Spatial neural network

From HandWiki
Revision as of 19:27, 6 February 2024 by LinuxGuru (talk | contribs) (fix)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Short description: Category of tailored neural networks
Difference in predicted house prices within the states of Austria, from a GWR and a GWNN whose the weighting metrics respectively use the Euclidean distance (ED) and travel time distance (TTD).[1]

Spatial neural networks (SNNs) constitute a supercategory of tailored neural networks (NNs) for representing and predicting geographic phenomena. They generally improve both the statistical accuracy and reliability of the a-spatial/classic NNs whenever they handle geo-spatial datasets, and also of the other spatial (statistical) models (e.g. spatial regression models) whenever the geo-spatial datasets' variables depict non-linear relations.[2][3][1]

History

Openshaw (1993) and Hewitson et al. (1994) started investigating the applications of the a-spatial/classic NNs to geographic phenomena.[4][5] They observed that a-spatial/classic NNs outperform the other extensively applied a-spatial/classic statistical models (e.g. regression models, clustering algorithms, maximum likelihood classifications) in geography, especially when there exist non-linear relations between the geo-spatial datasets' variables.[4][5] Thereafter, Openshaw (1998) also compared these a-spatial/classic NNs with other modern and original a-spatial statistical models at that time (i.e. fuzzy logic models, genetic algorithm models); he concluded that the a-spatial/classic NNs are statistically competitive.[6] Thereafter scientists developed several categories of SNNs – see below.

Spatial models

Spatial statistical models (aka geographically weighted models, or merely spatial models) like the geographically weighted regressions (GWRs), SNNs, etc., are spatially tailored (a-spatial/classic) statistical models, so to learn and model the deterministic components of the spatial variability (i.e. spatial dependence/autocorrelation, spatial heterogeneity, spatial association/cross-correlation) from the geo-locations of the geo-spatial datasets’ (statistical) individuals/units.[7][8][1][9]

Categories

There exist several categories of methods/approaches for designing and applying SNNs.

  • One-Size-Fits-all (OSFA) spatial neural networks, use the OSFA method/approach for globally computing the spatial weights and designing a spatial structure from the originally a-spatial/classic neural networks.[2]
  • Spatial Variability Aware Neural Networks (SVANNs) use an enhanced OSFA method/approach that locally recomputes the spatial weights and redesigns the spatial structure of the originally a-spatial/classic NNs, at each geo-location of the (statistical) individuals/units' attributes' values.[3] They generally outperform the OSFA spatial neural networks, but they do not consistently handle the spatial heterogeneity at multiple scales.[10]
  • Geographically Weighted Neural Networks (GWNNs) are similar to the SVANNs but they use the so-called Geographically Weighted Model (GWM) method/approach by Lu et al. (2023), so to locally recompute the spatial weights and redesign the spatial structure of the originally a-spatial/classic neural networks.[1][9] Like the SVANNs, they do not consistently handle spatial heterogeneity at multiple scales.[1]

Applications

There exist case-study applications of SNNs in:

See also


References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 "A geographically weighted artificial neural network". International Journal of Geographical Information Science 36 (2): 215–235. 2022. doi:10.1080/13658816.2021.1871618. 
  2. 2.0 2.1 "Comparing spatial networks: a one-size-fits-all efficiency-driven approach". Physical Review 101 (4): 042301. 2020. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.101.042301. PMID 32422764. 
  3. 3.0 3.1 "Spatial variability aware deep neural networks (SVANN): a general approach". ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology 12 (6): 1–21. 2021. doi:10.1145/3466688. 
  4. 4.0 4.1 "Modelling spatial interaction using a neural net". Geographic information systems, spatial modelling and policy evaluation. Berlin: Springer. 1993. pp. 147–164. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-77500-0_10. ISBN 978-3-642-77500-0. 
  5. 5.0 5.1 Neural nets: applications in geography. The GeoJournal Library. 29. Berlin: Springer. 1994. pp. 196. doi:10.1007/978-94-011-1122-5. ISBN 978-94-011-1122-5. 
  6. "Neural network, genetic, and fuzzy logic models of spatial interaction". Environment and Planning 30 (10): 1857–1872. 1998. doi:10.1068/a301857. 
  7. Anselin L (2017). A local indicator of multivariate spatial association: extending Geary's C (Report). Center for Spatial Data Science. pp. 27. https://geodacenter.github.io/docs/LA_multivariateGeary1.pdf. 
  8. "Modelling spatial processes in quantitative human geography". Annals of GIS 28: 5–14. 2021. doi:10.1080/19475683.2021.1903996. 
  9. 9.0 9.1 "GWmodelS: A software for geographically weighted models". SoftwareX 21: 101291. 2023. doi:10.1016/j.softx.2022.101291. https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/194864/7/1-s2.0-S2352711022002096-main.pdf. 
  10. "Harnessing heterogeneity in space with statistically guided meta-learning". Knowledge and Information Systems 65 (6): 2699–2729. 2023. doi:10.1007/s10115-023-01847-0. 
  11. "Spatial neural network for forecasting energy consumption of Palembang area". Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1402 (3): 033092. 2019. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1402/3/033092. 
  12. "Spectral-spatial neural network classification of hyperspectral vegetation images". 1138. 2023. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1138/1/012040. 
  13. "The Spatial neural network model with disruptive technology for property appraisal in real estate industry". Technological Forecasting and Social Change 177: 121067. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121067.