Generalized Poincaré conjecture

From HandWiki
Short description: Whether a manifold which is a homotopy sphere is a sphere

In the mathematical area of topology, the generalized Poincaré conjecture is a statement that a manifold that is a homotopy sphere is a sphere. More precisely, one fixes a category of manifolds: topological (Top), piecewise linear (PL), or differentiable (Diff). Then the statement is

Every homotopy sphere (a closed n-manifold which is homotopy equivalent to the n-sphere) in the chosen category (i.e. topological manifolds, PL manifolds, or smooth manifolds) is isomorphic in the chosen category (i.e. homeomorphic, PL-isomorphic, or diffeomorphic) to the standard n-sphere.

The name derives from the Poincaré conjecture, which was made for (topological or PL) manifolds of dimension 3, where being a homotopy sphere is equivalent to being simply connected and closed. The generalized Poincaré conjecture is known to be true or false in a number of instances, due to the work of many distinguished topologists, including the Fields Medal awardees John Milnor, Steve Smale, Michael Freedman, and Grigori Perelman.

Status

Here is a summary of the status of the generalized Poincaré conjecture in various settings.

  • Top: True in all dimensions.
  • PL: True in dimensions other than 4; unknown in dimension 4, where it is equivalent to Diff.
  • Diff: False generally, with the first known counterexample in dimension 7. True in some dimensions including 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 12, 56 and 61. This list includes all odd dimensions for which the conjecture is true. For even dimensions, it is true only for those on the list, possibly dimension 4, and possibly some additional dimensions 64 (though it is conjectured that there are none such).[1] The case of dimension 4 is equivalent to PL.

Thus the veracity of the Poincaré conjectures is different in each category Top, PL, and Diff. In general, the notion of isomorphism differs among the categories, but it is the same in dimension 3 and below. In dimension 4, PL and Diff agree, but Top differs. In dimensions above 6 they all differ. In dimensions 5 and 6 every PL manifold admits an infinitely differentiable structure that is so-called Whitehead compatible.[2]

History

The cases n = 1 and 2 have long been known by the classification of manifolds in those dimensions.

For a PL or smooth homotopy n-sphere, in 1960 Stephen Smale proved for n7 that it was homeomorphic to the n-sphere and subsequently extended his proof to n5;[3] he received a Fields Medal for his work in 1966. Shortly after Smale's announcement of a proof, John Stallings gave a different proof for dimensions at least 7 that a PL homotopy n-sphere was homeomorphic to the n-sphere, using the notion of "engulfing".[4] E. C. Zeeman modified Stalling's construction to work in dimensions 5 and 6.[5] In 1962, Smale proved that a PL homotopy n-sphere is PL-isomorphic to the standard PL n-sphere for n at least 5.[6] In 1966, M. H. A. Newman extended PL engulfing to the topological situation and proved that for n5 a topological homotopy n-sphere is homeomorphic to the n-sphere.[7]

Michael Freedman solved the topological case n=4 in 1982 and received a Fields Medal in 1986.[8] The initial proof consisted of a 50-page outline, with many details missing. Freedman gave a series of lectures at the time, convincing experts that the proof was correct. A project to produce a written version of the proof with background and all details filled in began in 2013, with Freedman's support. The project's output, edited by Stefan Behrens, Boldizsar Kalmar, Min Hoon Kim, Mark Powell, and Arunima Ray, with contributions from 20 mathematicians, was published in August 2021 in the form of a 496-page book, The Disc Embedding Theorem.[9][10]

Grigori Perelman solved the case n=3 (where the topological, PL, and differentiable cases all coincide) in 2003 in a sequence of three papers.[11][12][13] He was offered a Fields Medal in August 2006 and the Millennium Prize from the Clay Mathematics Institute in March 2010, but declined both.

In the smooth category for (n>4), studying the Poincare conjecture, comes down to determining the elements of the Kervaire-Milnor short exact sequence of groups 0bPn+1ΘnπnS/(Image(Jn))0, where the order of the group Θn equals the number of distinct smooth structures on Sn(n>4) . Here πnS is the n-th stable homotopy group and Jn is the J-homomorphism Jn:πn(SO)πnS, where SO is the infinite special orthogonal group. The quotient group πnS/(Image(Jn)) is usually denoted as coker(Jn), where coker(Jn)cokernel(Jn). The remaining term in the short exact sequence, namely the group bPn+1, denotes the n-dimensional homotopy spheres that bound an n+1-dimensional parallelizable manifold (note that in modern notation it has become customary to denote bPn+1 by the symbol Θnbp, instead). Importantly, bPn+1 has the additional property that it is trivial when n is even. Finally, the case where n2(mod4) has a slightly modified short exact sequence from the one given above, now involving the Kervaire invariant, namely 0bP4l+3Θ4k+2π4k+2S/(Image(J4k+2))ΦK/2bP4k+20, where ΦK is the Kervaire invariant. When the Kervaire invariant is zero, i.e. when n6,14,30,62, and 126, then this exact sequence reduces to the original exact sequence given above, but also gives the result that bP4k+2=/2. Plugging this result into the original short exact sequence given above, this implies that /2 is a subgroup of Θ4k+1 and therefore Θ4k+1 is nontrivial when the Kervaire invariant is zero for n=4k+2.

