Idele group
In number theory, the idele group is a way of packaging the multiplicative arithmetic of a global field at all of its completions at once, so that it contains the information of unique factorization as well as the data relating to units. Formally, the idele group of a global field is the restricted direct product of the multiplicative groups of the completions of , taken with respect to the unit groups at the non-archimedean places. Equivalently, it is the group of invertible elements of the adele ring , equipped with a topology finer than the subspace topology inherited from .
The quotient is the idele class group. Ideles and idele class groups are used in class field theory. They were exploited by John Tate in his thesis to formulate global zeta and -functions and Hecke characters.
Definition
Let be a global field, and let run over the places of . For each place , let denote the completion of at . If is non-archimedean, let be the corresponding valuation ring and let be its group of units.
The idele group of , usually denoted or , is the restricted product
of the groups , taken with respect to the subgroups at the non-archimedean places. Thus an idele is a family
such that
for all but finitely many non-archimedean places . Multiplication is defined componentwise.[1][2]
Equivalently, the idele group is the group of invertible elements of the adele ring . However, its topology is not the subspace topology inherited from ; it is the restricted product topology, or equivalently the topology induced by the embedding
The multiplicative group embeds diagonally in . The quotient
is called the idele class group of .
Motivation
The idele group may be viewed as a topological refinement of the group of fractional ideals of a number field. If is a number field with ring of integers , every nonzero fractional ideal has a unique factorization
where runs over the nonzero prime ideals of and all but finitely many integers are zero. Thus the group of fractional ideals records, for each finite place of , an integral valuation.
An idele records similar local valuation data, but with additional local information. For an idele , the component at a finite place determines an integer . Since is a unit for all but finitely many , these integers define a fractional ideal
This gives a surjective homomorphism from the idele group to the group of fractional ideals. The diagonal embedding sends an element to the principal idele whose associated fractional ideal is the principal ideal . Consequently, passing to quotients gives a natural surjection
from the idele class group to the ordinary ideal class group.[3]
Thus the idele class group enlarges the ideal class group. It extends the finite-prime data measured by fractional ideals with the unit groups at finite places and the multiplicative groups at the archimedean places. This additional topological information is important in class field theory and in the theory of Hecke characters, where characters of the idele class group replace characters defined only on ideal class groups or ray class groups.
Topology and Haar measure
Although the idele group is the group of invertible elements of the adele ring , it is not usually equipped with the subspace topology inherited from . With the subspace topology, inversion need not be continuous. Instead, is given the restricted product topology
where the restricted product is taken with respect to the compact open subgroups at the non-archimedean places. A basis of open neighbourhoods of the identity is given by products
where is an open neighbourhood of in and for all but finitely many non-archimedean places . Equivalently, this is the topology induced by the embedding
With this topology, is a locally compact topological group.[2][1]
Since the idele group is locally compact, it has a Haar measure, usually denoted . This measure is obtained as a product of local multiplicative Haar measures on the groups . At a non-archimedean place , the local measure is commonly normalized so that
At the real place, a standard multiplicative Haar measure on is
up to multiplication by a positive constant; analogous normalizations are used at complex places. These local choices combine to give a multiplicative Haar measure on . Such measures are used in harmonic analysis on the ideles, especially in Tate's thesis and in the analytic theory of Hecke -functions.[4][5]
Norm map and norm-one ideles
The idele group carries a homomorphism, usually called the idele norm or module into the positive reals. Choose the standard normalized absolute value on each completion : for a non-archimedean place , it is normalized so that where is a uniformizer and is the size of the residue field. At the archimedean places one uses the usual normalized absolute values, with the complex absolute value taken squared. For an idele , define
This product is finite, since for all but finitely many non-archimedean places, and hence for all but finitely many . Thus is a continuous group homomorphism.[1][2]
The norm-one ideles are the elements in the kernel of this homomorphism:
By the product formula for global fields, every element of , embedded diagonally in , has idele norm one. Hence
The quotient is called the group of norm-one idele classes. It is a compact group.[2][6]
