Biology:Fire blight

From HandWiki
(Redirected from Biology:Erwinia amylovora)
Short description: Disease of some Rosaceae trees (especially apples and pears) caused by Erwinia amylovora

Fire blight
Apple tree with fire blight.jpg
Scientific classification edit
Domain: Bacteria
Phylum: Pseudomonadota
Class: Gammaproteobacteria
Order: Enterobacterales
Family: Erwiniaceae
Genus: Erwinia
Species:
E. amylovora
Binomial name
Erwinia amylovora
(Burrill 1882) Winslow et al. 1920
Type strain = NCPPB 683

Fire blight, also written fireblight, is a contagious disease affecting apples, pears, and some other members of the family Rosaceae. It is a serious concern to apple and pear producers. Under optimal conditions, it can destroy an entire orchard in a single growing season.

The causal pathogen is Erwinia amylovora,[1] a Gram-negative bacterium in the genus Erwinia, order Enterobacterales. It is a short rod with rounded ends and many peritrichous flagellae. Pears are the most susceptible, but apples, loquat, crabapples, quinces, hawthorn, cotoneaster, Pyracantha, raspberry and some other rosaceous plants are also vulnerable. The disease is believed to be indigenous to North America, from where it spread to most of the rest of the world.

Fire blight is not believed to be present in Australia though it might possibly exist there.[2] It has been a major reason for a long-standing embargo on the importation of New Zealand apples to Australia.[3] Japan was likewise believed to be without the disease, but it was discovered in pears grown in northern Japan. Japanese authorities are, however, still denying its existence, and the Japanese scientist who discovered it is believed to have committed suicide after his name was leaked to affected farmers.[4] In Europe it is listed as a quarantine disease, and has been spreading along Hawthorn (Crataegus) hedges planted alongside railways, motorways and main roads.

History

Experiments in the early 1800s demonstrated that E. amylovora caused disease in plants, the first time that this could be shown. E. amylovora was found by Fritz Klement, a German scientist in 1910.[citation needed][clarification needed] It is generally accepted[by whom?] that this destructive crop bacterium initially originated in North America. Today, E. amylovora can currently be found in all the provinces of Canada, as well as in some parts of the United States of America, including Alabama, California , Colorado, Connecticut, Georgia, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts , Michigan, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Texas , Utah, Virginia, Washington (state) , West Virginia and Wisconsin. In the Americas it also occurs in other countries including, but not limited to, Mexico and Bermuda. On the African continent, E. amylovora has been confirmed in Egypt.[citation needed]

It is believed that the pathogen was first introduced into Northern Europe in the 1950's through fruit containers, contaminated with bacterial ooze, imported from the USA.[5] During the 1950s-1960's, E. amylovora spread through much of Northern Europe. Initially large areas of Germany and France seemed untouched by fireblight, but the disease, and E. amylovora, were discovered in the later 1990s in Germany. In the 1980s the bacterium was found in isolated regions in the Eastern Mediterranean and from the years 1995-1996 cases of fireblight began to be reported in countries such as Hungary, Romania, Northern Italy and Northern Spain .[citation needed]

Dissemination

Gala apple branch with “scorched” leaves after a severe fire blight infection.

Erwinia amylovora overwinters in cankers formed during the previous season. In the spring warmer temperatures support development and bacteria-filled ooze begins to exude from the cankers.[6] The factors that determine whether or not cankers become active are not well known, but it is thought that cankers found on larger or older tree limbs are more likely to become active.[7] Honeybees and other insects are attracted to this ooze and can spread bacteria to susceptible tissue, such as flower stigmata.[8] Birds, rain and wind can also transmit the bacterium to susceptible tissue, the colonisation of which will be heavily decided by temperature (21-27 C is most favourable) and moisture either from rain or heavy dew. Bacterial procession into the nectaries – cause "blossom blight". Flowers one to three days old are more susceptible than those five to eight days old. See Curry 1987 for the source and further review of this subject.[9]

Other than through the flowers, the bacterium can enter the plant through the stomata. Also highly susceptible to infection are lesions such as punctures caused by plant-sucking insects and tears caused by a variety of means, including infected cultivating tools. A few minutes of heavy hail can spread the disease throughout an entire orchard and growers normally do not wait until symptoms appear but begin control measures[citation needed] within a few hours.[citation needed]

