Hybrid choice model
 | This article may be too technical for most readers to understand. Please help improve it to make it understandable to non-experts, without removing the technical details. (May 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) |
Hybrid choice models (HCMs) are extensions of classical discrete-choice models that combine what analysts can observe—prices, incomes and travel times—with what they cannot measure directly, such as attitudes, perceptions and habits.[1] Unlike standard models, which recover preferences only from observed choices, an HCM links those choices to one or more latent variables—statistical constructs that represent psychological traits. Integrating such constructs into a random-utility framework improves both behavioural realism and predictive accuracy.[2][3]
Conceptual framework
A typical HCM contains three interconnected blocks. Structural equations describe how latent variables depend on socio-economic characteristics and on one another; measurement equationsrelate each latent variable to survey indicators, creating a statistical bridge between unobserved attitudes and their noisy proxies; and a conventional choice model links both latent and manifest variables to the probability that an individual selects a particular alternative.[4] Later work clarified identification conditions and introduced simulation-efficient estimators that scale to large data sets.[5]
Applications
Transportation. Hybrid models clarify how safety norms or environmental concern shape preferences for cars, public transport and new mobility technologies. A study of Austria's car market, for example, showed that a latent "green" attitude substantially increases the probability of choosing an electric vehicle, even after controlling for price and driving range.[6]
Marketing. In consumer research HCMs connect stated perceptions of quality or loyalty to revealed purchase data. An application to the chocolate-bar market found that latent loyalty toward manufacturer or private-label brands strongly mediates price sensitivity.[7]
Health economics. By incorporating latent risk and burden perceptions, HCMs improve forecasts of treatment uptake. For lower-back–pain therapies, adding a latent "fear-of-movement" construct increased model fit and changed welfare estimates for alternative interventions.[8]
Environmental policy. Analysts use HCMs to study pro-environmental behaviour. A grey-water reuse study found that latent concern about water scarcity was a stronger driver of adoption than installation cost alone.[9]
Strengths and challenges
Because HCMs embed attitudes directly in the utility function they can improve behavioural realism, run "what-if" simulations that target beliefs rather than prices, and reduce omitted-variable bias when latent factors correlate with observed attributes.[3] Critics caution that policy simulations must respect the psychological theory behind the latent variables; otherwise results may be hard to interpret.[10] Data requirements are demanding—surveys must collect attitudinal indicators for every respondent—and estimating many random parameters can be computationally expensive, although new algorithms mitigate that burden.[3]
References
- ↑ Ben-Akiva, Moshe; McFadden, Daniel; Train, Kenneth; Walker, Joan; Bhat, Chandra; Bierlaire, Michel; Bolduc, Denis (2002). "Hybrid Choice Models: Progress and Challenges". Marketing Letters 13 (3): 163–175. doi:10.1023/A:1020254301302.
- ↑ Walker, Joan L.; Ben-Akiva, Moshe (2002). "Generalized random utility model". Mathematical Social Sciences 43 (3): 303–343. doi:10.1016/S0165-4896(02)00023-9.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 Bhat, Chandra R.; Dubey, Subodh K. (2014). "A new estimation approach to integrate latent psychological constructs in choice modelling". Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 67: 68–85. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2014.04.011.
- ↑ Abou-Zeid, Maya; Ben-Akiva, Moshe (2014). "Hybrid choice models". in Hess, Stephane; Daly, Andrew. Handbook of Choice Modelling. Edward Elgar. pp. 383–412. ISBN 978-1-78100-315-2.
- ↑ Vij, Akshay; Walker, Joan L. (2014). "Hybrid choice models: the identification problem". in Hess, Stephane; Daly, Andrew. Handbook of Choice Modelling. Edward Elgar. pp. 519–564. ISBN 978-1-78100-315-2.
- ↑ Bahamonde-Birke, Francisco J.; Hanappi, Tibor (2016). "The potential of electromobility in Austria: Evidence from hybrid choice models under the presence of unreported information". Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 83: 30–41. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2015.11.002.
- ↑ Kiss, Marietta; Czine, Péter; Balogh, Péter; Szakály, Zoltán (2022). "The connection between manufacturer and private label brands and brand loyalty in chocolate bar buying decisions: A hybrid choice approach". Appetite 177. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2022.106145. PMID 35772641.
- ↑ Kløjgaard, Mirja E.; Hess, Stephane (2014). "Understanding the formation and influence of attitudes in patients' treatment choices for lower back pain: Testing the benefits of a hybrid choice model approach". Social Science & Medicine 114: 138–150. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.05.058.
- ↑ Amaris, Gloria; Hess, Stephane; Gironás, Jorge; Ortúzar, Juan de Dios (2021). "Using hybrid choice models to capture the impact of attitudes on residential greywater reuse preferences". Resources, Conservation & Recycling 164. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105171.
- ↑ Chorus, Caspar G.; Kroesen, Maarten (2014). "On the (im-)possibility of deriving transport policy implications from hybrid choice models". Transport Policy 36: 217–222. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.09.001.
 |  |
