Soul theorem

Short description: Complete manifolds of non-negative sectional curvature largely reduce to the compact case

In mathematics, the soul theorem is a theorem of Riemannian geometry that largely reduces the study of complete manifolds of non-negative sectional curvature to that of the compact case. Jeff Cheeger and Detlef Gromoll proved the theorem in 1972 by generalizing a 1969 result of Gromoll and Wolfgang Meyer. The related soul conjecture, formulated by Cheeger and Gromoll at that time, was proved twenty years later by Grigori Perelman.

Soul theorem

Cheeger and Gromoll's soul theorem states:({{{1}}}, {{{2}}})

If (M, g) is a complete connected Riemannian manifold with nonnegative sectional curvature, then there exists a closed totally convex, totally geodesic embedded submanifold whose normal bundle is diffeomorphic to M.

Such a submanifold is called a soul of (M, g). By the Gauss equation and total geodesicity, the induced Riemannian metric on the soul automatically has nonnegative sectional curvature. Gromoll and Meyer had earlier studied the case of positive sectional curvature, where they showed that a soul is given by a single point, and hence that M is diffeomorphic to Euclidean space.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}})

Very simple examples, as below, show that the soul is not uniquely determined by (M, g) in general. However, Vladimir Sharafutdinov constructed a 1-Lipschitz retraction from M to any of its souls, thereby showing that any two souls are isometric. This mapping is known as the Sharafutdinov's retraction.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}})

Cheeger and Gromoll also posed a converse question of whether there is a complete Riemannian metric of nonnegative sectional curvature on the total space of any vector bundle over closed manifolds of positive sectional curvature.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}})

Examples.

• As can be directly seen from the definition, every compact manifold is its own soul. For this reason, the theorem is often stated only for non-compact manifolds.
• As a very simple example, take M to be Euclidean space Rⁿ. The sectional curvature is 0 everywhere, and any point of M can serve as a soul of M.
• Now take the paraboloid M = {(x, y, z) : z = x² + y²}, with the metric g being the ordinary Euclidean distance coming from the embedding of the paraboloid in Euclidean space R³. Here the sectional curvature is positive everywhere, though not constant. The origin (0, 0, 0) is a soul of M. Not every point x of M is a soul of M, since there may be geodesic loops based at x, in which case [math]\displaystyle{ \{x\} }[/math] wouldn't be totally convex.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}})
• One can also consider an infinite cylinder M = {(x, y, z) : x² + y² = 1}, again with the induced Euclidean metric. The sectional curvature is 0 everywhere. Any "horizontal" circle {(x, y, z) : x² + y² = 1} with fixed z is a soul of M. Non-horizontal cross sections of the cylinder are not souls since they are neither totally convex nor totally geodesic.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}})

Soul conjecture

As mentioned above, Gromoll and Meyer proved that if g has positive sectional curvature then the soul is a point. Cheeger and Gromoll conjectured that this would hold even if g had nonnegative sectional curvature, with positivity only required of all sectional curvatures at a single point.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) This soul conjecture was proved by Grigori Perelman, who established the more powerful fact that Sharafutdinov's retraction is a Riemannian submersion, and even a submetry.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}})

References

Sources.

• Cheeger, Jeff; Ebin, David G. (2008). Comparison theorems in Riemannian geometry (Revised reprint of the 1975 original ed.). Providence, RI: AMS Chelsea Publishing. doi:10.1090/chel/365. ISBN 978-0-8218-4417-5. 
• Cheeger, Jeff; Gromoll, Detlef (1972). "On the structure of complete manifolds of nonnegative curvature". Annals of Mathematics. Second Series 96 (3): 413–443. doi:10.2307/1970819. ISSN 0003-486X. http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.bams/1183530120. 
• Chow, Bennett; Chu, Sun-Chin; Glickenstein, David; Guenther, Christine; Isenberg, James; Ivey, Tom; Knopf, Dan; Lu, Peng et al. (2010). The Ricci flow: techniques and applications. Part III. Geometric-analytic aspects. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs. 163. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society. doi:10.1090/surv/163. ISBN 978-0-8218-4661-2. 
• Gromoll, Detlef; Meyer, Wolfgang (1969). "On complete open manifolds of positive curvature". Annals of Mathematics. Second Series 90 (1): 75–90. doi:10.2307/1970682. ISSN 0003-486X. 
• Perelman, Grigori (1994). "Proof of the soul conjecture of Cheeger and Gromoll". Journal of Differential Geometry 40 (1): 209–212. doi:10.4310/jdg/1214455292. ISSN 0022-040X. https://projecteuclid.org/download/pdf_1/euclid.jdg/1214455292. 
• Petersen, Peter (2016). Riemannian geometry. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. 171 (Third edition of 1998 original ed.). Springer, Cham. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-26654-1. ISBN 978-3-319-26652-7. 
• Sakai, Takashi (1996). Riemannian geometry. Translations of Mathematical Monographs. 149. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society. doi:10.1090/mmono/149. ISBN 0-8218-0284-4. 
• Sharafutdinov, V. A. (1979). "Convex sets in a manifold of nonnegative curvature". Mathematical Notes 26 (1): 556–560. doi:10.1007/BF01140282. 
• Yau, Shing Tung (1982). "Problem section". Seminar on Differential Geometry. Annals of Mathematics Studies. 102. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. pp. 669–706. doi:10.1515/9781400881918-035. ISBN 9781400881918.