Convex position

From HandWiki

In discrete and computational geometry, a set of points in the Euclidean plane or a higher-dimensional Euclidean space is said to be in convex position or convex independent if none of the points can be represented as a convex combination of the others.[1] A finite set of points is in convex position if all of the points are vertices of their convex hull.[1] More generally, a family of convex sets is said to be in convex position if they are pairwise disjoint and none of them is contained in the convex hull of the others.[2] An assumption of convex position can make certain computational problems easier to solve. For instance, the traveling salesman problem, NP-hard for arbitrary sets of points in the plane, is trivial for points in convex position: the optimal tour is the convex hull.[3] Similarly, the minimum-weight triangulation of planar point sets is NP-hard for arbitrary point sets,[4] but solvable in polynomial time by dynamic programming for points in convex position.[5]

The Erdős–Szekeres theorem guarantees that every set of [math]\displaystyle{ n }[/math] points in general position (no three in a line) in two or more dimensions has at least a logarithmic number of points in convex position.[6] If [math]\displaystyle{ n }[/math] points are chosen uniformly at random in a unit square, the probability that they are in convex position is[7] [math]\displaystyle{ \left(\binom{2n-2}{n-1}/n!\right)^2. }[/math]

The McMullen problem asks for the maximum number [math]\displaystyle{ \nu(d) }[/math] such that every set of [math]\displaystyle{ \nu(d) }[/math] points in general position in a [math]\displaystyle{ d }[/math]-dimensional projective space has a projective transformation to a set in convex position. Known bounds are [math]\displaystyle{ 2d+1\le\nu(d)\le 2d+\lceil(d+1)/2\rceil }[/math].[8]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Lectures on Discrete Geometry, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, 2002, p. 30, ISBN 978-0-387-95373-1, https://books.google.com/books?id=0N5RVe5lKQUC&pg=PA30 
  2. Tóth, Géza; Valtr, Pavel (2005), "The Erdős-Szekeres theorem: upper bounds and related results", Combinatorial and computational geometry, Math. Sci. Res. Inst. Publ., 52, Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, pp. 557–568 
  3. Deĭneko, Vladimir G.; Hoffmann, Michael; Okamoto, Yoshio (2006), "The traveling salesman problem with few inner points", Operations Research Letters 34 (1): 106–110, doi:10.1016/j.orl.2005.01.002 
  4. Mulzer, Wolfgang; Rote, Günter (2008), "Minimum-weight triangulation is NP-hard", Journal of the ACM 55 (2): Article A11, doi:10.1145/1346330.1346336 
  5. Klincsek, G. T. (1980), "Minimal triangulations of polygonal domains", Annals of Discrete Mathematics 9: 121–123, doi:10.1016/s0167-5060(08)70044-x, ISBN 9780444861115 
  6. "A combinatorial problem in geometry", Compositio Mathematica 2: 463–470, 1935, http://www.numdam.org/item?id=CM_1935__2__463_0 
  7. Valtr, P. (1995), "Probability that n random points are in convex position", Discrete & Computational Geometry 13 (3–4): 637–643, doi:10.1007/BF02574070 
  8. Forge, David (2001), "10 points in dimension 4 not projectively equivalent to the vertices of a convex polytope", European Journal of Combinatorics 22 (5): 705–708, doi:10.1006/eujc.2000.0490