Biology:Opuntioideae
| Opuntioideae | |
|---|---|
| |
| Cylindropuntia ramosissima | |
Scientific classification 
| |
| Kingdom: | Plantae |
| Clade: | Tracheophytes |
| Clade: | Angiosperms |
| Clade: | Eudicots |
| Order: | Caryophyllales |
| Family: | Cactaceae |
| Subfamily: | Opuntioideae Burnett |
| Tribes | |
|
Cylindropuntieae | |
Opuntioideae is a subfamily of the cactus family, Cactaceae. It contains 15 genera divided into five tribes. The subfamily encompasses roughly 220–250 species, and is geographically distributed throughout the New World from Canada , to Argentina .[2] Members of this subfamily have diverse habits, including small geophytes, hemispherical cushions, shrubs, trees, and columnar cacti consisting of indeterminate branches or determinate terete or spherical segments.[3]
Description
Synapomorphies of Opuntioideae include small deciduous, barbed spines called glochids born on areoles and a bony aril surrounding a campylotropous ovule (inverted and curved, such that the micropyle almost meets the funiculus).[4] Other prominent morphological characters for this subfamily are presence of cylindrical, caducous leaves that tend to be shed by maturity and the sectioning of the stem into joints or pads known as cladodes.
Opuntioideae are unique among cacti for lacking in the stem a thick cortex, an extensive system of cortical bundles, collapsible cortical cells, and medullary bundles. Typically, the epidermis consists of a single layer of irregularly shaped cells, a cuticle at least 1-2 microns thick, and long, uniseriate trichomes in the areoles. Opuntioideae have a hypodermis of at least one layer, very thick walls, and druses (aggregations of calcium oxalate crystals), and their cortical cells have enlarged nuclei; the reason for this is unknown. They also possess mucilage cells.
Notably, their lack of collapsible cortical cells, ribs, and tubercles mean that they cannot absorb water or transfer it intercellularly as easily as the other cacti, so this may place evolutionary constraints on the aridity of habitats and maximum adult size. One adaptation around this problem is the evolution of flattened cladodes that allow opuntioids to swell up with water, increasing in volume without an increase in surface area risking water loss. Opuntioids also lack fiber caps to their phloem bundles, which in other cacti protect against sucking insects and stiffen developing internodes.[5]
Tribes and genera
Tribes and genera of the subfamily Opuntioideae include:[6]
Cylindropuntieae – round stems
- Cylindropuntia (Engelm.) F.M.Knuth
- Grusonia Rchb.f. ex Britton & Rose
- Pereskiopsis Britton & Rose
- Quiabentia Britton & Rose
Opuntieae – flattened stems
- Brasiliopuntia (K. Schum.) A. Berger
- Consolea Lem.
- Miqueliopuntia Fric ex F. Ritter
- Opuntia Mill.
- Salmonopuntia P.V.Heath
- Tacinga Britton & Rose
- Airampoa Frič
Tephrocacteae – round stems
- Austrocylindropuntia Backeb.
- Cumulopuntia F.Ritter
- Maihueniopsis Speg.
- Tephrocactus Lem.
- Pterocactus K.Schum.
- Punotia D.R.Hunt
Intergeneric Hybrids
- × Opulea M.H.J.van der Meer (Consolea × Opuntia)
Systematics
Current research shows conflicting arguments over the phylogenetic accuracy of the tribes and genera listed above. A major challenge in Opuntioideae classification is that the subfamily is known to hybridize (particularly the Opuntieae tribe), which further complicates how to define at the species level.[7] In addition, the genera within each tribe exhibits variation in morphology, which makes using genetic analysis more important in determining relationships, since defining physical characteristics may be unseen in some genera.[8]
In 2009, a study by Griffith and Porter, based on ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis defined four tribes of Opuntioideae:[4]
- Core Maihueniopsis - which was shown as monophyletic through genetic analysis
- Pterocactus - defined by a winged seed
- Terete-stemmed - defined by cylinder-shaped stems
- Flat-stemmed - defined by flat stems
However, this classification has been questioned by additional research that did not yield the same systematic results. Specifically, there was differences in yielded relationships based on what genetic sequences and analysis was being utilized.[3][9]
In 2010, it was proposed by Nyffeler and Eggli, as part of a larger overhaul of Cactaceae systematics, to only recognize Cylindropuntieae and Opuntieae as true tribes of Opuntioideae, since they are the tribes generally agreed upon to be monophyletic. It was proposed to include all other genera into one polyphyletic basal group until further research concludes more definitive answers to their phylogeny.[10]
See also
References
- ↑ "Family: Cactaceae Juss., nom. cons. subfam. Opuntioideae". Germplasm Resources Information Network. United States Department of Agriculture. 2004-02-13. http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/family.pl?1896.
- ↑ Anderson, Edward F. (2001). The Cactus Family. Portland, OR: Timber Press. ISBN 0881924989.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Ritz, C.M.; Reiker, J.; Charles, G.; Hoxey, P.; Hunt, D.; Lowry, M.; Stuppy, W.; Taylor, N. (2012). "Molecular phylogeny and character evolution in terete-stemmed Andean opuntias (Cactaceae−Opuntioideae)". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 65 (2): 668–681. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2012.07.027. PMID 22877645.
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 Griffith, M. Patrick; Porter, J. Mark (2009-01-01). "Phylogeny of Opuntioideae (Cactaceae)". International Journal of Plant Sciences 170 (1): 107–116. doi:10.1086/593048. ISSN 1058-5893.
- ↑ Mauseth, James D. (2005-12-01). "Anatomical features, other than wood, in subfamily opuntioideae (cactaceae)". Haseltonia 11: 113–125. doi:10.2985/1070-0048(2005)11[113:afotwi2.0.co;2]. ISSN 1070-0048.
- ↑ "GRIN Genera of Cactaceae subfam. Opuntioideae". Germplasm Resources Information Network. United States Department of Agriculture. http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/gnlist.pl?1896.
- ↑ Majure, Lucas; Judd, Walter; Soltis, Pam; Soltis, Doug (2012-02-14). "Cytogeography of the Humifusa clade of Opuntia s.s. Mill. 1754 (Cactaceae, Opuntioideae, Opuntieae): correlations with pleistocene refugia and morphological traits in a polyploid complex". Comparative Cytogenetics 6 (1): 53–77. doi:10.3897/compcytogen.v6i1.2523. ISSN 1993-078X. PMID 24260652.
- ↑ Bárcenas, Rolando T. (August 2016). "A molecular phylogenetic approach to the systematics of Cylindropuntieae (Opuntioideae, Cactaceae)" (in en). Cladistics 32 (4): 351–359. doi:10.1111/cla.12135.
- ↑ Hernandez-Hernandez, T.; Hernandez, H. M.; De-Nova, J. A.; Puente, R.; Eguiarte, L. E.; Magallon, S. (2010-12-23). "Phylogenetic relationships and evolution of growth form in Cactaceae (Caryophyllales, Eudicotyledoneae)". American Journal of Botany 98 (1): 44–61. doi:10.3732/ajb.1000129. ISSN 0002-9122. PMID 21613084.
- ↑ Nyffeler, Retro, Eggli, Urs (2010). "A Farewell to Dated Ideas and Concepts: Molecular Phylogenetics and a Revised Suprageneric Classification of the family Cactaceae". Schumannia 6: 109–149. https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/43285/1/Nyffeler1.pdf.
Wikidata ☰ Q901099 entry
 |  |
