Mega journal

From HandWiki
Short description: Peer-reviewed academic open access journal

A mega journal (also mega-journal and megajournal) is a peer-reviewed academic open access journal designed to be much larger than a traditional journal by exercising low selectivity among accepted articles. It was pioneered by PLOS ONE.[1][2] This "very lucrative publishing model"[2] was soon emulated by other publishers.

Definition

A mega journal has the following defining characteristics:

Other less universal characteristics are

  • "an accelerated review and publication process",[2] "fast turnaround time";[6]
  • "academic editors",[6] even "a large editorial board of academic editors",[5] (instead of professional editors); and
  • value-added services such as reusable graphics and data through Creative Commons licenses.[7]

Mega journals are also online-only, with no printed version, and are fully open access, in contrast to hybrid open access journals.[7] Some "predatory" open access publishers use the mega journal model.[1]

Influence

It has been suggested that the academic journal landscape might become dominated by a few mega journals in the future, at least in terms of total number of articles published.[8] Megajournals are also disrupting[clarification needed] the market of article processing charges.[9] Their business model may not motivate reviewers, who donate their time to "influence their field, gain exposure to the most current cutting edge research or list their service to a prestigious journal on their CVs."[10] Finally, they may no longer serve as "fora for the exchange ... among colleagues in a particular field or sub-field", as traditionally happened in scholarly journals.[11] To counter that indiscrimination, PLOS ONE, the prototypical megajournal, has started to "package relevant articles into subject-specific collections."[12]

List of mega journals

Notes

  1. ↑ Self-declared:[20]
  2. ↑ Self-declared:[26]
  3. ↑ Self-declared:[27]
  4. ↑ Self-declared:[28]
  5. ↑ Self-declared:[29]
  6. ↑ Self-declared:[30]

