List of polyhedral stellations
In three-dimensional space, applying the operation of stellation to a polyhedron extends its faces (or edges and planes) until they generate new vertices that bound a newly formed figure. Stellation represents the dual action to faceting a polyhedron.[1]
Originating from studies of star polyhedra in 14th century Europe, a proper mathematical account of polyhedral stellations was given by Johannes Kepler in his 1619 classic work, Harmonices Mundi.[2] Progress later ensued on detailing and enumerating stellations of prominent stars, such as the regular Kepler-Poinsot polyhedra,[3] with developments on different stellation methods occurring in the 1900s, principally from (Coxeter du Val) and soon afterward, (Pawley 1975).
A short generalized table of the most notable polyhedral stellations belonging to convex uniform polyhedra is provided, with complete sets of stellations for the Platonic solids (including the fifty-nine icosahedral stellations), as well as for select Catalan solids (e.g., the rhombic dodecahedron and the rhombic triacontahedron). Stellations of non-convex uniform polyhedra of structure with facial planes passing through their centers (i.e., hemipolyhedral), which render unbounded vertices, are also included; these are stellations to infinity — per (Wenninger 1983) — conforming to extensions on traditional definitions of polyhedra.
Background
Star polytopes

Experimentation with star polygons and star polyhedra since the fourteenth century AD led the way to formal theories for stellating polyhedra:
- 14th c. AD: Thomas Bradwardine was the first to detail studies of star polygons by extending the sides of polygons.[5]
- 15th – 16th c.: Charles de Bovelles became the first to study star polyhedra.[6]
- 1509: Luca Pacioli publishes Divina proportione, featuring woodcut illustrations by Leonardo da Vinci of various polyhedra, including "elevated" polyhedra that have been augmented by attaching pyramids to faces, as showcased with the stellated octahedron.[7][lower-alpha 1]
It was in 1619 that the first geometric description of a stellation was given, by Johannes Kepler in his landmark book, Harmonices Mundi: the process of extending the edges (or faces) of a figure until new vertices are generated, which collectively form a new figure.[10][11][lower-alpha 2] Using this method, Kepler was able to discover the small stellated dodecahedron and the great stellated dodecahedron.[12][13][14] In 1809, Louis Poinsot rediscovered Kepler's star figures and discovered a further two, the great icosahedron and great dodecahedron;[15] he achieved this by experimenting assembling regular star polygons and convex regular polygons on vertices of the regular icosahedron and dodecahedron (i.e., pentagons, pentagrams and equilateral triangles).[16] Three years later, Augustin-Louis Cauchy proved, using concepts of symmetry, that these four stellations are the only regular star-polyhedra,[17][18] eventually termed the Kepler–Poinsot polyhedra. As with most non-convex polyhedra including stellations and other star polyhedra, the Kepler-Poinsot polyhedra, with regular self-intersecting faces, are now known to be inequivalent to the topological sphere as a simple connected surface[19] (this is in contrast with the traditional convex uniform polyhedra and their corresponding homotopy invariance).[lower-alpha 3]
Stellation process
(Coxeter du Val) details, for the first time, all stellations of the regular icosahedron with specific rules proposed by J. C. P. Miller.[20] Generalizing these (Miller's rules) for stellating any uniform polyhedron yields the following:[21]
- The faces must lie in face-planes, i.e., the bounding planes of the regular solid.
- All parts composing the faces must be the same in each plane, although they may be quite disconnected.
- The parts included in any one plane must be symmetric about corresponding point groups, without or with reflection. This secures polyhedral symmetry for the whole solid.
- All parts included in planes must be "accessible" in the completed solid (i.e. they must be on the "outside").
- Cases where the parts can be divided into two sets, each giving a solid with as much symmetry as the whole figure, are excluded from consideration; combination of enantiomorphous pairs having no common part (which actually occurs in just one case) are included.