The idele norm descends to a homomorphism on the idele class group, whose kernel is . For number fields this gives an exact sequence
Thus the idele class group is not compact in the number field case, but its norm-one subgroup modulo is compact. This compactness is one of the idelic forms of the finiteness of the ideal class group together with the structure theorem for units.[1][2]
For number fields, the idele norm is surjective onto , and the above exact sequence splits after choosing a positive archimedean component. Thus is, non-canonically or after such a choice, a product of the compact group with . For global function fields, the image of the idele norm is instead a discrete subgroup of , so the corresponding quotient is discrete and isomorphic to an infinite cyclic group.[2][1]
Norms for field extensions
Let be a finite extension of global fields. For each place of and each place of lying above , there is a local norm map
These local norm maps combine to give a continuous homomorphism on idele groups
If , then the -component of is
This product is finite for each fixed . Moreover, for all but finitely many non-archimedean places , the component lies in , and its local norm lies in . Hence is again an idele of . The continuity follows from the continuity of the local norm maps and from the restricted product topology.[1][2]
The norm map is compatible with principal ideles. If is embedded diagonally in , then
is the principal idele of associated with the field norm . Consequently, the idele norm descends to a continuous homomorphism on idele class groups,
where and .
The embedding of into also gives a natural homomorphism
Explicitly, an idele of is sent to the idele whose component at is the image of in . Under this embedding,
where the power is taken componentwise. This follows from the identity
The field-extension norm should be distinguished from the idele norm or module . They are nevertheless compatible: with the standard normalized absolute values,
In particular, maps the norm-one idele group into and induces a homomorphism
In global class field theory, the image is called the norm subgroup of . For a finite abelian extension , the global Artin reciprocity map identifies the quotient
with the Galois group , up to the usual convention concerning arithmetic or geometric Frobenius.[3][6][7]
Example: the rational numbers
For , the finite adele ring is
and the finite integral adeles are
The finite ideles are
where the restricted product is taken with respect to . The idele group of is
Every idele class has a representative of the form
Indeed, multiplying by a rational number changes the finite valuations and can be used to make all finite components -adic units; the remaining positive real factor records the idele norm. Thus
Similarly, the norm-one idele classes are
This reflects the fact that has trivial ideal class group: the remaining finite part of the idele class group comes from the local unit groups .
Class field theory
The idele class group yields a formulation of class field theory. Global class field theory describes the abelian extensions of a global field in terms of topological quotients of
The main result is the global Artin reciprocity law. In one formulation, for every finite abelian extension there is a canonical reciprocity homomorphism whose kernel is the norm subgroup
The reciprocity homomorphism induces an isomorphism up to a conventional choice of arithmetic or geometric Frobenius automorphism.[3][6][7]
Thus, finite abelian extensions of correspond to open subgroups of finite index in the idele class group. Under this correspondence, an extension is associated with the subgroup . This replaces the older formulation of class field theory in terms of ideal class groups, ray class groups, and congruence conditions by a topological statement about quotients of .[3][7]
The idelic formulation also incorporates the local reciprocity maps of local class field theory: for each place of , local class field theory relates to the abelianized Galois group of . The global reciprocity map is compatible with these local maps through the embedding of each local multiplicative group into the idele group. At an unramified finite place, a uniformizer maps to a Frobenius element, with the precise inverse depending on the convention used for the Artin map.[3][7]
Classical ideal-theoretic class field theory is then a special case. Quotients of the idele class group by certain subgroups recover ray class groups, and the corresponding abelian extensions are the ray class fields. In particular, the Hilbert class field is obtained from the quotient associated with the ordinary ideal class group, packaging the relation between ideles, fractional ideals, and ideal classes.[3][6]
For the maximal abelian extension , the finite-level reciprocity maps are compatible as varies over finite abelian extensions of . They combine into a global reciprocity map from the idele class group to . Thus the abelianized absolute Galois group of is described by the system of finite quotients of the idele class group.[3][7]
Hecke characters and L-functions
A Hecke character of a global field can be described as a continuous homomorphism
or equivalently as a continuous character of the idele group that is trivial on the diagonally embedded subgroup . Such characters are the automorphic characters of .
