Medicine:Perineal tear

From HandWiki
Revision as of 00:05, 5 February 2024 by S.Timg (talk | contribs) (fix)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Perineal tear
Other namesLatin: Laceratio perinei
The diagnosis and treatment of diseases of women (1907) (14597939340).jpg
Illustration of two perineal tears
SpecialtyObstetrics

A perineal tear is a laceration of the skin and other soft tissue structures which, in women, separate the vagina from the anus. Perineal tears mainly occur in women as a result of vaginal childbirth, which strains the perineum. It is the most common form of obstetric injury.[1] Tears vary widely in severity. The majority are superficial and may require no treatment, but severe tears can cause significant bleeding, long-term pain or dysfunction. A perineal tear is distinct from an episiotomy, in which the perineum is intentionally incised to facilitate delivery. Episiotomy, a very rapid birth, or large fetal size can lead to more severe tears which may require surgical intervention.

Anatomy

In women, an anatomical area known as the perineum separates the opening of the vagina from that of the anus. Each opening is surrounded by a wall, and the anal wall is separated from the vaginal wall by a mass of soft tissue including:

  • The muscles of the anus (corrugator cutis ani, the internal anal sphincter and the external anal sphincter)
  • The medial muscles of the urogenital region (the superficial transverse perineal muscle, the deep transverse perineal muscle and bulbocavernosus)
  • The medial levator ani muscles (puborectalis and pubococcygeus)
  • The fascia of perineum, which covers these muscles
  • The overlying skin and subcutaneous tissue[2]

A perineal tear may involve some or all of these structures, which normally aid in supporting the pelvic organs and maintaining faecal continence.[3]

Classification

Tears are classified into four categories:[4][5]

  • First-degree tear: laceration is limited to the fourchette and superficial perineal skin or vaginal mucosa
  • Second-degree tear: laceration extends beyond fourchette, perineal skin and vaginal mucosa to perineal muscles and fascia, but not the anal sphincter
  • Third-degree tear: fourchette, perineal skin, vaginal mucosa, muscles, and anal sphincter are torn; third-degree tears may be further subdivided into three subcategories:[6]
    • 3a: partial tear of the external anal sphincter involving less than 50% thickness
    • 3b: greater than 50% tear of the external anal sphincter
    • 3c: internal sphincter is torn
  • Fourth-degree tear: fourchette, perineal skin, vaginal mucosa, muscles, anal sphincter, and rectal mucosa are torn
  • Button-hole tear: the tear involves rectal mucosa with an intact anal sphincter complex

Cause

In humans and some other primates, the head of the term fetus is so large in comparison to the size of the birth canal that delivery may result in some degree of trauma.[7] As the head passes through the pelvis, the soft tissues are stretched and compressed. The risk of severe tear is greatly increased if the fetal head is oriented occiput posterior (face forward), if the mother has not given birth before or if the fetus is large.[8]

A surgical incision on the perineum skin called an episiotomy was historically used routinely in order to reduce perineal tears.[9] However, its routine use has declined as there is some evidence it increases the severity of tears when it is not indicated.[10] A Cochrane review found that routine use of episiotomy increased the incidence of severe perineal tears by 30%.[11]

Several other techniques are used to reduce the risk of tearing, but with little evidence for efficacy. Antenatal digital perineal massage is often advocated, and may reduce the risk of trauma only in nulliparous women.[12] Hands-on techniques employed by midwives, in which the foetal head is guided through the vagina at a controlled rate have been widely advocated, but their efficacy is unclear.[13] Water birth and labouring in water are popular for several reasons, and it has been suggested that by softening the perineum they might reduce the rate of tearing. However, this effect has never been clearly demonstrated.[14]

Prevention and treatment

Perineal protection during the birth of the head[15]

Perineal protection is an obstetric measure to prevent the perineal tissue from tearing (perineal tear) during the birth of the baby's head or to keep the extent of the injury as small as possible. The midwife (or obstetrician) supports the perineal tissue with one hand as soon as the head stretches. The other hand rests on the baby's head and regulates its speed of passage (so-called head brake). At the same time, the woman giving birth is guided to push along slowly and in a well-dosed manner. This allows the head to be born slowly over the perineum, which thus has enough time to stretch.[16]

