Localization of an ∞-category

From HandWiki

In mathematics, specifically in higher category theory, a localization of an ∞-category is an ∞-category obtained by inverting some maps.

An ∞-category is a presentable ∞-category if it is a localization of an ∞-presheaf category in the sense of Bousfield, by definition[1] or as a result of Simpson.[2]

Definition

Let S be a simplicial set and W a simplicial subset of it. Then the localization in the sense of Dwyer–Kan is a map

u:SW1S

such that

  • W1S is an ∞-category,
  • the image u(W1) consists of invertible maps,
  • the induced map on ∞-categories
    u*:Hom(W1S,)HomW(S,)
is invertible.[3]

When W is clear form the context, the localized category S1W is often also denoted as L(S).

A Dwyer–Kan localization that admits a right adjoint is called a localization in the sense of Bousfield.[4] For example, the inclusion ∞-Grpd ∞-Cat has a left adjoint given by the localization that inverts all maps (functors).[5] The right adjoint to it, on the other hand, is the core functor (thus the localization is Bousfield).

Properties

Let C be an ∞-category with small colimits and WC a subcategory of weak equivalences so that C is a category of cofibrant objects. Then the localization CL(C) induces an equivalence

L(Hom_(X,C))Hom_(X,L(C))

for each simplicial set X.[6]

Similarly, if C is a hereditary ∞-category with weak fibrations and cofibrations, then

L(Hom_(I,C))Hom_(I,L(C))

for each small category I.[7]

See also

References

  1. Cisinski 2023, Definition 7.11.5.
  2. Lurie 2009, Theorem 5.5.1.1.
  3. Cisinski 2023, Definition 7.1.2.
  4. Land 2021, Definition 5.1.20.
  5. Land 2021, Example just before Proposition 5.1.24.
  6. Cisinski 2023, Proposition 7.9.2.
  7. Cisinski 2023, Theorem 7.9.8.

Further reading