Localization of an ∞-category

From HandWiki

In mathematics, specifically in higher category theory, a localization of an ∞-category is an ∞-category obtained by inverting some maps.

An ∞-category is a presentable ∞-category if it is a localization of an ∞-presheaf category in the sense of Bousfield, by definition[1] or as a result of Simpson.[2]

Definition

Let S be a simplicial set and W a simplicial subset of it. Then the localization in the sense of Dwyer–Kan is a map

u:S→W−1S

such that

  • W−1S is an ∞-category,
  • the image u(W1) consists of invertible maps,
  • the induced map on ∞-categories
    u*:Hom⁡(W−1S,−)→∼HomW(S,−)
is invertible.[3]

When W is clear form the context, the localized category S−1W is often also denoted as L(S).

A Dwyer–Kan localization that admits a right adjoint is called a localization in the sense of Bousfield.[4] For example, the inclusion ∞-Grpd ↪ ∞-Cat has a left adjoint given by the localization that inverts all maps (functors).[5] The right adjoint to it, on the other hand, is the core functor (thus the localization is Bousfield).

Properties

Let C be an ∞-category with small colimits and W⊂C a subcategory of weak equivalences so that C is a category of cofibrant objects. Then the localization C→L(C) induces an equivalence

L(Hom_(X,C))→∼Hom_(X,L(C))

for each simplicial set X.[6]

Similarly, if C is a hereditary ∞-category with weak fibrations and cofibrations, then

L(Hom_(I,C))→∼Hom_(I,L(C))

for each small category I.[7]

See also

References

  1. ↑ Cisinski 2023, Definition 7.11.5.
  2. ↑ Lurie 2009, Theorem 5.5.1.1.
  3. ↑ Cisinski 2023, Definition 7.1.2.
  4. ↑ Land 2021, Definition 5.1.20.
  5. ↑ Land 2021, Example just before Proposition 5.1.24.
  6. ↑ Cisinski 2023, Proposition 7.9.2.
  7. ↑ Cisinski 2023, Theorem 7.9.8.

Further reading