Medicine:Endovascular aneurysm repair

From HandWiki
Short description: Surgery used to treat abdominal aortic aneurysm
Endovascular aneurysm repair
Aneurysm endovascular.jpg
Endovascular aneurysm repair
Other namesEndovascular aortic repair
ICD-9-CM39.51, 39.52, 39.7

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is a type of minimally-invasive endovascular surgery used to treat pathology of the aorta, most commonly an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). When used to treat thoracic aortic disease, the procedure is then specifically termed TEVAR for "thoracic endovascular aortic/aneurysm repair." EVAR involves the placement of an expandable stent graft within the aorta to treat aortic disease without operating directly on the aorta. In 2003, EVAR surpassed open aortic surgery as the most common technique for repair of AAA,[1] and in 2010, EVAR accounted for 78% of all intact AAA repair in the United States.[2]

Medical uses

Standard EVAR is appropriate for aneurysms that begin below the renal arteries, where there exists an adequate length of normal aorta (the "proximal aortic neck") for reliable attachment of the endograft without leakage of blood around the device ("endoleak").[3] If the proximal aortic neck is also involved with the aneurysm, the patient may be a candidate for complex visceral EVAR with a fenestrated or branched EVAR.

Patients with aneurysms require elective repair of their aneurysm when it reaches a diameter large enough (typically greater than 5.5 cm) such that the risk of rupture is greater than the risk of surgery. Repair is also warranted for aneurysms that rapidly enlarge or those that have been the source of emboli (debris from the aneurysm that dislodges and travel into other arteries). Lastly, the repair is also indicated for aneurysms that are the source of pain and tenderness, which may indicate impending rupture. The options for repair include traditional open aortic surgery or endovascular repair.

Endovascular procedures aim to reduce the morbidity and mortality of treating arterial disease in a patient population that is increasingly older and less fit than when major open repairs were developed and popularized. Even in the early days, significant risks were accepted in the understanding that the large open operation was the only option. That is not the case in most patients today.

Studies that assign aneurysm patients to treatment with EVAR or traditional open surgery have demonstrated fewer early complications with the minimally invasive approach. Some studies have also observed a lower mortality rate with EVAR.[4][5] The reduction in death, however, does not persist long-term. After a few years, the survival after repair is similar to EVAR or open surgery. This observation may be the result of durability problems with early endograft, with a corresponding need for additional procedures to repair endoleaks and other device-related issues. Newer, improved technology may reduce the need for such secondary procedures. If so, the results of EVAR may improve to the point where long-term survival benefit becomes evident.

EVAR is also used for rupture of the abdominal and descending thoracic aorta, and in rare cases used to treat pathology of the ascending aorta.[6]

Aortic dissection

Endografts have been used in patients with aortic dissection, noting the extremely complex nature of open surgical repair in these patients. In uncomplicated aortic dissections, no benefit has been demonstrated over medical management alone. In uncomplicated type B aortic dissection, TEVAR does not seem either to improve or compromise 2-year survival and adverse event rates.[7] Its use in complicated aortic dissection is under investigation. In the Clinical Practice Guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery, it is recommended that in patients with complicated acute type B aortic dissection, endovascular repair with thoracic endografting should be the first line intervention.[8]

Before people are deemed to be suitable candidates for this treatment, they have to go through a rigorous set of tests. These include a CT scan of the complete thorax/abdomen/pelvis and blood tests. The CT scan gives precise measurements of the aneurysm and the surrounding anatomy. In particular, the calibre/tortuosity of the iliac arteries and the relationship of the neck of the aneurysm to the renal arteries are important determinants of whether the aneurysm is amenable to endoluminal repair. In certain occasions where the renal arteries are too close to the aneurysm, the custom-made fenestrated graft stent is now an accepted alternative to doing open surgery.

Relative contraindications

A patient's anatomy can be unsuitable for EVAR in several ways. Most commonly, in an infrarenal aneurysm, a potential EVAR candidate lacks adequate length of the normal-diameter aorta between the aneurysm and the takeoff of the renal arteries, the "infra-renal neck". Another relative contraindications include prohibitively small iliac arteries, aneurysmal iliac arteries, prohibitively small femoral arteries, or circumferential calcification of the femoral or iliac arteries.

