K-theory of a category

From HandWiki
Revision as of 20:35, 6 February 2024 by Rtexter1 (talk | contribs) (update)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Short description: Concept in algebra


In algebraic K-theory, the K-theory of a category C (usually equipped with some kind of additional data) is a sequence of abelian groups Ki(C) associated to it. If C is an abelian category, there is no need for extra data, but in general it only makes sense to speak of K-theory after specifying on C a structure of an exact category, or of a Waldhausen category, or of a dg-category, or possibly some other variants. Thus, there are several constructions of those groups, corresponding to various kinds of structures put on C. Traditionally, the K-theory of C is defined to be the result of a suitable construction, but in some contexts there are more conceptual definitions. For instance, the K-theory is a 'universal additive invariant' of dg-categories[1] and small stable ∞-categories.[2]

The motivation for this notion comes from algebraic K-theory of rings. For a ring R Daniel Quillen in (Quillen 1973) introduced two equivalent ways to find the higher K-theory. The plus construction expresses Ki(R) in terms of R directly, but it's hard to prove properties of the result, including basic ones like functoriality. The other way is to consider the exact category of projective modules over R and to set Ki(R) to be the K-theory of that category, defined using the Q-construction. This approach proved to be more useful, and could be applied to other exact categories as well. Later Friedhelm Waldhausen in (Waldhausen 1985) extended the notion of K-theory even further, to very different kinds of categories, including the category of topological spaces.

K-theory of Waldhausen categories

In algebra, the S-construction is a construction in algebraic K-theory that produces a model that can be used to define higher K-groups. It is due to Friedhelm Waldhausen and concerns a category with cofibrations and weak equivalences; such a category is called a Waldhausen category and generalizes Quillen's exact category. A cofibration can be thought of as analogous to a monomorphism, and a category with cofibrations is one in which, roughly speaking, monomorphisms are stable under pushouts.[3] According to Waldhausen, the "S" was chosen to stand for Graeme B. Segal.[4]

Unlike the Q-construction, which produces a topological space, the S-construction produces a simplicial set.

Details

The arrow category [math]\displaystyle{ Ar(C) }[/math] of a category C is a category whose objects are morphisms in C and whose morphisms are squares in C. Let a finite ordered set [math]\displaystyle{ [n] = \{ 0 \lt 1 \lt 2 \lt \cdots \lt n \} }[/math] be viewed as a category in the usual way.

Let C be a category with cofibrations and let [math]\displaystyle{ S_n C }[/math] be a category whose objects are functors [math]\displaystyle{ f: Ar[n] \to C }[/math] such that, for [math]\displaystyle{ i \le j \le k }[/math], [math]\displaystyle{ f(i = i) = * }[/math], [math]\displaystyle{ f(i \le j) \to f(i \le k) }[/math] is a cofibration, and [math]\displaystyle{ f(j \le k) }[/math] is the pushout of [math]\displaystyle{ f(i \le j) \to f(i \le k) }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ f(i \le j) \to f(j = j) = * }[/math]. The category [math]\displaystyle{ S_n C }[/math] defined in this manner is itself a category with cofibrations. One can therefore iterate the construction, forming the sequence[math]\displaystyle{ S^{(m)}C = S \cdots SC }[/math]. This sequence is a spectrum called the K-theory spectrum of C.

The additivity theorem

Most basic properties of algebraic K-theory of categories are consequences of the following important theorem.[5] There are versions of it in all available settings. Here's a statement for Waldhausen categories. Notably, it's used to show that the sequence of spaces obtained by the iterated S-construction is an Ω-spectrum.

