Zeeman's comparison theorem

From HandWiki
Short description: On when a morphism of spectral sequences in homological algebra is an isomorphism

In homological algebra, Zeeman's comparison theorem, introduced by Christopher Zeeman,[1] gives conditions for a morphism of spectral sequences to be an isomorphism.

Statement

Comparison theorem — Let Ep,qr,′Ep,qr be first quadrant spectral sequences of flat modules over a commutative ring and f:Er→′Er a morphism between them. Then any two of the following statements implies the third:

  1. f:E2p,0→′E2p,0 is an isomorphism for every p.
  2. f:E20,q→′E20,q is an isomorphism for every q.
  3. f:E∞p,q→′E∞p,q is an isomorphism for every p, q.

Illustrative example

As an illustration, we sketch the proof of Borel's theorem, which says the cohomology ring of a classifying space is a polynomial ring.[2][full citation needed]

First of all, with G as a Lie group and with ℚ as coefficient ring, we have the Serre spectral sequence E2p,q for the fibration G→EG→BG. We have: E∞≃ℚ since EG is contractible. We also have a theorem of Hopf stating that H*(G;ℚ)≃Λ(u1,…,un), an exterior algebra generated by finitely many homogeneous elements.

Next, we let E(i) be the spectral sequence whose second page is E(i)2=Λ(xi)⊗ℚ[yi] and whose nontrivial differentials on the r-th page are given by d(xi)=yi and the graded Leibniz rule. Let ′Er=⊗iEr(i). Since the cohomology commutes with tensor products as we are working over a field, ′Er is again a spectral sequence such that ′E∞≃ℚ⊗…⊗ℚ≃ℚ. Then we let

f:′Er→Er,xi↦ui.

Note, by definition, f gives the isomorphism ′Er0,q≃Er0,q=Hq(G;ℚ). A crucial point is that f is a "ring homomorphism"; this rests on the technical conditions that ui are "transgressive" (cf. Hatcher for detailed discussion on this matter.) After this technical point is taken care, we conclude: E2p,0≃′E2p,0 as ring by the comparison theorem; that is, E2p,0=Hp(BG;ℚ)≃ℚ[y1,…,yn].

References

  1. ↑ Zeeman (1957).
  2. ↑ Hatcher, Theorem 1.34.

Bibliography