In addition to a short proximal aortic neck, the neck may be angulated, large in diameter, or shaped like a funnel (conical) where the neck diameter at the top is larger than the neck diameter at the bottom. Along with a short proximal aortic neck, necks with any of these characteristics are called "hostile necks" and endovascular repair can be either contraindicated or associated with early-late complications of endoleak, or endograft migration, or both.

Many of the advances in EVAR technique aim to adapt EVAR for these situations, and advanced techniques allow EVAR to be employed in patients who previously were not candidates.


Abdominal aortic endograft on a CT scan; original aneurysm marked in blue

The procedure is carried out in a sterile environment under fluoroscopic guidance. It is usually carried out by a vascular surgeon, interventional radiologist or cardiac surgeon, and occasionally, general surgeon or interventional cardiologist.[9][10][11][12] The procedure can be performed under general, regional (spinal or epidural) or even local anesthesia. [13]

Access to the patient's femoral arteries can be with surgical incisions or percutaneously in the groin on both sides. Vascular sheaths are introduced into the patient's femoral arteries, through which guidewires, catheters, and the endograft are passed.

Diagnostic angiography images are captured of the aorta to determine the location of the patient's renal arteries, so the stent-graft can be deployed without blocking these. Failure to achieve this will cause kidney failure. With most devices, the "main body" of the endograft is placed first, followed by the "limbs" which join the main body and extend to the iliac arteries, effectively protecting the aneurysm sac from blood pressure.

The abdominal aneurysm extends down to the common iliac arteries in about 25%-30% of patients. In such cases, the iliac limbs can be extended into the external iliac artery to bypass a common iliac aneurysm. Alternatively, a specially designed endograft, (an iliac branch device) can be used to preserve flow to the internal iliac arteries. The preservation of the hypogastric (internal iliac) arteries is important to prevent buttock claudication and impotence, and every effort should be made to preserve flow to at least one hypogastric artery.

The endograft acts as an artificial lumen for blood to flow through, protecting the surrounding aneurysm sac. This reduces the pressure in the aneurysm, which itself will usually thrombose and shrink in size over time.[14]

Staging such procedures is common, particularly to address aortic branch points near the diseased aortic segment. One example in the treatment of thoracic aortic disease is revascularization of the left common carotid artery and/or the left subclavian artery from the innominate artery or the right common carotid artery to allow treatment of a thoracic aortic aneurysm that encroaches proximally into the aortic arch. These "extra-anatomic bypasses" can be performed without an invasive thoracotomy. Another example in the abdominal aorta is the embolization of the internal iliac artery on one side prior to coverage by an iliac limb device. Continued improvement in stent-graft design, including branched endografts, will reduce but not eliminate multi-stage procedures.

Percutaneous EVAR

Standard EVAR involves a surgical cut-down on either the femoral or iliac arteries, with the creation of a 4–6 cm incision. Like many surgical procedures, EVAR has advanced to a more minimally invasive technique, by accessing the femoral arteries percutaneously In percutaneous EVAR (PEVAR), small, sub-centimeter incisions are made over the femoral artery, and endovascular techniques are used to place the device over a wire. Percutaneous EVAR has been systematically compared to the standard EVAR cut-down femoral artery approach.[15] Moderate quality evidence suggests that there are no differences in short-term mortality, aneurysm sealing, long and short-term complications, or infections at the wound site.[15] Higher quality evidence suggests that there are no differences in post-repair bleeding complications or haematoma between the two approaches.[15] The percutaneous approach may have reduced surgical time.[15]

Fenestrated EVAR

An example of a physician-modified aortic endograft with fenestrations added to accommodate the visceral branch arteries

In certain circumstances, a specially designed custom-made graft, which has holes, or fenestrations, on the graft body to maintain the patency of the visceral arteries, is used for the procedure, which is called FEVAR (fenestrated endovascular aortic/aneurysm repair). When the aneurysm begins close to the renal arteries, standard EVAR may be contraindicated since there will be an inadequate length of suitable aorta for the endograft attachment. In these cases, a fenestrated endograft may be useful, where the attachment of the endograft to the aorta may be placed above the renal arteries with each fenestration aligned with a renal artery so that blood flow to the kidneys is maintained. Fenestrated EVAR has been in use in the United Kingdom for over a decade and early results were published in Jun 2012. [16]

