Physics:List of unsolved problems in physics

From HandWiki
Short description: None

The following is a list of notable unsolved problems grouped into broad areas of physics.[1]

Some of the major unsolved problems in physics are theoretical, meaning that existing theories seem incapable of explaining a certain observed phenomenon or experimental result. The others are experimental, meaning that there is a difficulty in creating an experiment to test a proposed theory or investigate a phenomenon in greater detail.

There are still some questions beyond the Standard Model of physics, such as the strong CP problem, neutrino mass, matter–antimatter asymmetry, and the nature of dark matter and dark energy.[2][3] Another problem lies within the mathematical framework of the Standard Model itself—the Standard Model is inconsistent with that of general relativity, to the point that one or both theories break down under certain conditions (for example within known spacetime singularities like the Big Bang and the centres of black holes beyond the event horizon).[4]

General physics

  • Theory of everything: Is there a singular, all-encompassing, coherent theoretical framework of physics that fully explains and links together all physical aspects of the universe?
  • Dimensionless physical constants: At the present time, the values of various dimensionless physical constants cannot be calculated; they can be determined only by physical measurement.[5][6] What is the minimum number of dimensionless physical constants from which all other dimensionless physical constants can be derived? Are dimensional physical constants necessary at all?

Quantum gravity

  • Quantum gravity: Can quantum mechanics and general relativity be realized as a fully consistent theory (perhaps as a quantum field theory)?[7] Is spacetime fundamentally continuous or discrete? Would a consistent theory involve a force mediated by a hypothetical graviton, or be a product of a discrete structure of spacetime itself (as in loop quantum gravity)? Are there deviations from the predictions of general relativity at very small or very large scales or in other extreme circumstances that flow from a quantum gravity mechanism?
  • Black holes, black hole information paradox, and black hole radiation: Do black holes produce thermal radiation, as expected on theoretical grounds?[8] Does this radiation contain information about their inner structure, as suggested by gauge–gravity duality, or not, as implied by Hawking's original calculation? If not, and black holes can evaporate away, what happens to the information stored in them (since quantum mechanics does not provide for the destruction of information)? Or does the radiation stop at some point, leaving black hole remnants? Is there another way to probe their internal structure somehow, if such a structure even exists?
  • The cosmic censorship hypothesis and the chronology protection conjecture: Can singularities not hidden behind an event horizon, known as "naked singularities", arise from realistic initial conditions, or is it possible to prove some version of the "cosmic censorship hypothesis" of Roger Penrose which proposes that this is impossible?[9] Similarly, will the closed timelike curves which arise in some solutions to the equations of general relativity (and which imply the possibility of backwards time travel) be ruled out by a theory of quantum gravity which unites general relativity with quantum mechanics, as suggested by the "chronology protection conjecture" of Stephen Hawking?
  • Holographic principle: Is it true that quantum gravity admits a lower-dimensional description that does not contain gravity? A well-understood example of holography is the AdS/CFT correspondence in string theory. Similarly, can quantum gravity in a de Sitter space be understood using dS/CFT correspondence? Can the AdS/CFT correspondence be vastly generalized to the gauge–gravity duality for arbitrary asymptotic spacetime backgrounds? Are there other theories of quantum gravity other than string theory that admit a holographic description?
  • Quantum spacetime or the emergence of spacetime: Is the nature of spacetime at the Planck scale very different from the continuous classical dynamical spacetime that exists in General relativity? In loop quantum gravity, the spacetime is postulated to be discrete from the beginning. In string theory, although originally spacetime was considered just like in General relativity (with the only difference being supersymmetry), recent research building upon the Ryu–Takayanagi conjecture has taught that spacetime in string theory is emergent by using quantum information theoretic concepts such as entanglement entropy in the AdS/CFT correspondence.[10] However, how exactly the familiar classical spacetime emerges within string theory or the AdS/CFT correspondence is still not well understood.
  • Problem of time: In quantum mechanics, time is a classical background parameter, and the flow of time is universal and absolute. In general relativity, time is one component of four-dimensional spacetime, and the flow of time changes depending on the curvature of spacetime and the spacetime trajectory of the observer. How can these two concepts of time be reconciled?[11]

Quantum physics

  • Yang–Mills theory: Given an arbitrary compact gauge group, does a non-trivial quantum Yang–Mills theory with a finite mass gap exist? (This problem is also listed as one of the Millennium Prize Problems in mathematics.)[12]
  • Quantum field theory (this is a generalization of the previous problem): Is it possible to construct, in a mathematically rigorous way, a quantum field theory in 4-dimensional spacetime that includes interactions and does not resort to perturbative methods?

Cosmology and general relativity

Estimated distribution of dark matter and dark energy in the universe
  • Dark matter: What is the identity of dark matter?[17] Is it a particle? If so, is it a WIMP, axion, the lightest superpartner (LSP), or some other particle? Or, do the phenomena attributed to dark matter point not to some form of matter but actually to an extension of gravity?
  • Dark energy: What is the cause of the observed accelerating expansion of the universe (the de Sitter phase)? Are the observations rightly interpreted as the accelerating expansion of the universe, or are they evidence that the cosmological principle is false?[21][22] Why is the energy density of the dark energy component of the same magnitude as the density of matter at present when the two evolve quite differently over time; could it be simply that we are observing at exactly the right time? Is dark energy a pure cosmological constant or are models of quintessence such as phantom energy applicable?
  • Dark flow: Is a non-spherically symmetric gravitational pull from outside the observable universe responsible for some of the observed motion of large objects such as galactic clusters in the universe?
  • Shape of the universe: What is the 3-manifold of comoving space, i.e., of a comoving spatial section of the universe, informally called the "shape" of the universe? Neither the curvature nor the topology is presently known, though the curvature is known to be "close" to zero on observable scales. The cosmic inflation hypothesis suggests that the shape of the universe may be unmeasurable, but, since 2003, Jean-Pierre Luminet, et al., and other groups have suggested that the shape of the universe may be the Poincaré dodecahedral space. Is the shape unmeasurable; the Poincaré space; or another 3-manifold?
  • Extra dimensions: Does nature have more than four spacetime dimensions? If so, what is their size? Are dimensions a fundamental property of the universe or an emergent result of other physical laws? Can we experimentally observe evidence of higher spatial dimensions?

High-energy/particle physics

Colour Confinement is the tendency of Quarks and Gluons to form colour neutral groups.
  • The QCD vacuum: Many of the equations in non-perturbative QCD are currently unsolved. These energies are the energies sufficient for the formation of atomic nuclei. How thus does low energy QCD give rise to the formation of complex nuclei and nuclear constituents?[citation needed]
  • Generations of matter: Why are there three generations of quarks and leptons? Is there a theory that can explain the masses of particular quarks and leptons in particular generations from first principles (a theory of Yukawa couplings)?[31]
  • Neutrino mass: What is the mass of neutrinos, whether they follow Dirac or Majorana statistics? Is the mass hierarchy normal or inverted? Is the CP violating phase equal to 0?[32][33]
  • Reactor antineutrino anomaly: There is an anomaly in the existing body of data regarding the antineutrino flux from nuclear reactors around the world. Measured values of this flux appears to be only 94% of the value expected from theory.[34] It is unknown whether this is due to unknown physics (such as sterile neutrinos), experimental error in the measurements, or errors in the theoretical flux calculations.[35]
  • Strong CP problem and axions: Why is the strong nuclear interaction invariant to parity and charge conjugation? Is Peccei–Quinn theory the solution to this problem? Could axions be the main component of dark matter?
  • Anomalous magnetic dipole moment: Why is the experimentally measured value of the muon's anomalous magnetic dipole moment ("muon g − 2") significantly different from the theoretically predicted value of that physical constant?[36]
  • Proton radius puzzle: What is the electric charge radius of the proton? How does it differ from a gluonic charge?
  • Pentaquarks and other exotic hadrons: What combinations of quarks are possible? Why were pentaquarks so difficult to discover?[37] Are they a tightly-bound system of five elementary particles, or a more weakly-bound pairing of a baryon and a meson?[38]
  • Mu problem: A problem in supersymmetric theories, concerned with understanding the reasons for parameter values of the theory.
  • Koide formula: An aspect of the problem of particle generations. The sum of the masses of the three charged leptons, divided by the square of the sum of the roots of these masses, to within one standard deviation of observations, is Q = ​23. It is unknown how such a simple value comes about, and why it is the exact arithmetic average of the possible extreme values of  1 /3 (equal masses) and 1 (one mass dominates).
  • Strange Matter: Does Strange Matter exist? Is it stable? Can they form Strange Stars? There have been various hypothesis and conjectures that it could form inside Exotic Stars such as Quark Stars in which they would be stable. So stable that they would be the most stable thing in the Universe and even hypothetically outlive the Heat Death of the Universe.
  • Glueballs: Do they exist in nature? What configurations of them are stable?

