Engineering:Kosmos 1402
| Mission type | Ocean reconnaissance |
|---|---|
| COSPAR ID | 1982-084A |
| SATCAT no. | 13441 |
| Spacecraft properties | |
| Spacecraft type | US-A |
| BOL mass | 3,000 pounds (1,400 kg) |
| Power | 2 kW BES-5 fission reactor |
| Start of mission | |
| Launch date | 30 August 1982, 10:06 UTC[1] |
| Rocket | Tsyklon-2 |
| Launch site | Tyuratam missile and space complex (now Baikonur launchpad 90) |
| End of mission | |
| Disposal | Decommissioned |
| Decay date | 23 January 1983 Reactor: 7 February 1983 |
| Orbital parameters | |
| Reference system | Geocentric |
| Regime | Low Earth |
| Eccentricity | 0.00188 |
| Perigee altitude | 251 kilometres (156 mi) |
| Apogee altitude | 263 kilometres (163 mi) |
| Inclination | 65.6 degrees |
| Period | 89.64 minutes |
| Epoch | 29 September 1982[2] |
Kosmos 1402 (Russian: Космос 1402) was a Soviet spy satellite that malfunctioned, resulting in the uncontrolled re-entry of its nuclear reactor and its radioactive uranium fuel. Kosmos 1402 was launched on August 30, 1982, and re-entered the atmosphere on 23 January 1983. The fission reactor entered a few days later; on 7 February 1983.
Kosmos 1402 was a RORSAT surveillance satellite that used radar for monitoring NATO vessels. The power source for the satellite was a BES-5 nuclear fission reactor, which used about 50 kilograms (110 lb) of enriched uranium as a fuel source. The satellite operated in low Earth orbit, and the reactor was designed to eject to a higher parking orbit at the end of the satellite's mission, or in the event of a mishap. This ejection mechanism was implemented in the RORSAT satellites after a nuclear accident caused by a previous malfunction of Kosmos 954, five years earlier over Canada's Northwest Territories.[3]
In response to the Kosmos 954 mishap, RORSAT satellites were modified with an ejection system for their nuclear reactors. This ejection system would allow the reactor section to be ejected in the event of a malfunction, or at the end of the satellite's service life, so the radioactive core could be placed in a disposal orbit (about 1000 km), where the fuel would remain for 500 years.[4]
Accident
On 28 December 1982, the ejection system in Kosmos 1402 failed to adequately jettison the reactor to a higher orbit, and the satellite split into three parts and began to tumble out of control.[5] The three main sub-components were the reactor with its booster engine, the instrument section of the satellite with the expended second stage of the launch vehicle, and the radar antenna.[4]
If the uranium core were to explode or shatter in the atmosphere, and radioactive fragments fell near a populated area, the resulting nuclear contamination could have caused a significant and widespread hazard.[5][6] Because of this concern, the soviet engineers had re-designed the reactor to completely burn up in the atmosphere, so that nothing would reach the ground. But this information was not verified by other countries at the time.[7][8]
The uncertainty of the reentry location and time, coupled with concerns of radioactive contamination, triggered many countries to place emergency response teams on high alert. Military aircraft, ships, and personnel were mobilized in anticipation. Countries with response plans included United States, Canada, Belgium, Australia,[6] Oman, UAE, West Germany, France and Sweden.[9]
The antenna section was the first part of the satellite to re-enter, it burned up in the atmosphere on December 30, 1982.
The main satellite bus of Kosmos 1402 reentered the Earth's atmosphere on January 23, 1983, south of Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean ( [ ⚑ ] 25°S 84°E / 25°S 84°E). No debris was recovered, but it is believed that the satellite disintegrated then crashed into the sea. The satellite was visible over the United Kingdom, for about a minute, on the night before impact.[9]
The reactor section and core continued to orbit for another two weeks, it re-entered on February 7, 1983, over the South Atlantic Ocean, near Ascension Island ( [ ⚑ ] 19°S 22°W / 19°S 22°W). The reactor is believed to have completely burned up into particles and dispersed to safe levels of atmospheric radioactivity.