Branched EVAR

Artist's rendering of a branched/fenestrated EVAR in the visceral segment of the aorta above an abdominal aortic aneurysm

Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA) involve the aorta in the chest and abdomen. As such, major branch arteries to the head, arms, spinal cord, intestines, and kidneys may originate from the aneurysm. An endovascular repair of a TAAA is only possible if blood flow to these critical arteries is preserved. Hybrid procedures offer one option, but a more direct approach involves the use of a branched endograft. However, the complex anatomy associated with the supra-aortic vessels is particularly difficult to accommodate with branched endograft devices.[17] Dr. Timothy Chuter pioneered this approach, with a completely endovascular solution. After partial deployment of the main body of an endograft, separate endograft limbs are deployed from the main body to each major aortic branch. This procedure is long, technically difficult, and currently only performed in a few centers. When the aneurysm begins above the renal arteries, neither fenestrated endografts nor "EndoAnchoring" of an infrarenal endograft is useful (an open surgical repair may be necessary). Alternatively, a "branched" endograft may be used. A branched endograft has graft limbs that branch off of the main portion of the device to directly provide blood flow to the kidneys or the visceral arteries.[18][19]

Hybrid procedures

On occasion, there is inadequate length or quality of the proximal or distal aortic neck. In these cases, a fully minimally invasive option is not possible. One solution, however, is a hybrid repair, which combines an open surgical bypass with EVAR or TEVAR. In hybrid procedures, the endograft is positioned over major aortic branches. While such a position would normally cause problems from disruption of blood flow to the covered branches (renal, visceral, or branches to the head or arms), the prior placement of bypass grafts to these critical vessels allowed the deployment of the endograft at a level that would otherwise not be possible.

If a patient has calcified or narrow femoral arteries that prohibit the introduction of the endograft transfemorally, an iliac conduit may be used. This is typically a piece of PTFE that is sewn directly to the iliac arteries, which are exposed via an open retroperitoneal approach. The endograft is then introduced into the aorta through the conduit.

In patients with thoracic aortic disease involving the arch and descending aorta, it is not always possible to perform a completely endovascular repair. This is because head vessels of the aortic arch supplying blood to the brain cannot be covered and for this reason, there is often an inadequate landing zone for stent-graft delivery. A hybrid repair strategy offers a reasonable choice for treating such patients. A commonly used hybrid repair procedure is the "frozen elephant trunk repair".[20] This technique involves midline sternotomy. The aortic arch is transected and the stent-graft device is delivered in an ante-grade fashion in the descending aorta. The aortic arch is subsequently reconstructed and the proximal portion of the stent-graft device is then directly sutured into the surgical graft. Patients with anomalies of the arch and some disease extension into the descending aorta are often ideal candidates. Studies have reported successful use of hybrid techniques for treating Kommerell diverticulum[21] and descending aneurysms in patients with previous coarctation repairs.[22][23]

In addition, hybrid techniques combining both open and endovascular repair are also used in managing emergency complications in the aortic arch, such as retrograde ascending dissection and endoleaks from previous stent grafting of descending aorta. A "reverse frozen elephant trunk repair" is shown to be particularly effective.[24]

Adjunctive procedures

  • Snorkel: A covered stent placed into a visceral vessel adjacent to the main body of the EVAR device. The aortic lumen of the visceral stent is directed superiorly, resembling a snorkel.
  • Chimney: In TEVAR, a covered stent placed from the ascending aorta to a great vessel (e.g., innominate artery) and adjacent to the main body of the EVAR is termed a chimney. In anatomic position, blood flows superiorly through a chimney-stent graft into the great vessel, just as smoke flows up a chimney.
  • Periscope: Like a snorkel, a periscope stent graft provides flow to a visceral vessel, but in a retrograde fashion, with the aortic lumen inferior to the main body of the EVAR device.
  • Stents: Large bare-metal stents have been used to treat proximal endoleaks, as have aortic extension cuffs to treat endograft migration.
  • Glue: Trans-catheter embolic glue has been used to treat type I endoleaks, with inconsistent success.[25]
  • EndoAnchors: Small, helically shaped devices are screwed through the endograft and into the aortic wall. EndoAnchors have been used successfully to treat endoleaks and, in concert with an aortic extension endograft, to treat migration of the original endograft.[26] Rigorous evaluations and long-term outcomes of this technique are not yet available.


