Medicine:Kraepelinian dichotomy
From HandWiki
The Kraepelinian dichotomy is the division of the major endogenous psychoses into the disease concepts of dementia praecox, which was reformulated as schizophrenia by Eugen Bleuler by 1908,[1][2] and manic-depressive psychosis, which has now been reconceived as bipolar disorder.[3] This division was formally introduced in the sixth edition of Emil Kraepelin's psychiatric textbook Psychiatrie. Ein Lehrbuch für Studirende und Aerzte, published in 1899.[3] It has been highly influential on modern psychiatric classification systems, the DSM and ICD, and is reflected in the taxonomic separation of schizophrenia from affective psychosis.[4] However, there is also a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder to cover cases that seem to show symptoms of both.
History
The Kraepelinian system and the modern classification of psychoses are ultimately derived from the insights of Karl Kahlbaum.[5] In 1863 the Prussian psychiatrist published his habilitation which was entitled, Die Gruppierung der psychischen Krankheiten (The Classification of Psychiatric Diseases).[6] In this text he reviewed the then heterogeneous state of medical taxonomies of mental illness and enumerated the existence of some thirty such nosologies from the early seventeenth-century until the mid-nineteenth-century.[7] The major contribution of his published dissertation, which is still the foundation of modern psychiatric nosology,[7] was to first formulate the clinical method for the classification of psychosis by symptom, course and outcome.[8]
Kahlbaum also differentiated between two major groups of mental illnesses which he termed vecordia and vesania.[7]
Emil Kraepelin first introduced his proposed dichotomy between the endogenous psychoses of manic-depressive illness and dementia praecox during a public lecture in Heidelberg, Germany on 27 November 1898.[9]
See also
- Comparison of bipolar disorder and schizophrenia
- History of bipolar disorder
- History of schizophrenia
Notes
- ↑ Jablensky 2007, p. 383; Greene 2007, p. 362
- ↑ Yuhas, Daisy. "Throughout History, Defining Schizophrenia Has Remained a Challenge". Scientific American Mind (March 2013). http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=throughout-history-defining-schizophrenia-has-remained-challenge.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Decker 2007, p. 399.
- ↑ Greene 2007, p. 361; Palm & Möller 2011, p. 318
- ↑ Jablensky 1999, p. 96; Berrios, Luque & Villagrán 2003, p. 126
- ↑ Noll 2007, p. 242; Kahlbaum 1863
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 7.2 Angst 2002, p. 6.
- ↑ Angst 2002, p. 6; Möller 2008, p. 60
- ↑ Noll 2007, p. 262.
Bibliography
- Angst, J. (2002). "Historical aspects of the dichotomy between manic-depressive disorders and schizophrenia". Schizophrenia Research 57 (1): 5–13. doi:10.1016/S0920-9964(02)00328-6. PMID 12165371.
- Angst, J.; Gamma, A. (2008). "Diagnosis and course of affective psychoses: was Kraepelin right?". European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience 258: 107–10. doi:10.1007/s00406-008-2013-2. PMID 18516522. https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/155938/1/ZORA_NL_155938.pdf.
- Berrios, German E.; Luque, Rogelio; Villagrán, José M. (2003). "Schizophrenia: a conceptual history". International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy 3 (2): 111–40.
- Bora, E.; Yucel, M.; Fornito, A.; Berk, M.; Pantelis, C. (2008). "Major psychoses with mixed psychotic and mood symptoms: are mixed psychoses associated with different neurobiological markers?". Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 118 (3): 172–87. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.2008.01230.x. ISSN 0001-690X. PMID 18699952.
- Briole, G. (2012). "Emil Kraepelin: The Fragility of a Colossal Oeuvre". Hurly-Burly 8: 125-147.
- Craddock, N.; Owen, M.J. (2005). "The beginning of the end for the Kraepelinian dichotomy". British Journal of Psychiatry 186 (5): 364–6. doi:10.1192/bjp.186.5.364. PMID 15863738.
- Craddock, N.; Owen, M. J. (2010). "The Kraepelinian dichotomy - going, going... but still not gone". The British Journal of Psychiatry 196 (2): 92–5. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.109.073429. ISSN 0007-1250. PMID 20118450.
- Crow, T. J. (2008). "Craddock & Owen vs Kraepelin: 85 years late, mesmerised by 'polygenes'". Schizophrenia Research 103 (1–3): 156–60. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2008.03.001. PMID 18434093.
- Cuesta, M. J.; Peralta, V. (2009). "Psychopathological assessment of schizophrenia: relevance for classification". Current Psychiatry Reports 11 (4): 324–31. doi:10.1007/s11920-009-0047-4. PMID 19635242.
- Decker, Hannah S. (2007). "How Kraepelinian was Kraepelin? How Kraepelinian are the neo-Kraepelinians? - from Emil Kraepelin to the DSM-III". History of Psychiatry 18 (3): 337–60. doi:10.1177/0957154X07078976. PMID 18175636. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00570896/file/PEER_stage2_10.1177%252F0957154X07078976.pdf.
- deVries, M. W (2008). "Multifactorial inheritance, rates of maturation and psychiatry's taxonomic dilemma". European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience 258: 25–8. doi:10.1007/s00406-008-2005-2. PMID 18516513.