Astronomy and astrophysics

Main page: Astronomy:List of unsolved problems in astronomy
  • Solar cycle: How does the Sun generate its periodically reversing large-scale magnetic field? How do other solar-like stars generate their magnetic fields, and what are the similarities and differences between stellar activity cycles and that of the Sun?[39] What caused the Maunder Minimum and other grand minima, and how does the solar cycle recover from a minima state?
  • Coronal heating problem: Why is the Sun's corona (atmosphere layer) so much hotter than the Sun's surface? Why is the magnetic reconnection effect many orders of magnitude faster than predicted by standard models?
  • Astrophysical jet: Why do only certain accretion discs surrounding certain astronomical objects emit relativistic jets along their polar axes? Why are there quasi-periodic oscillations in many accretion discs?[40] Why does the period of these oscillations scale as the inverse of the mass of the central object?[41] Why are there sometimes overtones, and why do these appear at different frequency ratios in different objects?[42]
  • Diffuse interstellar bands: What is responsible for the numerous interstellar absorption lines detected in astronomical spectra? Are they molecular in origin, and if so which molecules are responsible for them? How do they form?
  • Supermassive black holes: What is the origin of the M–sigma relation between supermassive black hole mass and galaxy velocity dispersion?[43] How did the most distant quasars grow their supermassive black holes up to 1010 solar masses so early in the history of the universe?
  • Kuiper cliff: Why does the number of objects in the Solar System's Kuiper belt fall off rapidly and unexpectedly beyond a radius of 50 astronomical units?
  • Flyby anomaly: Why is the observed energy of satellites flying by planetary bodies sometimes different by a minute amount from the value predicted by theory?
  • Galaxy rotation problem: Is dark matter responsible for differences in observed and theoretical speed of stars revolving around the centre of galaxies, or is it something else?
    Rotation curve of a typical spiral galaxy: predicted (A) and observed (B). Can the discrepancy between the curves be attributed to dark matter?
  • Supernovae: What is the exact mechanism by which an implosion of a dying star becomes an explosion?
  • p-nuclei: What astrophysical process is responsible for the nucleogenesis of these rare isotopes?
  • Ultra-high-energy cosmic ray:[17] Why is it that some cosmic rays appear to possess energies that are impossibly high, given that there are no sufficiently energetic cosmic ray sources near the Earth? Why is it that (apparently) some cosmic rays emitted by distant sources have energies above the Greisen–Zatsepin–Kuzmin limit?[44][17]
  • Rotation rate of Saturn: Why does the magnetosphere of Saturn exhibit a (slowly changing) periodicity close to that at which the planet's clouds rotate? What is the true rotation rate of Saturn's deep interior?[45]
  • Origin of magnetar magnetic field: What is the origin of magnetar magnetic field?
  • Large-scale anisotropy: Is the universe at very large scales anisotropic, making the cosmological principle an invalid assumption? The number count and intensity dipole anisotropy in radio, NRAO VLA Sky Survey (NVSS) catalogue[46] is inconsistent with the local motion as derived from cosmic microwave background[47][48] and indicate an intrinsic dipole anisotropy. The same NVSS radio data also shows an intrinsic dipole in polarization density and degree of polarization[49] in the same direction as in number count and intensity. There are several other observations revealing large-scale anisotropy. The optical polarization from quasars shows polarization alignment over a very large scale of Gpc.[50][51][52] The cosmic-microwave-background data shows several features of anisotropy,[53][54][55][56] which are not consistent with the Big Bang model.
  • Age–metallicity relation in the Galactic disk: Is there a universal age–metallicity relation (AMR) in the Galactic disk (both "thin" and "thick" parts of the disk)? Although in the local (primarily thin) disk of the Milky Way there is no evidence of a strong AMR,[57] a sample of 229 nearby "thick" disk stars has been used to investigate the existence of an age–metallicity relation in the Galactic thick disk, and indicate that there is an age–metallicity relation present in the thick disk.[58][59] Stellar ages from asteroseismology confirm the lack of any strong age–metallicity relation in the Galactic disc.[60]
  • The lithium problem: Why is there a discrepancy between the amount of lithium-7 predicted to be produced in Big Bang nucleosynthesis and the amount observed in very old stars?[61]
  • Ultraluminous X-ray sources (ULXs): What powers X-ray sources that are not associated with active galactic nuclei but exceed the Eddington limit of a neutron star or stellar black hole? Are they due to intermediate-mass black holes? Some ULXs are periodic, suggesting non-isotropic emission from a neutron star. Does this apply to all ULXs? How could such a system form and remain stable?
  • Fast radio bursts (FRBs): What causes these transient radio pulses from distant galaxies, lasting only a few milliseconds each? Why do some FRBs repeat at unpredictable intervals, but most do not? Dozens of models have been proposed, but none have been widely accepted.[62]
  • Are voids in space empty or consist of transparent matter?[63][64][65][66]

Nuclear physics

The "island of stability" in the proton vs. neutron number plot for heavy nuclei
  • Quantum chromodynamics: What are the phases of strongly interacting matter, and what roles do they play in the evolution of the cosmos? What is the detailed partonic structure of the nucleons? What does QCD predict for the properties of strongly interacting matter? What determines the key features of QCD, and what is their relation to the nature of gravity and spacetime? Does QCD truly lack CP violations?
  • Quark–gluon plasma: Where is the onset of deconfinement: 1) as a function of temperature and chemical potentials? 2) as a function of relativistic heavy-ion collision energy and system size? What is the mechanism of energy and baryon-number stopping leading to creation of quark-gluon plasma in relativistic heavy-ion collisions? Why is sudden hadronization and the statistical-hadronization model a near-to-perfect description of hadron production from quark–gluon plasma? Is quark flavor conserved in quark–gluon plasma? Are strangeness and charm in chemical equilibrium in quark–gluon plasma? Does strangeness in quark–gluon plasma flow at the same speed as up and down quark flavours? Why does deconfined matter show ideal flow?
  • Specific models of quark–gluon plasma formation: Do gluons saturate when their occupation number is large? Do gluons form a dense system called colour glass condensate? What are the signatures and evidences for the Balitsky–Fadin–Kuarev–Lipatov, Balitsky–Kovchegov, Catani–Ciafaloni–Fiorani–Marchesini evolution equations?
  • Nuclei and nuclear astrophysics: Why is there a lack of convergence in estimates of the mean lifetime of a free neutron based on two separate—and increasingly precise—experimental methods? What is the nature of the nuclear force that binds protons and neutrons into stable nuclei and rare isotopes? What is the explanation for the EMC effect? What is the nature of exotic excitations in nuclei at the frontiers of stability and their role in stellar processes? What is the nature of neutron stars and dense nuclear matter? What is the origin of the elements in the cosmos? What are the nuclear reactions that drive stars and stellar explosions? What is the heaviest possible chemical element?

