Nash-Williams theorem

From HandWiki
Revision as of 16:57, 6 February 2024 by Jport (talk | contribs) (url)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Short description: Theorem in graph theory describing number of edge-disjoint spanning trees a graph can have

In graph theory, the Nash-Williams theorem is a tree-packing theorem that describes how many edge-disjoint spanning trees (and more generally forests) a graph can have:

A graph G has t edge-disjoint spanning trees iff for every partition [math]\displaystyle{ V_1, \ldots, V_k \subset V(G) }[/math] where [math]\displaystyle{ V_i \neq \emptyset }[/math] there are at least t(k − 1) crossing edges (Tutte 1961, Nash-Williams 1961).[1]

For this article, we will say that such a graph has arboricity t or is t-arboric. (The actual definition of arboricity is slightly different and applies to forests rather than trees.)

Related tree-packing properties

A k-arboric graph is necessarily k-edge connected. The converse is not true.

As a corollary of NW, every 2k-edge connected graph is k-arboric.

Both NW and Menger's theorem characterize when a graph has k edge-disjoint paths between two vertices.

Nash-Williams theorem for forests

NW (1964) generalized the above result to forests:

G can be partitioned into t edge-disjoint forests iff for every [math]\displaystyle{ U \subset V(G) }[/math], the induced subgraph G[U] has at most [math]\displaystyle{ t(|U|-1) }[/math] edges.

A proof is given here.[2][1]

This is how people usually define what it means for a graph to be t-aboric.

In other words, for every subgraph SG[U], we have [math]\displaystyle{ t \geq \lceil E(S) / (V(S) - 1) \rceil }[/math]. It is tight in that there is a subgraph S that saturates the inequality (or else we can choose a smaller t). This leads to the following formula

[math]\displaystyle{ t = \lceil \max_{S \subset G} \frac{E(S)}{V(S) - 1} \rceil }[/math]

also referred to as the NW formula.

The general problem is to ask when a graph can be covered by edge-disjoint subgraphs.

See also

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Diestel, Reinhard, 1959– Verfasser. (2017-06-30). Graph theory. ISBN 9783662536216. OCLC 1048203362. 
  2. Chen, Boliong; Matsumoto, Makoto; Wang, Jianfang; Zhang, Zhongfu; Zhang, Jianxun (1994-03-01). "A short proof of Nash-Williams' theorem for the arboricity of a graph" (in en). Graphs and Combinatorics 10 (1): 27–28. doi:10.1007/BF01202467. ISSN 1435-5914. 

External links