Finite morphism
In algebraic geometry, a finite morphism between two affine varieties [math]\displaystyle{ X, Y }[/math] is a dense regular map which induces isomorphic inclusion [math]\displaystyle{ k\left[Y\right]\hookrightarrow k\left[X\right] }[/math] between their coordinate rings, such that [math]\displaystyle{ k\left[X\right] }[/math] is integral over [math]\displaystyle{ k\left[Y\right] }[/math].[1] This definition can be extended to the quasi-projective varieties, such that a regular map [math]\displaystyle{ f\colon X\to Y }[/math] between quasiprojective varieties is finite if any point like [math]\displaystyle{ y\in Y }[/math] has an affine neighbourhood V such that [math]\displaystyle{ U=f^{-1}(V) }[/math] is affine and [math]\displaystyle{ f\colon U\to V }[/math] is a finite map (in view of the previous definition, because it is between affine varieties).[2]
Definition by schemes
A morphism f: X → Y of schemes is a finite morphism if Y has an open cover by affine schemes
- [math]\displaystyle{ V_i = \mbox{Spec} \; B_i }[/math]
such that for each i,
- [math]\displaystyle{ f^{-1}(V_i) = U_i }[/math]
is an open affine subscheme Spec Ai, and the restriction of f to Ui, which induces a ring homomorphism
- [math]\displaystyle{ B_i \rightarrow A_i, }[/math]
makes Ai a finitely generated module over Bi.[3] One also says that X is finite over Y.
In fact, f is finite if and only if for every open affine subscheme V = Spec B in Y, the inverse image of V in X is affine, of the form Spec A, with A a finitely generated B-module.[4]
For example, for any field k, [math]\displaystyle{ \text{Spec}(k[t,x]/(x^n-t)) \to \text{Spec}(k[t]) }[/math] is a finite morphism since [math]\displaystyle{ k[t,x]/(x^n-t) \cong k[t]\oplus k[t]\cdot x \oplus\cdots \oplus k[t]\cdot x^{n-1} }[/math] as [math]\displaystyle{ k[t] }[/math]-modules. Geometrically, this is obviously finite since this is a ramified n-sheeted cover of the affine line which degenerates at the origin. By contrast, the inclusion of A1 − 0 into A1 is not finite. (Indeed, the Laurent polynomial ring k[y, y−1] is not finitely generated as a module over k[y].) This restricts our geometric intuition to surjective families with finite fibers.
Properties of finite morphisms
- The composition of two finite morphisms is finite.
- Any base change of a finite morphism f: X → Y is finite. That is, if g: Z → Y is any morphism of schemes, then the resulting morphism X ×Y Z → Z is finite. This corresponds to the following algebraic statement: if A and C are (commutative) B-algebras, and A is finitely generated as a B-module, then the tensor product A ⊗B C is finitely generated as a C-module. Indeed, the generators can be taken to be the elements ai ⊗ 1, where ai are the given generators of A as a B-module.
- Closed immersions are finite, as they are locally given by A → A/I, where I is the ideal corresponding to the closed subscheme.
- Finite morphisms are closed, hence (because of their stability under base change) proper.[5] This follows from the going up theorem of Cohen-Seidenberg in commutative algebra.
- Finite morphisms have finite fibers (that is, they are quasi-finite).[6] This follows from the fact that for a field k, every finite k-algebra is an Artinian ring. A related statement is that for a finite surjective morphism f: X → Y, X and Y have the same dimension.
- By Deligne, a morphism of schemes is finite if and only if it is proper and quasi-finite.[7] This had been shown by Grothendieck if the morphism f: X → Y is locally of finite presentation, which follows from the other assumptions if Y is Noetherian.[8]
- Finite morphisms are both projective and affine.[9]
See also
Notes
- ↑ Shafarevich 2013, p. 60, Def. 1.1.
- ↑ Shafarevich 2013, p. 62, Def. 1.2.
- ↑ Hartshorne 1977, Section II.3.
- ↑ Stacks Project, Tag 01WG, http://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/01WG.
- ↑ Stacks Project, Tag 01WG, http://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/01WG.
- ↑ Stacks Project, Tag 01WG, http://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/01WG.
- ↑ Grothendieck, EGA IV, Part 4, Corollaire 18.12.4.
- ↑ Grothendieck, EGA IV, Part 3, Théorème 8.11.1.
- ↑ Stacks Project, Tag 01WG, http://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/01WG.
References
- Grothendieck, Alexandre; Dieudonné, Jean (1966). "Éléments de géométrie algébrique: IV. Étude locale des schémas et des morphismes de schémas, Troisième partie". Publications Mathématiques de l'IHÉS 28: 5–255. doi:10.1007/bf02684343. http://www.numdam.org/articles/PMIHES_1966__28__5_0.
- Grothendieck, Alexandre; Dieudonné, Jean (1967). "Éléments de géométrie algébrique: IV. Étude locale des schémas et des morphismes de schémas, Quatrième partie". Publications Mathématiques de l'IHÉS 32: 5–361. doi:10.1007/bf02732123. http://www.numdam.org/articles/PMIHES_1967__32__5_0.
- Hartshorne, Robin (1977), Algebraic Geometry, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 52, New York: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-0-387-90244-9
- Shafarevich, Igor R. (2013). Basic Algebraic Geometry 1. Springer Science. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-37956-7. ISBN 978-0-387-97716-4. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-642-37956-7.
External links
- The Stacks Project Authors, The Stacks Project, http://stacks.math.columbia.edu/
Original source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finite morphism.
Read more |