Layers of protection analysis
Layers of protection analysis (LOPA) is a technique for evaluating the hazards, risks and layers of protection associated with a system, such as a chemical process plant. In terms of complexity and rigour LOPA lies between qualitative techniques such as hazard and operability studies (HAZOP) and quantitative techniques such as fault trees and event trees.[1] LOPA is used to identify scenarios that present the greatest risk and assists in considering how that risk could be reduced.
Introduction
LOPA is a risk assessment technique that uses rules to evaluate the frequency of an initiating event, the independent protection layers (IPL), and the consequences of the event. LOPA aims to identify the countermeasures available against the potential consequences of a risk. An IPL is a device, system or action that prevents a scenario from escalating. The effectiveness of an IPL is quantified by its probability of failure on demand (PFD), in the range 0 to 1.[2] An IPL must be independent of the other protective layers and its functionality must be capable of validation.[3]
LOPA was developed in the 1990s in the chemical process industry but has found wider application.[4] In functional safety, LOPA is often used to allocate a safety integrity level to instrumented protective functions. When this occurs in the context of the analysis of process plants, LOPA generally leverages the results of a preceding HAZOP.[1] LOPA is complementary to HAZOP and can generate a second in-depth analysis of a scenario, which can be used to challenge the HAZOP findings in terms of failure events and safeguards.[3]
Layers of protection in process plants
Safety protection systems for process plant typically comprises eight layers:[2]
| Layer of protection | Protection measure | Examples | Safeguards |
|---|---|---|---|
| Layer 1 | Process design | Design to standards, inherently safer design | |
| Layer 2 | Basic controls | Process controls, process alarms (yellow), operator supervision | |
| Layer 3 | Critical alarms | Process alarms (red), operator intervention | Preventive safeguards |
| Layer 4 | Automatic actions | Shutdown, emergency shutdown (ESD) | |
| Layer 5 | Physical protection | Relief valves, rupture discs, fire and gas system | |
| Layer 6 | Physical protection | Firewalls, dikes, berms, bunds (local containment) | Mitigative safeguards |
| Layer 7 | Plant emergency response | Emergency response teams, muster, evacuation | |
| Layer 8 | Community emergency response | Warning, evacuation, emergency services |
LOPA is used to determine how a process deviation can lead to a hazardous event if not interrupted by an IPL.[2]
The LOPA procedure
LOPA is a risk assessment undertaken on a 'one cause–one consequence' pair. The steps of a LOPA risk assessment are:[4]
- Identify the consequences, using a risk matrix
- Define the risk tolerance criteria (RTC), based on the tolerable/intolerable regions on the risk matrix
- Define the relevant accident scenario, e.g. mechanical or human failure
- Determine the initiating event frequency, again using the risk matrix
- Identify the conditions and estimate the probability of failure on demand (PFD)
- Estimate the frequency of unmitigated consequences
- Identify the IPLs and estimate the PFD for each one
- Determine the frequency of mitigated consequences
- Evaluate the need for additional IPLs.
| Consequences | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Effect on reputation | Negligible | Marginal | Critical | Catastrophic | ||
| Cost (indicative) | $0.1m | $0.3m | $0.6m | $1.2m | ||
| Frequency | Improbable | 1/100/yr | Low | Medium | Medium | Serious |
| Remote | 1/50/yr | Low | Medium | Medium | Serious | |
| Occasional | 1/10/yr | Low | Medium | Serious | High | |
| Probable | 1/2/yr | Medium | Serious | High | High | |
| Frequent | 1/½/yr | Medium | Serious | High | High | |
Other uses
Although the LOPA methodology started in the process industry, the technique can be used in other fields, including:[4]
- General design
- Management of change
- Facilities siting risk
- Mechanical integrity programs
- Incident investigations
- Screening tool for Quantified Risk Assessment (QRA)
See also
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 CCPS (2001). Layer of Protection Analysis: Simplified Process Risk Assessment. New York, N.Y.: American Institute of Chemical Engineers. ISBN 978-0-816-90811-0.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 Willey, Ronald J. (2014). "Layer of Protection Analysis". Procedia Engineering 84: 12–22. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.405.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Mokhatab, Saeid; Poe, William A.; Mak, John Y. (2019). Handbook of Natural Gas Transmission and Processing, Principles and Practices (4th ed.). Cambridge, Mass. and Oxford: Gulf Professional Publishing. pp. 517–518. ISBN 978-0-12-815817-3.
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 Kingsley, John (2017-07-11). "LOPA or Layer of Protection Analysis". https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/layers-protection-analysis-lopa-q-john-kingsley.
 |  |
