Biology:Symphyotrichum retroflexum

From HandWiki
Revision as of 23:25, 8 March 2023 by TextAI2 (talk | contribs) (link)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Short description: Species of flowering plant in the family Asteraceae native to the southeastern United States

Symphyotrichum retroflexum
refer to caption
S. retroflexum, Macon County, North Carolina

Apparently Secure (NatureServe)[lower-alpha 1][1]
Scientific classification edit
Kingdom: Plantae
Clade: Tracheophytes
Clade: Angiosperms
Clade: Eudicots
Clade: Asterids
Order: Asterales
Family: Asteraceae
Tribe: Astereae
Subtribe: Symphyotrichinae
Genus: Symphyotrichum
Subgenus: Symphyotrichum subg. Symphyotrichum
Section: Symphyotrichum sect. Symphyotrichum
Species:
S. retroflexum
Binomial name
Symphyotrichum retroflexum
(Lindl.) G.L.Nesom[2]
Symphyotrichum retroflexum native distribution map: US – Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Virginia. Source: USDA, NRCS PLANTS Database with added information from John C. Semple's Astereae Lab.
Native distribution[3][4]
Synonyms[2]
  • Aster curtisii Torr. & A.Gray
  • Aster retroflexus Lindl.

Symphyotrichum retroflexum (formerly Aster retroflexus) is a species of flowering plant in the family Asteraceae native to the southeastern United States. Commonly known as rigid whitetop aster, it is a perennial, herbaceous plant that may reach 40 to 100 centimeters (16 to 39 inches) tall. Its flowers have blue to purple ray florets and cream to pale yellow then pinkish disk florets. It is known only from the Blue Ridge Mountains in Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee , and Virginia, where it grows in wooded areas at elevations of 400–1,500 meters (1,300–4,900 feet).[5] (As of September 2021), NatureServe classified it as Apparently Secure (G4); it had been reviewed last in 1994 and is marked as "needs review".[1] There is an introduced presence of S. retroflexum in southeast China .[2]

S. retroflexum herbarium specimen

Notes

  1. (As of September 2021), NatureServe's latest global status review for this species was dated 25 November 1994 with a notation that "Global status needs review."[1]

Citations

References

Wikidata ☰ {{{from}}} entry