Aftermath
Subsequent RORSATs were equipped with a backup (secondary) core ejection mechanism – when the primary ejection mechanism failed on Kosmos 1900 in 1988 this system succeeded in raising the core to a safe disposal orbit.[10] After this accident, launches of new US-A series satellites were stopped for a year and a half.
Radioactive strontium was detected in rain samples from Fayetteville, Arkansas in the months following the incident. The radioactive material originated in the Kosmos 1402 core.[11] Another investigation determined that 44 kg of uranium had been dispersed into the stratosphere after the incident.[12]
The incident triggered widespread discussion about nuclear technology in space, including topics related to space law, insurance and liability, militarization, nuclear safety and security.
See also
- Kosmos 1818 - RORSAT mission destroyed in orbit
- Kosmos (satellite)
- List of Kosmos satellites
- List of nuclear power systems in space
References
- ↑ McDowell, Jonathan. "Launch Log". Jonathan's Space Page. http://planet4589.org/space/log/launchlog.txt.
- ↑ McDowell, Jonathan. "Satellite Catalog". Jonathan's Space Page. http://planet4589.org/space/log/satcat.txt.
- ↑ Hanton, Alex; Weidinger, Patrick (20 January 2012). "Top 10 Space Age Radiation Incidents - Listverse". Listverse Ltd.. https://listverse.com/2012/01/20/top-10-space-age-radiation-incidents/amp/.
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 Bennett, Gary L. (August 6, 1989). "A LOOK AT THE SOVIET SPACE NUCLEAR POWER PROGRAM". International Forum on Energy Engineering (NASA Propulsion, Power and Energy Division) IECEC-89. https://fas.org/nuke/space/sovspace.pdf. Retrieved 25 June 2018.
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 Spector, Dina (24 Jan 2013). "Thirty Years Ago, Everyone Thought A Nuclear Satellite Was Going To Fall From Space And Spread Destruction". Insider Inc.. http://www.businessinsider.com/flashback-how-a-tumbling-nuclear-russian-satellite-held-the-world-in-fear-for-a-month-2013-1.
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 Wilford, John Noble (January 21, 1983). "NUCLEAR-POWERED SATELLITE MAY CRASH SUNDAY" (in en). The New York Times. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/1983/01/21/us/nuclear-powered-satellite-may-crash-sunday.html.
- ↑ Deudney, David (1984). What goes up must come down. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. p. 10. https://books.google.com/books?id=3gUAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA10.
- ↑ Phelan, Dominic (2012). Cold War Space Sleuths: The Untold Secrets of the Soviet Space Program. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 85. ISBN 978-1-4614-3052-0. https://books.google.com/books?id=s3iukQc_DBEC&pg=PA85.
- ↑ 9.0 9.1 Davies, Nick; Tucker, Anthony (24 January 2013). "Russian spy satellite tumbles to Earth" (in en). https://www.theguardian.com/theguardian/2013/jan/24/satellite-cosmos-1402-russia-space.
- ↑ Harland, David M; Lorenz, Ralph D. (2005). Space Systems Failures – Disasters and rescues of satellites, rockets, and space probes. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Praxis Publishing (Springer). ISBN 0-387-21519-0.
- ↑ GUIMON, R. K.; SHENG, Z. Z.; BURCHFIELD, L. A.; KURODA, P. K. (March 18, 1985). "Radioactive strontium fallout from nuclear-powered satellite Cosmos-1402". Geochemical Journal 19 (4): 229–235. doi:10.2343/geochemj.19.229. Bibcode: 1985GeocJ..19..229G. https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/geochemj1966/19/4/19_4_229/_pdf. Retrieved 14 June 2018.
- ↑ LEIFER, R.; JUZDAN, Z. R.; KELLY, W. R.; FASSETT, J. D.; EBERHARDT, K. R. (23 October 1987). "Detection of Uranium from Cosmos-1402 in the Stratosphere". Science 238 (4826): 512–514. doi:10.1126/science.238.4826.512. PMID 17809615. Bibcode: 1987Sci...238..512L.
External links
 |  |
