Social:Variant Chinese characters
| Variant character |
|---|
Variant Chinese characters (traditional Chinese: 異體字; simplified Chinese: 异体字; pinyin: yìtǐzì; kanji: 異体字; Hepburn: itaiji; Korean: 이체자; Hanja: 異體字; Revised Romanization: icheja) are Chinese characters that are homophones and synonyms. Most variants are allographs in most circumstances, such as casual handwriting. Some contexts require the usage of certain variants, such as in textbook editing.
Regional standards
Variant Chinese characters exist within and across all regions where Chinese characters are used, whether Chinese-speaking (mainland China, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, Singapore), Japanese-speaking (Japan ), or Korean-speaking (North Korea, South Korea ). Some of the governments of these regions have made efforts to standardize the use of variants, by establishing certain variants as standard. The choice of which variants to use has resulted in some divergence in the forms of Chinese characters used in mainland China, Hong Kong, Japan, Korea and Taiwan. This effect compounds with the sometimes drastic divergence in the standard Chinese character sets of these regions resulting from the character simplifications pursued by mainland China and by Japan.
The standard character forms of each region are described in:
- The Table of General Standard Chinese Characters for mainland China
- The List of Graphemes of Commonly-Used Chinese Characters for Hong Kong
- The Standard Form of National Characters for Taiwan
- The list of Jōyō kanji for Japan
- The Kangxi Dictionary (de facto) for Korea
There are other standards or glyph sets with widespread use in particular regions (particularly for Traditional Chinese) which might not have an officially recognized status, but has a large user base using it daily. A few of such standard includes the Monotype Traditional Chinese fonts or Inherited Glyphs standard, which is compiled by Traditional Chinese users based on daily seen glyphs.
Origins of variants
Character forms that are most orthodox are known as orthodox variants (Template:Zhi), which is sometimes taken as homonymous to Kangxi Dictionary forms (Template:Zhi), as the forms found in the Kangxi dictionary are usually the ones considered to be orthodox, at least by late Imperial China standards. Variants that differ from the orthodox form, mainly used in informal situations, are known as folk variants (Template:Zhi; Revised Romanization: sokja; Hepburn: zokuji). Some of these are longstanding abbreviations or alternate forms that became the basis for the simplified character set promulgated by the People's Republic of China. For example, 痴 is the folk variant, whereas 癡 is the orthodox form, of the character meaning 'foolish' or 'obsessive'. In this case, two different phonetic elements were chosen to represent the same sound. In other cases, the differences between the orthodox form and popular form are merely minor distinctions in the length or location of strokes, whether certain strokes cross, or the presence or absence of minor inconspicuous strokes (dots). These are often not considered true variant characters but are adoptions of different standards for character shape. In mainland China, these are called xin zixing, typically a simplified popular form) and jiu zixing, typically the Kangxi Dictionary form). For instance, 述 is the new form of the character with traditional orthography 述 'recount', 'describe'. As another example, the surname 吴, also the name of an ancient state, is the 'new character shape' form of the character traditionally written 吳.
Variant graphs also sometimes arise during the historical processes of liding (Template:Zhi) and libian (Template:Zhi). Libian was the natural evolving process of the seal script into the clerical script, which often involved significant omissions, additions, or transmutations of graphical form, while liding is the direct regularization and linearization of shapes to convert them into clerical forms while also preserving the original structure. For instance, the small seal script character for 'year' was converted by liding to a clerical script form that led to the variant 秊, while the same character, after undergoing libian, gave rise to a clerical script form that eventually became the orthodox 年. A similar divergence in the regularization process led to two characters for 'tiger', 虎 and 乕.
There are variants that arise through the use of different radicals to refer to specific definitions of a polysemous character. For instance, the character 雕 could mean either 'a type of hawk' or 'carve'. For the former, the variant 鵰 (with the Template:Kxr radical) is sometimes employed, while for the latter, the variant 琱 (with the Template:Kxr radical) is sometimes used.
In rare cases, two characters in ancient Chinese with similar meanings can be confused and conflated if their modern Chinese readings have merged, for example, 飢 and 饑, are both read as Template:Zhp and mean 'famine', used interchangeably in the modern language, even though 飢 meant 'insufficient food to satiate', and 饑 meant 'famine' in Old Chinese. The two characters formerly belonged to two different Old Chinese rime groups (脂 and 微 groups, respectively) and could not possibly have had the same pronunciation back then. A similar situation is responsible for the existence of variant forms of the particle with the meaning 'in', 'to', 于 and 於 in the modern traditional character set. In both cases described above, the variants were merged into a single simplified character, 饥 and 于, by mainland authorities.
Usage in computing
Unicode deals with variant characters in a complex manner, as a result of the process of Han unification. In Han unification, some variants that are nearly identical between Chinese-, Japanese-, Korean-speaking regions are encoded in the same code point, and can only be distinguished using different typefaces. Other variants that are more divergent are encoded in different code points. On web pages, displaying the correct variants for the intended language is dependent on the typefaces installed on the computer, the configuration of the web browser and the language tags of web pages. Systems that are ready to display the correct variants are rare because many computer users do not have standard typefaces installed and the most popular web browsers are not configured to display the correct variants by default. The following are some examples of variant forms of Chinese characters with different code points and language tags.
| Different code points, China language tag |
Different code points, Taiwan language tag |
Different code points, Hong Kong language tag |
Different code points, Japanese language tag |
Different code points, Korean language tag |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 戶戸户 | 戶戸户 | 戶戸户 | 戶戸户 | 戶戸户 |
| 爲為为 | 爲為为 | 爲為为 | 爲為为 | 爲為为 |
| 強强 | 強强 | 強强 | 強强 | 強强 |
| 畫畵画 | 畫畵画 | 畫畵画 | 畫畵画 | 畫畵画 |
| 線綫线 | 線綫线 | 線綫线 | 線綫线 | 線綫线 |
| 匯滙 | 匯滙 | 匯滙 | 匯滙 | 匯滙 |
| 裏裡 | 裏裡 | 裏裡 | 裏裡 | 裏裡 |
| 夜亱 | 夜亱 | 夜亱 | 夜亱 | 夜亱 |
| 龜亀龟 | 龜亀龟 | 龜亀龟 | 龜亀龟 | 龜亀龟 |
The following are some examples of variant forms of Chinese characters with the same code points and different language tags.
|
|
Graphemic variants
Some variants are not allographic.For a set of variants to be allographs, someone who could read one should be able to read the others, but some variants cannot be read if one only knows one of them. An example is Template:Zhi and Template:Zhi, where someone who is able to read Template:Zhi might not be able to read Template:Zhi. Another example is Template:Zhi, which is a variant of Template:Zhi, but some people who could read Template:Zhi might not be able to read Template:Zhi.[clarification needed]
See also
- Ryakuji
- Han unification – Effort by Unicode/ISO 10646 to map Han characters into a single set, ignoring regional variations
- Z-variant – Glyphs with minor typographical differences
External links
 |  |
