Physics:PhysicsOverflow

From HandWiki
PhysicsOverflow
PhysicsOverflow Logo.svg
Type of site
Question and answer
Open peer review
OwnerRoger Cattin[1]
Created byAbhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Rahel Knoepfel and Roger Cattin
Website{{{1}}}
CommercialNo
RegistrationOptional
LaunchedApril 2014; 10 years ago (2014-04)[2]
Content license
User contributions under CC BY-SA 3.0[2]

PhysicsOverflow is a physics website that serves as a post-publication open peer review[2] platform for research papers in physics, as well as a collaborative blog and online community of physicists. It allows users to ask, answer and comment on graduate-level physics questions, post and review manuscripts from ArXiv (which lists PhysicsOverflow discussion pages among its trackbacks[3]) and other sources, and vote on both forms of content.

In addition to the two primary forms of content, the PhysicsOverflow community also welcomes discussions on unsolved problems, and hosts a chat section for discussions on topics generally of interest to physicists and students of physics, such as those related to recent events in physics, physics academia, and the publishing process.[2]

History

PhysicsOverflow was started in April 2014 as a physics-equivalent of MathOverflow by Rahel Knöpfel, a physics PhD at the University of Rostock, high-school student Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, and Roger Cattin, a retired professor of computer science at the University of Applied Sciences, Switzerland.[2] The site was initially a mere question-and-answer forum, as it was started by users dissatisfied by the policies of the Physics Stack Exchange, but it was eventually expanded to include a Reviews section in October 2014.[4]

Moderation practices

PhysicsOverflow is well-known for its liberal moderation policy and hesitation to block contributors except for spam, as reflected in the website's bill of "user rights".[5][6] The content is largely community-moderated, much like MathOverflow, although exceptions have been recorded.[7][8]

Although the site's moderation policy is publicly available as part of the moderator manual, the site has been criticised for the excessive dispersion of policy-related material, such as the FAQ, the Bill of Rights, the moderator list and the Community Moderation threads, leading to reduced transparency.[9][10] In response, the site's administrators posted a bulletin of all moderation-related content on the site on the homepage.

Technical details

The PhysicsOverflow discus as it appears in the PhysicsOverflow logo.

PhysicsOverflow runs Question2Answer, an open-source Q&A software, with a custom theme and several plugins and patches.[2] Some of its plugins have been used by other Question2Answer websites, such as the Open Science Q&A and the Physics Problems Q&A.[11][12]

Usage

Quantcast records around 3000 monthly visitors and between 20,000 and 50,000 global page views to PhysicsOverflow every month, over half of whom are located in four countries: the United States (26.8%), India (9.2%), the United Kingdom (8.5%), and Germany (6.4%).[13] However, according to PhysicsOverflow's own data, only around 1500 users actually contribute content to the site, and 440 are active at a given point in time.[14]

Recognition

The creation of PhysicsOverflow was well-received by the MathOverflow community.[15] PhysicsOverflow was also featured at the 5th Offtopicarium[16] and World Scientific's Asia-Pacific Physics News Letter.[17]

  • John Baez suggested the website as a platform for discussing research-level physics questions.[18]
  • Greg Bernhardt, the founder of PhysicsForums, acknowledged the site as a "very interesting development for the physics discussion communities".[19]
  • Arnold Neumaier, a professor at the University of Vienna, employs PhysicsOverflow as the platform for discussion about his Theoretical Physics FAQ.[20]
  • String theorist Lubos Motl referred to the website as a "very promising competition [to Physics Stack Exchange]".[21]
  • The University of Stavanger's cosmology department commented that PhysicsOverflow "seems to implement some interesting ideas", and that "it makes some sense the [sic] review the reviewing process".[22]
  • Urs Schreiber publicised the site, claiming it could act as a catalyst to make physics academia more open like mathematics.[23]

See also

References

  1. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 "FAQ - PhysicsOverflow". https://physicsoverflow.org/faq. 
  2. dimension10 (23 April 2015). "We have ArXiV trackbacks!". https://physicsoverflow.org/30425. 
  3. dimension10; Maimon, Ron (5 October 2014). "The reviews section is out of beta!". https://physicsoverflow.org/24235. 
  4. "What is Physics Overflow and how is it linked to Physics.SE?". https://physics.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/6196/what-is-physics-overflow-and-how-is-it-linked-to-physics-se. 
  5. "User Rights - PhysicsOverflow". https://physicsoverflow.org/user-rights. 
  6. drake; Dilaton; dimension10 (10 June 2015). "Violation of policy to close questions?". https://physicsoverflow.org/31863. 
  7. "Moderate | PhysicsOverflow". https://physicsoverflow.org/review. 
  8. "What is Physics Overflow and how is it linked to Physics.SE?". https://physics.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/6196/what-is-physics-overflow-and-how-is-it-linked-to-physics-se. 
  9. SaddlePoint; Dilaton; Maimon, Ron (14 August 2014). "Who are the Physics Overflow moderators, and what is their exact role and powers?". https://physicsoverflow.org/22268. 
  10. "How do I regain access to my imported account? - Ask Open Science". https://openscience.uni-bielefeld.de/768/how-do-i-regain-access-to-my-imported-account. 
  11. "Christopher Schwarzkopf – Wikimedia Deutschland Blog". https://blog.wikimedia.de/author/christopher_schwarzkopf/. 
  12. "Login". https://www.quantcast.com/user/login?forward=/physicsoverflow.org. 
  13. "PhysicsOverflow". https://physicsoverflow.org/statistics. 
  14. "PhysicsOverflow just went live". https://meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/1608/physicsoverflow-just-went-live. 
  15. Dilaton (24 August 2014). "We have a talk at the Offtopicarium !". https://physicsoverflow.org/22788. 
  16. Pallavi Sudhir, Abhimanyu; Knöpfel, Rahel (23 October 2015). "PhysicsOverflow: A postgraduate-level physics Q&A site and open peer review system". Asia Pacific Physics Newsletter 04 (1): 53–55. doi:10.1142/S2251158X15000193. 
  17. "books". http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/books.html. 
  18. Motl, Luboš (14 August 2013). "The Reference Frame: Discussion about old and new theoretical physics forums". https://motls.blogspot.com/2013/08/discussion-on-old-and-new-theoretical.html. 
  19. "A theoretical physics FAQ". https://www.mat.univie.ac.at/~neum/physfaq/physics-faq.html. 
  20. "Physics Overflow is live". https://motls.blogspot.com/2014/05/physics-overflow-is-live.html. 
  21. "UiS Cosmology". https://www.facebook.com/uiscosmology/posts/1228470267242602. 
  22. "New PhysicsOverflow forum for research-level physics discussion A new site...". 2 February 2019. https://plus.google.com/+UrsSchreiber/posts/SoWhSAqmUJ1?loc=us.