References

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 Beall, Jeffrey (2013). "Five Predatory Mega-Journals: A Review". The Charleston Advisor 14 (4): 20–25. doi:10.5260/chara.14.4.20. http://eprints.rclis.org/19815/2/TCA%20review%20april%202013.pdf. 
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 Bo-Christer Björk; David Solomon (March 2014). Developing an Effective Market for Open Access Article Processing Charges (Report). Wellcome Trust. pp. 69 pages. Archived from the original on 2014-06-02. https://web.archive.org/web/20140602195247/http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/stellent/groups/corporatesite/%40policy_communications/documents/web_document/wtp055910.pdf. 
  3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 "Wiley". http://exchanges.wiley.com/blog/2012/02/14/wiley-open-access-update-january-2012/. 
  4. ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 Claire Creaser (5 May 2014). "The rise of the mega-journal". Loughborough University. http://blog.lboro.ac.uk/sbe/centre-for-information-management/the-rise-of-the-mega-journal/. 
  5. ↑ 5.00 5.01 5.02 5.03 5.04 5.05 5.06 5.07 5.08 5.09 5.10 5.11 5.12 5.13 Peter Binfield (19 January 2014). "Novel Scholarly Journal Concepts". in Sönke Bartling. Opening Science. pp. 155–163. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8_10. ISBN 978-3-319-00025-1. http://book.openingscience.org/tools/novel_scholarly_journal_concepts.html. 
  6. ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 6.6 Frank Norman (9 July 2012). "Megajournals". Frank Norman. http://occamstypewriter.org/trading-knowledge/2012/07/09/megajournals/. 
  7. ↑ 7.0 7.1 Björk, Bo-Christer (2015-05-26). "Have the "mega-journals" reached the limits to growth?". PeerJ 3: e981. doi:10.7717/peerj.981. PMID 26038735. 
  8. ↑ Hayahiko Ozono, Okayama University, Participants' Report on The 5th SPARC Japan Seminar 2011. "Burgeoning Open Access MegaJournals". National Institute of Informatics. [1]
  9. ↑ Solomon, David J. (2014). "A survey of authors publishing in four megajournals". PeerJ 2: e365. doi:10.7717/peerj.365. PMID 24795855. 
  10. ↑ Wellen, R. (2013). "Open Access, Megajournals, and MOOCs: On the Political Economy of Academic Unbundling". SAGE Open 3 (4): 215824401350727. doi:10.1177/2158244013507271. 
  11. ↑ Beall, Jeffrey (2013). "The Open-Access Movement is Not Really about Open Access". TripleC 11 (2): 589–597. doi:10.31269/triplec.v11i2.525. http://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/e21d/4fc34f5a492470bca493d6b1991c58a7336a.pdf. 
  12. ↑ MacCallum, C. J. (2011). "Why ONE is More Than 5". PLOS Biology 9 (12): e1001235. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001235. 
  13. ↑ 13.0 13.1 Francisco Osorio (5 April 2013). "Open Library of Humanities: mega journals seeing from the south". http://www.facso.uchile.cl/noticias/90036/open-library-of-humanities-mega-journals-seeing-from-the-south. 
  14. ↑ 14.0 14.1 "Beyond open access for academic publishers", 15 May 2014, Publishing Technology PLC [2]
  15. ↑ 15.0 15.1 15.2 15.3 Dagmar Sitek & Roland Bertelmann, "Open Access: A State of the Art", 2 March 2014, Springer, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8_9 [3]
  16. ↑ James MacGregor, Kevin Stranack & John Willinsky, "The Public Knowledge Project: Open Source Tools for Open Access to Scholarly Communication", 2 March 2014, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8_11 [4]
  17. ↑ 17.0 17.1 17.2 17.3 17.4 17.5 17.6 Rhodri Jackson and Martin Richardson, "Gold open access: the future of the academic journal?", Chapter 9 in Cope and Phillip (2014), p.223-248.
  18. ↑ Michael Bernstein; Katie Cottingham, Ph.D. (14 December 2015). "American Chemical Society announces ACS Omega, a new open access journal serving global and multidisciplinary chemistry". ACS. http://www.acs.org/content/acs/en/pressroom/newsreleases/2015/december/american-chemical-society-announces-acs-omega-a-new-open-access-journal-serving-global-and-multidisciplinary-chemistry.html. 
  19. ↑ 19.0 19.1 Peter Binfield, "PLoS ONE and the Rise of the Open Access MegaJournal", The 5th SPARC Japan Seminar 2011, National Institute of Informatics, The 5th SPARC Japan Seminar 2011 February 29, 2012 [5] [6]
  20. ↑ "About". Royal Society Open Science. http://rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org/about. 
  21. ↑ Open-Access Mega-Journals: A Bibliometric Profile, November 18, 2016
  22. ↑ Transitioning from a Conventional to a ‘Mega’ Journal: A Bibliometric Case Study of the Journal Medicine, Publications 2017, 5(2), 7; doi:10.3390/publications5020007 [7]
  23. ↑ Open-access mega-journals: The future of scholarly communication or academic dumping ground? A review [8]
  24. ↑ Mega-journals: the future, a stepping stone to it or a leap into the abyss? October 13, 2016 [9]
  25. ↑ Jeffrey Beall (3 March 2013). "New Term: MOAMJ = Multidisciplinary Open Access Mega Journal". Archived from the original on 16 July 2014. https://web.archive.org/web/20140716114239/http://scholarlyoa.com/2013/03/05/new-term-moamj-multidisciplinary-open-access-mega-journal/. 
  26. ↑ New IEEE Open-Access "Mega Journal" Aims to Boost Technology Innovation "New IEEE Open-Access Mega Journal Aims to Boost Technology Innovation". Archived from the original on 2014-10-06. https://web.archive.org/web/20141006095803/http://www.multivu.com/mnr/61674-ieee-online-open-access-mega-journal-for-faster-peer-reviewed-publishing. Retrieved 2014-09-30. 
  27. ↑ "Press Release". Open Library of Humanities. Archived from the original on 2014-12-24. https://web.archive.org/web/20141224053751/https://www.openlibhums.org/about/media/press-release/. 
  28. ↑ "De Gruyter Open converts eight subscription journals to Open Access megajournals". De Gruyter Open. http://degruyteropen.com/de-gruyter-open-converts-eight-subscription-journals-open-access-megajournals/. 
  29. ↑ "Introducing Heliyon - Elsevier's new broad scope, open access journal". Elsevier Heliyon. http://www.elsevier.com/reviewers-update/story/innovation-in-publishing/introducing-heliyon-elseviers-new-broad-scope,-open-access-journal. 
  30. ↑ "The Journal of Engineering". IET the Journal of Engineering. https://digital-library.theiet.org/content/journals/joe. 

Further reading



Retrieved from "https://handwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Mega_journal&oldid=3386731"