Fluid dynamics

  • Under what conditions do smooth solutions exist for the Navier–Stokes equations, which are the equations that describe the flow of a viscous fluid? This problem, for an incompressible fluid in three dimensions, is also one of the Millennium Prize Problems in mathematics.[67]
  • Turbulent flow: Is it possible to make a theoretical model to describe the statistics of a turbulent flow (in particular, its internal structures)?[44]
  • Upstream contamination: When pouring water from a higher container to a lower one, particles floating in the latter can climb upstream into the upper container. A definitive explanation for this phenomenon is still lacking.
  • Granular convection: why does a granular material subjected to shaking or vibration exhibit circulation patterns similar to types of fluid convection? Why do the largest particles end up on the surface of a granular material containing a mixture of variously sized objects when subjected to a vibration/shaking?

Condensed matter physics

A sample of a cuprate superconductor (specifically BSCCO). The mechanism for superconductivity of these materials is unknown.
Magnetoresistance in a u = 8/5 fractional quantum Hall state
  • Fractional Hall effect: What mechanism explains the existence of the u = 5/2 state in the fractional quantum Hall effect? Does it describe quasiparticles with non-Abelian fractional statistics?[79]
  • Liquid crystals: Can the nematic to smectic (A) phase transition in liquid crystal states be characterized as a universal phase transition?[80][81]
  • Semiconductor nanocrystals: What is the cause of the nonparabolicity of the energy-size dependence for the lowest optical absorption transition of quantum dots?[82]
  • Metal whiskering: In electrical devices, some metallic surfaces may spontaneously grow fine metallic whiskers, which can lead to equipment failures. While compressive mechanical stress is known to encourage whisker formation, the growth mechanism has yet to be determined.
  • Superfluid transition in helium-4: Explain the discrepancy between the experimental[83] and theoretical[84][85][86] determinations of the heat capacity critical exponent α.[87]
  • Scharnhorst effect: Can light signals travel slightly faster than c between two closely spaced conducting plates, exploiting the Casimir effect?[88]

Quantum computing and quantum information

Plasma physics

  • Plasma physics and fusion power: Fusion energy may potentially provide power from an abundant resource (e.g. hydrogen) without the type of radioactive waste that fission energy currently produces. However, can ionized gases (plasma) be confined long enough and at a high enough temperature to create fusion power? What is the physical origin of H-mode?[93]
  • The injection problem: Fermi acceleration is thought to be the primary mechanism that accelerates astrophysical particles to high energy. However, it is unclear what mechanism causes those particles to initially have energies high enough for Fermi acceleration to work on them.[94]
  • Alfvénic turbulence: In the solar wind and the turbulence in solar flares, coronal mass ejections, and magnetospheric substorms are major unsolved problems in space plasma physics.[95]

Biophysics

  • Stochasticity and robustness to noise in gene expression: How do genes govern our body, withstanding different external pressures and internal stochasticity? Certain models exist for genetic processes, but we are far from understanding the whole picture, in particular in development where gene expression must be tightly regulated.
  • Quantitative study of the immune system: What are the quantitative properties of immune responses? What are the basic building blocks of immune system networks?
  • Homochirality: What is the origin of the preponderance of specific enantiomers in biochemical systems?
  • Magnetoreception: How do animals (e.g. migratory birds) sense the Earth's magnetic field?
  • Protein structure prediction: How is the three-dimensional structure of proteins determined by the one-dimensional amino acid sequence? How can proteins fold on microsecond to second timescales when the number of possible conformations is astronomical and conformational transitions occur on the picosecond to microsecond timescale? Can algorithms be written to predict a protein's three-dimensional structure from its sequence? Do the native structures of most naturally occurring proteins coincide with the global minimum of the free energy in conformational space? Or are most native conformations thermodynamically unstable, but kinetically trapped in metastable states? What keeps the high density of proteins present inside cells from precipitating?[96]
  • Quantum biology: Can coherence be maintained in biological systems at timeframes long enough to be functionally important? Are there non-trivial aspects of biology or biochemistry that can only be explained by the persistance of coherence as a mechanism?

Philosophy of physics

  • Interpretation of quantum mechanics: How does the quantum description of reality, which includes elements such as the superposition of states and wavefunction collapse or quantum decoherence, give rise to the reality we perceive?[44] Another way of stating this question regards the measurement problem: What constitutes a "measurement" which apparently causes the wave function to collapse into a definite state? Unlike classical physical processes, some quantum mechanical processes (such as quantum teleportation arising from quantum entanglement) cannot be simultaneously "local", "causal", and "real", but it is not obvious which of these properties must be sacrificed,[97] or if an attempt to describe quantum mechanical processes in these senses is a category error such that a proper understanding of quantum mechanics would render the question meaningless. Can the many worlds interpretation resolve it?
  • Arrow of time (e.g. entropy's arrow of time): Why does time have a direction? Why did the universe have such low entropy in the past, and time correlates with the universal (but not local) increase in entropy, from the past and to the future, according to the second law of thermodynamics?[44] Why are CP violations observed in certain weak force decays, but not elsewhere? Are CP violations somehow a product of the second law of thermodynamics, or are they a separate arrow of time? Are there exceptions to the principle of causality? Is there a single possible past? Is the present moment physically distinct from the past and future, or is it merely an emergent property of consciousness? What links the quantum arrow of time to the thermodynamic arrow?
  • Locality: Are there non-local phenomena in quantum physics?[98][99] If they exist, are non-local phenomena limited to the entanglement revealed in the violations of the Bell inequalities, or can information and conserved quantities also move in a non-local way? Under what circumstances are non-local phenomena observed? What does the existence or absence of non-local phenomena imply about the fundamental structure of spacetime? How does this elucidate the proper interpretation of the fundamental nature of quantum physics?
  • Quantum mind: Does quantum mechanical phenomena, such as entanglement and superposition, play an important part in the brain's function and can it explain critical aspects of consciousness?[100]

Problems solved in the past 30 years

General physics/quantum physics

Cosmology and general relativity

High-energy physics/particle physics

  • Existence of pentaquarks (1964–2015): In July 2015, the LHCb collaboration at CERN identified pentaquarks in the Λ0b→J/ψKp channel, which represents the decay of the bottom lambda baryon 0b) into a J/ψ meson (J/ψ), a kaon (K) and a proton (p). The results showed that sometimes, instead of decaying directly into mesons and baryons, the Λ0b decayed via intermediate pentaquark states. The two states, named P+c(4380) and P+c(4450), had individual statistical significances of 9 σ and 12 σ, respectively, and a combined significance of 15 σ—enough to claim a formal discovery. The two pentaquark states were both observed decaying strongly to J/ψp, hence must have a valence quark content of two up quarks, a down quark, a charm quark, and an anti-charm quark (uudcc), making them charmonium-pentaquarks.[111]
  • Existence of quark-gluon plasma, a new phase of matter was discovered and confirmed in experiments at CERN-SPS (2000), BNL-RHIC (2005) and CERN-LHC (2010).[112]
  • Higgs boson and electroweak symmetry breaking (1963[113]–2012): The mechanism responsible for breaking the electroweak gauge symmetry, giving mass to the W and Z bosons, was solved with the discovery of the Higgs boson of the Standard Model, with the expected couplings to the weak bosons. No evidence of a strong dynamics solution, as proposed by technicolor, has been observed.
  • Origin of mass of most elementary particles: Solved with the discovery of the Higgs boson, which implies the existence of the Higgs field giving mass to these particles.