John Milnor solved the smooth case n=5 in 1959 in the unpublished manuscript "Differentiable Manifolds Which Are Homotopy Spheres." The results of this manuscript were later incorporated in a larger and later (1963) paper where the smooth cases n=6 and n=12 were also solved.[14] The n=5 and n=6 cases also follow from Smale's PL result, since the smooth and PL categories coincide for n6.

Daniel Isaksen solved the smooth case n=56 in 2014. This followed from his calculation of the stable homotopy group in dimension 56 being of order 2 (See page 4 in section 1.4 and Charts 8.1 and 8.17 in Stable Stems (2019) by Daniel C. Isaksen)[15]. Since the image of the J-Homomorphism in the Kervaire-Milnor short exact sequence is also of order 2, this shows that the cokernel of the J-homomorphism is trival. Since bP57 is trivial (since bP2n+1 is always trivial), Θ56 is therefore trivial. Consequently, the number of smooth structures on S56 is one. Also, see Theorem 3.1.14 of Zhouli Xu's 2017 PhD thesis "In And Around Stable Homotopy Groups of Spheres." See also section 2 in the review article Stable Homotopy Groups Of Spheres and Motivic Homotopy Theory (2023) by Daniel C. Isaksen, Guozhen Wang, and Zhouli Xu.[16]

Guozhen Wang and Zhouli Xu solved the smooth case n=61 in 2017.[17]

It was known from a theorem of Kervaire and Milnor (See Groups of Homotopy Spheres I (1963)) that the Smooth Poincare conjecture is always false for dimesnions n=4k+3(k1). For dimensions n=4k+1(k1) the answer depends on the existence of Kervaire invariant elements. Due to work of Hill, Hopkins and Ravenel[18], it was thus known that the only odd dimensions where the smooth Poincare conjecture could be true were in dimensions 1, 3, 5, 13, 29, 61, and 125. J. Peter May ruled out the case of n=13[19]. The case n=29 was ruled out in the late 1960's by filling in the terms in the Kervaire-Milnor short exact sequence 0bP30Θ29π29S/(Image(J29))0. J. Peter May showed in his PhD thesis that the only odd prime primary term in π29S, namely p=3, is equal to 3. Mark Mahowald and Martin Tangora then showed that the 2-primary term was trivial.[20] This established that the stable homotopy group in dimension 29 is of order 3. William Browder showed that bP30=0 by establishing the existence of a framed manifold of Kervaire invariant 1 in dimension 30.[21] Because the image of the J-homomorphism in dimension 29, i.e., J29:π29(SO)π29S, is trivial (because π29(SO) is trivial), the conclusion is that Θ29=3 and therefore there are three different smooth structures on S29. Daniel Isaksen developed a more efficient and machine checkable method, namely motivic homotopy theory, that allowed calculations beyond n=60. The final case n=125 was finally ruled out by Guozhen Wang and Zhouli Xu by producing an explicit element of π125S/(Image(J125)) whose non-triviality is detected by the spectrum of topological modular forms (See Proposition 1.12 of their 2017 paper, "The Triviality of the 61-Stem in the Stable Homotopy Groups of Spheres"). Thus, it is now known that the only odd dimensions where the smooth Poincare conjecture is true are 1, 3, 5, and 61.

The smooth case in even dimensions has been checked in all even dimensions through n=138[22], with the exception of n=4. So far, the only even dimensions where the smooth Poincare conjecture has been found to be true are in dimensions n=2,6,12 and 56. In the even case, Θ2n=π2nS/(Image(J2n)) because bP2n+1=0 in the Kervaire-Milnor short exact sequence, unless the Kervaire invariant is nonzero, in which case Θ2n is a subgroup. Therefore determining all smooth structures on S2n(n>2) involves determining the structure of cokernel(J2n)π2nS/(Image(J2n)). Disproving the Poincare conjecture then amounts to finding a single nontrivial element in cokernel(J2n), with the caveat that the analysis is more complicated in the five even dimensions above n=4 where the Kervaire invariant is nonzero. The strategy has been to find nontrivial elements in low dimensions that are ν-periodic, that is, that reappear every ν dimensions. So, if there is a nontrivial element in dimension D, then there are nontrivial elements in all dimensions D+νk(k0). In this way, many infinite sequences of dimensions can be ruled out.

