Physics:Photon blockade

From HandWiki
Short description: Quantum optical phenomenon


Photon blockade is a quantum optical phenomenon in which the presence of a single photon in a nonlinear optical system suppresses the absorption or transmission of additional photons, resulting in strongly nonclassical light with photon antibunching. The effect arises when light–matter interactions introduce sufficient anharmonicity into the excitation spectrum of an optical mode, preventing resonant multi-photon excitation. Photon blockade is commonly regarded as the photonic analogue of Coulomb blockade in mesoscopic electronic systems.

Photon blockade is central to quantum nonlinear optics and underpins applications such as single-photon sources, quantum optical switches, and single-photon transistors.

Historical development

The concept of photon blockade was introduced by Atac Imamoğlu et al. in (1997), who proposed that strong effective photon–photon interactions could be engineered in cavity quantum electrodynamics (QED) systems, leading to suppression of multi-photon transmission in direct analogy with Coulomb blockade in electronic transport.[1] Subsequent theoretical work explored photon statistics and blockade mechanisms in realistic systems. Grangier, Dan Walls, and Gheri (1998) analysed nonclassical photon statistics in nonlinear optical systems, identifying regimes closely related to blockade behaviour.[2] Werner and Imamoğlu (1999) further clarified the connection between spectral anharmonicity and effective photon–photon interactions in strongly coupled cavity systems.[3]

The first experimental observation of photon blockade was reported by Birnbaum et al. (2005), who demonstrated antibunched transmission from an optical cavity containing a single trapped atom in the strong-coupling regime.[4]

Physical mechanism

Photon blockade arises when the excitation spectrum of a driven optical system becomes anharmonic, such that the energy required to add a second photon differs from that required to add the first. When the system is driven resonantly at the single-photon transition and dissipation is sufficiently weak, higher-order photon states are detuned, suppressing multi-photon occupation.

Single two-level atom in a cavity

The simplest realization of photon blockade is a single two-level atom strongly coupled to a single cavity mode, described by the Jaynes–Cummings model.[5] The dressed eigenstates form a ladder[6] with energies

En,±=nωc±gn,

where n is the number of excitations, ωc is the cavity frequency, and g is the atom–cavity coupling strength.

The characteristic n dependence produces intrinsic anharmonicity: the transition from zero to one excitation occurs at a different frequency from the transition between higher rungs. As a result, a laser tuned to the one-photon transition is detuned from the two-photon transition, suppressing simultaneous multi-photon occupation and producing antibunched light.

Analogy to Coulomb blockade

Photon blockade is inspired by Coulomb blockade,[7] in which electron transport through a small conducting island is suppressed due to the charging energy associated with adding a single electron. In photon blockade, effective photon–photon interactions induced by strong light–matter coupling inside a cavity play an analogous role, despite photons being bosons and non-interacting in free space.

Relation to dipole blockade

Photon blockade is conceptually related to dipole blockade,[8] which occurs in strongly interacting atomic ensembles, particularly involving Rydberg states. In dipole blockade, excitation of one atom shifts the energy levels of nearby atoms, preventing their simultaneous excitation. Although dipole blockade suppresses atomic rather than photonic excitations, it can mediate strong photon–photon interactions and has been used to realise single-photon nonlinearities.

Conventional and unconventional photon blockade

Photon blockade mechanisms are commonly classified as:

  • Conventional photon blockade, arising from strong spectral anharmonicity and typically requiring nonlinear interaction strengths exceeding dissipation rates.
  • Unconventional photon blockade,[9] where strong antibunching arises from destructive quantum interference between excitation pathways even in weakly nonlinear systems.

Experiments and applications

Single-photon sources and quantum statistics

Photon blockade enables the generation of antibunched light[4] with suppressed second-order correlations g(2)(0)<1, providing a mechanism for single-photon sources in quantum communication and metrology.

Single-photon transistor

Photon blockade underlies proposals and demonstrations of single-photon transistors,.[10] in which a single photon controls the transmission of many others.

