# Philosophy:Polysyllogism

__: Sequence of propositions which constitute a sequence of overlapping syllogisms__

**Short description**A **polysyllogism** (also called **multi-premise syllogism**, **sorites**, **climax**, or **gradatio**) is a string of any number of propositions forming together a sequence of syllogisms such that the conclusion of each syllogism, together with the next proposition, is a premise for the next, and so on. Each constituent syllogism is called a **prosyllogism** except the last, because the conclusion of the last syllogism is not a premise for another syllogism.

## Example

An example for a polysyllogism is:

- It is raining.
- If we go out while it is raining we will get wet.
- If we get wet, we will get cold.
- Therefore, if we go out we will get cold.

Examination of the structure of the argument reveals the following sequence of constituent (pro)syllogisms:

- It is raining.
- If we go out while it is raining we will get wet.
- Therefore, if we go out we will get wet.

- If we go out we will get wet.
- If we get wet, we will get cold.
- Therefore, if we go out we will get cold.

## Sorites

Look up in Wiktionary, the free dictionary. sorites |

A **sorites** (plural: sorites) is a specific kind of polysyllogism in which the predicate of each proposition is the subject of the next premise. Example:

- All lions are big cats.
- All big cats are predators.
- All predators are carnivores.
- Therefore, all lions are carnivores.

The word *sorites* /sɒˈraɪtiːz/ comes from Ancient Greek:, *heaped up*, from σωρός *heap* or *pile*. Thus a sorites is a heap of propositions chained together. A sorites polysyllogism should not be confused with the sorites paradox, a.k.a. the fallacy of the heap.

Lewis Carroll uses sorites in his book *Symbolic Logic* (1896). For example:^{[1]}

- No experienced person is incompetent;
- Jenkins is always blundering;
- No competent person is always blundering.
- Jenkins is inexperienced.

Carroll's example may be translated thus:

- All experienced persons are competent persons.
- No competent persons are blunderers.
- Jenkins is a blunderer.
- Jenkins is not an experienced person.

## See also

- Anadiplosis - the rhetorical grounds of polysyllogism.
- Transitive relation

## Notes

- ↑ Lewis Carroll (1897).
*Symbolic Logic*. Project Gutenberg. pp. 113. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/28696/28696-h/28696-h.htm.

## Bibliography

- B. P. Bairan.
*An Introduction to Syllogistic Logic*. Goodwill Trading. p. 342. ISBN 971-574-094-4.

Original source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polysyllogism.
Read more |