Physics:Edge-localized mode

From HandWiki

An edge-localized mode (ELM) is a plasma instability occurring in the edge region of a tokamak plasma due to periodic relaxations of the edge transport barrier in high-confinement mode. Each ELM burst is associated with expulsion of particles and energy from the confined plasma into the scrape-off layer. This phenomenon was first observed in the ASDEX tokamak in 1981.[1] Diamagnetic effects in the model equations expand the size of the parameter space in which solutions of repeated sawteeth can be recovered compared to a resistive MHD model.[2] An ELM can expel up to 20 percent of the reactor's energy.[3]

Issues

ELM is a major challenge in magnetic fusion research with tokamaks, as these instabilities can:

  • Damage wall components (in particular divertor plates) by ablating them away due to their extremely high energy transfer rate (GW/m2);[4]
  • Potentially couple or trigger other instabilities, such as the resistive wall mode (RWM) or the neoclassical tearing mode (NTM).[5]

Prevention and control

A variety of experiments/simulations have attempted to mitigate damage from ELM. Techniques include:

  • Application of resonant magnetic perturbations (RMPs) with in-vessel current carrying coils can eliminate or weaken ELMs.[6]
  • Injecting pellets to increase the frequency and thereby decrease the severity of ELM bursts (ASDEX Upgrade).[citation needed]
  • Multiple small-scale ELMs (000s/s) in tokamaks to prevent the creation of large ones, spreading the associated heat over a larger area and interval[7]
  • Increase the plasma density and, at high densities, adjusting the topology of the magnetic field lines confining the plasma.[8]

History

In 2003 DIII-D begn experimenting with resonant magnetic perturbations to control ELMs.[9]

In 2006 an initiative (Project Aster) was started to simulate a full ELM cycle including its onset, the highly non-linear phase, and its decay. However, this did not constitute a “true” ELM cycle, since a true ELM cycle would require modeling the slow growth after the crash, in order to produce a second ELM.

As of late 2011, several research facilities had demonstrated active control or suppression of ELMs in tokamak plasmas. For example, the KSTAR tokamak used specific asymmetric three-dimensional magnetic field configurations to achieve this goal.[10][11]

In 2015, results of the first simulation to demonstrate repeated ELM cycling was published.[12]

In 2022, researchers began testing the small ELM hypothesis at JET to assess the utility of the technique.[7][3]

See also

References

  1. F., Wagner; A.R., Field; G., Fussmann; J.V., Hofmann; M.E., Manso; O., Vollmer; José, Matias (1990). "Recent results of H-mode studies on ASDEX". 13th International Conference on Plasma Physics and Controlled Nuclear Fusion: 277–290. 
  2. Halpern, F D; Leblond, D; Lütjens, H; Luciani, J-F (2010-11-30). "Oscillation regimes of the internal kink mode in tokamak plasmas". Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 53 (1): 015011. doi:10.1088/0741-3335/53/1/015011. ISSN 0741-3335. 
  3. 3.0 3.1 Choi, Charles Q. (20 October 2022). "Controlled chaos may be the key to unlimited clean energy" (in en). https://www.inverse.com/innovation/nuclear-fusion-instabilities. 
  4. Lee, Chris (13 September 2018). "A third dimension helps Tokamak fusion reactor avoid wall-destroying instability" (in en-us). Ars Technica. https://arstechnica.com/science/2018/09/a-third-dimension-helps-tokamak-fusion-reactor-avoid-wall-destroying-instability/. 
  5. Leonard, A.W. (11 September 2014). "Edge-localized modes in tokamaks". Physics of Plasmas 21 (9): 090501. doi:10.1063/1.4894742. Bibcode2014PhPl...21i0501L. 
  6. T.E. Evans (2008). "RMP ELM suppression in DIII-D plasmas with ITER similar shapes and collisionalities". Nucl. Fusion 92 (48): 024002. doi:10.1088/0029-5515/48/2/024002. Bibcode2008NucFu..48b4002E. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0029-5515/48/2/024002. 
  7. 7.0 7.1 Harrer, G. F.; Faitsch, M.; Radovanovic, L.; Wolfrum, E.; Albert, C.; Cathey, A.; Cavedon, M.; Dunne, M. et al. (2022-10-10). "Quasicontinuous Exhaust Scenario for a Fusion Reactor: The Renaissance of Small Edge Localized Modes". Physical Review Letters 129 (16): 165001. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.165001. PMID 36306746. Bibcode2022PhRvL.129p5001H. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.165001. 
  8. "Fusion-reactor instabilities can be optimized by adjusting plasma density and magnetic fields". Physics World. Nov 4, 2022. https://physicsworld.com/a/fusion-reactor-instabilities-can-be-optimized-by-adjusting-plasma-density-and-magnetic-fields/. 
  9. T.E. Evans (2004). "Suppression of Large Edge-Localized Modes in High-Confinement DIII-D Plasmas with a Stochastic Magnetic Boundary". Physical Review Letters 92 (23): 235003. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.235003. PMID 15245164. Bibcode2004PhRvL..92w5003E. http://juser.fz-juelich.de/search?p=id:%22PreJuSER-38026%22. 
  10. Kwon, Eunhee (2011-11-10). "KSTAR announces successful ELM suppression". http://www.iter.org/newsline/198/950. 
  11. Park, Jong-Kyu; Jeon, YoungMu; In, Yongkyoon; Ahn, Joon-Wook; Nazikian, Raffi; Park, Gunyoung; Kim, Jaehyun; Lee, HyungHo et al. (2018-09-10). "3D field phase-space control in tokamak plasmas" (in En). Nature Physics 14 (12): 1223–1228. doi:10.1038/s41567-018-0268-8. ISSN 1745-2473. Bibcode2018NatPh..14.1223P. 
  12. Orain, François; Bécoulet, M; Morales, J; Huijsmans, G T A; Dif-Pradalier, G; Hoelzl, M; Garbet, X; Pamela, S et al. (2014-11-28). "Non-linear MHD modeling of edge localized mode cycles and mitigation by resonant magnetic perturbations". Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 57 (1): 014020. doi:10.1088/0741-3335/57/1/014020. ISSN 0741-3335. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02184569/file/Orain_F_PPCF_2014%20%281%29.pdf. 

Further reading