Once the bacterium gains access to the xylem or cortical parenchyma of the plant, it causes blackened, necrotic lesions, which may also produce a viscous exudate. This bacteria-laden exudate can be distributed to other parts of the same plant or to susceptible areas of different plants by rain, birds or insects, causing secondary infections. The disease spreads most quickly during hot, wet weather and is dormant in the winter when temperatures drop.[citation needed]

The pathogen spreads through the tree from the point of infection via the plant's vascular system, eventually reaching the roots and/or graft junction of the plant. Once the plant's roots are affected, the death of the plant often results. Over-pruning and too much fertilization (especially with nitrogen) can lead to water sprout and other midsummer growth that leave the tree more susceptible.[citation needed]

Unfortunately, there is no known cure for fire blight; the best that can be done is to prevent its spread by measures such as avoidance of overhead water systems, as falling water can spread the disease and the careful pruning of tainted stems or branches. Great attention must be paid to any gardening tools that have been exposed to the causitive microorganisms. These tools should be disinfected in an alcohol solution containing three parts denatured alcohol to one part water. Diluted household bleach (one part bleach to nine parts water) can likewise be utilized. Of course, implements should afterwards be dried and oiled to forestall corrosion.[10]

The fly Delia platura has been observed visiting fire blight wounds to feed and can successfully transmit fire blight to already damaged apple shoots.[11] Fire blight exopolysaccharide also served as the adhesive to attach propagated cells to D. platura.[11] D. platura shed fire blight at a constant rate[11] - and did not suffer from doing so - for at least five days.[11]

Pathogenesis

Pathogenicity depends on many different factors such as the production of the siderophore desferrioxamine, metalloproteases, plasmids, and histone-like proteins. However, some essential factors of pathogenicity are variations in the synthesis of extracellular polysaccharides (EPS) and the mechanism of type III secretion system and its associated proteins.[12] EPS helps bacterial pathogens avoid plant defenses, “clog” the host’s vascular system, protect bacteria against desiccation and attach to both surfaces and one another. One EPS is amylovoran, a polymer of pentasaccharide repeating units. If a strain of E. amylovora cannot produce amylovoran it will not be pathogenic and will be unable to spread in plants. Levan is another EPS, and a lack of it will slow development of symptoms. Type III secretion systems are used for exporting and delivering effector proteins into the cytosol of host plants. This system mainly consists of Hrc proteins. Motility is another major virulence factor.[13] Since E. amylovora is not an obligate biotroph, it is able to survive outside the host. This fact allows the organism to be spread by such a variety if methods.[citation needed]

Symptoms

Fire blight on a pear tree caused by Erwinia amylovora

Tissues affected by the symptoms of Erwinia amylovora include blossoms, fruits, shoots, and branches of apple (Pomoideae), pear, and many other rosaceous plants. All symptoms are above ground and are typically easy to recognize. Symptoms on blossoms include water soaking of the floral receptacle, ovary, and peduncles.[14] This results in a dull, gray-green appearance 1–2 weeks after petal fall, and eventually tissues will shrivel and turn black. The base of the blossom and young fruit show similar symptoms as infection spreads. Opaque white- or amber-colored droplets of bacterial ooze can be seen on the infected tissue in high humidity. Shoots show similar symptoms but these develop much more rapidly. A “Shepherd's Crook” can occur when the tip of the shoot wilts, and diseased shoot leaves typically have blackening along the mid-vein and before they die. When numerous, diseased shoots give the tree a blighted appearance. Infection of blossoms and shoots can spread to larger tree limbs. Branches will darken and become water soaked, eventually cracks will develop in bark. Wood under the bark will become streaked with black discoloration. Immature fruit forms water-soaked lesions and later turns black. Bacterial ooze can be found on these lesions. Severe infections result in fruit turning entirely black and shrivelling.[15]

