Physics:Energy loss
A particle passing through matter interacts with electrons and with nuclei, possibly also with the medium as a whole (Cherenkov radiation, coherent bremsstrahlung). A light projectile colliding with a heavy target particle will be deflected (
Multiple Scattering), but will lose little energy unless the collision is inelastic (see Bremsstrahlung, Pair Production). A heavy projectile colliding with a light target will lose energy without being appreciably deflected. The average energy loss of a hadron is mainly due to strong interactions, which eventually even destroy the particle (
Calorimeter). Nevertheless, electromagnetic energy loss of hadrons is important, because the mean free path for strong interactions (
Collision Length) is large.
Except when the projectile is highly relativistic, ionization is the main electromagnetic contribution to the energy loss for charged particles. The mean energy loss (the stopping power) due to ionization is given by the Bethe-Bloch formula Barnett96, for more discussion Leo94).
with
where
| E | = | projectile energy |
| M | = | projectile mass |
Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination
|
= | projectile velocity (in units of c) |
Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination
|
= | 1/ Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination
|
| z | = | projectile charge (in units of elementary charge) |
| x | = | path length |
| D | = | 4 Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination = 0.30707 MeV cm2/mole
|
Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination
|
= | 2.817 938 10-13 cm = classical electron radius |
Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination
|
= | 0.511 003 MeV/c2 = electron rest mass |
Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination
|
= | 6.022 1023/mole = Avogadro's number |
| Z | = | atomic number of the medium |
| A | = | atomic weight of the medium [g/mole] |
Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination
|
= | mass density of the medium [g/cm3] |
| I | = | average ionization potential |
Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination
|
= | density correction |
| C | = | shell correction |
Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination
|
= | higher order correction. |
The ionization energy loss is to a good approximation proportional to the electron density in the medium (given by
) and to the square of the projectile charge, and otherwise depends mainly on the projectile velocity. It decreases with
for increasing velocity until reaching a minimum around
= 3 to 4 (minimum ionization ), then starts to rise logarithmically (relativistic rise ) levelling off finally at a constant value (the Fermi plateau ). The numerical value of the minimum ionization (more precisely: of minimum energy loss) is
MeVcm2/g.
The first expressions for energy loss are due to Bethe and Livingston, later Rossi gave more refined descriptions including various correction terms (see Rossi65, Livingston37).
Sternheimer has worked in detail on the density effect which is at the origin of the Fermi plateau Sternheimer71. For a complete review, see Fano63.
The formulae and in particular the corrections include absorber-dependent terms defying simple description (e.g. ionization potential and shell correction). Hence energy loss is usually given in graphical or tabular form ( e.g. Barnett96). Extensive tables for the energy loss of p, K,
and
in many materials have been computed by Richard and Serre (Serre67, Richard71), where the Bethe-Bloch formula is also discussed with respect to the units used.
Measurements of energy loss, when giving enough care to calibration problems, can be used to identify particles if a simultaneous measurement of momentum is available. For details,
Ionization Sampling and Allison91. An example for measurements is the following diagram, obtained in a time projection chamber, taken from Abreu96: The ionization energy loss is statistically distributed around its mean value. The distribution, often referred to as energy straggling , is approximately Gaussian for thick absorbers, but develops asymmetry and a tail towards high energies for decreasing thickness; it becomes a Landau distribution for very thin absorbers (
Leo94 or Matthews81).
 |