PL

For piecewise linear manifolds, the Poincaré conjecture is true except possibly in dimension 4, where the answer is unknown, and equivalent to the smooth case. In other words, every compact PL manifold of dimension not equal to 4 that is homotopy equivalent to a sphere is PL isomorphic to a sphere.[2]

See also

References

  1. Wang, Guozhen; Xu, Zhouli (2017). "The triviality of the 61-stem in the stable homotopy groups of spheres". Ann. Math.. Second series 186 (2): 501–580. doi:10.4007/annals.2017.186.2.3.  See Corollaries 1.13 and 1.15 and Conjecture 1.17.
  2. 2.0 2.1 See Buoncristiano, Sandro (2003). "Fragments of Geometric Topology from the Sixties". Geometry & Topology Monographs 6. https://www.maths.ed.ac.uk/~v1ranick/haupt/sandro.pdf. 
  3. Smale, Stephen (1961). "Generalized Poincaré's conjecture in dimensions greater than four". Ann. Math.. Second series 74 (2): 391–406. doi:10.2307/1970239. 
  4. Stallings, John (1960). "Polyhedral homotopy spheres". Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 66 (6): 485–488. doi:10.1090/S0002-9904-1960-10511-3. 
  5. Zeeman, Erik Christopher (1962). "The Poincaré conjecture for n greater than or equal to 5". Topology of 3-manifolds and Related Topics (Proc. The Univ. Of Georgia Institute, 1961) (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice–Hall): 198–204. 
  6. Smale, Stephen (1962). "On the structure of manifolds". Amer. J. Math. 84 (3): 387–399. doi:10.2307/2372978. 
  7. Newman, M. H. A. (1966). "The Engulfing Theorem for Topological Manifolds". Annals of Mathematics. (2) 84 (3): 555–571. doi:10.2307/1970460. 
  8. Freedman, Michael (1982). "The topology of four-dimensional manifolds". Journal of Differential Geometry 17 (3): 357–453. doi:10.4310/jdg/1214437136. 
  9. Hartnett, Kevin (September 9, 2021). "New Math Book Rescues Landmark Topology Proof". Quanta Magazine. https://www.quantamagazine.org/new-math-book-rescues-landmark-topology-proof-20210909/. 
  10. The Disc Embedding Theorem
  11. Perelman, Grigori (11 November 2002). "The entropy formula for the Ricci flow and its geometric applications". arXiv:math.DG/0211159.
  12. Perelman, Grigori (10 March 2003). "Ricci flow with surgery on three-manifolds". arXiv:math.DG/0303109.
  13. Perelman, Grigori (17 July 2003). "Finite extinction time for the solutions to the Ricci flow on certain three-manifolds". arXiv:math.DG/0307245.
  14. Kervaire, Michel; Milnor, John (1963). "Groups of Homotopy Spheres I". Ann. Math.. Second series 186 (2): 504–537. 
  15. Isaksen, Daniel (2019). Stable Stems. Memoirs of the AMS. 262, No 1269. American Mathematical Society. doi:10.1090/memo/1269. 
  16. Isaksen, Daniel; Wang, Guozhen; Xu, Zhouli (2023). "Stable Homotopy Groups Of Spheres and Motivic Homotopy Theory". International Congress of Mathematicians 2022 July 6-14. IV. EMS Press. pp. 2768-2790. doi:10.4171/ICM2022/32. 
  17. Wang, Guozhen; Xu, Zhouli (2017). "The triviality of the 61-stem in the stable homotopy groups of spheres". Ann. Math.. Second series 186 (2): 501–580. doi:10.4007/annals.2017.186.2.3. 
  18. Hill, M. A.; Hopkins, M. J.; Ravenel, D. C. (2016). "On the nonexistence of elements of Kervaire invariant one". Annals of Mathematics 184: 1-262. doi:10.4007/annals.2016.184.1.1. 
  19. May, J. Peter (1964). The Cohomology of Restricted Lie Algebras and of Hopf Algebras: Application to the Steenrod Algebra (PhD thesis). 
  20. Mahowald, Mark; Tangora, Martin (1967). "Some Differentials In The Adams Spectral Sequence". Topology 6: 349-369. doi:10.1016/0040-9383(67)90023-7. 
  21. Browder, William (1969). "The Kervaire invariant of framed manifolds and its generalization". Annals of Mathematics 90: 157-186. doi:10.2307/1970686. 
  22. Behrens, M.; Hill, M.; Hopkins, M.J.; Mahowald, M. (2020). "Detecting exotic spheres in low dimensions using coker J". J. London Math. Soc. 2: 1-46. doi:10.1112/jlms.12301.