Astronomy and astrophysics

Nuclear physics

Rapidly solved problems

  • Existence of time crystals (2012–2016): The idea of a quantized time crystal was first theorized in 2012 by Frank Wilczek.[122][123] In 2016, Khemani et al.[124] and Else et al.[125] independently of each other suggested that periodically driven quantum spin systems could show similar behaviour. Also in 2016, Norman Yao at Berkeley and colleagues proposed a different way to create discrete time crystals in spin systems.[126] This was then used by two teams, a group led by Christopher Monroe at the University of Maryland and a group led by Mikhail Lukin at Harvard University, who were both able to show evidence for time crystals in the laboratory setting, showing that for short times the systems exhibited the dynamics similar to the predicted one.[127][128]
  • Photon underproduction crisis (2014–2015): This problem was resolved by Khaire and Srianand.[129] They show that a factor 2 to 5 times large metagalactic photoionization rate can be easily obtained using updated quasar and galaxy observations. Recent observations of quasars indicate that the quasar contribution to ultraviolet photons is a factor of 2 larger than previous estimates. The revised galaxy contribution is a factor of 3 larger. These together solve the crisis.
  • Hipparcos anomaly (1997[130]–2012): The High Precision Parallax Collecting Satellite (Hipparcos) measured the parallax of the Pleiades and determined a distance of 385 light years. This was significantly different from other measurements made by means of actual to apparent brightness measurement or absolute magnitude. The anomaly was due to the use of a weighted mean when there is a correlation between distances and distance errors for stars in clusters. It is resolved by using an unweighted mean. There is no systematic bias in the Hipparcos data when it comes to star clusters.[131]
  • Faster-than-light neutrino anomaly (2011–2012): In 2011, the OPERA experiment mistakenly observed neutrinos appearing to travel faster than light. On 12 July 2012 OPERA updated their paper after discovering an error in their previous flight time measurement. They found agreement of neutrino speed with the speed of light.[132]
  • Pioneer anomaly (1980–2012): There was a deviation in the predicted accelerations of the Pioneer 10 and 11 spacecraft as they left the Solar System.[44][17] It is believed that this is a result of previously unaccounted-for thermal recoil force.[133][134]

See also

Footnotes

  1. "This problem is widely regarded as one of the major obstacles to further progress in fundamental physics ... Its importance has been emphasized by various authors from different aspects. For example, it has been described as a 'veritable crisis" ...] and even 'the mother of all physics problems' ... While it might be possible that people working on a particular problem tend to emphasize or even exaggerate its importance, those authors all agree that this is a problem that needs to be solved, although there is little agreement on what is the right direction to find the solution."[24]
  2. When physicists strip neutrons from atomic nuclei, put them in a bottle, then count how many remain there after some time, they infer that neutrons radioactively decay in 14 minutes and 39 seconds, on average. But when other physicists generate beams of neutrons and tally the emerging protons — the particles that free neutrons decay into — they peg the average neutron lifetime at around 14 minutes and 48 seconds. The discrepancy between the “bottle” and “beam” measurements has persisted since both methods of gauging the neutron's longevity began yielding results in the 1990s. At first, all the measurements were so imprecise that nobody worried. Gradually, though, both methods have improved, and still they disagree.[26]

