Star coloring

From HandWiki
Short description: Graph coloring avoiding 2-colored paths
The star chromatic number of the Dyck graph is 4, although its chromatic number is 2.

In the mathematical field of graph theory, a star coloring of a graph G is a (proper) vertex coloring in which every path on four vertices uses at least three distinct colors. Equivalently, in a star coloring, the induced subgraphs formed by the vertices of any two colors has connected components that are star graphs.[1] Star coloring has been introduced by (Grünbaum 1973).[2] The star chromatic number χs(G) of G is the fewest colors needed to star color G.

In special classes of graphs

(Grünbaum 1973) observed that the star chromatic number is bounded for planar graphs.[2] More precisely, the star chromatic number of planar graphs is at most 20, and some planar graphs have star chromatic number at least 10.[1] More generally, the star chromatic number is bounded on every proper minor closed class.[3] This result has been generalized to all low-tree-depth colorings (standard coloring and star coloring being low-tree-depth colorings with respective parameter 1 and 2).[4]

For every graph of maximum degree d, the star chromatic number is O(d3/2). There exist graphs for which this bound is close to tight: they have star chromatic number Ω(d3/2/log1/2n).[5]

Complexity

It is NP-complete to determine whether χs(G)3, even when G is a graph that is both planar and bipartite.[1] Finding an optimal star coloring is NP-hard even when G is a bipartite graph.[6]

Star coloring is the special case for q=3 of q-centered coloring, colorings in which every connected subgraph either uses at least q colors or has at least one color that is used for exactly one vertex. For such a coloring, a connected subgraph with only two colors must be a star, with the vertex of a unique color at its center. There can be no edges between the remaining vertices in the component, because they would form two-vertex connected subgraphs without a uniquely used color.[7]

Another generalization of star coloring is the closely related concept of acyclic coloring, where it is required that every cycle uses at least three colors, so the two-color induced subgraphs are forests. If we denote the acyclic chromatic number of a graph G by χa(G), we have that χa(G)χs(G), and in fact every star coloring of G is an acyclic coloring. In the other direction, χs(G)2χa(G)2χa(G), so each of the two kinds of chromatic number is bounded if and only if the other one is.[1]

Notes

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Albertson et al. (2004).
  2. 2.0 2.1 Grünbaum (1973), p. 406, remark 12(i).
  3. Nešetřil & Ossona de Mendez (2003).
  4. Nešetřil & Ossona de Mendez (2006).
  5. Fertin, Raspaud & Reed (2004).
  6. Coleman & Moré (1984).
  7. (Nešetřil Ossona de Mendez). The equivalence between the numbers denoted here as χp and the minimum number of colors in a (p+1)centered coloring is (Nešetřil Ossona de Mendez).

References