Physics:Variable-range hopping

From HandWiki

Variable-range hopping is a model used to describe carrier transport in a disordered semiconductor or in amorphous solid by hopping in an extended temperature range.[1] It has a characteristic temperature dependence of

[math]\displaystyle{ \sigma= \sigma_0e^{-(T_0/T)^\beta} }[/math]

where [math]\displaystyle{ \sigma }[/math] is the conductivity and [math]\displaystyle{ \beta }[/math] is a parameter dependent on the model under consideration.

Mott variable-range hopping

The Mott variable-range hopping describes low-temperature conduction in strongly disordered systems with localized charge-carrier states[2] and has a characteristic temperature dependence of

[math]\displaystyle{ \sigma= \sigma_0e^{-(T_0/T)^{1/4}} }[/math]

for three-dimensional conductance (with [math]\displaystyle{ \beta }[/math] = 1/4), and is generalized to d-dimensions

[math]\displaystyle{ \sigma= \sigma_0e^{-(T_0/T)^{1/(d+1)}} }[/math].

Hopping conduction at low temperatures is of great interest because of the savings the semiconductor industry could achieve if they were able to replace single-crystal devices with glass layers.[3]

Derivation

The original Mott paper introduced a simplifying assumption that the hopping energy depends inversely on the cube of the hopping distance (in the three-dimensional case). Later it was shown that this assumption was unnecessary, and this proof is followed here.[4] In the original paper, the hopping probability at a given temperature was seen to depend on two parameters, R the spatial separation of the sites, and W, their energy separation. Apsley and Hughes noted that in a truly amorphous system, these variables are random and independent and so can be combined into a single parameter, the range [math]\displaystyle{ \textstyle\mathcal{R} }[/math] between two sites, which determines the probability of hopping between them.

Mott showed that the probability of hopping between two states of spatial separation [math]\displaystyle{ \textstyle R }[/math] and energy separation W has the form:

[math]\displaystyle{ P\sim \exp \left[-2\alpha R-\frac{W}{kT}\right] }[/math]

where α−1 is the attenuation length for a hydrogen-like localised wave-function. This assumes that hopping to a state with a higher energy is the rate limiting process.

We now define [math]\displaystyle{ \textstyle\mathcal{R} = 2\alpha R+W/kT }[/math], the range between two states, so [math]\displaystyle{ \textstyle P\sim \exp (-\mathcal{R}) }[/math]. The states may be regarded as points in a four-dimensional random array (three spatial coordinates and one energy coordinate), with the "distance" between them given by the range [math]\displaystyle{ \textstyle\mathcal{R} }[/math].

Conduction is the result of many series of hops through this four-dimensional array and as short-range hops are favoured, it is the average nearest-neighbour "distance" between states which determines the overall conductivity. Thus the conductivity has the form

[math]\displaystyle{ \sigma \sim \exp (-\overline{\mathcal{R}}_{nn}) }[/math]

where [math]\displaystyle{ \textstyle\overline{\mathcal{R}}_{nn} }[/math]is the average nearest-neighbour range. The problem is therefore to calculate this quantity.

The first step is to obtain [math]\displaystyle{ \textstyle\mathcal{N}(\mathcal{R}) }[/math], the total number of states within a range [math]\displaystyle{ \textstyle\mathcal{R} }[/math] of some initial state at the Fermi level. For d-dimensions, and under particular assumptions this turns out to be

[math]\displaystyle{ \mathcal{N}(\mathcal{R}) = K \mathcal{R}^{d+1} }[/math]

where [math]\displaystyle{ \textstyle K = \frac{N\pi kT}{3\times 2^d \alpha^d} }[/math]. The particular assumptions are simply that [math]\displaystyle{ \textstyle\overline{\mathcal{R}}_{nn} }[/math] is well less than the band-width and comfortably bigger than the interatomic spacing.