References

  1. Ginzburg, Vitaly L. (2001). The physics of a lifetime : reflections on the problems and personalities of 20th century physics. Berlin: Springer. pp. 3–200. ISBN 978-3-540-67534-1. https://archive.org/details/physicslifetimer00ginz_439. 
  2. Hammond, Richard (1 May 2008). "The Unknown Universe: The Origin of the Universe, Quantum Gravity, Wormholes, and Other Things Science Still Can't Explain". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A 456 (1999): 1685. 
  3. Womersley, J. (February 2005). "Beyond the Standard Model". Symmetry Magazine. http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/pdfs/200502/beyond_the_standard_model.pdf. 
  4. Overbye, Dennis (11 September 2023). "Don't Expect a 'Theory of Everything' to Explain It All - Not even the most advanced physics can reveal everything we want to know about the history and future of the cosmos, or about ourselves.". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 11 September 2023. https://archive.today/20230911043212/https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/11/science/space/astronomy-universe-simulations.html. Retrieved 11 September 2023. 
  5. "Alcohol constrains physical constant in the early universe". 13 December 2012. http://phys.org/news/2012-12-alcohol-constrains-physical-constant-early.html. 
  6. Bagdonaite, J.; Jansen, P.; Henkel, C.; Bethlem, H. L.; Menten, K. M.; Ubachs, W. (13 December 2012). "A Stringent Limit on a Drifting Proton-to-Electron Mass Ratio from Alcohol in the Early Universe". Science 339 (6115): 46–48. doi:10.1126/science.1224898. PMID 23239626. Bibcode2013Sci...339...46B. https://research.vu.nl/en/publications/1d54a47c-d3cf-4eed-900d-6a035ac35d88. Retrieved 10 January 2020. 
  7. Sokal, Alan (22 July 1996). "Don't Pull the String Yet on Superstring Theory". New York Times. https://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9D0DE7DB1639F931A15754C0A960958260. 
  8. Peres, Asher; Terno, Daniel R. (2004). "Quantum information and relativity theory". Reviews of Modern Physics 76 (1): 93–123. doi:10.1103/revmodphys.76.93. Bibcode2004RvMP...76...93P. 
  9. Joshi, Pankaj S. (January 2009). "Do Naked Singularities Break the Rules of Physics?". Scientific American. http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=naked-singularities. 
  10. Harlow, Daniel (2018). "TASI Lectures on the Emergence of Bulk Physics in AdS/CFT". Proceedings of Science TASI2017: 002. doi:10.22323/1.305.0002. https://pos.sissa.it/305/002/. 
  11. Isham, C. J. (1993). "Canonical Quantum Gravity and the Problem of Time" (in en). Integrable Systems, Quantum Groups, and Quantum Field Theories. NATO ASI Series. Springer, Dordrecht. pp. 157–287. doi:10.1007/978-94-011-1980-1_6. ISBN 9789401048743. 
  12. "Yang–Mills and Mass Gap" (in en). https://www.claymath.org/millennium-problems/yang%E2%80%93mills-and-mass-gap. 
  13. Rees, Martin (3 May 2001) (in en-us). Just Six Numbers: The Deep Forces That Shape The Universe. New York, New York: Basic Books; First American edition. p. 4. ISBN 9780465036721. https://archive.org/details/justsixnumbersde00rees. 
  14. Gribbin, J. and Rees, M., Cosmic Coincidences: Dark Matter, Mankind, and Anthropic Cosmology, pp. 7, 269. 1989, ISBN:0-553-34740-3
  15. Davis, Paul (2007) (in en-us). Cosmic Jackpot: Why Our Universe Is Just Right for Life. New York: Orion Publications. p. 2. ISBN 978-0618592265. https://archive.org/details/cosmicjackpotwhy0000davi/page/2. 
  16. Podolsky, Dmitry. "Top ten open problems in physics". NEQNET. http://www.nonequilibrium.net/225-top-ten-open-problems-physics/. 
  17. 17.0 17.1 17.2 17.3 17.4 Brooks, Michael (19 March 2005). "13 things that do not make sense". New Scientist. Issue 2491. https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg18524911.600-13-things-that-do-not-make-sense.html. 
  18. "Quanta Magazine". https://www.quantamagazine.org/neutrino-asymmetry-passes-critical-threshold-20200415/. 
  19. 19.0 19.1 19.2 19.3 Abdalla, Elcio; Abellán, Guillermo Franco; Aboubrahim, Amin (11 March 2022). "Cosmology Intertwined: A Review of the Particle Physics, Astrophysics, and Cosmology Associated with the Cosmological Tensions and Anomalies". Journal of High Energy Astrophysics 34: 49. doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2022.04.002. Bibcode2022JHEAp..34...49A. 
  20. Krishnan, Chethan; Mohayaee, Roya; Colgáin, Eoin Ó; Sheikh-Jabbari, M. M.; Yin, Lu (16 September 2021). "Does Hubble Tension Signal a Breakdown in FLRW Cosmology?". Classical and Quantum Gravity 38 (18): 184001. doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ac1a81. ISSN 0264-9381. Bibcode2021CQGra..38r4001K. 
  21. 21.0 21.1 Ellis, G. F. R. (2009). "Dark energy and inhomogeneity". Journal of Physics: Conference Series 189 (1): 012011. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/189/1/012011. Bibcode2009JPhCS.189a2011E. 
  22. 22.0 22.1 Colin, Jacques; Mohayaee, Roya; Rameez, Mohamed; Sarkar, Subir (20 November 2019). "Evidence for anisotropy of cosmic acceleration". Astronomy and Astrophysics 631: L13. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936373. Bibcode2019A&A...631L..13C. https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2019/11/aa36373-19/aa36373-19.html. Retrieved 25 March 2022. 
  23. Steinhardt, P.; Turok, N. (2006). "Why the Cosmological constant is so small and positive". Science 312 (5777): 1180–1183. doi:10.1126/science.1126231. PMID 16675662. Bibcode2006Sci...312.1180S. 
  24. 24.0 24.1 Wang, Qingdi; Zhu, Zhen; Unruh, William G. (11 May 2017). "How the huge energy of quantum vacuum gravitates to drive the slow accelerating expansion of the Universe". Physical Review D 95 (10): 103504. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.103504. Bibcode2017PhRvD..95j3504W. 
  25. Dirac, Paul (1931). "Quantised singularities in the electromagnetic field". Proceedings of the Royal Society A 133 (821): 60. doi:10.1098/rspa.1931.0130. Bibcode1931RSPSA.133...60D. http://users.physik.fu-berlin.de/~kleinert/files/dirac1931.pdf. Retrieved 25 December 2010. 
  26. 26.0 26.1 Wolchover, Natalie (13 February 2018). "Neutron lifetime puzzle deepens, but no dark matter seen". Quanta Magazine. https://www.quantamagazine.org/neutron-lifetime-puzzle-deepens-but-no-dark-matter-seen-20180213/. Retrieved 31 July 2018. 
  27. Li, Tianjun; Nanopoulos, Dimitri V.; Walker, Joel W. (2011). "Elements of fast proton decay". Nuclear Physics B 846 (1): 43–99. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2010.12.014. Bibcode2011NuPhB.846...43L. 
  28. Hansson, Johan (2010). "The "proton spin crisis" – a quantum query". Progress in Physics 3: 23. http://www.ptep-online.com/index_files/2010/PP-22-08.PDF. Retrieved 14 April 2012. 
  29. Langacker, Paul (2012). "Grand unification". Scholarpedia 7 (10): 11419. doi:10.4249/scholarpedia.11419. Bibcode2012SchpJ...711419L. 
  30. Wu, T.-Y. (1991). Relativistic Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Fields. World Scientific. ISBN 978-981-02-0608-6. 
  31. Blumhofer, A.; Hutter, M. (1997). "Family structure from periodic solutions of an improved gap equation". Nuclear Physics B484 (1): 80–96. doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(96)00644-X. Bibcode1997NuPhB.484...80B. 
  32. "India-based Neutrino Observatory (INO)". Tata Institute of Fundamental Research. http://www.ino.tifr.res.in/ino/. 
  33. Nakamura, K. (2010). "2011 Review of Particle Physics". J. Phys. G 37 (7A): 075021. doi:10.1088/0954-3899/37/7A/075021. Bibcode2010JPhG...37g5021N. http://pdg.lbl.gov/2011/reviews/contents_sports.html. Retrieved 25 April 2012. 
  34. Mention, G.; Fechner, M.; Lasserre, Th.; Mueller, Th.A.; Lhuillier, D.; Cribier, M.; Letourneau, A. (2011-04-29). "Reactor antineutrino anomaly". Physical Review D 83 (7): 073006. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.83.073006. Bibcode2011PhRvD..83g3006M. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.83.073006. Retrieved 2 October 2021. 
  35. Fallot, Muriel (2017-06-19). "Getting to the bottom of an antineutrino anomaly". Physics 10: 66. doi:10.1103/Physics.10.66. Bibcode2017PhyOJ..10...66F. https://physics.aps.org/articles/v10/66. Retrieved 2 October 2021. 
  36. Blum, Thomas; Denig, Achim; Logashenko, Ivan; de Rafael, Eduardo; Roberts, B. Lee; Teubner, Thomas; Venanzoni, Graziano (2013). "The muon (g − 2) theory value: Present and future". arXiv:1311.2198 [hep-ph].