These rules are ideal for stellating smaller uniform solids, such as the regular polyhedra; however, when assessing stellations of other larger uniform polyhedra, this method can quickly become overwhelming. (For example, there are a total of 358,833,072 stellations to the rhombic triacontahedron using this set of rules.)[22] To address this, (Pawley 1973) proposed a set of rules that restrict the number of stellations to a more manageable set of fully supported stellations that are radially convex,[23][24] such that an outward ray from the center of the original polyhedron (in any direction) crosses the stellation surface only once[25] (that is to say, all visible parts of a face are seen from the same side).[lower-alpha 4]
In the 1948 first edition of Regular Polytopes, H. S. M. Coxeter describes the stellation process as the reciprocal action to faceting,[1] identifying the four Kepler-Poinsot polyhedra as stellations and facetings of the regular dodecahedron and icosahedron.[28][29] He specifies the construction of a star polyhedron as a stellation of its core (with congruent face-planes), or by faceting its case — the former requires the addition of solid pieces that generate new vertices, while the latter involves the removal of solid pieces, without forming any new vertices (the core of a star polyhedron or compound is the largest convex solid that can be drawn inside them, while their case is the smallest convex solid that contains them).[30]
Lists
Lists for polyhedral stellations contain non-convex polyhedra; some of the most notable examples include:
- Kepler-Poinsot polyhedra (W20, W21, W22, and W41/C7)
- Regular compound polyhedra (W19, W2/C3, W24/C47, W25/C22, UC9) and
- Platonic or Kepler-Poinsot compound dual polyhedra (W19, W47, W61, W43, and the great icosahedron and great stellated dodecahedron compound)
Stellations that topologically do not fit into standard definitions of uniform polyhedra are listed further down (i.e. stellations of hemipolyhedra).[31]
- KEY
* Kepler-Poinsot polyhedron (star polyhedron with regular facets)
† Regular compound polyhedron (vertex, edge, and face-transitive compound)
‡ Compound of dual regular polyhedra (Platonic or Kepler-Poinsot duals)
¶ First/outermost stellation of stellation core
"Stellation core" describes a stellated regular (Platonic), semi-regular (Archimedean), or dual to a semi-regular (Catalan) figure.
"Face diagram" represents the lines of intersection from extended polyhedral edges that are used in the stellation process.
"Refs." (references) such as indexes found in (Coxeter du Val) using the Crennells' illustration notation (C), and (Wenninger 1989) (W).
Enumerations
The table below is adapted from research by Robert Webb, using his program Stella.[36] It enumerates fully supported stellations and stellations per Miller's process, of the regular Platonic solids as well as the semi-regular Archimedean solids and their Catalan duals. In this list, the elongated square gyrobicupola and its dual polyhedron are not included (these are sometimes considered a fourteenth Archimedean and Catalan solid, respectively). The base polyhedron stellation core is included as a zeroth convex stellation following the Crennells' indexing, with stellation totals the sum of chiral and reflexible stellations (a "chiral" stellation is enantiomorphous, while a "reflexible" stellation maintains the same group symmetry as its stellation core, yet remains achiral – for a count of these separately, visit the parent source).
| Stellation totals of convex polyhedra by group symmetry and order (Td, Oh, Ih)Template:Hair-space[36] | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▼ | Polyhedron | Cell types | Fully supported stellations | Miller stellations | ||
P L A T O N I C
|
Tetrahedron | 1 | 1[22] | 1[37] | ||
| Cube | 1 | 1[22] | 1[37] | |||
| Octahedron | 2 | 2[38] | 2[37] | |||
| Dodecahedron | 4 | 4[38] | 4[39] | |||
| Icosahedron | 11 | 18[38][21] | 59[40] | |||
A R C H I M E D E A N
|
Truncated tetrahedron | 4 | 6 | 10 | ||
| Cuboctahedron | 8 | 13 | 21 | |||
| Truncated octahedron | 9 | 18 | 45 | |||
| Truncated cube | 9 | 18 | 45 | |||
| Rhombicuboctahedron | 48 | 18827 | ? (128723453647 reflexible) | |||
| Truncated cuboctahedron | 49 | 22632 | ? (317650001638 reflexible) | |||
| Snub cube | 274 | 299050957776 | ? | |||
| Icosidodecahedron | 41 | 847 | 70841855109 | |||
| Truncated icosahedron | 45 | 1117 | 3082649548558 | |||
| Truncated dodecahedron | 45 | 1141 | 2645087084526 | |||
| Rhombicosidodecahedron | 273 | 298832037395 | ? | |||
| Truncated icosidodecahedron | 294 | 1016992138164 | ? | |||
| Snub dodecahedron | 1940 | ? (579 reflexible) | ? | |||
C A T A L A N
|
Triakis tetrahedron | 9 | 188 | |||
| Rhombic dodecahedron | 4 | 4[41][38] | 5 | |||
| Tetrakis hexahedron | 10 | 1762[38] | 143383367876 | |||
| Triakis octahedron | 32 | 3083[38] | 218044256331 | |||
| Deltoidal icositetrahedron | 32 | 1201 | 253811894971 | |||
| Disdyakis dodecahedron | 292 | ? (14728897413 reflexible) | ? | |||
| Pentagonal icositetrahedron | 69 | 72621[38] | ? | |||
| Rhombic triacontahedron | 29 | 227[42][38] | 358833098[lower-alpha 5] | |||
| Pentakis dodecahedron | 253 | 71112946668 | ? | |||
| Triakis icosahedron | 241 | 13902332663 | ? | |||
| Deltoidal hexecontahedron | 226 | 7146284014 | ? | |||
| Disdyakis triacontahedron | 2033 | ? (~ 1012 reflexible) | ? | |||
| Pentagonal hexecontahedron | 536 | 30049378413796 | ? | |||
"Cell types" are sets of symmetrically equivalent stellation cells, where "stellation cells" are the minimal 3D spaces enclosed on all sides by the original polyhedron's extended facial planes.