The complications of EVAR can be divided into those that are related to the repair procedure and those related to the endograft device. For example, a myocardial infarction that occurs immediately after the repair is normally related to the procedure and not the device. By contrast, the development of an endoleak from degeneration of endograft fabric would be a device-related complication.[19]

Durability and problems such as 'endoleaks' may require careful surveillance and adjuvant procedures to ensure the success of the EVAR or EVAR/hybrid procedure. CT angiography (CTA) imaging has, in particular, made a key contribution to planning, success, durability in this complex area of vascular surgery.

A major cause of complications in EVAR is the failure of the seal between the proximal, infra-renal aneurysm neck and the endovascular graft.[27][28][29] Risk of this form of failure is especially elevated in adverse or challenging proximal neck anatomies, where this seal could be compromised by unsuitable geometric fit between the graft and vessel wall, as well as instability of the anatomy.[30][31][32] New recent techniques have been introduced to address these risks by utilizing a segment of the supra-renal portion of the aorta to increase the sealing zone, such as with fenestrated EVAR, chimneys and snorkels.[33] These techniques may be suitable in certain patients with qualifying factors, e.g., configuration of renal arteries, renal function. However, these are more complex procedures than standard EVAR and may be subject to further complications.[34][35][36]

An approach that directly augments the fixation and sealing between the graft and aorta to mimic the stability of a surgical anastomosis is EndoAnchoring.[37][38] EndoAnchors are small, helically shaped implants that directly lock the graft to the aortic wall with the goal to prevent complications of the seal, especially in adverse neck anatomies.[39][40] These EndoAnchors may also be used to treat identified leaks between the graft and proximal neck.[41][42][43]


Arterial dissection, contrast-induced kidney failure, thromboembolizaton, ischemic colitis, groin hematoma, wound infection, type II endoleaks, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, cardiac arrhythmias, respiratory failure.


Endograft migration, aneurysm rupture, graft limb stenosis/kinking, type I/III/IV endoleaks, stent graft thrombosis, or infection.[44]


An endoleak is a leak into the aneurysm sac after endovascular repair. Five types of endoleaks exist:[14]

  • Type I - Perigraft leakage at proximal or distal graft attachment sites (near the renal and iliac arteries)
  • Type II - Retrograde flow to the aneurysm sac from branches such as the lumbar and inferior mesenteric arteries. Type II endoleaks are the most common, and least serious type of endoleak. Type II endoleaks do not require immediate treatment, as a portion will resolve spontaneously.
  • Type III - Leakage between overlapping parts of the stent (i.e., the connection between overlapping components) or rupture through graft material.
  • Type IV - Leakage through the graft wall due to the quality (porosity) of the graft material. As seen in first-generation grafts, changes in graft material in modern devices have decreased the prevalence of type IV leaks.
  • Type V - Expansion of the aneurysm sac without an identifiable leak. Also called "endotension".

Type I and III leaks are considered high-pressure leaks and are more concerning than other leak types. Depending on the aortic anatomy, they may require further intervention to treat. Type 2 leaks are common and often can be left untreated unless the aneurysm sac continues to expand after EVAR.[45]

Spinal cord injury

Spinal cord injury is a devastating complication after aortic surgery, specifically for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair; severe injury could lead to urine and fecal incontinence, paresthesia and even paraplegia.[46] The risk varies between studies with two metanalysis demonstrating a pooled incidence of spinal cord injury 2.2%[47] and 11%.[48] Predictive factors include increasing extent of coverage, hypogastric artery occlusion, prior aortic repair and perioperative hypotension.[49] Spinal cord injury related to aortic repair occurs due to impaired blood flow to the spine after coverage of blood vessels, important to the blood circulation of the spine, namely intercostal- and lumbar arteries.[50] A few methods exist for potentially reversing spinal cord injury, if it arises, elevated blood pressure, increased oxygenation, blood transfusion and cerebrospinal fluid drainage.

