Frobenius determinant theorem

From HandWiki

In mathematics, the Frobenius determinant theorem was a conjecture made in 1896 by the mathematician Richard Dedekind, who wrote a letter to F. G. Frobenius about it (reproduced in (Dedekind 1968), with an English translation in (Curtis 2003)).

If one takes the multiplication table of a finite group G and replaces each entry g with the variable xg, and subsequently takes the determinant, then the determinant factors as a product of n irreducible polynomials, where n is the number of conjugacy classes. Moreover, each polynomial is raised to a power equal to its degree. Frobenius proved this surprising conjecture, and it became known as the Frobenius determinant theorem. His proof of the theorem sparked a new branch of mathematics known as representation theory of finite groups.[1]

Formal statement

Let a finite group G have elements g1,g2,…,gn, and let xgi be associated with each element of G. Define the matrix XG with entries aij=xgigj. Then

det⁡XG=∏j=1rPj(xg1,xg2,…,xgn)deg⁡Pj

where the Pj's are pairwise non-proportional irreducible polynomials and r is the number of conjugacy classes of G.[2]

Examples

If G=ℤ/2ℤ=⟨g∣g2=1⟩, the matrix would be

XG=[x1Gxgxgx1G].

The determinant of this matrix is

det⁡XG=(x1G−xg)(x1G+xg).

The number of irreducible polynomial factors is two, which is equal to the number of conjugacy classes of ℤ/2ℤ.

If G=S3, the symmetric group of order 3, the matrix would be

XG=[xex(12)x(23)x(31)x(123)x(321)x(12)xex(321)x(123)x(31)x(23)x(23)x(123)xex(321)x(12)x(31)x(31)x(321)x(123)xex(23)x(12)x(123)x(23)x(31)x(12)x(321)xex(321)x(31)x(12)x(23)xex(123)].

The determinant of this matrix factors out as

det⁡XG=(∑σ∈S3xσ)(∑σ∈S3sign(σ)xσ)(F(xe,x(123),x(321))−F(x(12),x(23),x(31)))2

where F(a,b,c)=a2+b2+c2−ab−bc−ca. The number of irreducible polynomial factors is three, which is equal to the number of conjugacy clsses of S3. The degree-2 polynomial factor has multiplicity 2.[3]

Proof

This proof is based on the one given by Evan Chen, which involves representation theory.[3] It relies on the following lemma.

Lemma — Let Y be an n×n matrix whose entries are independent variables yij. Then det⁡Y is an irreducible polynomial.

Let V=(V,ρ)=ℂ[G] be the regular representation of group G. Consider the linear map

T=∑g∈Gxgρ(g),

whose matrix is given by XG. We wish to examine det⁡T.

By Maschke's theorem, ℂ[G] is a semisimple algebra, so it is possible to break down V into a direct sum of irreducible representations,

V=⨁i=1rVi⊕dim⁡Vi

where each Vi is an irreducible representation of V. This lets us write

det⁡T=∏i=1r(det⁡(T|Vi))dim⁡Vi,

where each det⁡(T|Vi) is a polynomial factor of det⁡T.

A result from character theory states that the number of nonisomorphic irreps of regular representation V equals the number of conjugacy classes of G. This explains why the number of polynomial factors is equal to the number of conjugacy classes.

Furthermore, dim⁡Vi is both the degree and multiplicity of the polynomial det⁡(T|Vi), which explains why the degree and multiplicity of each polynomial factor are equal.

To complete the proof, we wish to show that polynomials det⁡(T|Vi) are irreducible and not proportional to each other.

Proof of irreducibility: By Jacobson density theorem, for any matrix M∈Mat(Vi), there exists a particular choice of complex numbers for each xg∈G such that

M=∑g∈Gxgρi(g)=T|Vi({xg})

This shows that T|Vi, when viewed as a matrix with polynomial entries, must have linearly independent entries. Thus, by letting each of these entries be an independent variable yij, it follows by Lemma above that det⁡T|Vi is an irreducible polynomial.

Proof of non-proportionality: This follows by noticing that we can read off the character χVi from the coefficients of det⁡T|Vi, using the fact that for all g∈G, the coefficient of xgx1Gk−1 in det⁡T|Vi is equal to χVi(g). Since characters are linearly independent to each other, it follows that det⁡T|Vi is not proportional to any other polynomial factor.

References

  1. ↑ Etingof 2005, p. 1
  2. ↑ Etingof 2005, Theorem 5.4.
  3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 Chen, Chapter 22.