Management

In an attempt to prevent new infections, plants have been sprayed with either streptomycin, copper sulfate or both in some parts of the world, such as the USA, but has been found to be effective only for slowing or temporarily stopping growth in already diseased plants.[16] The widespread use of streptomycin spray has led to antibiotic resistance in some areas, such as California and Washington. Certain biological controls consisting of beneficial bacteria or yeast can also prevent fire blight from infecting new trees. The only effective treatment for plants already infected is to prune off the affected branches and remove them from the area.[16] Plants or trees should be inspected routinely for the appearance of new infections. The rest of the plant can be saved if the blighted wood is removed before the infection spreads to the roots.[17] There is no known cure; prevention is the key.[18]

Methods to predict the likelihood of an outbreak so that control measures can be best targeted, were introduced from the 1980s following the work of Eve Billings at East Malling Research Station, UK. These were based on temperature and rainfall, and have been developed further by Billings and others.[19][20]

E. amylovora generally needs to be destroyed externally, before it enters plant tissues because once it enters the host, it spreads during the endophytic phase of pathogenesis. Once this happens external control methods become ineffective. The application of copper and antibiotics to the plant externally is the most effective method of prevention. Currently it has been noted that E. amylovora has developed a resistance to the antibiotic streptomycin, as do most bacteria able to transfer preferential genes horizontally from species to species.[21]

New research conducted by John C. Wise out of Michigan State University shows that E. amylovora can be controlled with relative efficacy through tree trunk injection of either streptomycin, potassium phosphites (PH), or acibenzolar-S-methyl (ASM). PH and ASM both work through gene inductions of PR-1, PR-2, and PR-8 in the leafy material.[22] Oxytetracycline Hydrochloride (OTC) was also tested and found to greatly reduce the activity of the bacteria within the tree. These new control methods are still being researched and have not been approved for fruit crop production by the EPA.[citation needed]

Phytosanitary measures have been employed as the best sanitary measures against E. amylovora dispersal. High risk countries are encouraged not to import plants susceptible to the pathogen into their territory because, once the bacteria become established in an area it is nearly impossible to eradicate the disease. Nurseries and orchards in such regions are placed on strict phytosanitary surveillance measures and well-monitored. Imported and infected crops are destroyed as soon as they are noticed since the bacteria spreads very rapidly and eradication methods are usually costly and inefficient.[citation needed]

Current fire blight strategies depend upon phytosanitary measures to lessen inoculum in the plantation and the utilization of splash medicines to forestall contamination, particularly blossom infections. Decreasing essential inoculum in the plantation by removing remainder holdover cankers during winter pruning is a set up as a basic method of control fire blight disease.[23]

In seriously influenced plantations, social practices that moderate the development pace of the tree will likewise slow the pace of canker improvement. This incorporates retaining irrigation water, nitrogen fertilizer, and agriculture. Also, practices that decrease tree injuring and bacterial development can diminish auxiliary disease. This incorporates controlling bugs, for example, plant bugs and psylla, constraining utilization of appendage spreaders in youthful plantations, and avoiding use of overhead sprinklers.[15]

Cultural control options include selecting resistant cultivars, however most commercially successful apple cultivars lack fire blight resistance. Breeders have developed fire blight resistant rootstocks, but resistance is not conferred to the grafted scion.[24]

Prohexadione calcium (BASF brand name Apogee in the United States) is a plant growth inhibitor which is recommended for shoot blight. Since fire blight relies on gibberellin-dependent growth for much of its own life cycle, prohexadione's gibberellin synthesis inhibition effect also suppresses blight. Not effective in blossom blight.[25]

Importance

Besides the historical significance of being the first bacterium proven to be a plant pathogen, fire blight is extremely important economically.[15] Costs for control and loss are estimated to be approximately $100 million per year in the USA. Specifically, in Michigan in the year 2000, $42 million in losses were estimated because of the removal of about 400,000 apple trees.[26] Warm, humid, and wet weather in May gave rise to this epidemic. In Washington and northern Oregon approximately $68 million in losses were estimated. E. amylovora has spread throughout the USA and much of the world,causing heavy losses, although it so far has not caused severe damage in northern Europe and, as long as E. amylovora is not introduced to Central Asia where wild apple trees still grow, it will not modify any ecosystems. Biodiversity is not impacted either, as no plant species are threatened with extinction due to this pathogen. Growing pears in Emilia-Romagna in Italy is a traditional activity for some families, and fire blight threatens this tradition which has been passed down for several generations.[27] In southern Germany apple and pear trees have been a part of the landscape for a long time, and are difficult to protect. The decline of apple and pear trees from their landscape can be expensive to replace and could have a negative effect on tourism. In the long-run, fire blight is a very important factor of economy and society.[citation needed]