Cerebrospinal fluid drainage

Cerebrospinal fluid drainage is one of the adjunct methods used to reverse spinal cord injury. With increased drainage of spinal fluid, the intrathecal pressure decreases which allows for increase blood perfusion to the spine, possibly reversing the ischemic injury of the spinal tissue due to lessened blood supply. The benefits of this procedure have been established in open aortic repair[51] and suggested in endovascular aortic repair.[46]

Recovery after EVAR

Unlike traditional aortic repair, standard recovery after EVAR is remarkably straightforward. Patients who have undergone EVAR typically spend one night in the hospital to be monitored, although it has been suggested that EVAR can be performed as a same-day procedure.[52]

Patients are advised to slowly return to normal activity. There are no specific activity restrictions after EVAR, however, patients typically are seen by their surgeon within one month after EVAR to begin post-EVAR surveillance.

There is limited research looking at patients' experience of recovery after more complex and staged EVAR for thoracoabdominal aortic diseases. One qualitative study found that patients with complex aortic diseases struggle with physical and psychological setbacks, continuing years after their operations.[53]


Dr. Juan C. Parodi introduced the minimally-invasive endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) to the world and performed the first successful endovascular repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm on 7 September 1990 in Buenos Aires on a friend of Carlos Menem, the then President of Argentina. The first device was simple, according to Parodi: "It was a graft I designed with expandable ends, the extra-large Palmaz stent, a Teflon sheath with a valve, a wire, and the valvuloplasty balloon, which I took from the cardiologists." Parodi's first patient lived for nine years after the procedure and died from pancreatic cancer.[54][55] The first EVAR performed in the United States was in 1992 by Drs. Frank Veith, Michael Marin, Juan Parodi and Claudio Schonholz at Montefiore Medical Center affiliated with Albert Einstein College of Medicine.

The modern endovascular device used to repair abdominal aortic aneurysms, which is bifurcated and modular, was pioneered and first employed by Dr. Timothy Chuter while a fellow at the University of Rochester.[56] The first clinical series of his device was published from Nottingham in 1994.[57] The first endovascular repair of a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm was also reported from Nottingham in 1994.[58]

By 2003, four devices were on the market in the United States.[59] Each of these devices has since been either abandoned or further refined to improve its characteristics in vivo.

Special populations


Women are known to have smaller aortas on average than men, so are potential candidates for AAA treatment at smaller maximum aneurysm diameters than men.

Transplant candidates

As immunosuppressive medications are known to increase the rate of aneurysm growth, transplant candidates are AAA repair candidates at smaller maximum aneurysm diameters than the general population.

Other animals

Due to the expense associated with EVAR stent-graft devices and their specificity to human aortic anatomy, EVAR is not used in other animals.