Many-body extensions

The Jaynes–Cummings–Hubbard model extends photon blockade physics to arrays of coupled cavities, predicting strongly correlated phases of light such as photonic Mott insulators and nonequilibrium quantum phase transitions.[11][12][13]

See also

References

  1. Imamoḡlu, A.; Schmidt, H.; Woods, G.; Deutsch, M. (25 August 1997). "Strongly Interacting Photons in a Nonlinear Cavity". Physical Review Letters 79 (8): 1467–1470. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.1467. 
  2. Grangier, Philippe; Walls, Daniel F.; Gheri, Klaus M. (28 September 1998). "Comment on “Strongly Interacting Photons in a Nonlinear Cavity”". Physical Review Letters 81 (13): 2833–2833. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.2833. 
  3. Werner, M. J.; Imamoḡlu, A. (8 December 1999). "Photon-photon interactions in cavity electromagnetically induced transparency". Physical Review A 61 (1). doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.61.011801. 
  4. 4.0 4.1 Birnbaum, K. M.; Boca, A.; Miller, R.; Boozer, A. D.; Northup, T. E.; Kimble, H. J. (July 2005). "Photon blockade in an optical cavity with one trapped atom". Nature 436 (7047): 87–90. doi:10.1038/nature03804. 
  5. E.T. Jaynes; F.W. Cummings (1963). "Comparison of quantum and semiclassical radiation theories with application to the beam maser". Proc. IEEE 51 (1): 89–109. doi:10.1109/PROC.1963.1664. 
  6. Cohen-Tannoudji, Claude, ed (2008). Atom-photon interactions: basic processes and applications. A Wiley-Interscience publication. New York, NY: Wiley. ISBN 978-3-527-61719-7. 
  7. Averin, D. V.; Likharev, K. K. (February 1986). "Coulomb blockade of single-electron tunneling, and coherent oscillations in small tunnel junctions". Journal of Low Temperature Physics 62 (3-4): 345–373. doi:10.1007/BF00683469. ISSN 0022-2291. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF00683469. 
  8. Lukin, M. D.; Fleischhauer, M.; Cote, R.; Duan, L. M.; Jaksch, D.; Cirac, J. I.; Zoller, P. (2001-06-26). "Dipole Blockade and Quantum Information Processing in Mesoscopic Atomic Ensembles". Physical Review Letters 87 (3). doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.037901. ISSN 0031-9007. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.037901. 
  9. Flayac, H.; Savona, V. (2017-11-06). "Unconventional photon blockade". Physical Review A 96 (5). doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.96.053810. ISSN 2469-9926. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.96.053810. 
  10. Wang, Zhiling; Bao, Zenghui; Li, Yan; Wu, Yukai; Cai, Weizhou; Wang, Weiting; Han, Xiyue; Wang, Jiahui et al. (2022-10-15). "An ultra-high gain single-photon transistor in the microwave regime". Nature Communications 13 (1): 6104. doi:10.1038/s41467-022-33921-6. ISSN 2041-1723. PMID 36243719. PMC 9569345. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-33921-6. 
  11. Hartmann, Michael J.; Brandão, Fernando G. S. L.; Plenio, Martin B. (December 2006). "Strongly interacting polaritons in coupled arrays of cavities". Nature Physics 2 (12): 849–855. doi:10.1038/nphys462. ISSN 1745-2481. https://www.nature.com/articles/nphys462. 
  12. Greentree, Andrew D.; Tahan, Charles; Cole, Jared H.; Hollenberg, Lloyd C. L. (December 2006). "Quantum phase transitions of light". Nature Physics 2 (12): 856–861. doi:10.1038/nphys466. ISSN 1745-2473. https://www.nature.com/articles/nphys466. 
  13. Angelakis, Dimitris G.; Santos, Marcelo Franca; Bose, Sougato (2007-09-28). "Photon-blockade-induced Mott transitions and X Y spin models in coupled cavity arrays". Physical Review A 76 (3). doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.76.031805. ISSN 1050-2947. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.76.031805.