Treatment is to either let the tear heal naturally or to surgically repair it. Third- and fourth-degree tears generally require surgical repair. A Cochrane review of comparing surgical treatment with natural healing of first- and second-degree tears found no to little difference between the two treatment options. The review concluded that there was insufficient evidence to recommend either treatment option over the other for first- and second-degree tears.[1]

Prevalence

A 2008 study found that over 85% of women having a vaginal birth sustain some form of perineal trauma.[17] A retrospective study of 8,603 vaginal deliveries in 1994 found a third-degree tear had been clinically diagnosed in only 50 women (0.6%).[18] However, when the same authors used anal endosonography in a consecutive group of 202 deliveries, there was evidence of third-degree tears in 35% of first-time mothers and 44% of mothers with previous children.[19] These numbers are confirmed by other researchers in 1999.[20]

A study by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) found that in 2011, first- and second-degree perineal tear was the most common complicating condition for vaginal deliveries in the U.S. among women covered by either private insurance or Medicaid.[21]

Second-degree perineal laceration rates were higher for women covered by private insurance than for women covered by Medicaid.[22]

Complications

First- and second-degree tears rarely cause long-term problems. Among women who experience a third- or fourth-degree tear, 60–80% are asymptomatic after 12 months.[23] Faecal incontinence, faecal urgency, chronic perineal pain, pain with sex, and fistula formation occur in a minority of women, but may be permanent.[24] The symptoms associated with perineal tear are not always due to the tear itself, since there are often other injuries, such as avulsion of pelvic floor muscles, that are not evident on examination.[25]

