Social:Divisional patent application
A divisional patent application, also called divisional application or simply divisional, is a type of patent application that contains subject-matter from a previously filed application, the previously filed application being its parent application.[1] While a divisional application is filed later than the parent application, it retains its parent's filing date,[1] and will generally claim the same priority. Divisional applications are generally used in cases where the parent application may lack unity of invention; that is, the parent application describes more than one invention and the applicant is required to split the parent into one or more divisional applications each claiming only a single invention. The ability to file divisional applications in cases of lack of unity of invention is required by Article 4G of the Paris Convention.[2]
Practice by jurisdiction
The practice and procedure of filing a divisional patent application vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. In most countries, the filing of divisional applications is possible at least as long as the parent patent applications are pending. Since 2013, the European Patent Office rules are again in line with the current practice before the patent offices in the U.S., Germany, and Japan.[3]
European Patent Convention
Before the European Patent Office (EPO), divisional applications can be filed under Article 76 EPC. A European divisional application is a new application which is separate and independent from the parent application unless specific provisions in the European Patent Convention (EPC) require something different.[4]
- "The procedure concerning the divisional application is in principle independent from the procedure concerning the parent application and the divisional application is treated as a new application... Although there are some connections between the two procedures (e.g. concerning time limits), actions (or omissions) occurring in the procedure concerning the parent application after the filing of the divisional application should not influence the procedure concerning the latter...."[5]
The practice relating to the filing of divisional applications under the EPC was clarified by the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the EPO in June 2007. The Board held that a divisional application which on filing contained subject-matter extending beyond the content of the earlier application as filed could be amended later to remove the deficiency, even at a time when the earlier application is no longer pending.[6]
United States
In the United States , a divisional application is seen as a type of continuing patent application, except that if a restriction requirement necessitated the filing of the divisional application, the law provides protection against a rejection of the application and against invalidation of thus-issued patents for double patenting.[7]
Cascade of divisionals
If a divisional application is filed based on a patent application that is already a divisional application, the newly filed divisional is a second-generation divisional, and so on, "thereby creating a cascade of divisionals".[8]
See also
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Daniels, Mark; Parsons, Giles (8 August 2017). "Patents Court grants declarations that dosage regimens were obvious". Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 12 (8): 624–626. doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpx112. "Once a patent application is pending, the applicant can file a new application, called a divisional, in respect of the same subject matter as the original application, and this divisional is entitled to the original application’s priority date.".
- ↑ "Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property". WIPO. https://wipolex.wipo.int/en/text/288514. "(Article 4G) (1) If the examination reveals that an application for a patent contains more than one invention, the applicant may divide the application into a certain number of divisional applications and preserve as the date of each the date of the initial application and the benefit of the right of priority, if any. (2) The applicant may also, on his own initiative, divide a patent application and preserve as the date of each divisional application the date of the initial application and the benefit of the right of priority, if any. Each country of the Union shall have the right to determine the conditions under which such division shall be authorized."
- ↑ "Decision of the Administrative Council of 16 October 2013 amending Rules 36, 38 and 135 of the Implementing Regulations to the European Patent Convention (CA/D 15/13)". European Patent Office. 24 October 2013. http://www.epo.org/law-practice/legal-texts/official-journal/ac-decisions/archive/20131024a.html. Retrieved 26 October 2013.
- ↑ Decision G 1/05 of the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the EPO, Reasons 3.1 and 8.1.
- ↑ Opinion G 4/98 in point 5 of the Reasons, cited in decision G 1/05 of the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the EPO, Reasons 8.1.
- ↑ Decisions G 1/05 and G 1/06 of the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the EPO.
- ↑ 35 U.S.C. § 121
- ↑ Daniels, Mark; Parsons, Giles (8 August 2017). "Patents Court grants declarations that dosage regimens were obvious". Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 12 (8): 624–626. doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpx112. "Second-generation divisionals can then in turn be filed from the first-generation divisionals, thereby creating a cascade of divisionals.".
 |  |