- Fischer, B. A.; Carpenter, W. T. (2009). "Will the Kraepelinian Dichotomy Survive DSM-V?". Neuropsychopharmacology 34 (9): 2081–7. doi:10.1038/npp.2009.32. PMID 19295511.
- Gaebel, W.; Zielasek, J. (2008). "The DSM-V initiative "deconstructing psychosis" in the context of Kraepelin's concept on nosology". European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience 258 (Suppl. 2): 41–7. doi:10.1007/s00406-008-2009-y. PMID 18516517.
- Greene, Talya (2007). "The Kraepelinian dichotomy: the twin pillars crumbling?". History of Psychiatry 18 (3): 361–79. doi:10.1177/0957154X07078977. PMID 18175637. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00570897/file/PEER_stage2_10.1177%252F0957154X07078977.pdf.
- Häfner, Heinz; Heiden, Wolfram an der; Maurer, Kurt (2008). "Evidence for separate diseases?". European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience 258 (Suppl. 2): 85–96. doi:10.1007/s00406-008-2011-4. PMID 18516520.
- Hippius, H.; Müller, N. (2008). "The work of Emil Kraepelin and his research group in München". European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience 258 (Suppl. 2): 3–11. doi:10.1007/s00406-008-2001-6. PMID 18516510.
- Jablensky, Assen (1999). "The conflict of the nosologists: views on schizophrenia and manic-depressive illness in the early part of the 20th century". Schizophrenia Research 39 (2): 95–100. doi:10.1016/S0920-9964(99)00106-1. PMID 10507518.
- Jablensky, Assen (2007). "Living in a Kraepelinian world. Kraepelin's impact on modern psychiatry". History of Psychiatry 18 (3): 381–8. doi:10.1177/0957154X07079690. PMID 18175638. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00570899/file/PEER_stage2_10.1177%252F0957154X07079690.pdf.
- Kahlbaum, Karl Ludwig (1863). Die Gruppierung der psychischen Krankheiten und die Eintheilung der Seelenstörungen: Entwurf einer historisch-kritischen Darstellung der bisherigen Eintheilungen und Versuch zur Anbahnung einer empirisch-wissenschaftlichen Grundlage der Psychiatrie als klinischer Disciplin. Danzig: Kafemann. https://books.google.com/books?id=zYY_AAAAcAAJ.
- Lake, Charles Ray; Hurwitz, Nathaniel (2008). "Schizoaffective Disorder—Its Rise and Fall: Perspectives for DSM-V". Clinical Schizophrenia & Related Psychoses 2 (1): 91–7. doi:10.3371/csrp.2.1.8.
- Maier, Wolfgang (2006). "Do schizoaffective disorders exist at all?". Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 113 (5): 369–371. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.2006.00763.x. ISSN 0001-690X. PMID 16603028.
- Möller, Hans-Jürgen; Bottlender, R.; Gross, A; Hoff, P.; Wittmann, J.; Wegner, U.; Strauss, A. (2002). "The Kraepelinian dichotomy: preliminary results of a 15-year follow-up study on functional psychoses: focus on negative symptoms". Schizophrenia Research 56 (1–2): 87–94. doi:10.1016/S0920-9964(01)00252-3. PMID 12084423.
- Möller, Hans-Jürgen (2008). "Systematic of psychiatric disorders between categorical and dimensional approaches: Kraepelin's dichotomy and beyond". European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience 258 (Suppl. 2): 48–73. doi:10.1007/s00406-008-2004-3. PMID 18516518.
- Müller, N.; Schwarz, M. J (2008). "A psychoneuroimmunological perspective to Emil Kraepelins dichotomy". European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience 258: 97–106. doi:10.1007/s00406-008-2012-3. PMID 18516521.
- Noll, Richard (2007). The Encyclopedia of Schizophrenia and other Psychotic Disorders (3rd ed.). New York: Infobase Publishing. ISBN 978-0-8160-6405-2. https://books.google.com/books?id=jzoJxps189IC.
- Palm, Ulrich; Möller, Hans-Jürgen (2011). "Reception of Kraepelin's ideas 1900–1960". Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences 65 (4): 318–325. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1819.2011.02226.x. PMID 21682810.
- Pilgrim, D. (2002). "The biopsychosocial model in Anglo-American psychiatry: past, present and future". Journal of Mental Health 11 (6): 585–94. doi:10.1080/09638230020023930.
- Radden, Jennifer (1996). "Lumps and Bumps:Kantian Faculty Psychology, Phrenology, and Twentieth-Century Psychiatric Classification". Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology 3 (1): 1–14. doi:10.1353/ppp.1996.0008. ISSN 1086-3303.
- Roelcke, Volker (1997). "Biologizing social facts: An early 20th century debate on Kraepelin's concepts of culture, neurasthenia, and degeneration". Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry 21 (4): 383–403. doi:10.1023/A:1005393121931. PMID 9492972.
- Rogler, L.H. (1997). "Making Sense of Historical Changes in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: Five Propositions". Journal of Health and Social Behavior 38 (1): 9–20. doi:10.2307/2955358. PMID 9097505.
- Stefanis, N. (2008). "Genes do not read DSM-IV: implications for psychosis classification". Annals of General Psychiatry 7 (Suppl 1): S68. doi:10.1186/1744-859X-7-S1-S68.
 |  |
