Organization:Open Government Partnership

Open Government Partnership

Abbreviation	OGP
Formation	September 20, 2011 (2011-09-20)
Founder	Brazil Indonesia Mexico Norway Template:Country data The Philippines South Africa United Kingdom United States
Founded at	New York City , United States
Headquarters	Washington, D.C., United States
Location	Worldwide
Membership	76 (National) 104 (Local)
CEO	Sanjay Pradhan
Staff (2020)	55
Website	opengovpartnership.org

The Open Government Partnership (OGP) is a multilateral initiative that aims to secure concrete commitments from national and sub-national governments to promote open government, empower citizens, fight corruption, and harness new technologies to strengthen governance. In the spirit of multi-stakeholder collaboration, OGP is overseen by a steering committee including representatives of governments and civil society organizations.

History

The Open Government Partnership (OGP) was formally launched on September 20, 2011, on the sidelines of a UN General Assembly meeting during which Heads of State from 8 founding governments (Brazil , Indonesia, Mexico, Norway , Philippines , South Africa , United Kingdom , and the United States ) endorsed the Open Government Declaration and announced their country action plans along with an equal number of civil society leaders. The eight founding members also welcomed the commitment of 38 governments to join OGP. In the first 10 years, OGP members have created over 4,500 commitments in more than 300 action plans. India and Russia had initially expressed intentions to join the partnership, but neither follow through with the process.

Six months after its start, OGP had grown from eight action plans and 46 participating countries to 50 action plans and 54 participating countries. The meeting in Brasilia brought together countries and organizations united in their belief in the power of transparency, with participation from anti-censorship campaigners in Yemen to reformers using data on primary schools to improve education in India.

A total of 46 members had already published action plans containing over 300 open government commitments. According to then Minister of the United Kingdom's Cabinet Office responsible for public transparency and open data, Francis Maude, Britain sought to "further secure the foundations of OGP as a globally recognized and respected international initiative…. [and to] strengthen the role of civil society organizations, encouraging greater collaboration with governments to forge more innovative and open ways of working."

In 2013, OGP's thematic goals centered around Citizen Action and Responsive Government. In an era of hyperconnectivity, openness and transparency, as well as citizen participation and collaboration, are increasingly viewed as essential components of good governance.

With the adoption and implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development by world leaders at a historic United Nations Summit, including Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) 16 for the "promotion of peaceful and inclusive societies," 2015 marked a milestone for the future of development outcomes and open government. In October 2015, the Government of Mexico hosted the third OGP Global Summit in Mexico City emphasizing the theme of "Openness for All: Using the Open Government principles as key mechanisms to implement the post-2015 development agenda."

In early 2016, OGP launched a new pilot program designed to involve sub-national governments more proactively in the initiative. Later in December 2016, the Government of France, in partnership with the World Resources Institute (WRI), hosted the fourth OGP Global Summit in the nation's capital, Paris, gathering 3000 representatives from 70 countries.

Objectives

OGP provides a platform for reformers inside and outside of governments around the world to develop initiatives that promote transparency, empower citizens, fight corruption and harness new technologies to strengthen governance. OGP aims to secure concrete commitments from national and sub-national governments that drive open government reform and innovation in an effort to push countries further in the areas of transparency, accountability, and citizen engagement. It is a voluntary partnership that countries opt to join and through which civil society organizations, in collaboration with government, can advance initiatives that they deem in line with their reform agendas.

Open Government Declaration

The principles of OGP are best explained by the Open Government Declaration. As outlined in the declaration, participating countries are expected to adhere to the following principles:

• Acknowledge that people all around the world are demanding more openness in government. They are calling for greater civic participation in public affairs, and seeking ways to make their governments more transparent, responsive, accountable, and effective.
• Recognize that countries are at different stages in their efforts to promote openness in government, and that each of us pursues an approach consistent with our national priorities and circumstances and the aspirations of our citizens.
• Accept responsibility for seizing this moment to strengthen our commitments to promote transparency, fight corruption, empower citizens, and harness the power of new technologies to make government more effective and accountable.
• Uphold the value of openness in our engagement with citizens to improve services, manage public resources, promote innovation, and create safer communities. We embrace principles of transparency and open government with a view toward achieving greater prosperity, well-being, and human dignity in our own countries and in an increasingly interconnected world.

OGP participants declare their commitment to increase the availability of information about governmental activities, support civic participation, implement the highest standards of professional integrity, and increase access to new technologies for openness and accountability.

