Cartesian fibration

From HandWiki

In mathematics, especially homotopy theory, a cartesian fibration is, roughly, a map so that every lift exists that is a final object among all lifts. For example, the forgetful functor

QCoh→Sch

from the category of pairs (X,F) of schemes and quasi-coherent sheaves on them is a cartesian fibration (see § Basic example). In fact, the Grothendieck construction says all cartesian fibrations are of this type; i.e., they simply forget extra data. See also: fibred category, prestack.

The dual of a cartesian fibration is called an op-fibration; in particular, not a cocartesian fibration.

A right fibration between simplicial sets is an example of a cartesian fibration.

Definition

Given a functor π:C→S, a morphism f:x→y in C is called π-cartesian or simply cartesian if the natural map

(f*,π):Hom⁡(z,x)→Hom⁡(z,y)×Hom⁡(π(z),π(y))Hom⁡(π(z),π(x))

is bijective.[1][2] Explicitly, thus, f:x→y is cartesian if given

  • g:z→y and
  • u:π(z)→π(x)

with π(g)=π(f)∘u, there exists a unique g′:z→x in π−1(u) such that f∘g′=g.

Then π is called a cartesian fibration if for each morphism of the form f:s→π(z) in S, there exists a π-cartesian morphism g:a→z in C such that π(g)=f.[3] Here, the object a is unique up to unique isomorphisms (if b→z is another lift, there is a unique b→a, which is shown to be an isomorphism). Because of this, the object a is often thought of as the pullback of z and is sometimes even denoted as f*z.[4] Also, somehow informally, g is said to be a final object among all lifts of f.

A morphism φ:π→ρ between cartesian fibrations over the same base S is a map (functor) over the base; i.e., π=ρ∘φ that sends cartesian morphisms to cartesian morphisms.[5] Given φ,ψ:π→ρ, a 2-morphism θ:φ→ψ is an invertible map (map = natural transformation) such that for each object E in the source of π, θE:φ(E)→ψ(E) maps to the identity map of the object ρ(φ(E))=ρ(ψ(E)) under ρ.

This way, all the cartesian fibrations over the fixed base category S determine the (2, 1)-category denoted by Cart⁡(S).[6]

Basic example

Let QCoh be the category where

  • an object is a pair (X,F) of a scheme X and a quasi-coherent sheaf F on it,
  • a morphism f‾:(X,F)→(Y,G) consists of a morphism f:X→Y of schemes and a sheaf homomorphism φf:f*G→∼F on X,
  • the composition g‾∘f‾ of g‾:(Y,G)→(Z,H) and above f‾ is the (unique) morphism h‾ such that h=g∘f and φh is
    (g∘f)*H≃f*g*H→f*φgf*G→φfF.

To see the forgetful map

π:QCoh⁡→Sch

is a cartesian fibration,[7] let f:X→π((Y,G)) be in QCoh. Take

f‾=(f,φf):(X,F)→(Y,G)

with F=f*G and φf=id. We claim f‾ is cartesian. Given g‾:(Z,H)→(Y,G) and h:Z→X with g=f∘h, if φh exists such that g‾=f‾∘h‾, then we have φg is

(f∘h)*G≃h*f*G=h*F→φhH.

So, the required h‾ trivially exists and is unqiue.

Note some authors consider QCoh≃, the core of QCoh instead. In that case, the forgetful map restricted to it is also a cartesian fibration.

Grothendieck construction

Given a category S, the Grothendieck construction gives an equivalence of ∞-categories between Cart⁡(S) and the ∞-category of prestacks on S (prestacks = category-valued presheaves).[8]

Roughly, the construction goes as follows: given a cartesian fibration π, we let Fπ:Sop→Cat be the map that sends each object x in S to the fiber π−1(x). So, Fπ is a Cat-valued presheaf or a prestack. Conversely, given a prestack F, define the category CF where an object is a pair (x,a) with a∈F(x) and then let π be the forgetful functor to S. Then these two assignments give the claimed equivalence.

For example, if the construction is applied to the forgetful π:QCoh→Sch, then we get the map X↦QCoh(X) that sends a scheme X to the category of quasi-coherent sheaves on X. Conversely, π is determined by such a map.

Lurie's straightening theorem generalizes the above equivalence to the equivalence between the ∞-category of cartesian fibrations over some ∞-category C and the ∞-category of ∞-prestacks on C.[9]

See also

  • fibered category

Footnotes

  1. ↑ Kerodon, Definition 5.0.0.1.
  2. ↑ Khan 2022, Definition 3.1.1.
  3. ↑ Khan 2022, Definition 3.1.2.
  4. ↑ Vistoli 2008, Definition 3.1. and § 3.1.2.
  5. ↑ Vistoli 2008, Definition 3.6.
  6. ↑ Khan 2022, Construction 3.1.4.
  7. ↑ Khan 2022, Example 3.1.3.
  8. ↑ Khan 2022, Theorem 3.1.5.
  9. ↑ An introduction in Louis Martini, Cocartesian fibrations and straightening internal to an ∞-topos [arXiv:2204.00295]

References

  • Khan, Adeel A. (2022). "A modern introduction to algebraic stacks". https://www.preschema.com/lecture-notes/2022-stacks/. 
  • "Kerodon". https://kerodon.net/. 
  • Mazel-Gee, Aaron (2015). "A user's guide to co/cartesian fibrations". arXiv:1510.02402 [math.CT].
  • Vistoli, Angelo (September 2, 2008). "Notes on Grothendieck topologies, fibered categories and descent theory". http://homepage.sns.it/vistoli/descent.pdf. 

Further reading