Comparison of H.264 and VC-1

Short description: None

H.264 and VC-1 are two competing video compression standards.

Overview

	VC-1	H.264
Goals	Designed to offer very high image quality with excellent compression efficiency	-	Example industry use	Supports 4:2:0 compression / color space	Supports studio archiving requirements with 4:4:4 color space; separate black and white (BW) video mode
Licensing costs	Similar
Documentation	Not free. Reference decoder, comes with external documentation.	? AVC/H264 Licensing costs and terms from MPEG LA. Reference encoder and decoder free as well. Additionally, JVT & M4IF mailing lists are available where one may receive answers on AVC related questions.

Terminology

All sources for the below information are from the respective specifications listed in the overview section.

Feature	VC-1	H.264
Partition sizes	16×16 and 8×8	-	Integer transform	8×8, 4×8, 8×4, and 4×4	4×4; 8×8 available in High Profile only
Frame	Used for progressive or interlaced content
Macroblock sizes	16×16 only
Motion vector	Two dimensional vector offset from current position to reference frame
Picture	A field or frame
Skipped macroblock	No data is encoded for macroblock

Features

	VC-1	H.264
Bitstream formats	single bit stream	NAL and byte stream
Bitstream format	In advanced profile, each Bitstream Data Unit has its own header. Simple and Main profile provide neither sequence nor entry point headers.	SPS (sequence parameter set), PPS (picture parameters set), slice header, macroblock
Deblocking filter	In-loop filter and overlap transform	In-loop only
CABAC	No	Only supported in Main and higher profiles
Variable transform size	Yes	Only in High profile and above
Slice	Contiguous (integer number of macroblock rows only)	Contiguous or non-contiguous
Sub-pixel interpolation methods	bicubic, bilinear	6-tap filter for half pixels; averaging for quarter pixels
Variable Length Coding	Yes
B frame used for predicting other pictures	Yes

Adoption

H.264 is by far the most commonly used format for the recording, compression, and distribution of video content, used by 79% of video industry developers as of December 2024.

External links

• AVC/H264 Licensing costs and terms from MPEG LA
• EEtimes comparison of video codecs [1]
• Codec challenge comparison on Doom9 with professional VC1 encoder, PeP, and x264 for H264 => x264 win the first round
• Microsoft employee discusses differences between VC-1 and H.264
• Comparison at Doom9

{{Navbox |name = Video processing |title = Video processing |state = autocollapse |listclass = hlist |basestyle = text-align:center;

|group1 = Post-processing |list1 =

• Deblocking
• Resizing
  • Comparison
• Deinterlacing
• Denoising
• Deflicking

|group2 = Special processing |list2 =

• [[Engineering:Film colorizatFilm colorization (tinting)
• Color grading
• Film look
• Super-resolution imaging
• Uncompressed
• Pixel art scaling

|group3 = 24 to 30 fps conversion |list3 =

• Telecine (3:2 pulldown)

|group4 = 30 to 24 fps conversion |list4 =

• Inverse telecine

}}