Community of reformers

Rather than establish a worldwide transparency ranking of countries, OGP provides support and encouragement to countries around the world as they champion ambitious new reforms and deliver on their promises "under the watchful eyes of citizens," The community of reformers is meant to "offer support to those in government that are willing and to create a hook whereby the conversations among government and civil societies can occur." This relationship between government and civil society is the cornerstone of OGP. Governments are expected to actively collaborate with civil society when drafting and implementing country commitments, as well as when reporting on and monitoring efforts. The OGP process requires government to consult with civil society and citizens, and the Independent Reporting Mechanism (IRM) assesses the quality of this consultation.

Funding

Funding for OGP comes from participating countries, donors and development partners.

Member contributions

In May 2014, it was agreed that all participating governments are expected to contribute towards OGP's budget. Contributions are based on each participating country's income level (according to the World Bank Data). Steering Committee set both minimum and recommended contribution levels.

Income level	Minimum member contribution	Recommended member contribution
Low income	$10,000	$25,000
Lower middle income	$25,000	$50,000
Upper middle income	$50,000	$100,000
High income	$100,000	$200,000

Donor organizations

Grants made in 2015 came from Omidyar Network, Department for International Development (Government of the United Kingdom), Hewlett Foundation, Open Society Foundation, and the Ford Foundation. In May 2019, Open Society Foundation announced a potential $10,000,000 funding scheme awarded to OGP with $1,000,000 being awarded in 2020 and an additional $4,000,000 in matching grants within three years if OGP raises $5,000,000 from other partners.

Structure

As a multi-stakeholder initiative, civil society participation is enshrined in OGP's foundational principles and management structures. Governments and civil society play an equally important role in managing the OGP through participation in the steering committee, OGP's executive management body, as well as at the national level.

Co-chairs

Year	Government Co-chair	Civil Society Co-chair
2012–2013	Government of the United Kingdom	Warren Krafchik, Senior Vice President, International Budget Partnership (IBP)
2013–2014	Government of Indonesia	Rakesh Rajani, Head, Twaweza
2014–2015	Government of Mexico	Alexandro Gonzales, Executive Director, GESOC A.C.
2015–2016	Government of South Africa	Suneeta Kaimal, Chief Operating Officer, Natural Resource Governance Institute (NRGI)
2016–2017	Government of France	Manish Bapna, Executive Vice President & Managing Director, World Resources Institute (WRI)
2017–2018	Government of Georgia	Mukelani Dimba, Executive Director, Open Democracy Advice Centre (ODAC)
2018–2019	Government of Canada	Nathaniel Heller, Executive Vice President, Results for Development (R4D)
2019–2020	Government of Argentina	Robin Hodess, Director of Governance & Transparency, The B Team
2020–2021	Government of South Korea	María Baron, Global Executive Director, Directorio Legislativo
2021–2022	Government of Italy	Aidan Eyakuze, Executive Director, Twaweza
2022–2023	Government of Estonia	Anabel Cruz, Founder Director, Institute for Communication and Development

Steering committee

The OGP Steering Committee provides guidance and direction at the international level in order to maintain the highest standards for the initiative and ensure its long-term sustainability. It is composed of equal numbers of representatives of governments and civil society organizations. OGP's leadership regularly rotates by appointing a new government co-chair and a new civil society co-chair every year. Incoming government and civil society members of the steering committee are selected by their peers.

Subcommittees

Members of the OGP Steering Committee delegate work to the OGP Subcommittees. There are three subcommittees: 1) Governance and Leadership; 2) Criteria and Standards; and 3) Thematic Leadership. The principle of parity is preserved in the Subcommittees as an equal number of government and civil society representatives serves in each one.

OGP Support Unit

The OGP Support Unit is a small, permanent secretariat that works closely with the steering committee to advance the goals of the OGP. It is designed to maintain institutional memory, manage OGP's external communications, ensure the continuity of organizational relationships with OGP's partners, and support the broader membership. It also serves as a neutral, third-party between governments and civil society organizations, ensuring that OGP maintains a productive balance between the two constituencies.

Independent Reporting Mechanism

The Independent Reporting Mechanism (IRM) is the key means by which all stakeholders can track OGP progress in participating countries. The IRM produces biannual independent progress reports for each country participating in OGP. Progress reports assess governments on the development and implementation of their OGP action plans, as well as their progress in upholding open government principles. The reports also provide technical recommendations for improvements. These reports are intended to stimulate dialogue and promote accountability between member governments and citizens.

