Philosophy:Argument from incredulity
Argument from incredulity, also known as argument from personal incredulity, appeal to common sense, or the divine fallacy,[1] is a fallacy in informal logic. It asserts that a proposition must be false because it contradicts one's personal expectations or beliefs, or is difficult to imagine.
Arguments from incredulity can take the form:
- I cannot imagine how F could be true; therefore F must be false.
- I cannot imagine how F could be false; therefore F must be true.
Arguments from incredulity can sometimes arise from inappropriate emotional involvement, the conflation of fantasy and reality, a lack of understanding, or an instinctive 'gut' reaction, especially where time is scarce.[2] They are also frequently used to argue that something must be supernatural in origin.[3] This form of reasoning is fallacious because one's inability to imagine how a statement can be true or false gives no information about whether the statement is true or false in reality.[4]
Examples
References
- ↑ Carroll, Robert T.. "divine fallacy (argument from incredulity)". The Skeptic's Dictionary. http://skepdic.com/dvinefal.html. Retrieved 5 April 2013.
- ↑ "Toolkit for Thinking". http://www.toolkitforthinking.com/critical-thinking/anatomy-of-an-argument/denial-arguments/argument-from-personal-incredulity.
- ↑ Sen, Madhucchanda (2011). An Introduction to Critical Thinking. Pearson Education India. ISBN 9788131734568. https://books.google.com/books?id=vJ4oVpKY_nwC&pg=PA63. Retrieved 2016-11-26.
- ↑ "The Argument from Incredulity: How People Explain What They Don’t Understand – Effectiviology" (in en-US). https://effectiviology.com/argument-from-incredulity/.
 |  |