"?" denotes an unknown total number of stellations; however, the number of reflexible stellations are sometimes known for these (where chiral stellations are excluded).
Stellations of Platonic solids
Only three of the five Platonic solids produce stellations: the regular octahedron, regular dodecahedron, and regular icosahedron. The regular tetrahedron and cube are unable to generate stellations when extending their faces, since extending their vertices only form one possible convex hull.[37]
Stellations of the octahedron
The stella octangula (or stellated octahedron) is the only stellation of the regular octahedron.[37] This stellation is made of self-dual tetrahedra, as the simplest regular polyhedral compound:[44]
| Figure | Stellation |
|---|---|
Compound of two tetrahedra
stella octangula | |
60px
|
60px
|
60px
|
60px
|
deltahedra, antiprisms
| |
Stellations of the dodecahedron
All stellations of the regular dodecahedron are Kepler-Poinsot polyhedra:
| Platonic solid | Kepler–Poinsot solids | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Regular dodecahedron | Small stellated dodecahedron | Great dodecahedron | Great stellated dodecahedron |
| 60px | 60px | 60px | 60px |
| 60px | 60px | 60px | 60px |
Stellations of the icosahedron

(Coxeter du Val) detailed the stellations of the regular icosahedron with rules proposed by J. C. P. Miller. As found in (Coxeter du Val), the following table lists all stellations of the icosahedron per the Crennells' indexing (in it, the regular icosahedron (or snub octahedron) stellation core is indexed as "1"):
| Stellations of the regular icosahedron [45] | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crennell | Cells | Faces | Figure | Face diagram | ||
| A | 0 | 60px | 60px
| |||
2
|
B | 1 | 60px | 60px
| ||
| C | 2 | 60px | 60px
| |||
4
|
D | 3 4 | 60px | 60px
| ||
5
|
E | 5 6 7 | 60px | 60px
| ||
6
|
F | 8 9 10 | 60px | 60px
| ||
| G | 11 12 | 60px | 60px
| |||
| H | 13 | 60px | 60px
| |||
9
|
e1 | 3' 5 | 60px | 60px
| ||
10
|
f1 | 5' 6' 9 10 | 60px | 60px
| ||
11
|
g1 | 10' 12 | 60px | 60px
| ||
12
|
e1f1 | 3' 6' 9 10 | 60px | 60px
| ||
13
|
e1f1g1 | 3' 6' 9 12 | 60px | 60px
| ||
14
|
f1g1 | 5' 6' 9 12 | 60px | 60px
| ||
15
|
e2 | 4' 6 7 | 60px | 60px
| ||
16
|
f2 | 7' 8 | 60px | 60px
| ||
17
|
g2 | 8' 9'11 | 60px | 60px
| ||
18
|
e2f2 | 4' 6 8 | 60px | 60px
| ||
19
|
e2f2g2 | 4' 6 9' 11 | 60px | 60px
| ||
20
|
f2g2 | 7' 9' 11 | 60px | 60px
| ||
21
|
De1 | 4 5 | 60px | 60px
| ||
| Ef1 | 7 9 10 | 60px | 60px
| |||
23
|
Fg1 | 8 9 12 | 60px | 60px
| ||
24
|
De1f1 | 4 6' 9 10 | 60px | 60px
| ||
25
|
De1f1g1 | 4 6' 9 12 | 60px | 60px
| ||
26
|
Ef1g1 | 7 9 12 | 60px | 60px
| ||
27
|
De2 | 3 6 7 | 60px | 60px
| ||
28
|
Ef2 | 5 6 8 | 60px | 60px
| ||
29
|
Fg2 | 10 11 | 60px | 60px
| ||
| De2f2 | 3 6 8 | 60px | 60px
| |||
31
|
De2f2g2 | 3 6 9' 11 | 60px | 60px
| ||
32
|
Ef2g2 | 5 6 9' 11 | 60px | 60px