  37. Muir, H. (2 July 2003). "Pentaquark discovery confounds skeptics". https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn3903-pentaquark-discovery-confounds-sceptics.html. 
  38. Amit, G. (14 July 2015). "Pentaquark discovery at LHC shows long-sought new form of matter". New Scientist. https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn27892-pentaquark-discovery-at-lhc-shows-long-sought-new-form-of-matter/. 
  39. Michael J. Thompson (2014). "Grand Challenges in the Physics of the Sun and Sun-like Stars". Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences 1: 1. doi:10.3389/fspas.2014.00001. Bibcode2014FrASS...1....1T. 
  40. Strohmayer, Tod E.; Mushotzky, Richard F. (20 March 2003). "Discovery of X-Ray Quasi-periodic Oscillations from an Ultraluminous X-Ray Source in M82: Evidence against Beaming". The Astrophysical Journal 586 (1): L61–L64. doi:10.1086/374732. Bibcode2003ApJ...586L..61S. 
  41. Titarchuk, Lev; Fiorito, Ralph (10 September 2004). "Spectral Index and Quasi-Periodic Oscillation Frequency Correlation in Black Hole Sources: Observational Evidence of Two Phases and Phase Transition in Black Holes". The Astrophysical Journal 612 (2): 988–999. doi:10.1086/422573. Bibcode2004ApJ...612..988T. http://159.226.72.19/share/reference/x-raybinary/Titarchuk-Fiorito04.pdf. Retrieved 25 January 2013. 
  42. Shoji Kato (2012). "An Attempt to Describe Frequency Correlations among kHz QPOs and HBOs by Two-Armed Nearly Vertical Oscillations". Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan 64 (3): 62. doi:10.1093/pasj/64.3.62. Bibcode2012PASJ...64...62K. 
  43. Ferrarese, Laura; Merritt, David (2000). "A Fundamental Relation between Supermassive Black Holes and their Host Galaxies". The Astrophysical Journal 539 (1): L9–L12. doi:10.1086/312838. Bibcode2000ApJ...539L...9F. 
  44. 44.0 44.1 44.2 44.3 44.4 44.5 Baez, John C. (March 2006). "Open Questions in Physics". Usenet Physics FAQ. University of California, Riverside: Department of Mathematics. http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/open_questions.html. 
  45. "Scientists Find That Saturn's Rotation Period is a Puzzle". NASA. 28 June 2004. http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/cassini/media/cassini-062804.html. 
  46. Condon, J. J.; Cotton, W. D.; Greisen, E. W.; Yin, Q. F.; Perley, R. A.; Taylor, G. B.; Broderick, J. J. (1998). "The NRAO VLA Sky Survey". The Astronomical Journal 115 (5): 1693–1716. doi:10.1086/300337. Bibcode1998AJ....115.1693C. 
  47. Singal, Ashok K. (2011). "Large peculiar motion of the solar system from the dipole anisotropy in sky brightness due to distant radio sources". The Astrophysical Journal 742 (2): L23–L27. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/742/2/L23. Bibcode2011ApJ...742L..23S. 
  48. Tiwari, Prabhakar; Kothari, Rahul; Naskar, Abhishek; Nadkarni-Ghosh, Sharvari; Jain, Pankaj (2015). "Dipole anisotropy in sky brightness and source count distribution in radio NVSS data". Astroparticle Physics 61: 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2014.06.004. Bibcode2015APh....61....1T. 
  49. Tiwari, P.; Jain, P. (2015). "Dipole anisotropy in integrated linearly polarized flux density in NVSS data". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 447 (3): 2658–2670. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2535. Bibcode2015MNRAS.447.2658T. 
  50. Hutsemekers, D. (1998). "Evidence for very large-scale coherent orientations of quasar polarization vectors". Astronomy and Astrophysics 332: 410–428. Bibcode1998A&A...332..410H. https://orbi.uliege.be/bitstream/2268/3811/1/1998A%2bA...332..410H.pdf. 
  51. Hutsemékers, D.; Lamy, H. (2001). "Confirmation of the existence of coherent orientations of quasar polarization vectors on cosmological scales". Astronomy & Astrophysics 367 (2): 381–387. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20000443. Bibcode2001A&A...367..381H. 
  52. Jain, P.; Narain, G.; Sarala, S. (2004). "Large-scale alignment of optical polarizations from distant QSOs using coordinate-invariant statistics". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 347 (2): 394–402. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07169.x. Bibcode2004MNRAS.347..394J. 
  53. Angelica de Oliveira-Costa; Tegmark, Max; Zaldarriaga, Matias; Hamilton, Andrew (2004). "The significance of the largest scale CMB fluctuations in WMAP". Physical Review D 69 (6): 063516. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.69.063516. Bibcode2004PhRvD..69f3516D. 
  54. Eriksen, H. K.; Hansen, F. K.; Banday, A. J.; Górski, K. M.; Lilje, P. B. (2004). "Asymmetries in the Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropy Field". The Astrophysical Journal 605 (1): 14–20. doi:10.1086/382267. Bibcode2004ApJ...605...14E. 
  55. Pramoda Kumar Samal; Saha, Rajib; Jain, Pankaj; Ralston, John P. (2008). "Testing Isotropy of Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 385 (4): 1718–1728. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.12960.x. Bibcode2008MNRAS.385.1718S. 
  56. Pramoda Kumar Samal; Saha, Rajib; Jain, Pankaj; Ralston, John P. (2009). "Signals of Statistical Anisotropy in WMAP Foreground-Cleaned Maps". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 396 (511): 511–522. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14728.x. Bibcode2009MNRAS.396..511S. 
  57. Casagrande, L.; Schönrich, R.; Asplund, M.; Cassisi, S.; Ramírez, I.; Meléndez, J.; Bensby, T.; Feltzing, S. (2011). "New constraints on the chemical evolution of the solar neighbourhood and Galactic disc(s)". Astronomy & Astrophysics 530: A138. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201016276. Bibcode2011A&A...530A.138C. 
  58. Bensby, T.; Feltzing, S.; Lundström, I. (July 2004). "A possible age–metallicity relation in the Galactic thick disk?". Astronomy and Astrophysics 421 (3): 969–976. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20035957. Bibcode2004A&A...421..969B. 
  59. Gilmore, G.; Asiri, H. M. (2011). "Open Issues in the Evolution of the Galactic Disks". Stellar Clusters & Associations: A RIA Workshop on Gaia. Proceedings. Granada: 280. Bibcode2011sca..conf..280G. 
  60. Casagrande, L.; Silva Aguirre, V.; Schlesinger, K. J.; Stello, D.; Huber, D.; Serenelli, A. M.; Scho Nrich, R.; Cassisi, S. et al. (2015). "Measuring the vertical age structure of the Galactic disc using asteroseismology and SAGA". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 455 (1): 987–1007. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2320. Bibcode2016MNRAS.455..987C. 
  61. Fields, Brian D. (2012). "The Primordial Lithium Problem". Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science 61 (2011): 47–68. doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-102010-130445. Bibcode2011ARNPS..61...47F. 
  62. Platts, E.; Weltman, A.; Walters, A.; Tendulkar, S.P.; Gordin, J.E.B.; Kandhai, S. (2019). "A living theory catalogue for fast radio bursts". Physics Reports 821: 1–27. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2019.06.003. Bibcode2019PhR...821....1P. 
  63. Fong, Richard; Doroshkevich, Andrei; Turchaninov, Victor (1995). "Dark Matter in Voids". AIP Conference Proceedings 336: 429–432. doi:10.1063/1.48369. Bibcode1995AIPC..336..429F. 
  64. Doroshkevich, Andrei; Fong, Richard; Gottlober, Stefan; Mucket, Jan; Muller, Volker (1995). "The formation and evolution of large- and superlarge-scale structure in the universe - I: General Theory". arXiv:astro-ph/9505088.
  65. Geller, Margaret; Hwang, Ho Seong (2015). "Schwarzschild Lecture 2014: HectoMAPping the Universe". Astronomische Nachrichten 336: 428. doi:10.1002/asna.201512182. 
  66. Ben-Amots, N. (2021). "Helium as a major portion of the dark matter and the cell structure of the universe". Journal of Physics 1956 (1): 012006. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1956/1/012006. Bibcode2021JPhCS1956a2006B. 
  67. Charles Fefferman. "Existence and Uniqueness of the Navier-Stokes Equation". Clay Mathematics Institute. https://www.claymath.org/sites/default/files/navierstokes.pdf. 
  68. Schlein, Benjamin. "Graduate Seminar on Partial Differential Equations in the Sciences – Energy and Dynamics of Boson Systems". Hausdorff Center for Mathematics. http://www.hcm.uni-bonn.de/homepages/prof-dr-benjamin-schlein/teaching/graduate-seminar-on-pdes-in-the-sciences/. 
  69. Kenneth Chang (29 July 2008). "The Nature of Glass Remains Anything but Clear". The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/29/science/29glass.html. 