Let C be a Waldhausen category. The category of extensions [math]\displaystyle{ \mathcal{E}(C) }[/math] has as objects the sequences [math]\displaystyle{ A \rightarrowtail B \twoheadrightarrow A' }[/math] in C, where the first map is a cofibration, and [math]\displaystyle{ B \twoheadrightarrow A' }[/math] is a quotient map, i.e. a pushout of the first one along the zero map A0. This category has a natural Waldhausen structure, and the forgetful functor [math]\displaystyle{ [ A \rightarrowtail B \twoheadrightarrow A' ] \mapsto (A, A') }[/math] from [math]\displaystyle{ \mathcal{E}(C) }[/math] to C × C respects it. The additivity theorem says that the induced map on K-theory spaces [math]\displaystyle{ K(\mathcal{E}(C)) \to K(C) \times K(C) }[/math] is a homotopy equivalence.[6]

For dg-categories the statement is similar. Let C be a small pretriangulated dg-category with a semiorthogonal decomposition [math]\displaystyle{ C \cong \langle C_1, C_2 \rangle }[/math]. Then the map of K-theory spectra K(C) → K(C1) ⊕ K(C2) is a homotopy equivalence.[7] In fact, K-theory is a universal functor satisfying this additivity property and Morita invariance.[1]

Category of finite sets

Consider the category of pointed finite sets. This category has an object [math]\displaystyle{ k_+ = \{0, 1, \ldots, k\} }[/math] for every natural number k, and the morphisms in this category are the functions [math]\displaystyle{ f : m_+ \to n_+ }[/math] which preserve the zero element. A theorem of Barratt, Priddy and Quillen says that the algebraic K-theory of this category is a sphere spectrum.[4]

Miscellaneous

More generally in abstract category theory, the K-theory of a category is a type of decategorification in which a set is created from an equivalence class of objects in a stable (∞,1)-category, where the elements of the set inherit an Abelian group structure from the exact sequences in the category.[8]

Group completion method

The Grothendieck group construction is a functor from the category of rings to the category of abelian groups. The higher K-theory should then be a functor from the category of rings but to the category of higher objects such as simplicial abelian groups.

Topological Hochschild homology

Waldhausen introduced the idea of a trace map from the algebraic K-theory of a ring to its Hochschild homology; by way of this map, information can be obtained about the K-theory from the Hochschild homology. Bökstedt factorized this trace map, leading to the idea of a functor known as the topological Hochschild homology of the ring's Eilenberg–MacLane spectrum.[9]

K-theory of a simplicial ring

If R is a constant simplicial ring, then this is the same thing as K-theory of a ring.


See also

Notes

  1. 1.0 1.1 Tabuada, Goncalo (2008). "Higher K-theory via universal invariants". Duke Mathematical Journal 145 (1): 121–206. doi:10.1215/00127094-2008-049. 
  2. *Blumberg, Andrew J; Gepner, David; Tabuada, Gonçalo (2013-04-18). "A universal characterization of higher algebraic K-theory". Geometry & Topology 17 (2): 733–838. doi:10.2140/gt.2013.17.733. ISSN 1364-0380. 
  3. Boyarchenko, Mitya (4 November 2007). "K-theory of a Waldhausen category as a symmetric spectrum". http://www.math.uchicago.edu/~mitya/langlands/spectra/ktwcss-new.pdf. 
  4. 4.0 4.1 Dundas, Bjørn Ian; Goodwillie, Thomas G.; McCarthy, Randy (2012-09-06) (in en). The Local Structure of Algebraic K-Theory. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 9781447143932. https://books.google.com/books?id=hEDjmKdyFAAC. 
  5. Staffeldt, Ross (1989). "On fundamental theorems of algebraic K-theory". K-theory 2 (4): 511–532. doi:10.1007/bf00533280. 
  6. Weibel, Charles (2013). "Chapter V: The Fundamental Theorems of higher K-theory". The K-book: an introduction to algebraic K-theory. Graduate Studies in Mathematics. 145. AMS. 
  7. Tabuada, Gonçalo (2005). "Invariants additifs de dg-catégories". International Mathematics Research Notices 2005 (53): 3309–3339. doi:10.1155/IMRN.2005.3309. Bibcode2005math......7227T. 
  8. "K-theory in nLab". https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/K-theory#idea. 
  9. Schwänzl, R.; Vogt, R. M.; Waldhausen, F. (October 2000). "Topological Hochschild Homology". Journal of the London Mathematical Society 62 (2): 345–356. doi:10.1112/s0024610700008929. ISSN 1469-7750. https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/download/1785323/2314834. 

References


Further reading

For the recent ∞-category approach, see