Writing an idele as , a Hecke character decomposes into local characters
with
For all but finitely many non-archimedean places , the local character is unramified, meaning that it is trivial on . At such a place its value is determined by , where is a uniformizer of .
Associated to a Hecke character is a global -function, defined for suitable by an Euler product
At an unramified non-archimedean place , the local factor has the form
where is the size of the residue field. The remaining finitely many finite places give ramified local factors, and the archimedean places contribute gamma factors. These local factors combine to form the completed Hecke -function.[4][8]
Classical Dirichlet characters and ideal class characters occur as special cases. For example, over , Dirichlet characters can be interpreted as finite-order Hecke characters with prescribed finite conductors. More generally, ray class characters of a number field can be realized as finite-order characters of quotients of the idele class group.
Hecke -functions are among the basic examples of automorphic -functions. In Tate's thesis, the analytic continuation and functional equation of these -functions are obtained by harmonic analysis on the adele ring and the idele group. This approach recovers the analytic theory of Dirichlet -functions and Hecke's original -series, while also explaining their local-global factorization in terms of the product structure of the ideles.[4][9]
Relation with the ideal class group
For a number field , the idele group refines the ordinary ideal-theoretic arithmetic of . Let be the ring of integers of , let be the group of nonzero fractional ideals of , and let
be the profinite completion of , where runs over the nonzero prime ideals of . Its group of units is
Let denote the finite idele group,
There is a natural surjective homomorphism
defined by
where is the normalized additive valuation at . The product is finite because for all but finitely many . The kernel of this homomorphism is exactly . Hence
This identifies the group of fractional ideals with the quotient of the finite idele group obtained by forgetting the local unit components.[1][6]
The diagonal embedding is compatible with principal ideals. If , then the finite idele whose components are all equal to maps to the principal fractional ideal . Therefore the preceding homomorphism descends to a quotient map from finite idele classes to ideal classes. In particular,
Equivalently, using the full idele group,
Thus the ordinary ideal class group is obtained from the idele class group by quotienting out the finite local unit groups and the archimedean multiplicative factors.
The same construction gives a useful way to view why ideles contain more information than ideals. Passing from an idele to the associated fractional ideal records only the valuations at the finite places. It discards the unit components in and also discards the archimedean components. These extra local and topological data are precisely what make the idele class group suitable for class field theory and for the theory of Hecke characters.
A proof sketch is as follows. For each finite prime , choose a uniformizer of . Every element of can be written as , with and . Hence the valuation map records exactly the exponent of . Since an idele is a unit at almost all finite places, only finitely many exponents are nonzero, so the formula above defines a fractional ideal. The kernel consists exactly of those finite ideles with all valuations zero, namely . Surjectivity follows because any fractional ideal is represented by the finite idele whose -component is for the finitely many primes appearing in the product and is elsewhere. Finally, quotienting by the diagonal image of identifies principal fractional ideals with principal ideles, giving the ideal class group.
Further structure and proof sketches
The following standard structural facts give equivalent descriptions of the idele topology, related subgroups, and some compactness and decomposition results used in the arithmetic theory of ideles.
Topology induced from the adele ring
The topology on can be described by a general construction for unit groups of topological rings. Let be a topological ring. Define
Equipped with the topology induced from the product topology on and , is a topological group and the inclusion map is continuous. It is the coarsest topology, emerging from the topology on , that makes a topological group.
- Proof.
