Biology:Crocodylomorpha

From HandWiki
Short description: Clade of reptiles

Crocodylomorphs
Temporal range: Late Triassic–Present, 235–0 Ma[1]
Terrestrisuchus.jpg
Skeleton of Terrestrisuchus, an early saltoposuchid crocodylomorph
Scientific classification e
Missing taxonomy template (fix): Archosauria/Reptilia
Clade: Pseudosuchia
Clade: Paracrocodylomorpha
Clade: Loricata
Clade: Crocodylomorpha
Hay, 1930
Subgroups

Crocodylomorpha is a group of pseudosuchian archosaurs that includes the crocodilians and their extinct relatives. They were the only members of Pseudosuchia to survive the end-Triassic extinction.

During Mesozoic and early Cenozoic times, crocodylomorphs were far more diverse than at Present. Triassic forms were small, lightly built, active terrestrial animals. The earliest and most primitive crocodylomorphs are represented by "sphenosuchians", a paraphyletic assemblage containing small-bodied forms with elongated limbs that walked upright, which represents the ancestral morphology of Crocodylomorpha. These forms persisted until the end of the Jurassic.[4] During the Jurassic, Crocodylomorphs morphologically diversified into numerous niches, with the subgroups Neosuchia (which includes modern crocodilians) and the extinct Thalattosuchia adapting to aquatic life.

Evolutionary history

Life restoration of Hesperosuchus

When their extinct species and stem group are examined, the crocodylian lineage (clade Pseudosuchia, formerly Crurotarsi) proves to have been a very diverse and adaptive group of reptiles. Not only are they an ancient group of animals – at least as old as the dinosaurs – they also evolved into a great variety of forms and sizes. Some terrestrial notosuchians were noticeably small animals, less than 1.2 m (3 ft 11 in) in length, while aquatic or semiaquatic crocodylomorphs, especially tethysuchians, thalattosuchians, and some crocodilians reached around 8 m (26 ft) in length.[5]

The earliest forms, the sphenosuchians, evolved during the Late Triassic, and were highly gracile terrestrial forms built like greyhounds. During the Jurassic and the Cretaceous, marine forms in the family Metriorhynchidae, such as Metriorhynchus, evolved forelimbs that were paddle-like and had a tail similar to modern fish. Dakosaurus andiniensis, a species closely related to Metriorhynchus, had a skull that was adapted to eat large marine reptiles. Several terrestrial species during the Cretaceous were herbivorous, such as Simosuchus clarki and Chimaerasuchus paradoxus. A number of lineages during the Cenozoic became wholly terrestrial predators.

Taxonomy and phylogeny

Historically, all known living and extinct crocodiles were indiscriminately lumped into the order Crocodilia. However, beginning in the late 1980s, many scientists began restricting the order Crocodilia to the living species and close extinct relatives such as Mekosuchus. The various other groups that had previously been known as Crocodilia were moved to Crocodylomorpha and the slightly more restrictive Crocodyliformes.[6] Crocodylomorpha has been given the rank of superorder in some 20th and 21st century studies.[7]

The old Crocodilia was subdivided into the suborders:

Mesosuchia is a paraphyletic group as it does not include eusuchians (which nest within Mesosuchia). Mesoeucrocodylia was the name given to the clade that contains mesosuchians and eusuchians (Whetstone and Whybrow, 1983).

Phylogeny

Below is a cladogram modified from Nesbitt (2011)[8] and Bronzati (2012).[9]

Crocodylomorpha 

CM 73372

HesperosuchusHesperosuchus flipped.jpg

Dromicosuchus

Sphenosuchus

Dibothrosuchus

Terrestrisuchus

Litargosuchus

Kayentasuchus

 Crocodyliformes 

Protosuchia Sichuanosuchus BW flipped.jpg

 Metasuchia 

Notosuchia Comahuesuchus BW white background.jpg

Neosuchia Deinosuchus riograndensis.png

The previous definitions of Crocodilia and Eusuchia did not accurately convey evolutionary relationships within the group. The only order-level taxon that is currently considered valid is Crocodilia in its present definition. Prehistoric crocodiles are represented by many taxa, but since few major groups of the ancient forms are distinguishable, a conclusion on how to define new order-level clades is not yet possible. (Benson & Clark, 1988).