There are claims that sometimes the perineum is excessively repaired after childbirth using a so-called "husband stitch" and that this can increase vaginal tightness or result in pain during intercourse.[26]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Elharmeel, Suzan MA; Chaudhary, Yasmin; Tan, Stephanie; Scheermeyer, Elly; Hanafy, Ashraf; van Driel, Mieke L (2011-08-10). Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group. ed. "Surgical repair of spontaneous perineal tears that occur during childbirth versus no intervention" (in en). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (8): CD008534. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD008534.pub2. PMID 21833968. http://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:254189/UQ254189_OA.pdf. 
  2. Last, R. J. (1984). Anatomy Regional and Applied. London: Churchill Livingstone. p. 345. ISBN 978-0-443-02989-9. 
  3. Finn, Martha; Bowyer, Lucy; Carr, Sandra; O'Connor, Vivienne; Vollenhoven, Beverley (2005). Women's Health: A Core Curriculum. Australia: Elsevier. ISBN 978-0-7295-3736-0. 
  4. Taber's Cyclopedic Medical Dictionary tabers.com
  5. "Perineal Trauma: Assessment and Repair CPG". Archived from the original on 2011-10-01. https://web.archive.org/web/20111001014558/http://www.thewomens.org.au/PerinealTraumaAssessmentandRepair. Retrieved 2011-07-12. 
  6. MDConsult mdconsult.com
  7. Rosenberg, Karen; Trevathan, Wenda (2002). "Birth, obstetrics and human evolution". BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 109 (11): 1199–1206. doi:10.1046/j.1471-0528.2002.00010.x. ISSN 1470-0328. PMID 12452455. 
  8. Eskandar, O; Shet, D (February 2009). "Risk factors for 3rd and 4th degree perineal tear.". Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 29 (2): 119–22. doi:10.1080/01443610802665090. PMID 19274544. 
  9. Caroline, Nancy L. (1977-01-03). "Medical Care in the Streets". JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 237 (1): 43–6. doi:10.1001/jama.1977.03270280045020. ISSN 0098-7484. PMID 576129. 
  10. Frankman, Elizabeth A.; Wang, Li; Bunker, Clareann H.; Lowder, Jerry L. (May 2009). "Episiotomy in the United States: has anything changed?" (in en). American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 200 (5): 573.e1–573.e7. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.022. PMID 19243733. 
  11. Jiang, Hong; Qian, Xu; Carroli, Guillermo; Garner, Paul (2017-02-08). Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group. ed. "Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth" (in en). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017 (2): CD000081. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000081.pub3. PMID 28176333. 
  12. Seehusen, DA; Raleigh, M (1 March 2014). "Antenatal perineal massage to prevent birth trauma.". American Family Physician 89 (5): 335–6. PMID 24695503. 
  13. Wang, H; Jayasekara, R; Warland, J (12 March 2015). "The effect of "hands on" techniques on obstetric perineal laceration: A structured review of the literature.". Women and Birth 28 (3): 194–8. doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2015.02.006. PMID 25773668. 
  14. Nutter, E.; Meyer, S.; Shaw-Battista, J.; Marowitz, A. (2014). "Waterbirth: an integrative analysis of peer-reviewed literature.". Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health 59 (3): 286–319. doi:10.1111/jmwh.12194. PMID 24850284.  Another popular method of perineal tearing prevention are childbirth exercisers such as Aniball or Epi-No. There are currently ongoing studies supporting their effectiveness.
  15. Neugeborenenmanagement
  16. Kleprlikova, Hana; Kalis, Vladimir; Lucovnik, Miha; Rusavy, Zdenek; Blaganje, Mija; Thakar, Ranee; Ismail, Khaled M. (2020). "Manual perineal protection: The know‐how and the know‐why". Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 99 (4): 445–450. doi:10.1111/aogs.13781. PMID 31793662. https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/aogs.13781. 
  17. Kettle, C., & Tohill, S. (2008). Perineal care. Clinical evidence, 2008.[1]
  18. "Bartram CI. Third degree obstetric anal sphincter tears: risk factors and outcome of primary repair". BMJ 308 (6933): 887–91. 1994. doi:10.1136/bmj.308.6933.887. PMID 8173367. 
  19. "Anal sphincter disruption during vaginal delivery". N Engl J Med 329 (26): 1905–1911. 1993. doi:10.1056/NEJM199312233292601. PMID 8247054. 
  20. "Effect of second vaginal delivery on anorectal physiology and faecal continence: a prospective study". Lancet 354 (9183): 983–986. 1999. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(98)11205-9. PMID 10501360. 
  21. "Complicating Conditions Associate With Childbirth, by Delivery Method and Payer, 2011.". HCUP Statistical Brief #173. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. April 2014. https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb173-Childbirth-Delivery-Complications.jsp. 
  22. "Complicating Conditions Associate With Childbirth, by Delivery Method and Payer, 2011.". HCUP Statistical Brief #173. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. April 2014. https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb173-Childbirth-Delivery-Complications.jsp. 
  23. Toglia, Marc. "Repair of episiotomy and perineal lacerations associated with childbirth". http://www.uptodate.com/contents/repair-of-episiotomy-and-perineal-lacerations-associated-with-childbirth?source=search_result&search=perineal+laceration&selectedTitle=1~29#H6881188. Retrieved 22 May 2015. 
  24. Fernando, RJ; Sultan, AH; Kettle, C; Radley, S; Jones, P; O'Brien, PM (June 2006). "Repair techniques for obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a randomized controlled trial.". Obstetrics and Gynecology 107 (6): 1261–8. doi:10.1097/01.aog.0000218693.24144.bd. PMID 16738150. 
  25. Lammers, K; Prokop, M; Vierhout, ME; Kluivers, KB; Fütterer, JJ (August 2013). "A pictorial overview of pubovisceral muscle avulsions on pelvic floor magnetic resonance imaging.". Insights into Imaging 4 (4): 431–41. doi:10.1007/s13244-013-0261-9. PMID 23756995. 
  26. Vinopal, Lauren (17 August 2017). "Are Husbands and Doctors Conspiring to Sew New Moms Up Too Tight?". https://www.fatherly.com/health-science/why-parents-fear-husband-stitch/. Retrieved 15 October 2017. 

External links

Classification