Company:List of former IA-32 compatible processor manufacturers

From HandWiki
Short description: none

As the 32-bit Intel Architecture became the dominant computing platform during the 1980s and 1990s, multiple companies have tried to build microprocessors that are compatible with that Intel instruction set architecture. Most of these companies were not successful in the mainstream computing market. So far, only AMD has had any market presence in the computing market for more than a couple of product generations. Cyrix was successful during the 386 and 486 generations of products but did not do well after the Pentium was introduced.

List of former IA-32 compatible microprocessor vendors:

Progressed into surviving companies

Product discontinued/transformed

  • Harris Corporation – sold radiation-hardened versions of the 8086 and 80286; product line discontinued. Produced 20 MHz and 25 MHz 80286s (some motherboards were equipped with cache memory, which was unusual for 80286 processors).
  • NEC – sold processors, such as NEC V20 and NEC V30, that were compatible with early Intel 16-bit architectures; product line transitioned to NEC-designed architectures.
  • Siemens – sold versions of the 8086 and 80286; product line discontinued.
  • VM Technology – developed VM860 (8086-compatible processor) and VM8600SP (386-compatible processor) for the Japanese market.[1][2][3]

Left the market or closed

Incomplete/unsuccessful projects

  • Chromatic Researchmedia processor with x86 instruction set compatibility never completed
  • Exponential Technology – x86-compatible microprocessor never completed[4]
  • IIT Corp – 486-compatible project never completed[5][6]
  • International Meta Systems – Pentium/PPro-class processors "Meta 6000", "Meta 6500", "Meta 7000/BiFrost" never completed[7]
  • MemoryLogix – multi-threaded CPU core "MLX1" and SOC for PCs never completed[8][9]
  • Metaflow Technologies – 486-class processor "CP100" never released[10][11][12]
  • Montalvo Systems – asymmetric multiprocessor never completed[9]
  • ULSI System Technology – never completed x86 SOC; company shut down after one of their employees was convicted for stealing Intel floating-point x87 design documents
  • VLSI Technology - developed 386SX-based "Polar" SoC in collaboration with Intel[13] - cancelled due to low performance and lack of software support[14]

See also

References

  1. "KAY NISHI's VM TECHNOLOGY HAS 80386-COMPATIBLE CHIP…". CBR. May 4, 1988. https://techmonitor.ai/technology/kay_nishis_vm_technology_has_80386_compatible_chip. 
  2. Komatsu, N.. "VM8600SP" (in Japanese). http://www.st.rim.or.jp/~nkomatsu/miscproc/VM8600.html. 
  3. "OASYS LX-4500" (in Japanese). http://chimaki29q.com/ct/mono/pc/lx.htm.  Laptop using the VM867S CPU
  4. "EVSX Emerges from Exponential Ashes". Microprocessor Report. December 29, 1997. http://www.cecs.uci.edu/~papers/mpr/MPR/19971229/1117msb.pdf. 
  5. "PC Market Centers On Growing 486 Family". Microprocessor Report 8 (1). January 24, 1994. http://www.cecs.uci.edu/~papers/mpr/MPR/ARTICLES/080101.pdf.  Mentions IIT as developing a 486-class CPU for release in 1994.
  6. "National Pushes 486 into Embedded Market". Microprocessor Report 9 (12). September 11, 1995. http://www.cecs.uci.edu/~papers/mpr/MPR/ARTICLES/091201.pdf.  Mentions NatSemi's licensing technology from IIT for its own NS486 processor.
  7. "Products". http://www.imes.com/products.html. 
  8. Peter Song, "MLX1 - A Tiny Multithreaded 586 Core for Smart Mobile Devices". https://dada.cs.washington.edu/smt/memoryLogix.pdf. 
  9. 9.0 9.1 "A Tale Of Two Companies". Linley Newsletter. The Linley Group. May 27, 2008. https://www.linleygroup.com/newsletters/newsletter_detail.php?num=4139. 
  10. "CP100 High Performance 32-bit x86 Core". http://www.metaflow.com/html/cp100core.htm. 
  11. "New processor drives STM buyout of Metaflow". 1997. http://www.eet.com/news/97/957news/drives.html. 
  12. Smotherman, Mark (February 2011). "Metaflow - Lightning/Thunder SPARC designs, x86 designs". https://people.computing.clemson.edu/~mark/metaflow.html. 
  13. Byte (magazine), January 1994, pp. 101-104
  14. "What’s Happened to the PDA Market?". Microprocessor Report 8 (12). September 12, 1994. https://www.cecs.uci.edu/~papers/mpr/MPR/EDITOR/0812ed.pdf.