  1. "Impact of hospital market competition on endovascular aneurysm repair adoption and outcomes.". J. Vasc. Surg. 58 (3): 596–606. September 2013. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2013.02.014. PMID 23684424. 
  2. Dua, A (2014). "Epidemiology of aortic aneurysm repair in the United States from 2000 to 2010". J Vasc Surg 59 (6): 1512–7. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2014.01.007. PMID 24560865. 
  3. Zarkowsky, DS; Sorber, R; Ramirez, JL; Goodney, PP; Iannuzzi, JC; Wohlauer, M; Hicks, CW (August 2021). "Aortic Neck IFU Violations During EVAR for Ruptured Infrarenal Aortic Aneurysms are Associated with Increased In-Hospital Mortality.". Annals of Vascular Surgery 75: 12–21. doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2021.04.019. PMID 33951521. 
  4. Jackson, Rubie (Apr 2012). "Comparison of Long-term Survival After Open vs Endovascular Repair of Intact Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Among Medicare Beneficiaries". JAMA 307 (15): 1621–8. doi:10.1001/jama.2012.453. PMID 22511690. 
  5. Schermerhorn, Marc (January 2008). "Endovascular vs. open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in the Medicare population.". New England Journal of Medicine 358 (5): 464–74. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0707348. PMID 18234751. 
  6. McCallum, JC; Limmer, KK; Perricone, A; Bandyk, D; Kansal, N (July 2013). "Total endovascular repair of acute ascending aortic rupture: a case report and review of the literature.". Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 47 (5): 374–8. doi:10.1177/1538574413486838. PMID 23697343. 
  7. "Randomized comparison of strategies for type B aortic dissection: the INvestigation of STEnt Grafts in Aortic Dissection (INSTEAD) trial". Circulation 120 (25): 2519–28. December 2009. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.886408. PMID 19996018. 
  8. "Editor's choice - Management of descending thoracic aorta diseases: Clinical practice guidelines of the European Society of Vascular Surgery (ESVS)". European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 53 (1): 4–52. January 2017. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2016.06.005. PMID 28081802. 
  9. "The comparative effectiveness of surgeons over interventionalists in endovascular repairs of abdominal aortic aneurysm.". Ann. Surg. 258 (3): 476–82. September 2013. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a196b5. PMID 24022440. 
  10. "National Vascular Registry - 2018 Annual Report", VSQIP,, retrieved 2019-12-09 
  11. Andrew England & Richard Mc Williams (2013). "Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR)". The Ulster Medical Journal 82 (1): 3–10. PMID 23620623. 
  12. "Endovascular aortic repair: first twenty years". Srp Arh Celok Lek 140 (11–12): 792–9. 2012. doi:10.2298/SARH1212792K. PMID 23350259. 
  13. Noh, M; Choi, BM; Kwon, H; Han, Y; Ko, GY; Kwon, TW; Noh, GJ; Cho, YP (August 2018). "General anesthesia versus local anesthesia for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.". Medicine 97 (32): e11789. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000011789. PMID 30095638. 
  14. 14.0 14.1 "Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm". N. Engl. J. Med. 358 (5): 494–501. 2008. doi:10.1056/NEJMct0707524. PMID 18234753. 
  15. 15.0 15.1 15.2 15.3 Gimzewska, Madelaine; Jackson, Alexander Ir; Yeoh, Su Ern; Clarke, Mike (February 21, 2017). "Totally percutaneous versus surgical cut-down femoral artery access for elective bifurcated abdominal endovascular aneurysm repair". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017 (2): CD010185. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD010185.pub3. ISSN 1469-493X. PMID 28221665. 
  16. British Society for Endovascular Therapy and the Global Collaborators on Advanced Stent-Graft Techniques for Aneurysm Repair (GLOBALSTAR) Registry. Early results of fenestrated endovascular repair of juxtarenal aortic aneurysms in the United Kingdom. Circulation. 2012 Jun 5;125(22):2707-15. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.070334. Correspondence to S R Vallabhaneni.
  17. "Anatomic Suitability for Branched Thoracic Endovascular Repair in Patients with Aortic Arch Pathological Features". J. Am. Heart Assoc. 9 (20): e016695. October 2020. doi:10.1161/JAHA.120.016695. PMID 33012240. 
  18. "Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms". 16 October 2020. 
  19. 19.0 19.1 The use of fenestrated and branched endovascular aneurysm repair for juxtarenal and thoracoabdominal aneurysms: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.. December 2014. Retrieved 2021-06-25. 
  20. Lima, B., Roselli, E. E., Soltesz, E. G., Johnston, D. R., Pujara, A. C., Idrees, J., & Svensson, L. G. (2012). Modified and "reverse" frozen elephant trunk repairs for extensive disease and complications after stent grafting. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 93(1), 103-109.