International Experts Panel

The International Experts Panel (IEP) oversees the IRM by helping to ensure quality of the reviews, assess procedures and promote findings.

Membership

1. Afghanistan
2. Albania
3. Argentina
4. Armenia
5. Australia
6. Bosnia and Herzegovina
7. Brazil
8. Bulgaria
9. Burkina Faso
10. Cabo Verde
11. Canada
12. Chile
13. Colombia
14. Costa Rica
15. Côte d'Ivoire
16. Croatia
17. Czech Republic
18. Denmark
19. Dominican Republic
20. Ecuador
21. Estonia
22. Finland
23. France
24. Georgia
25. Germany
26. Ghana
27. Greece
28. Guatemala
29. Honduras
30. Indonesia
31. Ireland
32. Israel
33. Italy
34. Jamaica
35. Jordan
36. Kenya
37. Kyrgyz Republic
38. Kosovo (non-voting member)
39. Latvia
40. Liberia
41. Lithuania
42. Malawi
43. Malta
44. Mexico
45. Moldova
46. Mongolia
47. Montenegro
48. Morocco
49. Netherlands
50. New Zealand
51. Nigeria
52. North Macedonia
53. Norway
54. Panama
55. Papua New Guinea
56. Paraguay
57. Peru
58. Philippines
59. Portugal
60. Romania
61. Senegal
62. Serbia
63. Seychelles
64. Sierra Leone
65. Slovak Republic
66. South Africa
67. South Korea
68. Spain
69. Sri Lanka
70. Sweden
71. Timor-Leste
72. Tunisia
73. Ukraine
74. United Kingdom
75. United States
76. Uruguay

OGP Local

1. Abuja, Nigeria
2. Akhaltsikhe, Georgia
3. Anloga District, Ghana
4. Aragón, Spain
5. Armavir, Armenia
6. Asturias, Spain
7. Austin, Texas , United States
8. Banggai, Indonesia
9. Banská Bystrica, Slovak Republic
10. Basque Country, Spain
11. Béni Mellal-Khénifra, Morocco
12. Bishkek, Kyrgyz Republic
13. Bogotá, Colombia
14. Borongan, Philippines
15. Brebes, Indonesia
16. Buenos Aires, Argentina
17. Cartagena de Indias, Colombia
18. Carthage (municipality), Tunisia
19. Catalonia, Spain
20. Chepo, Panama
21. Chihuahua City, Mexico
22. Contagem, Brazil
23. Córdoba (City), Argentina
24. Córdoba (Province), Argentina
25. Corrientes, Argentina
26. Curridabat, Costa Rica
27. Detmold, Germany
28. El Kef, Tunisia
29. Elbasan, Albania
30. Elgeyo-Marakwet, Kenya
31. Glasgow, United Kingdom
32. Greater Karak, Jordan
33. Greater Salt, Jordan
34. Gwangju, South Korea
35. Gyumri, Armenia
36. Hamburg, Germany
37. Jalisco, Mexico
38. Kaduna State, Nigeria
39. Ketu South Municipal District, Ghana
40. Khmelnytskyi, Ukraine
41. Khoni, Georgia
42. Kildare County Council, Ireland
43. Kutaisi, Georgia
44. La Libertad, Peru
45. Lima, Peru
46. Los Angeles , United States
47. Madrid, Spain
48. Maipú, Chile
49. Makhanda, South Africa
50. Makueni, Kenya
51. Manizales, Colombia
52. Mendoza, Argentina
53. Mérida, Mexico
54. Mexico State, Mexico
55. Montevideo, Uruguay
56. Nairobi, Kenya
57. Nandi, Kenya
58. Nariño, Colombia
59. Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
60. Novi Pazar, Serbia
61. Nuevo León - Monterrey Municipality - San Pedro Garza García, Mexico
62. Ontario, Canada
63. Osasco, Brazil
64. Ozurgeti, Georgia
65. Palermo, Italy
66. Paris, France
67. Peñalolén, Chile
68. Plateau, Nigeria
69. Québec, Canada
70. Quintana Roo, Mexico
71. Quito, Ecuador
72. Regueb, Tunisia
73. Rosario, Argentina
74. Rustavi, Georgia
75. Salcedo, Dominican Republic
76. Santa Catarina, Brazil
77. Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas, Ecuador
78. São Paulo, Brazil
79. Sarchí, Costa Rica
80. Scotland, United Kingdom
81. Sekondi-Takoradi, Ghana
82. Semarang, Indonesia
83. Seoul, South Korea
84. Shama, Ghana
85. South Cotabato, Philippines
86. Sveti Nikole, North Macedonia
87. Tangier – Tetouan – Al Hoceima, Morocco
88. Tarkwa-Nsuaem, Ghana
89. Tbilisi, Georgia
90. Ternopil, Ukraine
91. Tétouan, Tunisia
92. Timișoara, Romania
93. Tirana, Albania
94. Tlajomulco de Zúñiga, Mexico
95. Tlalnepantla de Baz, Mexico
96. Valencian Community, Spain
97. Vanadzor, Armenia
98. Vinnytsia, Ukraine
99. Wassa Amenfi East, Ghana
100. West Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia
101. West Sumbawa, Indonesia
102. Yerevan, Armenia
103. Yucatán, Mexico
104. Žilina Region, Slovak Republic