Biology

The Crocodylomorpha comprise a variety of forms, shapes, and sizes, which occupied a range of habitats. As with most amniotes, Crocodylomorphs were and are oviparous, laying eggs in a nest or mound, known from strata as old as the Late Jurassic.[10] Adult size varies widely, from about 55 cm long in Knoetschkesuchus to much larger dimensions, as in Sarcosuchus. Most crocodylomorphs were carnivores, but many lineages evolved to be obligate piscivores, such as the extant gharials.

References

  1. Irmis, R. B.; Nesbitt, S. J.; Sues, H. -D. (2013). "Early Crocodylomorpha". Geological Society, London, Special Publications 379 (1): 275–302. doi:10.1144/SP379.24. Bibcode2013GSLSP.379..275I. 
  2. Spiekman, S. N. F. (2023). "A revision and histological investigation of Saltoposuchus connectens (Archosauria: Crocodylomorpha) from the Norian (Late Triassic) of south-western Germany". Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 199 (2): 354–391. doi:10.1093/zoolinnean/zlad035. 
  3. Ruebenstahl, A. A.; Klein, M. D.; Yi, H.; Xu, X.; Clark, J. M. (2022). "Anatomy and relationships of the early diverging Crocodylomorphs Junggarsuchus sloani and Dibothrosuchus elaphros". The Anatomical Record 305 (10): 2463–2556. doi:10.1002/ar.24949. PMID 35699105. 
  4. Ruebenstahl, Alexander A.; Klein, Michael D.; Yi, Hongyu; Xu, Xing; Clark, James M. (2022-06-14). "Anatomy and relationships of the early diverging Crocodylomorphs Junggarsuchus sloani and Dibothrosuchus elaphros" (in en). The Anatomical Record 305 (10): 2463–2556. doi:10.1002/ar.24949. ISSN 1932-8486. PMID 35699105. 
  5. Godoy, P. L.; Benson, R. B. J.; Bronzati, M.; Butler, R. J. (2019). "The multi-peak adaptive landscape of crocodylomorph body size evolution". BMC Evolutionary Biology 19 (167): 167. doi:10.1186/s12862-019-1466-4. PMID 31390981. PMC 6686447. https://bmcecolevol.biomedcentral.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s12862-019-1466-4.pdf. 
  6. Martin, J.E.; Benton, M.J. (2008). "Crown Clades in Vertebrate Nomenclature: Correcting the Definition of Crocodylia". Systematic Biology 57 (1): 173–181. doi:10.1080/10635150801910469. PMID 18300130. 
  7. Parrilla-Bel, J.; Young, M. T.; Moreno-Azanza, M.; Canudo, J. I. (2013). Butler, Richard J. ed. "The First Metriorhynchid Crocodylomorph from the Middle Jurassic of Spain, with Implications for Evolution of the Subclade Rhacheosaurini". PLOS ONE 8 (1): e54275. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0054275. PMID 23372699. Bibcode2013PLoSO...854275P. 
  8. Nesbitt, S.J. (2011). "The early evolution of archosaurs: relationships and the origin of major clades". Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 352: 1–292. doi:10.1206/352.1. https://digitallibrary.amnh.org/handle/2246/6112. 
  9. Bronzati, M.; Montefeltro, F. C.; Langer, M. C. (2012). "A species-level supertree of Crocodyliformes". Historical Biology 24 (6): 598–606. doi:10.1080/08912963.2012.662680. 
  10. Russo, J.; Mateus, O.; Marzola, M.; Balbino, A. (2017). "Two new ootaxa from the late Jurassic: The oldest record of crocodylomorph eggs, from the Lourinhã Formation, Portugal". PLOS One 12 (3): 1–23. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0171919. PMID 28273086. Bibcode2017PLoSO..1271919R. 

Sources

  • Benton, M. J. (2004), Vertebrate Palaeontology, 3rd ed. Blackwell Science Ltd
  • Hay, O. P. 1930 (1929–1930). Second Bibliography and Catalogue of the Fossil Vertebrata of North America. Carnegie Institution Publications, Washington, 1, 990 pp.

External links

Wikidata ☰ Q131863 entry