Convex measure

From HandWiki

In measure and probability theory in mathematics, a convex measure is a probability measure that — loosely put — does not assign more mass to any intermediate set "between" two measurable sets A and B than it does to A or B individually. There are multiple ways in which the comparison between the probabilities of A and B and the intermediate set can be made, leading to multiple definitions of convexity, such as log-concavity, harmonic convexity, and so on. The mathematician Christer Borell was a pioneer of the detailed study of convex measures on locally convex spaces in the 1970s.[1][2]

General definition and special cases

Let X be a locally convex Hausdorff vector space, and consider a probability measure μ on the Borel σ-algebra of X. Fix −∞ ≤ s ≤ 0, and define, for u, v ≥ 0 and 0 ≤ λ ≤ 1,

[math]\displaystyle{ M_{s, \lambda}(u, v) = \begin{cases} (\lambda u^s + (1 - \lambda) v^{s})^{1/s} & \text{if } - \infty \lt s \lt 0, \\ \min(u, v) & \text{if } s = - \infty, \\ u^{\lambda} v^{1- \lambda} & \text{if } s = 0. \end{cases} }[/math]

For subsets A and B of X, we write

[math]\displaystyle{ \lambda A + (1 - \lambda) B = \{ \lambda x + ( 1 - \lambda ) y \mid x \in A, y \in B \} }[/math]

for their Minkowski sum. With this notation, the measure μ is said to be s-convex[1] if, for all Borel-measurable subsets A and B of X and all 0 ≤ λ ≤ 1,

[math]\displaystyle{ \mu(\lambda A + (1 - \lambda) B) \geq M_{s, \lambda}(\mu(A), \mu(B)). }[/math]

The special case s = 0 is the inequality

[math]\displaystyle{ \mu(\lambda A + (1 - \lambda) B) \geq \mu(A)^{\lambda} \mu(B)^{1 - \lambda}, }[/math]

i.e.

[math]\displaystyle{ \log \mu(\lambda A + (1 - \lambda) B) \geq \lambda \log \mu(A) + (1 - \lambda) \log \mu(B). }[/math]

Thus, a measure being 0-convex is the same thing as it being a logarithmically concave measure.

Properties

The classes of s-convex measures form a nested increasing family as s decreases to −∞"

[math]\displaystyle{ s \leq t \text{ and } \mu \text{ is } t \text{-convex} \implies \mu \text{ is } s \text{-convex} }[/math]

or, equivalently

[math]\displaystyle{ s \leq t \implies \{ s \text{-convex measures} \} \supseteq \{ t \text{-convex measures} \}. }[/math]

Thus, the collection of −∞-convex measures is the largest such class, whereas the 0-convex measures (the logarithmically concave measures) are the smallest class.

The convexity of a measure μ on n-dimensional Euclidean space Rn in the sense above is closely related to the convexity of its probability density function.[2] Indeed, μ is s-convex if and only if there is an absolutely continuous measure ν with probability density function ρ on some Rk so that μ is the push-forward on ν under a linear or affine map and [math]\displaystyle{ e_{s, k} \circ \rho \colon \mathbb{R}^{k} \to \mathbb{R} }[/math] is a convex function, where

[math]\displaystyle{ e_{s, k}(t) = \begin{cases} t^{s / (1 - s k)} & \text{if } -\infty \lt s \lt 0 \\ t^{-1/k} & \text{if } s = - \infty, \\ - \log t & \text{if } s = 0.\end{cases} }[/math]

Convex measures also satisfy a zero-one law: if G is a measurable additive subgroup of the vector space X (i.e. a measurable linear subspace), then the inner measure of G under μ,

[math]\displaystyle{ \mu_{\ast}(G) = \sup \{ \mu(K) \mid K \subseteq G \text{ and } K \text{ is compact} \}, }[/math]

must be 0 or 1. (In the case that μ is a Radon measure, and hence inner regular, the measure μ and its inner measure coincide, so the μ-measure of G is then 0 or 1.)[1]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Borell, Christer (1974). "Convex measures on locally convex spaces". Ark. Mat. 12 (1–2): 239–252. doi:10.1007/BF02384761. ISSN 0004-2080. 
  2. 2.0 2.1 Borell, Christer (1975). "Convex set functions in d-space". Period. Math. Hungar. 6 (2): 111–136. doi:10.1007/BF02018814. ISSN 0031-5303.