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria – In order to participate in OGP, governments must exhibit a demonstrated commitment to open government in four key areas, as measured by objective indicators and validated by independent experts. The four critical areas of open government: fiscal transparency, access to information, asset disclosure and citizen engagement. Countries can earn a total of 16 points for their performance in these four metrics, or 12 points if they are not measured in one of the metrics. Countries that earn 75% of the applicable points (either 12 out of 16 or 9 out of 12) or more are eligible to join. For an eligible country to join, all that is required is a letter from a ministerial representative indicating agreement with the Open Government Declaration and intent to participate OGP, as well as the leading agency and an individual point of contact for future work.

The following countries are eligible, but have yet to express interest to join the partnership as of May 2023.

1. Angola
2. Austria
3. Belgium
4. Bhutan
5. Bolivia
6. Guyana
7. Iceland
8. Japan
9. Luxembourg
10. Maldives
11. Mozambique
12. Namibia
13. Nepal
14. Niger
15. Pakistan
16. Poland
17. Slovenia
18. Switzerland
19. Tanzania
20. Trinidad and Tobago

Withdrawal

• Turkey on May 4, 2016 (due to inactivity)
• Hungary on December 7, 2016 (by request of its government)
• Tanzania on July 1, 2017 (due to inactivity)
• Trinidad and Tobago on December 6, 2019 (due to inactivity)
• Pakistan on March 7, 2022 (due to inactivity)
• Luxembourg on January 1, 2023 (by request of its government)
• El Salvador on March 24, 2023 (due to inactivity)
• Sucre Department, Colombia on April 5, 2023 (due to inactivity)
• Mexico City - Cuauhtémoc, Mexico, on June 6 (by request of its government)
• Azerbaijan on August 17, 2023 (permanently suspended by the OGP Steering Committee)

Mechanism

Co-creation

Action plan co-creation – OGP participating countries co-create a National Action Plan (NAP) with civil society. The actions plans are "the driving device" for OGP as it is the instrument through which government and civil society develop their agreed reforms, or commitments, every two years. The set of commitments aim to advance transparency, accountability, participation and/or technological innovation. Countries, with the active involvement of civil society, are encouraged to tackle new and ambitious commitments as well as build upon past successes. Effective public consultation process during the development of action plans can help build broad support for commitments with a wider set of actors to rely on for successful implementation. OGP participating countries operate on a two-year action plan calendar cycle, whereby countries are continuously implementing their programs. The government must regularly report on its progress and work with civil society to monitor and achieve the agreed reforms. Progress is evaluated at regular intervals by an independent researcher appointed by the OGP's Independent Reporting Mechanism.

Civil society engagement

The Civil Society Engagement (CSE) Team works to broaden, strengthen and engage a strong civil society network to participate in OGP, particularly at the national level. The team supports national civil society actors to help them make better use of the OGP process – including the design, implementation and monitoring of OGP action plans – for achieving their own advocacy objectives.

OGP Local

Launched in 2016 as the sub-national pilot program, OGP Local seeks to extend the principles of OGP to the local level. A total of 15 sub-national governments were selected to participate in the pilot program and, with the support of the OGP Support Unit and steering committee, have developed national action plans in collaboration with civil society. They will actively contribute to peer learning and networking activities with other sub-national governments and, like OGP's member countries, will be assessed by the IRM. The cohort later expanded to 20 before further expansion in October 2020, with 56 new local jurisdictions added to the program. In 2022, 30 new more local jurisdictions joined OGP Local.