A relatively small number of apple cultivars are responsible for an enormous proportion of yearly apple production. Food sellers and shoppers prize these cultivars for their appearance, quality, flavour, and storability, while cultivators additionally esteem their orchard attributes and guaranteed market due to this popularity. To maintain the desirable qualities of a cultivar while at the same time changing its disease resistance through ordinary breeding techniques is for all intents and purposes impossible due to the apple's heterozygosity, self-incongruence, and long growth span. Hereditary designing offers an appealing option since it can be faster, resistance qualities can be acquired from numerous sources, the statement of local apple qualities can be altered, and the attractive characteristics of the changed cultivar or rootstock can be safeguarded.[23]

References

  1. ↑ Type strain NCPPB 683 (dead link 3 December 2019)
  2. ↑ "Australia, New Zealand trade insults over fire blight. (tree disease)". Agra Europe. May 23, 1997. http://www.accessmylibrary.com/article-1G1-19464464/australia-new-zealand-trade.html. 
  3. ↑ "Local apple producers say no to Kiwis' fruit". Australian Broadcasting Corporation. 2010-04-13. http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/content/2010/s2871221.htm. 
  4. ↑ Helm, Leslie; Eisenstodt, Gale (July 22, 1996). "Caught in Cross-Fire of Pacific Apple War". Los Angeles Times. http://articles.latimes.com/1996-07-22/news/mn-26755_1_fire-blight. 
  5. ↑ Billing, E.; Berrie, A.M. (November 2002). "A Re-Examination of Fire Blight Epidemiology in England". Acta Horticulturae (590): 61–67. doi:10.17660/ActaHortic.2002.590.6. 
  6. ↑ van der Zwet, Tom; Keil, Harry L (1979). Fire Blight: a bacterial disease of rosaceous plants. U.S. Department of Agriculture. pp. 200 : ill. (some col.) maps. –-. OCLC 256060652. http://handle.nal.usda.gov/10113/CAT79714375. [page needed]
  7. ↑ Beer, Steven V.; Norelli, John L. (1977). "Fire Blight Epidemiology: Factors Affecting Release of Erwinia Amylovora by Cankers". Phytopathology 77 (9): 1119–1125. doi:10.1094/Phyto-67-1119. 
  8. ↑ Thomson, S. V. (1986). "The role of the stigma in fire blight infections". Phytopathology 76 (5): 476–482. doi:10.1094/Phyto-76-476. 
  9. ↑ Malnoy, Mickael; Martens, Stefan; Norelli, John L.; Barny, Marie-Anne; Sundin, George W.; Smits, Theo H.M.; Duffy, Brion (2012-09-08). "Fire Blight: Applied Genomic Insights of the Pathogen and Host". Annual Review of Phytopathology (Annual Reviews) 50 (1): 475–494. doi:10.1146/annurev-phyto-081211-172931. ISSN 0066-4286. PMID 22702352. 
  10. ↑ "StackPath". 26 July 2021. https://www.gardeningknowhow.com/plant-problems/disease/fire-blight-remedies-and-symptoms.htm. 
  11. ↑ 11.0 11.1 11.2 11.3 Boucher, Matthew; Collins, Rowan; Harling, Kayli; Brind'Amour, Gabrielle; Cox, Kerik; Loeb, Greg (January 2021). "Interactions Between Delia platura and Erwinia amylovora Associated with Insect Mediated Transmission of Shoot Blight". PhytoFrontiers 1 (1): 62–74. doi:10.1094/phytofr-08-20-0013-r. 
  12. ↑ Piqué, Núria; Miñana-Galbis, David; Merino, Susana; Tomás, Juan (5 June 2015). "Virulence Factors of Erwinia amylovora: A Review". International Journal of Molecular Sciences 16 (12): 12836–12854. doi:10.3390/ijms160612836. PMID 26057748. 
