Social:Defalcation
In financial and legal usage, defalcation may involve misappropriation of funds by a person trusted with their charge; also, the act of misappropriation, or an instance thereof. The United States Bankruptcy Code uses the term specifically to describe a category of acts that taint a particular debt such that it cannot be discharged in bankruptcy.[1] The United States Supreme Court addressed the issue in 2013,[2] holding that "defalcation" in the context of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code [3] requires proof of "a culpable state of mind… involving knowledge of, or gross recklessness in respect to, the improper nature of the relevant fiduciary behavior."[4]
In accounting terminology, especially with respect to the area of audit, defalcation means a misappropriation of assets or theft of assets by employees or officers of a corporation.
Defalcation occurs when a debtor commits a bad act while acting in a fiduciary capacity.[5] The classic example of defalcation occurs when a trustee recklessly invests trust funds and loses the money. If the beneficiary wins a judgment against the trustee, and the trustee files for bankruptcy, the debt (the judgment) cannot be discharged in bankruptcy because the debt was the result of a defalcation.
Defalcation, for example, applies when a debtor is acting in a fiduciary capacity. To constitute a defalcation, the conduct involves a degree of culpability that is greater than negligence, but the act does not need to rise to the level of a "fraud" under common law. Defalcation requires showing of conscious behavior or extreme recklessness.[6]
The term is used in legal proceedings other than bankruptcy to refer more generally to embezzlement; it is often used in the context of the title insurance business. A title agent who misuses funds intended to be used to close insured transactions is said to be involved in a defalcation. Many[citation needed] title insurers have their own "defalcation units".
Sometimes defalcation has been pronounced for very small amounts as under 2 £ and cents, even if it was claimed to be an error in handling change.
Etymology
The term is from Latin, and is analyzed as de- "off" + falx "sickle" + -atio "act of", hence literally "cutting off with a sickle". There is also a verb form, "defalcate".
References
- ↑ US Bankruptcy Code, section 523(a)(4) (11 U.S.C. §523(a)(4)
- ↑ Bullock v. BankChampaign, N.A. 133 S. Ct 1754 (2013)
- ↑ Title 11 of the United States Code (11 U.S.C. §523(a)(4)
- ↑ Bullock v. BankChampaign, N.A. 133 S. Ct 1754, at p. 1757 (2013)
- ↑ Collier on Bankruptcy, 523.10 (15th ed. rev. 2007)
- ↑ In re Hyman, 502 F.3d 61 (2d. Cir. 2007)
 |  |