Open Parliaments

As OGP continued to expand, engagement with legislative institutions also became more prevalent. In some OGP participating countries, open parliament has become a particularly significant part of the push for more open government, although commitments related to parliamentary transparency, public participation, and accountability are not always co-created in the same process as the country's OGP action plan. The open parliament initiative also benefits from strategic collaborations with the Open Parliament e-Network (OPeN), a global consortium of organizations focused on parliamentary engagement. As of 2020, its members are Directorio Legislativo, the Westminster Foundation for Democracy (WFD), the National Democratic Institute (NDI), ParlAmericas, Red Latinoamericana por la Transparencia Legislativa (RedLTL), and the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights.

OGP Global Summits

OGP participants gather regularly at regional and global events to share their findings in person and to strengthen international cooperation. The most significant of these events has been the Global Summit, held annually since 2012. At the 2013 Global Summit, the steering committee voted to skip the 2014 Summit and reconvene in 2015. In addition to providing spaces where participating countries and civil society groups could share information in person, OGP wanted to find a way to showcase standout efforts of global transparency leaders.

Year	Event	Host	Dates
2012	The 1st OGP Annual Meeting	Brasilia, Brazil	April 17–18, 2012
2013	The 2nd OGP Annual Meeting	London, United Kingdom	October 31–November 1, 2013
2015	The 3rd OGP Global Summit	Mexico City, Mexico	October 28–29, 2015
2016	The 4th OGP Global Summit	Paris, France	December 7–8, 2016
2018	The 5th OGP Global Summit	Tbilisi, Georgia	July 18–19, 2018
2019	The 6th OGP Global Summit	Ottawa, Canada	May 29–30, 2019
2021	The 7th OGP Global Summit	Seoul, South Korea	December 13–17, 2021
2023	The 8th OGP Global Summit	Tallinn, Estonia	September 6–7, 2023

Open Government Awards

Year	Theme	Category	Winner
2014	Citizen Engagement	Gold Awards	1. Denmark for "Statutory Elected Senior Citizens’ Council" 2. Montenegro for "Be Responsible, Zero Grey Economy" 3. Philippines for "Grassroots Participatory Budgeting"
		Silver Awards	4. Italy for "OpenCoesione-Monithon" 5. Netherlands for "MijnWOZ: My Law on Appreciating Local Property" 6. United Kingdom for "Sciencewise"
		Bronze Awards	7. Mexico for "Centro de Itegracion Ciudadana" 8. Peru for "Children of Miraflores" 9. United States for "Collaboration and Innovation through Prizes, Crowdsourcing, and Citizen Science" 10. France for "data.gouv.fr"
2015	Improving Public Services	Overall Awards	1. Uruguay for "atuservicio.uy" 2. Indonesia for "The Guiding Lights of the Archipelago" 3. United Kingdom for "Neighborhood Planning"
		Regional Awards	Africa: Tunisia for "Tunisia Online e-Procurement System" Americas: Mexico for "Stakeholder Participation in Day Care Center Safety" Asia-Pacific: Armenia for "Smart Municipality" Europe: Croatia for "E-Citizens"
		Special Recognition	Indonesia for "The Guiding Lights of the Archipelago" for how the initiative benefits vulnerable populations
2016	Making Transparency Count	Overall Awards	1. Ukraine for "ProZorro: Bringing Government Procurement to the People" 2. Indonesia for "API Pemilu: Improving Access and Understanding of Elections Data" 3. Honduras for "Construction Sector Transparency Initiative Honduras: Better Infrastructure through Transparency"
		Regional Awards	Africa: Malawi for "Construction Sector Transparency Initiative Malawi: Development through Transparency" Americas: Mexico for "Budget Transparency Portal: Expenditure Tracking from the Executive to the Streets" Asia-Pacific: Mongolia for "Check My Service: Closing the Feedback Loop" Europe: Netherlands for "OpenSpending: Reporting Directly to the Taxpayers"
		Special Recognition	Ukraine for "ProZorro: Bringing Government Procurement to the People" for the involvement of youth in the project

See also

• Transparency International
• Transparency Directive
• Transparency (behavior)
• Open Data Partnership
• Corruption
• Corruption Perceptions Index
• Anti-corruption