Biology:Digitalis transiens

From HandWiki
Revision as of 06:22, 26 October 2022 by Carolyn (talk | contribs) (fix)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Short description: Species of plant

Digitalis transiens
Scientific classification edit
Kingdom: Plantae
Clade: Tracheophytes
Clade: Angiosperms
Clade: Eudicots
Clade: Asterids
Order: Lamiales
Family: Plantaginaceae
Genus: Digitalis
Species:
D. transiens
Binomial name
Digitalis transiens
Maire[1]
Synonyms[2]

Homotypic synonyms

  • Digitalis lutea subsp. transiens (Maire) Emb. & Maire
  • Digitalis subalpina var. transiens (Maire) Ivanina

Heterotypic synonyms

  • Digitalis lutea var. atlantica Ball (1878)
  • Digitalis lutea subsp. atlantica (Ball) Litard. (1928)
  • Digitalis subalpina var. mesatlantica (Maire) Ivanina
  • Digitalis transiens var. mesatlantica Maire (1940)
  • Digitalis lutea var. mesatlantica (Maire) Maire (1941)

Digitalis transiens is a species of flowering plant in the family Plantaginaceae which is endemic to Morocco.[3] It was recently also classified as a synonym of D. subalpina.[4] It has yellow flowers with woolly hairs on its lip and throat, the corolla length is 11 to 13mm.[5]

Taxonomy

A specimen of Digitalis transiens collected at around 2,000 metres in altitude near Aït Mesan in the Atlas Mountains by Johannes Justus Rein and Karl Fritsch during their excursion to Morocco in the early 1870s had been misidentified as D. atlantica, and using that misidentification, in 1878 the Irish botanist John Ball then synonymised D. atlantica to D. lutea in error.[6][7]

It took until 1940 before the French botanist René Maire described it as a new species,[1] but it has since had a confused and turbulent taxonomic history.[2] Karol Marhold in 2011 in the Euro+Med Plantbase, for example, does not even recognise the species, but does include two different taxa both called D. atlantica, the correct one endemic to Algeria, and the other Moroccan one without authority attribution presumably being D. transiens.[8]

Description

Based on Ball's 1878 description, it is distinguished from Digitalis lutea by having smaller, more abundant flowers, and the leaves in the inflorescence being somewhat bract-like.[6]

References

Wikidata ☰ Q50991488 entry