Dedekind-finite ring

From HandWiki
Short description: Mathematical concept

In mathematics, a ring is said to be a Dedekind-finite ring (also called directly finite rings[1][2][3] and Von Neumann finite rings[4][2][3]) if ab = 1 implies ba = 1 for any two ring elements a and b. In other words, all one-sided inverses in the ring are two-sided. Numerous examples of Dedekind-finite rings include commutative rings, finite rings, and Noetherian rings.

Definitions

A ring R is Dedekind-finite if any of the following equivalent conditions hold:[3] * All one sided inverses are two sided: xy=1 implies yx=1.

  • Each element that has a right inverse has a left inverse: For xR, if there is a yR where xy=1, then there is a zR such that zx=1.
  • Capacity condition: xy=1, xz=0 implies z=0.
  • Each element has at most one right inverse.
  • Each element that has a left inverse has a right inverse.
  • Dual of the capacity condition: yx=1, zx=0 implies z=0.
  • Each element has at most one left inverse.
  • Each element that has a right inverse also has a two sided inverse.

Examples

Non-examples

A counter-example can be constructed by considering the free algebra Rx,y (a "polynomial ring" in two non-commuting indeterminates, that is, xyyx), where the ring R has no zero divisors, being divided by the ideal I=(xy1). Then x+IRx,y/I has a right inverse but is not invertible. This illustrates that Dedekind-finite rings need not be closed under homomorpic images.[2]

Another non-example is the endomorphism ring End(V) of a vector space (or free module) V with a countably infinite basis e1,e2,. Let LEnd(V) be the left shift defined by L(e1)=0 and L(ei)=ei1 for i2, and let REnd(V) be the right shift R(ei)=ei+1. Then LR=1, but RL(e1)=0.[4]

A matrix ring over a Dedekind-finite ring may also fail to be Dedekind-finite. For this, one can consider R=ks,t,u,v,w,x,y,z, where k is a field, let A=(stuv), B=(wxyz), and J the two-sided ideal of R generated by the entries of ABI. Then R/J is a domain, but AB=IBA in M2(R/J).[5]

Properties

Dedekind-finite rings are closed under subrings[1][2] , direct products,[3][2] and finite direct sums.[2] This makes the class of Dedekind-finite rings a quasivariety, which can also be seen from the fact that its axioms are equations and the Horn sentence ab=1ba=1.[2] A ring is Dedekind-finite if and only if so is its opposite ring.[2] If either a ring R, its polynomial ring R[X] with indeterminates X, the free word algebra R[X~] over X with coefficients in R, or the power series ring RX are Dedekind-finite, then they all are Dedekind-finite.[2] Letting Rad(R) denote the Jacobson radical of the ring R, the quotient ring R/Rad(R) is Dedekind-finite if and only if so is R, and this implies that local rings and semilocal rings are also Dedekind-finite.[2] This extends to the fact that, given a ring R and a nilpotent ideal I, the ring R is Dedekind-finite if and only if so is the quotient ring R/I,[2] and as a consequence, a ring is also Dedekind-finite if and only if the upper triangular matrices with coeffecients in the ring also form a Dedekind-finite ring.[2]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Goodearl, Kenneth (1976) (in en). Ring Theory: Nonsingular Rings and Modules. CRC Press. pp. 165–166. ISBN 978-0-8247-6354-1. https://books.google.com/books?id=5FKzb7LZMvAC&dq=%22directly+finite+rings%22&pg=PA166. 
  2. 2.00 2.01 2.02 2.03 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.09 2.10 2.11 2.12 Breaz, Simion; Călugăreanu, Grigore; Schultz, Phill, Modules with Dedekind Finite Endomorphism Rings 
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 Riis, Søren (5 July 2015), Network Communication with operators in Dedekind Finite and Stably Finite Rings 
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 Lam, T. Y. (2012-12-06) (in en). A First Course in Noncommutative Rings. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 978-1-4684-0406-7. https://books.google.com/books?id=2PwGCAAAQBAJ. 
  5. Lam, Tsit-Yuen (2007), Exercises in modules and rings, Problem Books in Mathematics, Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag, p. 11, ISBN 978-0-387-98850-4 

See also