  70. P.W. Anderson (1995). "Through the Glass Lightly". Science 267 (5204): 1615–1616. doi:10.1126/science.267.5204.1615-e. PMID 17808155. "The deepest and most interesting unsolved problem in solid state theory is probably the theory of the nature of glass and the glass transition.". 
  71. Zaccone, A. (2023). Theory of Disordered Solids. Lecture Notes in Physics. 1015 (1st ed.). Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-24706-4. ISBN 978-3-031-24705-7. 
  72. Pohl, R.O.; etc, etc (2002). "Low-temperature thermal conductivity and acoustic attenuation in amorphous solids". Rev. Mod Phys. 74: 991. doi:10.1080/14786437208229210. 
  73. Leggett, A.J. (1991). "Amorphous materials at low temperatures: why are they so similar?". Physica B 169 (1–4): 322–327. doi:10.1016/0921-4526(91)90246-B. Bibcode1991PhyB..169..322L. 
  74. Cryogenic electron emission phenomenon has no known physics explanation . Physorg.com. Retrieved on 20 October 2011.
  75. Meyer, H. O. (1 March 2010). "Spontaneous electron emission from a cold surface". Europhysics Letters 89 (5): 58001. doi:10.1209/0295-5075/89/58001. Bibcode2010EL.....8958001M. https://zenodo.org/record/896477. Retrieved 20 April 2018. 
  76. Storey, B. D.; Szeri, A. J. (8 July 2000). "Water vapour, sonoluminescence and sonochemistry". Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 456 (1999): 1685–1709. doi:10.1098/rspa.2000.0582. Bibcode2000RSPSA.456.1685S. 
  77. Wu, C. C.; Roberts, P. H. (9 May 1994). "A Model of Sonoluminescence". Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 445 (1924): 323–349. doi:10.1098/rspa.1994.0064. Bibcode1994RSPSA.445..323W. 
  78. Yoshida, Beni (1 October 2011). "Feasibility of self-correcting quantum memory and thermal stability of topological order". Annals of Physics 326 (10): 2566–2633. doi:10.1016/j.aop.2011.06.001. ISSN 0003-4916. Bibcode2011AnPhy.326.2566Y. 
  79. Dean, Cory R. (2015). "Even denominators in odd places" (in En). Nature Physics 11 (4): 298–299. doi:10.1038/nphys3298. ISSN 1745-2481. Bibcode2015NatPh..11..298D. 
  80. Mukherjee, Prabir K. (1998). "Landau Theory of Nematic-Smectic-A Transition in a Liquid Crystal Mixture". Molecular Crystals & Liquid Crystals 312 (1): 157–164. doi:10.1080/10587259808042438. Bibcode1998MCLCA.312..157M. 
  81. A. Yethiraj, "Recent Experimental Developments at the Nematic to Smectic-A Liquid Crystal Phase Transition" , Thermotropic Liquid Crystals: Recent Advances, ed. A. Ramamoorthy, Springer 2007, chapter 8.
  82. Norris, David J. (2003). "The Problem Swept Under the Rug". in Klimov, Victor. Electronic Structure in Semiconductors Nanocrystals: Optical Experiment (in Semiconductor and Metal Nanocrystals: Synthesis and Electronic and Optical Properties). CRC Press. p. 97. ISBN 978-0-203-91326-0. https://books.google.com/books?id=sarqqnaw-7oC&pg=PA97. Retrieved 18 October 2020. 
  83. Lipa, J. A.; Nissen, J. A.; Stricker, D. A.; Swanson, D. R.; Chui, T. C. P. (14 November 2003). "Specific heat of liquid helium in zero gravity very near the lambda point". Physical Review B 68 (17): 174518. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.68.174518. Bibcode2003PhRvB..68q4518L. 
  84. Campostrini, Massimo; Hasenbusch, Martin; Pelissetto, Andrea; Vicari, Ettore (6 October 2006). "Theoretical estimates of the critical exponents of the superfluid transition in $^{4}\mathrm{He}$ by lattice methods". Physical Review B 74 (14): 144506. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.74.144506. 
  85. Hasenbusch, Martin (26 December 2019). "Monte Carlo study of an improved clock model in three dimensions". Physical Review B 100 (22): 224517. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.100.224517. ISSN 2469-9950. Bibcode2019PhRvB.100v4517H. 
  86. Chester, Shai M.; Landry, Walter; Liu, Junyu; Poland, David; Simmons-Duffin, David; Su, Ning; Vichi, Alessandro (2020). "Carving out OPE space and precise $O(2)$ model critical exponents". Journal of High Energy Physics 2020 (6): 142. doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2020)142. Bibcode2020JHEP...06..142C. 
  87. Rychkov, Slava (31 January 2020). "Conformal bootstrap and the λ-point specific heat experimental anomaly" (in en). Journal Club for Condensed Matter Physics. doi:10.36471/JCCM_January_2020_02. https://www.condmatjclub.org/?p=4037. Retrieved 8 February 2020. 
  88. Barton, G.; Scharnhorst, K. (1993). "QED between parallel mirrors: light signals faster than c, or amplified by the vacuum". Journal of Physics A 26 (8): 2037. doi:10.1088/0305-4470/26/8/024. Bibcode1993JPhA...26.2037B.  A more recent follow-up paper is Scharnhorst, K. (1998). "The velocities of light in modified QED vacua". Annalen der Physik 7 (7–8): 700–709. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1521-3889(199812)7:7/8<700::AID-ANDP700>3.0.CO;2-K. Bibcode1998AnP...510..700S. 
  89. 89.0 89.1 89.2 Aaronson, Scott. "Ten Semi-Grand Challenges for Quantum Computing Theory". https://www.scottaaronson.com/writings/qchallenge.html. 
  90. Ball, Phillip (2021). "Major Quantum Computing Strategy Suffers Serious Setbacks". https://www.quantamagazine.org/major-quantum-computing-strategy-suffers-serious-setbacks-20210929/. 
  91. Skyrme, Tess (2023-03-20). "The Status of Room-Temperature Quantum Computers" (in en-US). https://www.eetimes.eu/the-status-of-room-temperature-quantum-computers/. 
  92. Shor, Peter (2000). "Quantum Information Theory: Results and Open Problems". in Alon N.. Visions in Mathematics, GAFA 2000 Special Volume: Part II. Modern Birkhäuser Classics. Birkhäuser Basel. pp. 816–838. doi:10.1007/978-3-0346-0425-3_9. ISBN 978-3-0346-0425-3. http://www-math.mit.edu/~shor/papers/GAFA.pdf. 
  93. F. Wagner (2007). "A quarter-century of H-mode studies". Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 49 (12B): B1. doi:10.1088/0741-3335/49/12B/S01. Bibcode2007PPCF...49....1W. http://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/4300/b370108edb8203ef135047b55b1510772227.pdf. .
  94. André Balogh; Rudolf A. Treumann (2013). "Section 7.4 The Injection Problem". Physics of Collisionless Shocks: Space Plasma Shock Waves. Springer. p. 362. ISBN 978-1-4614-6099-2. https://books.google.com/books?id=mR4_AAAAQBAJ. Retrieved 3 September 2015. 
  95. Goldstein, Melvyn L. (2001). "Major Unsolved Problems in Space Plasma Physics". Astrophysics and Space Science 277 (1/2): 349–369. doi:10.1023/A:1012264131485. Bibcode2001Ap&SS.277..349G. 
  96. Dill, K. A.; MacCallum, J. L. (2012). "The Protein-Folding Problem, 50 Years On". Science 338 (6110): 1042–1046. doi:10.1126/science.1219021. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 23180855. Bibcode2012Sci...338.1042D. 
  97. Cabello, Adán (2017). "Interpretations of quantum theory: A map of madness". in Lombardi, Olimpia. What is Quantum Information?. Cambridge University Press. pp. 138–143. doi:10.1017/9781316494233.009. ISBN 9781107142114. Bibcode2015arXiv150904711C. 
  98. Wiseman, Howard (2014). "The Two Bell's Theorems of John Bell" (in en). Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 47 (42): 424001. doi:10.1088/1751-8113/47/42/424001. ISSN 1751-8121. Bibcode2014JPhA...47P4001W. 
  99. Fuchs, Christopher A.; Mermin, N. David; Schack, Rüdiger (2014). "An introduction to QBism with an application to the locality of quantum mechanics". American Journal of Physics 82 (8): 749. doi:10.1119/1.4874855. Bibcode2014AmJPh..82..749F. 
  100. Atmanspacher, Harald (2020), Zalta, Edward N., ed., Quantum Approaches to Consciousness (Summer 2020 ed.), Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/qt-consciousness/, retrieved 2023-04-12 
  101. Philip M. Pearle (1970), "Hidden-Variable Example Based upon Data Rejection", Phys. Rev. D 2 (8): 1418–1425, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.2.1418, Bibcode1970PhRvD...2.1418P 
  102. Hensen, B. (21 October 2015). "Loophole-free Bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres". Nature 526 (7575): 682–686. doi:10.1038/nature15759. PMID 26503041. Bibcode2015Natur.526..682H. 
  103. Markoff, Jack (21 October 2015). "Sorry, Einstein. Quantum Study Suggests 'Spooky Action' Is Real". New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/22/science/quantum-theory-experiment-said-to-prove-spooky-interactions.html. 
  104. Giustina, M. (16 December 2015). "Significant-Loophole-Free Test of Bell's Theorem with Entangled Photons". Physical Review Letters 115 (25): 250401. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.250401. PMID 26722905. Bibcode2015PhRvL.115y0401G. 