  21. "Hybrid repair of Kommerell diverticulum". The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 147 (3): 973–976. 2014. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.02.063. PMID 23535153. 
  22. "Hybrid repair of aortic aneurysm in patients with previous coarctation". The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 148 (1): 60–64. 2014. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.03.045. PMID 23988283. 
  23. Roselli, E. E., Qureshi, A., Idrees, J., Lima, B., Greenberg, R. K., Svensson, L. G., & Pettersson, G. (2012). Open, hybrid, and endovascular treatment for aortic coarctation and post-repair aneurysm in adolescents and adults. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 94(3), 751-758.
  24. "Repair of retrograde ascending dissection after descending stent grafting". The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 147 (1): 151–154. 2014. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.08.075. PMID 24139893. 
  25. "Treatment of type I endoleaks using transcatheter embolization with onyx". J Endovasc Ther 21 (1): 162–71. 2014. doi:10.1583/13-4349MR2.1. PMID 24502498. 
  26. Deaton DH (2012). "Improving proximal fixation and seal with the HeliFx Aortic EndoAnchor". Semin Vasc Surg 25 (4): 187–92. doi:10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2012.09.002. PMID 23206564. 
  27. "Endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. United Kingdom EVAR Trial Investigators". N Engl J Med 362 (20): 1863–71. May 2010. doi:10.1056/nejmoa0909305. PMID 21977143. 
  28. "Long-term outcome of open or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm". N Engl J Med 362 (20): 1881–9. 2010. doi:10.1056/nejmoa0909499. PMID 20484396. 
  29. "A randomized controlled trial of endovascular aneurysm repair versus open surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysms in low- to moderate-risk patients". J Vasc Surg 53 (5): 1167–1173. May 2011. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2010.10.124. PMID 21276681. 
  30. "Influence of infrarenal neck length on outcome of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair". J Endovasc Ther 13 (5): 640–8. 2006. doi:10.1583/06-1882.1. PMID 17042668. 
  31. "The correlation of aortic neck length to early and late outcomes in endovascular aneurysm repair patients". J Vasc Surg 50 (4): 738–48. 2009. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2009.04.061. PMID 19595545. 
  32. "Aortic neck angulation predicts adverse outcome with endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair". J Vasc Surg 35 (3): 482–6. 2002. doi:10.1067/mva.2002.119506. PMID 11877695. 
  33. Deaton DH (Jun 2009). "Future technologies to address the failed endoprosthesis". Semin Vasc Surg 22 (2): 111–8. doi:10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2009.04.010. PMID 19573751. 
  34. "Comparison of outcomes with open, fenestrated, and chimney graft repair of juxtarenal aneurysms: are we ready for a paradigm shift?". J Endovasc Ther 20 (2): 159–69. Apr 2013. doi:10.1583/1545-1550-20.2.159. PMID 23581756. 
  35. "Technical aspects, current indications, and results of chimney grafts for juxtarenal aortic aneurysms". J Vasc Surg 53 (6): 1520–7. Jun 2011. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2011.01.067. PMID 21514774. 
  36. "Fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair". Br J Surg 99 (2): 152–9. Feb 2012. doi:10.1002/bjs.7804. PMID 22183704. 
  37. Melas (2012). "Helical Endostaples Enhance Endograft Fixation in an Experimental Model Using Human Cadaveric Aortas". J Vasc Surg 55 (6): 1726–1733. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2011.11.048. PMID 22322119. 
  38. Deaton DH (Dec 2012). "Improving proximal fixation and seal with the HeliFx Aortic EndoAnchor". Semin Vasc Surg 25 (4): 187–92. doi:10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2012.09.002. PMID 23206564. 
  39. "Rationale of EndoAnchors in abdominal aortic aneurysms with short or angulated necks". J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 55 (1): 103–7. Feb 2014. 
  40. Perdikides et al "Primary EndoAnchoring in the Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms With an Unfavorable Neck" J Endovasc Ther 2012; 19.
  41. Successful Treatment of a Proximal Type I Endoleak with HeliFX EndoAnchors. Hogendoorn W et al. Ann Vasc Surg 2013.
  42. "EndoAnchor Placement in Thoracic and Thoracoabdominal Stent-Grafts to Repair Complications of Nonalignment". J Endovasc Ther 20 (4): 471–480. 2013. doi:10.1583/12-4125.1. PMID 23914854. 
  43. de Vries (2011). "Use of endostaples to secure migrated endografts and proximal cuffs after failed endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair". J Vasc Surg 54 (6): 1792–1794. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2011.05.099. PMID 21784606. 
  44. Becquemin, J. P.; Qvarfordt, P.; Kron, J.; Cavillon, A.; Desgranges, P.; Allaire, E.; Melliere, D. (December 1997). "Aortic graft infection: is there a place for partial graft removal?". European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 14 Suppl A: 53–58. doi:10.1016/s1078-5884(97)80155-4. ISSN 1078-5884. PMID 9467616. 