| ||
33
|
f1 | 5' 6' 9 10 | 60px | 60px
| ||
34
|
e1f1 | 3' 5 6' 9 10 | 60px | 60px
| ||
35
|
De1f1 | 4 5 6' 9 10 | 60px | 60px
| ||
36
|
f1g1 | 5' 6' 9 10' 12 | 60px | 60px
| ||
37
|
e1f1g1 | 3' 5 6' 9 10' 12 | 60px | 60px
| ||
38
|
De1f1g1 | 4 5 6' 9 10' 12 | 60px | 60px
| ||
39
|
f1g2 | 5' 6' 8' 9' 10 11 | 60px | 60px
| ||
40
|
e1f1g2 | 3' 5 6' 8' 9' 10 11 | 60px | 60px
| ||
41
|
De1f1g2 | 4 5 6' 8' 9' 10 11 | 60px | 60px
| ||
42
|
f1f2g2 | 5' 6' 7' 9' 10 11 | 60px | 60px
| ||
43
|
e1f1f2g2 | 3' 5 6' 7' 9' 10 11 | 60px | 60px
| ||
44
|
De1f1f2g2 | 4 5 6' 7' 9' 10 11 | 60px | 60px
| ||
45
|
e2f1 | 4' 5' 6 7 9 10 | 60px | 60px
| ||
46
|
De2f1 | 3 5' 6 7 9 10 | 60px | 60px
| ||
| Ef1 | 5 6 7 9 10 | 60px | 60px
| |||
48
|
e2f1g1 | 4' 5' 6 7 9 10' 12 | 60px | 60px
| ||
49
|
De2f1g1 | 3 5' 6 7 9 10' 12 | 60px | 60px
| ||
50
|
Ef1g1 | 5 6 7 9 10' 12 | 60px | 60px
| ||
51
|
e2f1f2 | 4' 5' 6 8 9 10 | 60px | 60px
| ||
52
|
De2f1f2 | 3 5' 6 8 9 10 | 60px | 60px
| ||
53
|
Ef1f2 | 5 6 8 9 10 | 60px | 60px
| ||
54
|
e2f1f2g1 | 4' 5' 6 8 9 10' 12 | 60px | 60px
| ||
55
|
De2f1f2g1 | 3 5' 6 8 9 10' 12 | 60px | 60px
| ||
56
|
Ef1f2g1 | 5 6 8 9 10' 12 | 60px | 60px
| ||
57
|
e2f1f2g2 | 4' 5' 6 9' 10 11 | 60px | 60px
| ||
58
|
De2f1f2g2 | 3 5' 6 9' 10 11 | 60px | 60px
| ||
59
|
Ef1f2g2 | 5 6 9' 10 11 | 60px | 60px
| ||
"Cells" (du Val notation) correspond to the internal congruent spaces formed by extending face-planes of the regular icosahedron.
A subset of these are illustrated in (Wenninger 1989), alongside constructions for physical models (W19–W66).[46]
Stellations of Catalan solids
Stellations of the rhombic dodecahedron

The rhombic dodecahedron produces three fully supported stellations, described in (Luke 1957):[48][49]
| Stellation | Figure | Face diagram |
|---|---|---|
Second stellation of the rhombic dodecahedron
|
||
Final stellation of the rhombic dodecahedron
|
An additional fourth stellation is possible under Miller's rules.[50] The first stellation of the rhombic dodecahedron is notable for being able to form a honeycomb in three-dimensional space, using copies of itself.[47]
Stellations of the rhombic triacontahedron
(Pawley 1975) shows the rhombic triacontahedron produces 227 fully supported stellations, including the rhombic triacontahedron itself.[38] Some of these are shown in the table below:
| Stellation | Figure | Face diagram |
|---|---|---|
| 65px | 60px
| |
First stellation of the rhombic triacontahedron
|
65px | 60px
|
Medial rhombic triacontahedron
|
65px | 60px
|
| 65px | 60px
| |
| 65px | 60px
| |
Great rhombic triacontahedron
|
65px | 60px
|
Final stellation of the rhombic triacontahedron
|
65px | 60px
|
Of these, the compound of five cubes is notable for being a regular compound polyhedron. The medial rhombic triacontahedron and the great rhombic triacontahedron are also notable for being star (non-convex) isotoxal polyhedra.