  105. Shalm, L. K. (16 December 2015). "Strong Loophole-Free Test of Local Realism". Physical Review Letters 115 (25): 250402. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.250402. PMID 26722906. Bibcode2015PhRvL.115y0402S. 
  106. "Einstein papers at the Instituut-Lorentz". http://www.lorentz.leidenuniv.nl/history/Einstein_archive/. 
  107. Castelvecchi, Davide; Witze, Witze (11 February 2016). "Einstein's gravitational waves found at last". Nature News. doi:10.1038/nature.2016.19361. http://www.nature.com/news/einstein-s-gravitational-waves-found-at-last-1.19361. Retrieved 11 February 2016. 
  108. B. P. Abbott (2016). "Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger". Physical Review Letters 116 (6): 061102. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102. PMID 26918975. Bibcode2016PhRvL.116f1102A. 
  109. "Gravitational waves detected 100 years after Einstein's prediction". National Science Foundation. https://www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=137628. 
  110. Pretorius, Frans (2005). "Evolution of Binary Black-Hole Spacetimes". Physical Review Letters 95 (12): 121101. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.121101. PMID 16197061. Bibcode2005PhRvL..95l1101P.  Campanelli, M.; Lousto, C. O.; Marronetti, P.; Zlochower, Y. (2006). "Accurate Evolutions of Orbiting Black-Hole Binaries without Excision". Physical Review Letters 96 (11): 111101. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.111101. PMID 16605808. Bibcode2006PhRvL..96k1101C.  Baker, John G.; Centrella, Joan; Choi, Dae-Il; Koppitz, Michael; Van Meter, James (2006). "Gravitational-Wave Extraction from an Inspiraling Configuration of Merging Black Holes". Physical Review Letters 96 (11): 111102. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.111102. PMID 16605809. Bibcode2006PhRvL..96k1102B. 
  111. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb collaboration) (2015). "Observation of J/ψp resonances consistent with pentaquark states in Λ0b→J/ψKp decays". Physical Review Letters 115 (7): 072001. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.072001. PMID 26317714. Bibcode2015PhRvL.115g2001A. 
  112. 112.0 112.1 Rafelski, Johann (2020). "Discovery of Quark-Gluon Plasma: Strangeness Diaries" (in en). The European Physical Journal Special Topics 229 (1): 1–140. doi:10.1140/epjst/e2019-900263-x. ISSN 1951-6355. Bibcode2020EPJST.229....1R. 
  113. Higgs, Peter (24 November 2010). "My Life as a Boson". Talk given by Peter Higgs at King's College, London, 24 November 2010, expanding on a paper originally presented in 2001. http://www.kcl.ac.uk/nms/depts/physics/news/events/MyLifeasaBoson.pdf.  – the original 2001 paper can be found at: Duff and Liu, ed (2003). 2001 A Spacetime Odyssey: Proceedings of the Inaugural Conference of the Michigan Center for Theoretical Physics, Michigan, USA, 21–25 May 2001. World Scientific. pp. 86–88. ISBN 978-9812382313. https://books.google.com/books?id=ONhnbpq00xIC&q=2001:+A+Space+Time+Odyssey++%22life+as+a+boson%22&pg=PR11. Retrieved 17 January 2013. 
  114. 114.0 114.1 Kouveliotou, Chryssa; Meegan, Charles A.; Fishman, Gerald J.; Bhat, Narayana P.; Briggs, Michael S.; Koshut, Thomas M.; Paciesas, William S.; Pendleton, Geoffrey N. (1993). "Identification of two classes of gamma-ray bursts". The Astrophysical Journal 413: L101. doi:10.1086/186969. Bibcode1993ApJ...413L.101K. 
  115. Cho, Adrian (16 October 2017). "Merging neutron stars generate gravitational waves and a celestial light show". Science. https://www.science.org/content/article/merging-neutron-stars-generate-gravitational-waves-and-celestial-light-show. 
  116. Casttelvecchi, Davide (25 August 2017). "Rumours swell over new kind of gravitational-wave sighting". Nature News. doi:10.1038/nature.2017.22482. https://www.nature.com/news/rumours-swell-over-new-kind-of-gravitational-wave-sighting-1.22482. Retrieved 27 August 2017. 
  117. Shull, J. Michael, Britton D. Smith, and Charles W. Danforth. "The baryon census in a multiphase intergalactic medium: 30% of the baryons may still be missing." The Astrophysical Journal 759.1 (2012): 23.
  118. "Half the universe's missing matter has just been finally found" (in en-US). New Scientist. https://www.newscientist.com/article/2149742-half-the-universes-missing-matter-has-just-been-finally-found/. 
  119. Nicastro, F.; Kaastra, J.; Krongold, Y.; Borgani, S.; Branchini, E.; Cen, R.; Dadina, M.; Danforth, C. W. et al. (June 2018). "Observations of the missing baryons in the warm–hot intergalactic medium" (in En). Nature 558 (7710): 406–409. doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0204-1. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 29925969. Bibcode2018Natur.558..406N. 
  120. Cleveland, Bruce T.; Daily, Timothy; Davis, Jr., Raymond; Distel, James R.; Lande, Kenneth; Lee, C. K.; Wildenhain, Paul S.; Ullman, Jack (1998). "Measurement of the Solar Electron Neutrino Flux with the Homestake Chlorine Detector". The Astrophysical Journal 496 (1): 505–526. doi:10.1086/305343. Bibcode1998ApJ...496..505C. 
  121. Helled, Ravit; Galanti, Eli; Kaspi, Yohai (2015). "Saturn's fast spin determined from its gravitational field and oblateness". Nature 520 (7546): 202–204. doi:10.1038/nature14278. PMID 25807487. Bibcode2015Natur.520..202H. 
  122. Wilczek, Frank (2012). "Quantum Time Crystals". Physical Review Letters 109 (16): 160401. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.160401. ISSN 0031-9007. PMID 23215056. Bibcode2012PhRvL.109p0401W. 
  123. Shapere, Alfred; Wilczek, Frank (2012). "Classical Time Crystals". Physical Review Letters 109 (16): 160402. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.160402. ISSN 0031-9007. PMID 23215057. Bibcode2012PhRvL.109p0402S. 
  124. Khemani, Vedika; Lazarides, Achilleas; Moessner, Roderich; Sondhi, S. L. (21 June 2016). "Phase Structure of Driven Quantum Systems". Physical Review Letters 116 (25): 250401. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.250401. PMID 27391704. Bibcode2016PhRvL.116y0401K. 
  125. Else, Dominic V.; Bauer, Bela; Nayak, Chetan (25 August 2016). "Floquet Time Crystals". Physical Review Letters 117 (9): 090402. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.090402. PMID 27610834. Bibcode2016PhRvL.117i0402E. 
  126. Yao, N. Y.; Potter, A. C.; Potirniche, I.-D.; Vishwanath, A. (2017). "Discrete Time Crystals: Rigidity, Criticality, and Realizations". Physical Review Letters 118 (3): 030401. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.030401. ISSN 0031-9007. PMID 28157355. Bibcode2017PhRvL.118c0401Y. https://physics.aps.org/featured-article-pdf/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.030401. Retrieved 21 November 2021. 
  127. Zhang, J. (8 March 2017). "Observation of a discrete time crystal". Nature 543 (7644): 217–220. doi:10.1038/nature21413. PMID 28277505. Bibcode2017Natur.543..217Z. 
  128. Choi, S. (8 March 2017). "Observation of discrete time-crystalline order in a disordered dipolar many-body system". Nature 543 (7644): 221–225. doi:10.1038/nature21426. PMID 28277511. Bibcode2017Natur.543..221C. 
  129. Khaire, V.; Srianand, R. (2015). "Photon underproduction crisis: Are QSOs sufficient to resolve it?". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters 451: L30–L34. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slv060. Bibcode2015MNRAS.451L..30K. 
  130. Van Leeuwen, Floor (1999). "HIPPARCOS distance calibrations for 9 open clusters". Astronomy and Astrophysics 341: L71. Bibcode1999A&A...341L..71V. 
  131. Charles Francis; Erik Anderson (2012). "XHIP-II: Clusters and associations". Astronomy Letters 38 (11): 681–693. doi:10.1134/S1063773712110023. Bibcode2012AstL...38..681F. 
  132. OPERA collaboration (12 July 2012). "Measurement of the neutrino velocity with the OPERA detector in the CNGS beam". Journal of High Energy Physics 2012 (10): 93. doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2012)093. Bibcode2012JHEP...10..093A. 
  133. Turyshev, S.; Toth, V.; Kinsella, G.; Lee, S. C.; Lok, S.; Ellis, J. (2012). "Support for the Thermal Origin of the Pioneer Anomaly". Physical Review Letters 108 (24): 241101. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.241101. PMID 23004253. Bibcode2012PhRvL.108x1101T. 
  134. Overbye, Dennis (23 July 2012). "Mystery Tug on Spacecraft Is Einstein's 'I Told You So'". The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/24/science/mystery-tug-on-pioneer-10-and-11-probes-is-einsteins-i-told-you-so.html. 

External links