Moser's worm problem

From HandWiki
Revision as of 17:19, 6 February 2024 by Importwiki (talk | contribs) (fixing)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Short description: Unsolved geometry problem about planar regions
Question, Web Fundamentals.svg Unsolved problem in mathematics:
What is the minimum area of a shape that can cover every unit-length curve?
(more unsolved problems in mathematics)

Moser's worm problem (also known as mother worm's blanket problem) is an unsolved problem in geometry formulated by the Austrian-Canadian mathematician Leo Moser in 1966. The problem asks for the region of smallest area that can accommodate every plane curve of length 1. Here "accommodate" means that the curve may be rotated and translated to fit inside the region. In some variations of the problem, the region is restricted to be convex.

Examples

For example, a circular disk of radius 1/2 can accommodate any plane curve of length 1 by placing the midpoint of the curve at the center of the disk. Another possible solution has the shape of a rhombus with vertex angles of 60° and 120° and with a long diagonal of unit length.[1] However, these are not optimal solutions; other shapes are known that solve the problem with smaller areas.

Solution properties

It is not completely trivial that a minimum-area cover exists. An alternative possibility would be that there is some minimal area that can be approached but not actually attained. However, there does exist a smallest convex cover. Its existence follows from the Blaschke selection theorem.[2]

It is also not trivial to determine whether a given shape forms a cover. (Gerriets Poole) conjectured that a shape accommodates every unit-length curve if and only if it accommodates every unit-length polygonal chain with three segments, a more easily tested condition, but (Panraksa Wetzel) showed that no finite bound on the number of segments in a polychain would suffice for this test.

Known bounds

The problem remains open, but over a sequence of papers researchers have tightened the gap between the known lower and upper bounds. In particular, (Norwood Poole) constructed a (nonconvex) universal cover and showed that the minimum shape has area at most 0.260437; (Gerriets Poole) and (Norwood Poole) gave weaker upper bounds. In the convex case, (Wang 2006) improved an upper bound to 0.270911861. (Khandhawit Pagonakis) used a min-max strategy for area of a convex set containing a segment, a triangle and a rectangle to show a lower bound of 0.232239 for a convex cover.

In the 1970s, John Wetzel conjectured that a 30° circular sector of unit radius is a cover with area [math]\displaystyle{ \pi/12 \approx 0.2618 }[/math]. Two proofs of the conjecture were independently claimed by (Movshovich Wetzel) and by (Panraksa Wichiramala). If confirmed, this will reduce the upper bound for the convex cover by about 3%.

See also

Notes

  1. (Gerriets Poole).
  2. (Norwood Poole) attribute this observation to an unpublished manuscript of Laidacker and Poole, dated 1986.

References