Hemipolychrons
In (Wenninger 1983), a unique family of stellations with unbounded vertices are identified.[51] These originate from orthogonal edges of faces that pass through centers of their corresponding dual hemipolyhedra. The following is a list of these stellations; specifically, of non-convex uniform hemipolyhedra (with coincidental figures in parentheses):
| Image | Name | Dual figure | Stellation coreTemplate:Hair-space[53] |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60px | Tetrahemihexacron | Tetrahemihexahedron | Cube |
| 60px | Octahemioctacron (hexahemioctacron) |
Octahemioctahedron (cubohemioctahedron) |
Rhombic dodecahedron |
| 60px | Small icosihemidodecacron (small dodecahemidodecacron) |
Small icosihemidodecahedron (small dodecahemidodecahedron) |
Rhombic triacontahedron[54] |
| 60px | Great dodecahemidodecacron (great icosihemidodecacron) |
Great dodecahemidodecahedron (great icosihemidodecahedron) | |
| 60px | Great dodecahemicosacron (small dodecahemicosacron) |
Great dodecahemicosahedron (small icosihemidodecahedron) | |
| 60px | Great dirhombicosidodecacron (great disnub dirhombidodecacron) |
Great dirhombicosidodecahedron (great disnub dirhombidodecahedron) |
Deltoidal hexecontahedron[55] |
This family of stellations does not strictly fulfill the definition of a polyhedron that is bound by vertices, and Wenninger notes that at the limit their facets can be interpreted as forming unbounded elongated pyramids, or equivalently, prisms (indistinguishably).[56] As with their dual polyhedra, these hemipolyhedral stellations are isotoxal polyhedra (in their case, at infinity). The final polyhedron on this list, the great dirhombicosidodecacron,[57] is the only stellation whose dual figure — the last-indexed and most complex uniform polyhedron, the great dirhombicosidodecahedron (U75) — is constructed using a spherical quadrilateral Wythoff construction (rather than with spherical triangles).[58][lower-alpha 6]
The tetrahemihexahedron is the only hemipolyhedron to produce a dual hemipolychron without a coincidental figure, the tetrahemihexacron.
Notes
- ↑ More specifically, Pacioli's "elevation" of polyhedra involved truncating (or rectifying) the Platonic solids, after-which pyramids of different bases are systematically attached to faces of the polyhedra[8] (akin to kleetopes, augmenting them into a "star-like" polyhedron). In this same work, da Vinci illustrates a concaved triakis icosahedron, which shares its outer shell with the great stellated dodecahedron.[9]
- ↑ (Kepler 1997) defines a star polygon via stellation of a convex polygon:
"Some of these [figures] are primary and basic, not extending beyond their boundaries, and it is to these that the previous definition properly applies: others are augmented, as if it were extending beyond their sides, and if two non-neighboring sides of one of the basic figures are produced they meet [to form a vertex of the augmented figure]: these are called Stars." - ↑ See also, Euler characteristic § Homotopy invariance.
- ↑ (McKeown Badler) presented an early computer algorithm to generate and visualize stellations of convex polyhedra,[26] as for the 227 stellations of the rhombic triacontahedron that (Pawley 1975) formally described.[27]
- ↑ 358833072 from earlier sources,[22] and extending to 358833106 per a deeper analysis by Webb of Miller's fifth rule.[43]
- ↑ The dual to the great dirhombicosidodecacron is furthermore the only non-degenerate uniform polyhedron that is unable to be constructed using a spherical triangular Wythoff construction; its coincidental figure (the great disnub dirhombidodecacron), on the other hand, is dual to the great disnub dirhombidodecahedron, which is the only degenerate uniform polyhedron with coincident edges discovered to date, constructed instead using traditional triangular and quadrilateral Wythoff spherical domains.[59]
References
Works cited
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Coxeter (1948), pp. 95.
- ↑ Kepler (1997), Book I: II. Definitions; p. 17.
- ↑ Wenninger (1965), pp. 244–248.
- ↑ Kepler (1619), pl. V (pp. 58:59).
- ↑ Coxeter (1969), p. 37.
- ↑ Chasles (1875), pp. 480, 481.