Since is a topological ring, it is sufficient to show that the inverse map is continuous. Let be open. Then is open. It is necessary to show that is open, or equivalently that
is open. But this is the same condition applied to . The idele group is equipped with this topology.
The subset topology inherited from is not a suitable candidate in general, since the group of units of a topological ring equipped with the subset topology may not be a topological group. For example, the inverse map in is not continuous. The sequence
converges to . To see this, let be a neighbourhood of ; without loss of generality it can be assumed that
Since for all , it follows that for large enough. However, the inverses of this sequence do not converge to in .
Subgroups attached to sets of places
For a subset of places of , set
The following identities of topological groups hold:
Here the restricted product has the restricted product topology, generated by restricted open rectangles of the form
where is a finite subset of the set of all places and are open sets.
- Proof.
It suffices to prove the identity for ; the other two follow similarly. First show the two sets are equal:
In going from the second line to the third, as well as have to be in , meaning for almost all and for almost all . Therefore for almost all .
Now the topology on the left-hand side equals the topology on the right-hand side. Every open restricted rectangle is open in the topology of the idele group. Conversely, for a given open in the topology of the idele group, meaning that is open, for each there exists an open restricted rectangle contained in and containing . Therefore is the union of all these restricted open rectangles and is open in the restricted product topology.
For each set of places , is a locally compact topological group. The local compactness follows from the description of as a restricted product, and the topological group property follows from the preceding discussion on the group of units of a topological ring.
A neighbourhood system of is given by all sets of the form
where is a neighbourhood of and for almost all .
Finite extensions
Let be a finite extension. Then
where the restricted product is with respect to the unit groups .
There is a canonical embedding of in . Map to with the property
for . Therefore can be seen as a subgroup of . An element is in this subgroup if and only if its components satisfy the following properties: for , and for and over the same place of .
The embedding induces an injective map
Principal ideles and discreteness
There is a natural embedding of into given by the diagonal map
Since is a subset of for all , the embedding is well-defined and injective. In analogy to the ideal class group, the elements of in are called principal ideles.
The subgroup is closed and discrete in . Therefore
is a locally compact topological group and a Hausdorff space.
More generally, in the adelic algebra setting described below, is a discrete subgroup of .
Product formula and compactness of norm-one idele classes
For , define
Since is an idele, this product is finite and therefore well-defined. The set of norm-one ideles is
The subgroup is a closed subgroup of . The -topology on equals the subspace topology of on .[10]
The product formula states that
for all .
- Proof.
For number fields, the case of global function fields being similar, let be a number field and . It has to be shown that
For a finite place for which the corresponding prime ideal does not divide , and therefore . This is valid for almost all . There is
In going from the first line to the second, the identity
is used, where is a place of and is a place of lying above . Going from the second line to the third uses the compatibility of local and global norms. The norm is in , so it remains to prove the product formula over . Write
where is for almost all . Then
The following approximation lemma is used in the proof of compactness.
- Lemma. There exists a constant , depending only on , such that for every satisfying
there exists such that
for all .[11]
- Corollary. Let be a place of and let be given for all , with the property that for almost all . Then there exists such that
for all .
- Proof.
Let be the constant from the lemma. Let be a uniformizing element of . Define the adele by , with minimal so that
for all . Then for almost all . Define , with , so that
This works because for almost all . By the lemma there exists such that
for all .
- Theorem. is discrete and cocompact in .
- Proof.
Since is discrete in , it is also discrete in . To prove the compactness of , let be the constant of the lemma and suppose satisfies
Define
Clearly is compact. It can be claimed that the natural projection
is surjective. Let be arbitrary. Then
and therefore
It follows that
By the lemma there exists such that
for all , and therefore . This proves the surjectivity of the natural projection. Since it is also continuous, compactness follows.[2][12]
The rational numbers
There is a canonical isomorphism
Furthermore, is a set of representatives for , and is a set of representatives for .
- Proof.
