Disintegration theorem

From HandWiki
Short description: Theorem in measure theory

In mathematics, the disintegration theorem is a result in measure theory and probability theory. It rigorously defines the idea of a non-trivial "restriction" of a measure to a measure zero subset of the measure space in question. It is related to the existence of conditional probability measures. In a sense, "disintegration" is the opposite process to the construction of a product measure.


Consider the unit square in the Euclidean plane R2, S = [0, 1] × [0, 1]. Consider the probability measure μ defined on S by the restriction of two-dimensional Lebesgue measure λ2 to S. That is, the probability of an event ES is simply the area of E. We assume E is a measurable subset of S.

Consider a one-dimensional subset of S such as the line segment Lx = {x} × [0, 1]. Lx has μ-measure zero; every subset of Lx is a μ-null set; since the Lebesgue measure space is a complete measure space, [math]\displaystyle{ E \subseteq L_{x} \implies \mu (E) = 0. }[/math]

While true, this is somewhat unsatisfying. It would be nice to say that μ "restricted to" Lx is the one-dimensional Lebesgue measure λ1, rather than the zero measure. The probability of a "two-dimensional" event E could then be obtained as an integral of the one-dimensional probabilities of the vertical "slices" ELx: more formally, if μx denotes one-dimensional Lebesgue measure on Lx, then [math]\displaystyle{ \mu (E) = \int_{[0, 1]} \mu_{x} (E \cap L_{x}) \, \mathrm{d} x }[/math] for any "nice" ES. The disintegration theorem makes this argument rigorous in the context of measures on metric spaces.

Statement of the theorem

(Hereafter, P(X) will denote the collection of Borel probability measures on a topological space (X, T).) The assumptions of the theorem are as follows:

  • Let Y and X be two Radon spaces (i.e. a topological space such that every Borel probability measure on M is inner regular e.g. separable metric spaces on which every probability measure is a Radon measure).
  • Let μ ∈ P(Y).
  • Let π : YX be a Borel-measurable function. Here one should think of π as a function to "disintegrate" Y, in the sense of partitioning Y into [math]\displaystyle{ \{ \pi^{-1}(x)\ |\ x \in X\} }[/math]. For example, for the motivating example above, one can define [math]\displaystyle{ \pi((a,b)) = a, (a,b) \in [0,1]\times [0,1] }[/math], which gives that [math]\displaystyle{ \pi^{-1}(a) = a \times [0,1] }[/math], a slice we want to capture.
  • Let [math]\displaystyle{ \nu }[/math]P(X) be the pushforward measure ν = π(μ) = μ ∘ π−1. This measure provides the distribution of x (which corresponds to the events [math]\displaystyle{ \pi^{-1}(x) }[/math]).

The conclusion of the theorem: There exists a [math]\displaystyle{ \nu }[/math]-almost everywhere uniquely determined family of probability measures {μx}xXP(Y), which provides a "disintegration" of [math]\displaystyle{ \mu }[/math] into [math]\displaystyle{ \{\mu_x\}_{x \in X} }[/math], such that:

  • the function [math]\displaystyle{ x \mapsto \mu_{x} }[/math] is Borel measurable, in the sense that [math]\displaystyle{ x \mapsto \mu_{x} (B) }[/math] is a Borel-measurable function for each Borel-measurable set BY;
  • μx "lives on" the fiber π−1(x): for [math]\displaystyle{ \nu }[/math]-almost all xX, [math]\displaystyle{ \mu_{x} \left( Y \setminus \pi^{-1} (x) \right) = 0, }[/math] and so μx(E) = μx(E ∩ π−1(x));
  • for every Borel-measurable function f : Y → [0, ∞], [math]\displaystyle{ \int_{Y} f(y) \, \mathrm{d} \mu (y) = \int_{X} \int_{\pi^{-1} (x)} f(y) \, \mathrm{d} \mu_{x} (y) \mathrm{d} \nu (x). }[/math] In particular, for any event EY, taking f to be the indicator function of E,[1] [math]\displaystyle{ \mu (E) = \int_{X} \mu_{x} \left( E \right) \, \mathrm{d} \nu (x). }[/math]


Product spaces

The original example was a special case of the problem of product spaces, to which the disintegration theorem applies.

When Y is written as a Cartesian product Y = X1 × X2 and πi : YXi is the natural projection, then each fibre π1−1(x1) can be canonically identified with X2 and there exists a Borel family of probability measures [math]\displaystyle{ \{ \mu_{x_{1}} \}_{x_{1} \in X_{1}} }[/math] in P(X2) (which is (π1)(μ)-almost everywhere uniquely determined) such that [math]\displaystyle{ \mu = \int_{X_{1}} \mu_{x_{1}} \, \mu \left(\pi_1^{-1}(\mathrm d x_1) \right)= \int_{X_{1}} \mu_{x_{1}} \, \mathrm{d} (\pi_{1})_{*} (\mu) (x_{1}), }[/math] which is in particular[clarification needed] [math]\displaystyle{ \int_{X_1\times X_2} f(x_1,x_2)\, \mu(\mathrm d x_1,\mathrm d x_2) = \int_{X_1}\left( \int_{X_2} f(x_1,x_2) \mu(\mathrm d x_2|x_1) \right) \mu\left( \pi_1^{-1}(\mathrm{d} x_{1})\right) }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ \mu(A \times B) = \int_A \mu\left(B|x_1\right) \, \mu\left( \pi_1^{-1}(\mathrm{d} x_{1})\right). }[/math]

The relation to conditional expectation is given by the identities [math]\displaystyle{ \operatorname E(f|\pi_1)(x_1)= \int_{X_2} f(x_1,x_2) \mu(\mathrm d x_2|x_1), }[/math] [math]\displaystyle{ \mu(A\times B|\pi_1)(x_1)= 1_A(x_1) \cdot \mu(B| x_1). }[/math]

Vector calculus

The disintegration theorem can also be seen as justifying the use of a "restricted" measure in vector calculus. For instance, in Stokes' theorem as applied to a vector field flowing through a compact surface Σ ⊂ R3, it is implicit that the "correct" measure on Σ is the disintegration of three-dimensional Lebesgue measure λ3 on Σ, and that the disintegration of this measure on ∂Σ is the same as the disintegration of λ3 on ∂Σ.[2]

Conditional distributions

The disintegration theorem can be applied to give a rigorous treatment of conditional probability distributions in statistics, while avoiding purely abstract formulations of conditional probability.[3]

See also


  1. Dellacherie, C.; Meyer, P.-A. (1978). Probabilities and Potential. North-Holland Mathematics Studies. Amsterdam: North-Holland. ISBN 0-7204-0701-X. 
  2. Ambrosio, L., Gigli, N. & Savaré, G. (2005). Gradient Flows in Metric Spaces and in the Space of Probability Measures. ETH Zürich, Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel. ISBN 978-3-7643-2428-5. 
  3. Chang, J.T.; Pollard, D. (1997). "Conditioning as disintegration". Statistica Neerlandica 51 (3): 287. doi:10.1111/1467-9574.00056. http://www.stat.yale.edu/~jtc5/papers/ConditioningAsDisintegration.pdf.