Then the probability that a state with range [math]\displaystyle{ \textstyle\mathcal{R} }[/math] is the nearest neighbour in the four-dimensional space (or in general the (d+1)-dimensional space) is

[math]\displaystyle{ P_{nn}(\mathcal{R}) = \frac{\partial \mathcal{N}(\mathcal{R})}{\partial \mathcal{R}} \exp [-\mathcal{N}(\mathcal{R})] }[/math]

the nearest-neighbour distribution.

For the d-dimensional case then

[math]\displaystyle{ \overline{\mathcal{R}}_{nn} = \int_0^\infty (d+1)K\mathcal{R}^{d+1}\exp (-K\mathcal{R}^{d+1})d\mathcal{R} }[/math].

This can be evaluated by making a simple substitution of [math]\displaystyle{ \textstyle t=K\mathcal{R}^{d+1} }[/math] into the gamma function, [math]\displaystyle{ \textstyle \Gamma(z) = \int_0^\infty t^{z-1} e^{-t}\,\mathrm{d}t }[/math]

After some algebra this gives

[math]\displaystyle{ \overline{\mathcal{R}}_{nn} = \frac{\Gamma(\frac{d+2}{d+1})}{K^{\frac{1}{d+1}}} }[/math]

and hence that

[math]\displaystyle{ \sigma \propto \exp \left(-T^{-\frac{1}{d+1}}\right) }[/math].

Non-constant density of states

When the density of states is not constant (odd power law N(E)), the Mott conductivity is also recovered, as shown in this article.

Efros–Shklovskii variable-range hopping

The Efros–Shklovskii (ES) variable-range hopping is a conduction model which accounts for the Coulomb gap, a small jump in the density of states near the Fermi level due to interactions between localized electrons.[5] It was named after Alexei L. Efros and Boris Shklovskii who proposed it in 1975.[5]

The consideration of the Coulomb gap changes the temperature dependence to

[math]\displaystyle{ \sigma= \sigma_0e^{-(T_0/T)^{1/2}} }[/math]

for all dimensions (i.e. [math]\displaystyle{ \beta }[/math] = 1/2).[6][7]

See also

  • Mobility edge

Notes

  1. Hill, R. M. (1976-04-16). "Variable-range hopping" (in en). Physica Status Solidi A 34 (2): 601–613. doi:10.1002/pssa.2210340223. ISSN 0031-8965. Bibcode1976PSSAR..34..601H. 
  2. Mott, N. F. (1969). "Conduction in non-crystalline materials". Philosophical Magazine (Informa UK Limited) 19 (160): 835–852. doi:10.1080/14786436908216338. ISSN 0031-8086. Bibcode1969PMag...19..835M. 
  3. P.V.E. McClintock, D.J. Meredith, J.K. Wigmore. Matter at Low Temperatures. Blackie. 1984 ISBN:0-216-91594-5.
  4. Apsley, N.; Hughes, H. P. (1974). "Temperature-and field-dependence of hopping conduction in disordered systems". Philosophical Magazine (Informa UK Limited) 30 (5): 963–972. doi:10.1080/14786437408207250. ISSN 0031-8086. Bibcode1974PMag...30..963A. 
  5. 5.0 5.1 Efros, A. L.; Shklovskii, B. I. (1975). "Coulomb gap and low temperature conductivity of disordered systems" (in en). Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics 8 (4): L49. doi:10.1088/0022-3719/8/4/003. ISSN 0022-3719. Bibcode1975JPhC....8L..49E. http://stacks.iop.org/0022-3719/8/i=4/a=003. 
  6. Li, Zhaoguo (2017). et. al. "Transition between Efros–Shklovskii and Mott variable-range hopping conduction in polycrystalline germanium thin films". Semiconductor Science and Technology 32 (3): 035010. doi:10.1088/1361-6641/aa5390. Bibcode2017SeScT..32c5010L. 
  7. Rosenbaum, Ralph (1991). "Crossover from Mott to Efros-Shklovskii variable-range-hopping conductivity in InxOy films". Physical Review B 44 (8): 3599–3603. doi:10.1103/physrevb.44.3599. ISSN 0163-1829. PMID 9999988. Bibcode1991PhRvB..44.3599R.