- ↑ Pacioli (1509), pls. XIX, XX.
- ↑ Innocenzi (2018), p. 248.
- ↑ Pacioli (1509), pls. XXV, XXVI.
- ↑ Kepler (1619), Liber I: II. Definitio (pp. 6, 7).
- ↑ Kepler (1997), Book I: II. Definitions (p. 17).
- ↑ Wenninger (1965), pp. 244.
- ↑ Kepler (1619), Liber II: XXVI Propositio (p. 60).
- ↑ Kepler (1997), Book II: XXVI Proposition (pp. 116, 117).
- ↑ Wenninger (1965), pp. 244, 245.
- ↑ Poinsot (1810), pp. 39–42.
- ↑ Wenninger (1965), p. 245.
- ↑ Cauchy (1813), pp. 68–75.
- ↑ Richeson (2007), p. 431.
- ↑ Coxeter et al. (1938), pp. 7, 8.
- ↑ 21.0 21.1 Webb (2000).
- ↑ 22.0 22.1 22.2 22.3 Messer (1995), p. 26.
- ↑ Wenninger (1983), pp. 36, 153.
- ↑ Messer (1995), p. 27.
- ↑ Webb (2001). "Stella Polyhedral Glossary". https://www.software3d.com/Glossary.php.
- ↑ McKeown & Badler (1980), pp. 19–24.
- ↑ Lansdown (1982), p. 55.
- ↑ Cundy (1949), p. 48.
- ↑ Coxeter (1948), pp. 96.
- ↑ Coxeter (1948), pp. 98, 99.
- ↑ Wenninger (1983), pp. 101–119.
- ↑ Pawley (1975), p. 225.
- ↑ Bulatov (1996). "compound of small stellated dodecahedron and great dodecahedron". https://bulatov.org/polyhedra/uniform_compounds/uc39.html.
- ↑ Holden (1971), p. 134.
- ↑ Brückner (1900), p. 260.
- ↑ 36.0 36.1 Webb (2001). "Enumeration of Stellations (Research)". https://www.software3d.com/Enumerate.php.
- ↑ 37.0 37.1 37.2 37.3 37.4 Coxeter (1973), p. 96.
- ↑ 38.0 38.1 38.2 38.3 38.4 38.5 38.6 38.7 38.8 Messer (1995), p. 32.
- ↑ Wenninger (1989), pp. 35, 38–40.
- ↑ Coxeter et al. (1938).
- ↑ Luke (1957).
- ↑ Pawley (1975).
- ↑ Webb (2001). "Miller's Fifth Rule". https://www.software3d.com/Millers5th.php.
- ↑ Coxeter (1973), pp. 48, 49.
- ↑ Coxeter et al. (1999).
- ↑ Wenninger (1989), pp. 34–36, 41–65.
- ↑ 47.0 47.1 Holden (1971), p. 165.
- ↑ Cundy & Rollett (1961), pp. 149–151.
- ↑ Hart (1996). "Stellations". https://www.georgehart.com/virtual-polyhedra/stellations-info.html.
- ↑ Weisstein (1999). "Rhombic Dodecahedron Stellations". https://mathworld.wolfram.com/RhombicDodecahedronStellations.html.
- ↑ Wenninger (1983), pp. 101–139.
- ↑ Wenninger (1983), pp. 101–117, 135, 137–139.
- ↑ Wenninger (1983), pp. 101–104.
- ↑ Wenninger (1983), pp. 104, 114.
- ↑ Wenninger (1983), p. 135.
- ↑ Wenninger (1983), pp. 101, 103, 104.
- ↑ Wenninger (1983), pp. 135, 139.
- ↑ Skilling (1975), p. 123.
- ↑ Skilling (1975), pp. 119, 123.
Secondary sources
- Bulatov, Vladimir (1996). "compound of small stellated dodecahedron and great dodecahedron". https://bulatov.org/polyhedra/uniform_compounds/uc39.html.
- Chasles, Michel (1875) (in fr). Aperçu historique sur l'origine et le développement des méthodes en géométrie particulièrement de celles qui se rapportent à la géométrie moderne, suivi d'un mémoire de géométrie sur deux principes généraux de la science, la dualité et l'homographie (2nd ed.). Paris (École polytechnique): Gauthiers-Villars. pp. 1–851. https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k65439706/.
- Coxeter, H. S. M. (1969). Introduction to Geometry (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley. pp. 1–486. ISBN 0471182834. https://www.scribd.com/document/774187910/Coxeter-Introduction-to-Geometry-2ndEd-1969.