Consider the map
This map is well-defined, since for all and therefore
Obviously is a continuous group homomorphism. Suppose
Then there exists such that
By considering the infinite place it can be seen that , which proves injectivity. To show surjectivity, let
The absolute value of this element is , and therefore
Hence , and there is
Since
it follows that is surjective.
The absolute value function induces the following isomorphisms of topological groups:
The isomorphisms are given by
and
Decomposition of the idele group and idele class group
The idele norm gives the following decompositions:
- Proof.
First suppose . For each place of , , so that for all , belongs to the subgroup of generated by . Therefore, for each , is in the subgroup of generated by . Thus the image of the homomorphism is a discrete subgroup of . Since this group is nontrivial, it is generated by for some . Choose such that . Then is the direct product of and the subgroup generated by . This subgroup is discrete and isomorphic to .
Now suppose . For , define
The map is an isomorphism of onto a closed subgroup of , and . The isomorphism is given by multiplication:
Obviously, is a homomorphism. To show it is injective, let . Since for , it follows that for . Moreover, there exists a such that for . Therefore for . Since
it follows that , where is the number of archimedean places of . Consequently , and therefore is injective.
To show surjectivity, let . Define , and define for and for . Let
Then
Therefore is surjective. The statements for follow similarly.
Characterisation by a finite set of places
Let be a number field. There exists a finite set of places such that
- Proof.
The class number of a number field is finite, so let be ideals representing the classes in . These ideals are generated by a finite number of prime ideals . Let be a finite set of places containing the archimedean places and the finite places corresponding to . Consider the isomorphism
induced by
At infinite places the statement is immediate, so it remains to prove the statement for finite places. The inclusion is obvious. Let . The corresponding ideal
belongs to a class , meaning
for a principal ideal . The idele maps to the ideal under the map . That means
Since the prime ideals in are in , it follows that for all . Thus for all . It follows that , and therefore .
Ideles of finite-dimensional algebras
The construction also extends to finite-dimensional algebras over . Let be a finite-dimensional algebra over . Since is not a topological group with the subspace topology in general, equip with the topology similar to above and call the idele group of . The elements of the idele group are called ideles of .[2]
Let be a finite subset of containing a basis of over . For each finite place of , let be the -module generated by in . There exists a finite set of places containing the archimedean places such that for all , is a compact subring of . For each , is an open subset of and the map is continuous on . As a consequence, maps homeomorphically onto its image in . For each , the group is an open and compact subgroup of .
Let be a finite set of places. Then
is an open subgroup of , and is the union of all . In the special case , for each finite set of places ,
is an open subgroup of . Furthermore, is the union of all .
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 Neukirch 1999, Ch. VI, §1.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 Weil 1995, Ch. IV.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 Neukirch 1999, Ch. VI.
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 Tate 1967.
- ↑ Ramakrishnan & Valenza 1999.
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 Cassels & Fröhlich 1967.
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 Weil 1995, Ch. VII.
- ↑ Weil 1995.
- ↑ Bump 1997.
- ↑ Cassels & Fröhlich 1967, p. 69.
- ↑ Cassels & Fröhlich 1967, p. 66.
- ↑ Cassels & Fröhlich 1967, p. 70.
- Neukirch, Jürgen (1999), Algebraic Number Theory, Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, 322, Springer, ISBN 978-3-540-65399-8.
- Weil, André (1995), Basic Number Theory, Classics in Mathematics, Springer, ISBN 978-3-540-58655-5.
- Algebraic Number Theory, London: Academic Press, 1967.
- Tate, John (1967), "Fourier analysis in number fields, and Hecke's zeta-functions", Algebraic Number Theory, London: Academic Press, pp. 305–347.
- Ramakrishnan, Dinakar; Valenza, Robert J. (1999), Fourier Analysis on Number Fields, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 186, Springer, ISBN 978-0-387-98436-0.
- Bump, Daniel (1997), Automorphic Forms and Representations, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, 55, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-65818-8.
