Philosophy:Warrant: The Current Debate

From HandWiki
Revision as of 20:42, 25 June 2023 by Steve Marsio (talk | contribs) (fixing)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Warrant: The Current Debate
Warrant The Current Debate.jpg
AuthorAlvin Plantinga
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish
SubjectEpistemology
PublisherOxford University Press
Publication date
1993
Pages228
ISBNISBN:978-0-19-507862-6
121/.6
LC ClassBD161 .P58
Followed byWarrant and Proper Function 

Warrant: The Current Debate is the first in a trilogy of books written by the philosopher Alvin Plantinga on epistemology. Plantinga introduces, analyzes, and criticizes 20th-century developments in analytic epistemology, particularly the works of Roderick Chisholm, Laurence BonJour, William Alston, Alvin Goldman, and others.[1] In the 1993 book, Plantinga argues specifically that the theories of what he calls "warrant" – what many others have called justification (Plantinga draws out a difference: justification is a property of a person holding a belief while warrant is a property of a belief) – put forth by these epistemologists have systematically failed to capture in full what is required for knowledge.[2]

See also

References

  1. ↑ Plantinga 1993.
  2. ↑ Plantinga 1993, p. 3.

Bibliography

  • Plantinga, Alvin (1993). Warrant: The Current Debate. New York: Oxford University Press. 





Retrieved from "https://handwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Philosophy:Warrant:_The_Current_Debate&oldid=2937276"