Finance:Mixture-space theorem

From HandWiki
Short description: Utility-representation theorem in Decision Theory

In microeconomic theory and decision theory, the Mixture-space theorem is a utility-representation theorem for preferences defined over general mixture spaces.

The theorem generalizes the von Neumann–Morgenstern utility theorem and the usual utility-representation theorem for consumer preferences over n. It was first proven by Israel Nathan Herstein and John Milnor in 1953,[1] together with the introduction of the definition of a mixture space.

Mixture spaces

Definition

Mixture spaces, as introduced by Herstein and Milnor, are a generalization of convex sets from vector spaces. Formally:

Definition: A mixture space is a pair (X,h), where

  • X is just any set, and
  • h:[0,1]×X×X is a mixture function: it associates with each α[0,1] and each pair x,yX×X the α-mixture of the two, hα(x,y)h(α,x,y), such that
  1. h1(x,y)=x.
  2. hα(x,y)=h1α(y,x).
  3. hα(hβ(x,y),y)=hαβ(x,y).

Mixture spaces are essentially a special case of convex spaces (also called barycentric algebras),[2] where the mixing operation is restricted to be over [0,1] and not just an appropriately closed subset of a semiring.

Examples

Some examples and non-examples of mixture spaces are:

  • Vector spaces: any convex subset X of a vector space (V,+,) over , with hα(x,y)=αx+(1α)y constitutes a mixture space (X,h).
  • Lotteries: given any finite set X, the set (x)={p:X[0,1]:xp(x)=1} of lotteries over X constitutes a mixture space, with hα(p,q)(x):=αp(x)+(1α)q(x). Notice that this induces an "isomorphic" mixture space of CDFs over X, with the naturally-induced mixture function.
  • Quantile functions: for any CDF F:[0,1], define QF:[0,1] as its quantile function. For any two CDFs F1,F2 and any α[0,1], define the mixture operation αF1(1α)F2 as the CDF for the quantile function αQF1+(1α)QF2. This does not define a mixture over CDFs, but it does define a mixture over quantile functions.[3]

Axioms and theorem

Axioms

Herstein and Milnor proposed the following axioms for preferences over X when (X,h) is a mixture space:

  • Axiom 1 (Preference Relation): is a weak order, in the sense that it is complete (for all x,yX, it's true that xy or yx) and transitive.
  • Axiom 2 (Independence): For any x,y,zX,
xyh1/2(x,z)h1/2(y,z).[nb 1]
  • Axiom 3 (Mixture Continuity): for any x,y,zX, the sets
{α[0,1]:hα(x,y)z},
{α[0,1]:hα(x,y)z}

are closed in [0,1] with the usual topology.

The Mixture-Continuity Axiom is a way of introducing some form of continuity for the preferences without having to consider a topological structure over X.[1]

Theorem

Theorem (Herstein & Milnor 1953): Given any mixture space (X,h) and a preference relation over X, the following are equivalent:

  • satisfies Axioms 1, 2, and 3.
  • There exists a mixture-preserving utility function U:X that represents , where "mixture-preserving" represents a form of linearity: for any x,yX and any α[0,1],
U(hα(x,y))=αU(x)+(1α)U(y).

Notes

  1. This version of the Indepence Axiom is equivalent to the more usual one of von Neumann-Morgenstern which requires a general α[0,1] instead of just α=1/2.[1]

References