  45. Kumar, L; Cowled, P; Boult, M; Howell, S; Fitridge, R (October 2017). "Type II Endoleak after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair: Natural History and Treatment Outcomes.". Annals of Vascular Surgery 44: 94–102. doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2017.04.029. PMID 28483626. 
  46. 46.0 46.1 Cheung, Albert T.; Pochettino, Alberto; McGarvey, Michael L.; Appoo, Jehangir J.; Fairman, Ronald M.; Carpenter, Jeffrey P.; Moser, William G.; Woo, Edward Y. et al. (October 2005). "Strategies to Manage Paraplegia Risk After Endovascular Stent Repair of Descending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms" (in en). The Annals of Thoracic Surgery 80 (4): 1280–1289. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.04.027. PMID 16181855. 
  47. Dijkstra, Martijn L.; Vainas, Tryfon; Zeebregts, Clark J.; Hooft, Lotty; Van Der Laan, Maarten J. (2018). "Editor's Choice – Spinal Cord Ischaemia in Endovascular Thoracic and Thoraco-abdominal Aortic Repair: Review of Preventive Strategies". European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 55 (6): 829–841. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.02.002. PMID 29525741. 
  48. Pini, Rodolfo; Faggioli, Gianluca; Paraskevas, Kosmas I.; Alaidroos, Moad; Palermo, Sergio; Gallitto, Enrico; Gargiulo, Mauro (2022). "A systematic review and meta-analysis of the occurrence of spinal cord ischemia after endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms". Journal of Vascular Surgery 75 (4): 1466–1477.e8. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2021.10.015. PMID 34736999. 
  49. Tenorio, Emanuel R.; Eagleton, Matthew J.; Kärkkäinen, Jussi M.; Oderich, Gustavo S. (February 2019). "Prevention of spinal cord injury during endovascular thoracoabdominal repair". The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 60 (1): 54–65. doi:10.23736/S0021-9509.18.10739-7. ISSN 1827-191X. PMID 30260147. 
  50. Etz, Christian D.; Weigang, Ernst; Hartert, Marc; Lonn, Lars; Mestres, Carlos A.; Di Bartolomeo, Roberto; Bachet, Jean E.; Carrel, Thierry P. et al. (2015). "Contemporary spinal cord protection during thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic surgery and endovascular aortic repair: A position paper of the vascular domain of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery". European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 47 (6): 943–957. doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezv142. PMID 25991554. 
  51. Coselli, Joseph S.; LeMaire, Scott A.; Köksoy, Cüneyt; Schmittling, Zachary C.; Curling, Patrick E. (April 2002). "Cerebrospinal fluid drainage reduces paraplegia after thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair: Results of a randomized clinical trial" (in en). Journal of Vascular Surgery 35 (4): 631–639. doi:10.1067/mva.2002.122024. PMID 11932655. 
  52. "Outpatient endovascular aortic aneurysm repair: experience in 100 consecutive patients". Ann. Surg. 258 (5): 754–8; discussion 758–9. November 2013. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a617f1. PMID 24045449. 
  53. Haakseth, Linda; Wanhainen, Anders; Björck, Martin; Jangland, Eva (2019). "Understanding patients' experiences of recovery after staged complex aortic repair: A phenomenological study" (in en). Journal of Advanced Nursing 75 (11): 2834–2844. doi:10.1111/jan.14103. ISSN 1365-2648. PMID 31222821. 
  54. Parodi, JC (February 1997). "Endoluminal treatment of arterial diseases using a stent-graft combination: reflections 20 years after the initial concept.". Journal of Endovascular Surgery 4 (1): 3–4. doi:10.1177/152660289700400102. PMID 9034912. 
  55. "Endovascular revolution in the aorta: 25 years of a landmark case". Society for Vascular Surgery. 26 January 2016. "On 7 September 1990, a 70-year-old man with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and severe back pain caused by a 6cm abdominal aortic aneurysm underwent the first successful endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in the Western world. The case by Juan C Parodi and Julio Palmaz became the first widely known endovascular repair of the aorta and was described the following year in the Annals of Vascular Surgery. On the 25th anniversary of that landmark case, we dedicate these pages to some of the EVAR pioneers." 
  56. "Transfemoral endovascular aortic graft placement". J. Vasc. Surg. 18 (2): 185–95; discussion 195–7. August 1993. doi:10.1016/0741-5214(93)90598-G. PMID 8350427. 
  58. S W Yusuf, S C Whitaker, TAM Chuter, PW Wenham, BR Hopkinson EMERGENCY ENDOVASCULAR ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSM REPAIR (letter) Lancet 1994; 344: 1645
  59. Rutherford, RB (March 2012). "Open versus endovascular stent graft repair for abdominal aortic aneurysms: an historical view.". Seminars in Vascular Surgery 25 (1): 39–48. doi:10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2012.03.005. PMID 22595481.