Earth:CO2 is Green
CO2 is Green is a non-profit organization supporting public policy on environmental issues that rejects science of climate change. A main focus of the organization are federal proposals that may “interfere with natures dependence on carbon dioxide.” CO2 is Green does not view carbon dioxide as a pollutant and advocates for federal law and regulations to support this thinking.
Founders and funding
The CO2 is Green campaign was produced by H. Leighton Steward and Corbin Robertson. Steward retired in 2000, and was the vice chairman of Burlington Resources, a Houston-based oil and gas company bought by ConocoPhillips in 2006.[1] Robertson, the CEO of Natural Resource Partners, an owner of coal resources based in Houston. Mufson also stated that Steward and Robertson had started the campaign with about $1 million, and that both CO2 is Green and a related organization, Plants Need CO2, has applied for 501c3 status. As to the reason he launched the campaign, Steward said, "I'm not getting a penny for this," and "It's just something I thought people should know."[2] Additionally, according to Kate Sheppard, Steward is also the honorary director of the American Petroleum Institute.[3]
Reception
The organization denies scientific evidence for global warming and argues against proposed actions to mitigate global warming. To this end, the organization has purchased ads in major newspapers, such as the Washington Post, as well as television ads, both of which argue that proposed measures to reduce carbon dioxide emissions would have deleterious economic effects, that carbon dioxide is not the main cause of global warming, and that, in keeping with the organization's name, increasing levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide would have positive environmental effects--for example, the TV ad states that "higher CO2 levels than we have today would help the Earth's ecosystems,"[2] and the ad in the Washington Post states that the Waxman-Markey bill "is based on the false premise that man-made CO2 is a major cause of climate change," but "Real, empirical evidence indicates it is not."[4] The ads have been met with much criticism; for example, Leo Hickman wrote that the ad "would be almost funny if it weren't so depressing."[5]
See also
- Individual and political action on climate change
- US Climate Symposium
- Merchants of Doubt
- The Climate Reality Project
- 350.org
References
- ↑ "H. Leighton Steward". http://www.desmogblog.com/h-leighton-steward. Retrieved 19 February 2015.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Mufson, Steven (25 September 2009). "New Groups Revive the Debate Over Causes of Climate Change". Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/24/AR2009092404797.html. Retrieved 20 January 2014.
- ↑ Sheppard, Kate (25 September 2009). "New Front Group: "CO2 is Green"". Mother Jones. https://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2009/09/new-front-group-promotes-idea-co2-green. Retrieved 20 January 2014.
- ↑ Mulkern, Anne C. (14 July 2010). "Ads Backed by Fossil-Fuel Interests Argue 'CO2 Is Green'". New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/gwire/2010/07/14/14greenwire-ads-backed-by-fossil-fuel-interests-argue-co2-79814.html. Retrieved 20 January 2014.
- ↑ Hickman, Leo (28 September 2009). "CO2 is green: the TV advert making viewers choke". The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/blog/2009/sep/28/co2-is-green-tv-advert. Retrieved 24 February 2014.
 |