- Coxeter, H. S. M. (1973). Regular Polytopes (3rd ed.). New York: Dover. ISBN 0-486-61480-8.
- Hart, George W. (1996). "Virtual Polyhedra (The Encyclopedia of Polyhedra)". http://www.georgehart.com/virtual-polyhedra/vp.html.
- Hart, George W. (1996). "Stellations". https://www.georgehart.com/virtual-polyhedra/stellations-info.html.
- Cundy, H. Martyn (February 1949). "Regular Polytopes. By H.S.M. Coxeter. Pp. xx, 324. 50s. 1948". The Mathematical Gazette (Cambridge University Press) 33 (303): 47–49. doi:10.2307/3608432.
- Cundy, H. Martyn; Rollett, A. P. (1961). "The Stellations of the Rhombic Dodecahedron". Mathematical Models (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 149–151. https://prometeo.matem.unam.mx/recursos/VariosNiveles/iCartesiLibri/recursos/Curvas_y_Superficies_Parametricas/docs/cundy.pdf.
- Holden, Alan (1971). Shapes, space, and symmetry. New York: Columbia University Press. pp. 1–200. ISBN 9780231035491. https://archive.org/details/shapesspacesymme0000hold_z8t1.
- Innocenzi, Plinio (2018). "The Divine Proportion". The Innovators Behind Leonardo. Cham: Springer Nature. pp. 231–260. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-90449-8. ISBN 978-3-319-90448-1. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-90449-8_11.
- Lansdown, John (September 1982). Review of original work by David W. Brisson (1978). "Hypergraphics: Visualizing Complex Relationships in Art, Science and Technology". Computers and the Humanities (Springer Nature) 16 (1): 55–57. ISSN 0010-4817. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30204734.
- Bradley, Robert E.; Sandifer, Edward, eds (2007). "The Polyhedral Formula". Leonhard Euler: Life, Work and Legacy. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Mathematics. 5. Amsterdam: Elsevier B. V.. pp. 421–439. doi:10.1016/S0928-2017(07)80023-5. ISBN 978-0-444-52728-8. https://pyrkov-professor.ru/Portals/0/Mediateka/18%20vek/bradley_leonhard_euler.pdf.
- Webb, Robert (2000). "Stella: Polyhedron Navigator". Symmetry: Culture and Science 11 (1–4): 231–268. http://www.software3d.com/PolyNav/PolyNavigator.php.
- Weisstein, Eric W. (1999). "Rhombic Dodecahedron Stellations". Wolfram Research. https://mathworld.wolfram.com/RhombicDodecahedronStellations.html.
- Wenninger, Magnus (1965). "Historically Speaking: The world of polyhedra*". Mathematics Teacher (National Council of Teachers of Mathematics) 58 (3): 244–248. doi:10.5951/MT.58.3.0244. https://www.polyhedra-world.nc/stuff/world_of_polyhedra.pdf. – via Maurice Starck
Primary sources
- Brückner, Max (1900) (in de). Vielecke und Vielflache: Theorie und Geschichte. Leipzig: B.G. Treubner. pp. 1–268. https://archive.org/details/vieleckeundviel00brgoog.
- Cauchy, Augustin-Louis (1813). Read in undergraduate courses at l'École polytechnique, on February 1811. "1er Mémoire: Recherches sur les polyèdres" (in French). Journal de l'École polytechnique (Paris: Gauthiers-Villars) 9 (16): 68–86. https://www.digitale-sammlungen.de/en/view/bsb10052917?page=76,77.
- Coxeter, H. S. M. (1948). Regular Polytopes (1st ed.). London: Methuen & Co.. pp. 1–321. https://archive.org/details/regularpolytopes0000hsmc/mode/2up.
- Coxeter, H. S. M.; du Val, P.; Flather, P.; Petrie, J. F. (1938). Plates (I–XX) by Flather & Petrie. "The Fifty-Nine Icosahedra". University of Toronto Studies (Mathematical Series) (University of Toronto Press) (6): 1–26. https://www.scribd.com/doc/186979812/The-Fifty-Nine-Icosahedra.
- Third edition: Coxeter, H. S. M. et al. (1999). The Fifty-Nine Icosahedra. Illustrations by Kate and David Crennell. Tarquin. pp. 1–72. ISBN 978-1899618323.