  13. ↑ Vrancken, K.; Holtappels, M.; Schoofs, H.; Deckers, T.; Valcke, R. (1 May 2013). "Pathogenicity and infection strategies of the fire blight pathogen Erwinia amylovora in Rosaceae: State of the art". Microbiology 159 (5): 823–832. doi:10.1099/mic.0.064881-0. PMID 23493063. 
  14. ↑ Schroth, M.N. (2010). "Fire Blight of Apple and Pear". https://www.plantdiseases.org/sites/default/files/plant_disease/narratives/2.pdf. 
  15. ↑ 15.0 15.1 15.2 Johnson, K. B. (2000). "Fire blight of apple and pear". The Plant Health Instructor. doi:10.1094/PHI-I-2000-0726-01. 
  16. ↑ 16.0 16.1 Iljon, Tzvia; Stirling, Jenna; Smith, Robert J. (2012). "A mathematical model describing an outbreak of fire blight". in Mushayabasa, Steady; Bhunu, Claver P.. Understanding the Dynamics of Emerging and Re-Emerging Infectious Diseases Using Mathematical Models. pp. 91–104. ISBN 978-81-7895-549-0. https://mysite.science.uottawa.ca/rsmith43/FireBlight.pdf. 
  17. ↑ "Fireblight: Symptoms, Causes and Treatment". University of Georgia. http://extension.uga.edu/publications/detail.cfm?number=C871. 
  18. ↑ "Fire Blight". Colorado State University. http://www.ext.colostate.edu/pubs/garden/02907.html. 
  19. ↑ Schouten, Henk J. (1991). Studies on fire blight (Thesis).
  20. ↑ Billing, Eve (2007). "Challenges in Adaptation of Plant Disease Warning Systems to New Locations: Re-Appraisal of Billing's Integrated System for Predicting Fire Blight in a Warm Dry Environment". Phytopathology 97 (9): 1036–1039. doi:10.1094/PHYTO-97-9-1036. PMID 18944167. 
  21. ↑ "Superbug, super-fast evolution". April 2008. http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/news/080401_mrsa. 
  22. ↑ Aćimović, Srđan G.; Zeng, Quan; McGhee, Gayle C.; Sundin, George W.; Wise, John C. (10 February 2015). "Control of fire blight (Erwinia amylovora) on apple trees with trunk-injected plant resistance inducers and antibiotics and assessment of induction of pathogenesis-related protein genes". Frontiers in Plant Science 6: 16. doi:10.3389/fpls.2015.00016. PMID 25717330. 
  23. ↑ 23.0 23.1 Norelli, John L.; Jones, Alan L.; Aldwinckle, Herb S. (July 2003). "Fire Blight Management in the Twenty-first Century: Using New Technologies that Enhance Host Resistance in Apple". Plant Disease 87 (7): 756–765. doi:10.1094/PDIS.2003.87.7.756. PMID 30812883. 
  24. ↑ Ohlendorf, Barbara (1999). Integrated Pest Management for Apples & Pears (2nd ed.). University of California, Agriculture and Natural Resources. ISBN 978-1-879906-42-6. [page needed]
  25. ↑ Beckerman, Janna; (Purdue University, Co-Editor-in-Chief); Rodriguez-Salamanca, Lina et al., eds. "Midwest Fruit Pest Management Guide 2021-2022". http://ag.purdue.edu/hla/Hort/Documents/ID-465.pdf. 
  26. ↑ Aćimović, Srđan G.; Zeng, Quan; McGhee, Gayle C.; Sundin, George W.; Wise, John C. (2015). "Control of fire blight (Erwinia amylovora) on apple trees with trunk-injected plant resistance inducers and antibiotics and assessment of induction of pathogenesis-related protein genes". Frontiers in Plant Science 6: 16. doi:10.3389/fpls.2015.00016. PMID 25717330. 
  27. ↑ "Erwinia Amylovora (fireblight)." The Centre for Agriculture and Bioscience International. N.p., n.d. Web. 15 Nov. 2016.

External links

Wikidata ☰ Q866091 entry



Retrieved from "https://handwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Biology:Fire_blight&oldid=3664293"