-of-Singur-blames-Trinamool-stir/369241/. 
  36. ↑ "If Tata pulls out, Trinamool will be solely responsible: CM". The Hindu (Chennai, India). 28 September 2008. http://www.hindu.com/2008/09/28/stories/2008092859731000.htm. 
  37. ↑ 37.0 37.1 Supersize Gujarat – Business Today – Business News. Businesstoday.intoday.in (23 January 2011). Retrieved on 2011-10-09.
  38. ↑ Rajagopal, Krishnadas (31 August 2016). "Return land to Farmers: SC orders West Bengal govt.". The Hindu (The Hindu, 31 August 2016). http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/Return-Singur-land-to-farmers-SC-orders-West-Bengal-govt./article14600055.ece. 
  39. ↑ "Bengal to return Singur land to farmers on Sept 14". The Hindu Business Line, 12 September 2016. 12 September 2016. http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/news/national/bengal-to-return-singur-land-to-farmers-on-sept-14/article9100087.ece. 



Retrieved from "https://handwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Social:Tata_Nano_Singur_controversy&oldid=3300487"