Social:Horizontal mobility
Horizontal mobility is the mobility of the individual or group in the same social class, in the same situation category, without changing the level of power or status.[1] Horizontal mobility, which is a type of social mobility, refers to the change of physical space or profession without changes in the economic situation, prestige, and lifestyle of the individual, or the forward or backward movement from one similar group or status to another.[1]
Definition
Pitirim Sorokin defines horizontal mobility as a change in religious, regional, political, or other horizontal shifts without any change in vertical position.[2]According to Andrew W. Lind, horizontal mobility occurs when a person changes their profession, but their social status remains unchanged. Eg. if a doctor switches from a job in health care to teaching in medical school, the profession changes, but dignity and social status remain the same.[3] According to Cameron Anderson, social status is the level of social value that a person is considered to have.[4] The American sociologist Linda K. George listed the social status factors in horizontal mobility as work, wealth, success, education, ethnicity, and marital status.[5]
Timeline
Pitirim Sorokin defined social mobility between positions as two types: vertical and horizontal. According to Sorokin, the first period in which horizontal mobility tended to increase was the second half of the nineteenth century.[6] Academic studies have been carried out on the direction of the movement that will maintain and improve this distinction made by Sorokin. The vertical or horizontal social mobility that a person shows in his own life is called intragenerational mobility.[7] According to Weber, when mobility changes, up or down, class conflicts lose their central importance and group solidarity gives way to competition.[8] According to the conflict theorists, the diversification of social roles due to competition and industrialization led to the emergence of horizontal mobility.[8]
Metrology
Horizontal mobility is one of the quantitative research methods. Werrett Wallace Charters conducted a horizontal mobility study on American teachers called "The Social Background of Teaching".[9] John W. Alspaugh from the University of Missouri referred to the Charters, in his research called An Index of Teacher Horizontal Mobility, "The properties of horizontal mobility and attempting to measure it arose from an interest in testing research hypotheses regarding the mobility of various types of educators."[10] Alspaugh, developed formulas for measuring the horizontal mobility of teachers.[11]
Works
Teacher mobility study
The goal of Alspaugh's study was to develop an index of teacher mobility that would be used as research.[12]
| YEARS | TEACHERS | TEACHER MOBLITY TABLE | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 1 | ● | ||||||||||||||
| 2 | 2 | ● | ● | ● | ||||||||||||
| 1 | 3 | ● | ||||||||||||||
| MOVES | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | |
| Teacher 1 changed jobs only once, at the end of the third year. Teacher 2 changed jobs three times at the end of the second, tenth, and thirteenth years. Teacher 3 changed jobs at the end of the second and fourth years. Teacher 1 is the least mobile and teacher 2 is the most mobile. | ||||||||||||||||
For the mobility index to be valid, the trainer must have accepted the general mobility concept. The table above is a ranking of the 3 career orders from least to most.[11]
The Power Elite
The Power Elite is a book published in 1956 by the American sociologist C. Wright Mills.[13] In this book, Mills dealt with the horizontal mobility of the relationship between the political, military and economic elites. Mills has written that horizontal mobility moves within and between three institutional structures.[14]
References
- Footnotes
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Schaefer 2012, p. 24.
- ↑ Lind 1928, p. 847.
- ↑ Lind 1928, p. 412.
- ↑ Anderson, Hildreth & Howland 2015, pp. 574–601.
- ↑ George 1978, pp. 840–847.
- ↑ Sorokin 1959, p. 381.
- ↑ Kemerlioglu 1996, p. 148.
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 Aberg 1979, p. 249.
- ↑ Charters 1963, p. 753.
- ↑ Alspaugh 1969, pp. 5-8.
- ↑ 11.0 11.1 Alspaugh 1969, p. 7.
- ↑ Alspaugh 1969, p. 6.
- ↑ Mills 1999, p. 1.
- ↑ Johnson 1997, pp. 785–786.
- Works cited
- Schaefer, Richard T. (2012). Sociology : a brief introduction (13 ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0-07-802666-9. OCLC 768480429. https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/768480429.
- Lind, Andrew W. (1928). "Social Mobility. Pitirim Sorokin" (in en). American Journal of Sociology 33 (5): 847. doi:10.1086/214569. ISSN 0002-9602. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/214569.
- Anderson, Cameron; Hildreth, John Angus D.; Howland, Laura (2015). "Is the desire for status a fundamental human motive? A review of the empirical literature". Psychological Bulletin 141 (3): 574–601. doi:10.1037/a0038781. ISSN 1939-1455. PMID 25774679. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25774679/.
- George, L. K. (1978-11-01). "The Impact of Personality and Social Status Factors Upon Levels of Activity and Psychological Well-being". Journal of Gerontology 33 (6): 840–847. doi:10.1093/geronj/33.6.840. ISSN 0022-1422. PMID 744858. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/33.6.840.
- Sorokin, Pitirim Aleksandrovich (1959) (in English). Social and cultural mobility. OCLC 254655. https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/254655.
- Kemerlioglu, Eyüp (1996) (in Turkish). Toplumsal tabakalaşma ve hareketlilik. Bornova, İzmir: Saray Kitabevleri. ISBN 978-975-7074-09-0. OCLC 36072100. https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/36072100.
- Aberg, Rune (1979-07-01). "Social Mobility and Class Structuration1" (in en). Acta Sociologica 22 (3): 247–271. doi:10.1177/000169937902200302. ISSN 0001-6993. https://doi.org/10.1177/000169937902200302.
- Charters, W. W (1963). The Social Background of Teaching. p. 753.
- Alspaugh, John W. (1969-09-01). "An Index of Teacher Horizontal Mobility". The Journal of Experimental Education 38 (1): 5–8. doi:10.1080/00220973.1969.11011159. ISSN 0022-0973. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1969.11011159.
- Johnson, Ken (1997). "The Protection Racket State: Elite Politics, Military Extortion, and Civil War in El Salvador. By William Stanley. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 1996. 328p. $59.95 cloth, $22.95 paper." (in en). American Political Science Review 91 (3): 785–786. doi:10.2307/2952158. ISSN 0003-0554. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055400211805/type/journal_article.
- Mills, C. Wright (1999). The power elite. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-513354-7. OCLC 41482166. https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/41482166.
 |  |