- Jamnitzer, Wenzel (1568) (in German). Perspectiva Corporum Regularium. Engravings by Jost Amman (A.I–I.III) from drawings by Jamnitzer. Nuremberg: Christoph Heussler. pp. 1–4. https://portal.getty.edu/books/gri_9924967690001551.
- Kepler, Johannes (1619) (in Latin). Harmonices Mundi. Five plate engravings and numerous woodcut illustrations prepared by Wilhelm Schickard.. Linz: Gottfried Tambach & John Plancus (printer). pp. i–v, 1–66, 1–255. doi:10.5479/sil.135810.39088002800316. https://library.si.edu/digital-library/book/ioanniskepplerih00kepl.
- English translation: Kepler, Johannes (1997). Harmony of the World. Memoirs. 209. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society Press. pp. i–xlii, 1–549. doi:10.70249/9798893982398. ISBN 9798893982398. https://www.pennpress.org/9780871692092/harmony-of-the-world-by-johannes-kepler/.
- Luke, Dorman (October 1957). "Stellations of the Rhombic Dodecahedron". The Mathematical Gazette (Cambridge University Press) 41 (337): 189–194. doi:10.2307/3609190. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/mathematical-gazette/article/abs/stellations-of-the-rhombic-dodecahedron/12C416EC5B74346A58F66B08CBD7CAA2.
- Messer, Peter W. (1995). "Stellations of the rhombic triacontahedron and beyond". Structural Topology (Structural Topology Research Group (University of Montreal)) (21): 25–46. ISSN 0226-9171. http://www-iri.upc.es/people/ros/StructuralTopology/ST21/st21-06-a3-ocr.pdf.
- McKeown, Kathleen R.; Badler, Norman I. (1980). Creating polyhedral stellations. SIGGRAPH '80: Proceedings of the 7th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques (Seattle). New York: Association for Computing Machinery. pp. 19–24. doi:10.1145/965105.807463. ISBN 978-0-89791-021-7. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/965105.807463.
- Pacioli, Luca (1509) (in Italian). Divina proportione. Woodcut illustrations by Leonardo da Vinci (I–LXI). Venice: Paganino Paganini.
- Manuscript: Pacioli, Luca (December 14, 1498) (in Italian). Divina proportione. Colored woodcut illustrations by Leonardo da Vinci (I–LXI). Milan: Biblioteca Ambrosiana. https://ambrosiana.it/en/opere/de-divina-proportione/.
- Original manuscript reprint: Pacioli, Luca (1956) (in Italian). De Divina Proportione. Fontes Ambrosiani. 31. Milan: Mediobanca. pp. i–xxix; 1–247. https://archiviostorico.mediobanca.com/pubblicazione/luca-pacioli-de-divina-proportione/.
- Pawley, G. S. (1975). "The 227 triacontahedra". Geometriae Dedicata 4 (2–4): 221–232. doi:10.1007/BF00148756. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00148756.
- Pawley, G. S. (1973). Stellated triacontahedra.. Unpublished manuscript.
- Poinsot, Louis (1810). "Mémoire: Sur les Polygones et les Polyèdres" (in French). Journal de l'École polytechnique (Paris: Imprimerie de la République) 4 (10): 16–48. https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k433667x/f1.item.r=journal%20de%20l'ecole%20polytechnique1810.
- Webb, Robert (2001). "Enumeration of Stellations (Research)". https://www.software3d.com/Enumerate.php.
- Webb, Robert (2001). "Miller's Fifth Rule". https://www.software3d.com/Millers5th.php.
- Skilling, John (1975). "The complete set of uniform polyhedra". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A (London: Proceedings of the Royal Society) 278 (1278): 111–135. doi:10.1098/rsta.1975.0022. Bibcode: 1975RSPTA.278..111S. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsta.1975.0022.
- Wenninger, Magnus (1983). Dual Models. Cambridge University Press. pp. 1–156. ISBN 0521098599. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/dual-models/7F1B1D1AEF65D83BB77F516AEBA22919.
- Wenninger, Magnus (1989). Polyhedron Models (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 1–208. ISBN 9780521098595. https://www.scribd.com/document/831959201/Polyhedron-Models-PDFDrive.
External links
- Stellation and Facetting - a Brief History from Guy's Polyhedral Pages (Guy Inchbald) for a brief chronological listing regarding stellation
- Stellations of the Rhombic Triacontahedron from Virtual Polyhedra (The Encyclopedia of Polyhedra) (George W. Hart)








